Rangeland Condition Assessment Based on Economic Criteria

Ahmadpour, A., Heshmati, G.A., (2016). Struvture, Functions and Their Relations in Ecosystems, a viewpoint. Unpublished study.Search in Google Scholar

Bodin, P., Wiman, B.L.B., (2007). The usefulness of stability concepts in forest management when coping with increasing climate uncertainties. Forest Ecology and Management 242, 541-552.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.066Search in Google Scholar

Bradshaw, A.D., (1984). Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Planning, 11, 35-48.10.1016/0304-3924(84)90016-9Search in Google Scholar

Chomitz, K., Kumari, K., (1996). The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: a Critical Review,Working paper 96- 19, CSERGE, University of East Anglia and University College London.Search in Google Scholar

Ciais, P.H., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Oge´e, J., Allard, V., Aubinet, M., Buchmann, N., Bernhofer, Chr., Carrara, A., Chevallier, F., De Noblet, N., Friend, A.D., Friedlingstein, P., Gru¨nwald, T., Heinesch, B., Keronen, P., Knohl, A., Krinner, G., Loustau, D., Manca, G., Matteucci, G., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.M., Papale, D., Pilegaard, K., Rambal, S., Seufert, G., Soussana, J.F., Sanz, M.J., Schulze, E.D., Vesala, T., Valentini, R., (2005). Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437, 529-533.10.1038/nature03972Search in Google Scholar

Clements, F.E., (1916). Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Inst., Washington Pub., 242, 1-512.10.5962/bhl.title.56234Search in Google Scholar

Cortina, J., Maestre, F.T., Vallejo, R., Baeza, M.J., Valdecantos, A.L., Pe´rez-Devesa, M., (2006). Ecosystem structure, function, and restorationsuccess: Are they related? Journal for Nature Conservation, 14, 152-160.10.1016/j.jnc.2006.04.004Search in Google Scholar

Costanza, R, D'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, S., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton P., van den Belt, M., (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260.10.1038/387253a0Search in Google Scholar

Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R.S., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-60.10.1038/387253a0Search in Google Scholar

Daily, G.C., Soderquist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R., Folke, C., Jannson, A., Jansson, B.O., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Maler, K.G., David, S., Starrett, D., Tilman, D., Walker, B., (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289, 395-396.10.1126/science.289.5478.395Search in Google Scholar

de Groot, R.S., (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision-Making. Wolters Noordhoff BV, Groningen, The Netherlands.Search in Google Scholar

de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M., Boumans, R., (2002). A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Economics, 41, 393-408.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7Search in Google Scholar

DSEWPC, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, (2011). ACRIS Landscape Function Update 2006-2010: Updated Information to That Provided in Rangelands 2008- Taking the Pulse. Commonwealth of Australia. 37p.Search in Google Scholar

Elsasser, P., (1999). Recreational benefits of forests in Germany, in C.Roper and A.Park (eds), The Living Forest: the Non-market Benefits of Forestry (pp. 175-188), London: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Francis, G.R., Magnuson, J.J., Regier, H.A., Talhelm, D.R., (1979). Rehabilitating Great Lakes Ecosystems. Great Lakes Fishery Commision. Technical Report 37, Ann Arbor, MI., pp. 1-107.Search in Google Scholar

Friedel, M. H., (1991). Range condition assessment and the concept of threshold -a viewpoint. J. Range Manage. 44:422-426.Search in Google Scholar

GES, Glossary of Environment Statistics, (1997). Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, United Nations, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Gram, S., (2001). Economic valuation of special forest products: an assessment of methodological shortcomings, Ecological Economics, 36, 109-117.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00213-5Search in Google Scholar

Gunawardena, U., Edwards-Jones, G and McGregor, M., (1999). A contingent valuation approach for a tropical rainforest: a case study of Sinharaja rainforest reserve in Sri Lanka, In Roper S and Park, A (eds), The Living Forest: the Non-Market Benefits of Forestry (pp. 275-284),London: The Stationery Office.Search in Google Scholar

Hacket, S., C., (2006). Environmentas and Natural Resources Economics. London: Armonk, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Hanley, N., Shogren, J., White, B., (2007). Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice, Palgrave, London.Search in Google Scholar

Harris, J., (2006). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach. Houghton Mifflin Company.Search in Google Scholar

Hobbs, R.J., Norton, D.A., (1996). Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol., 4(2), 93-110.10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00112.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hooper, D.U., Chapin III, F.S., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J.H., Lodge, D.M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Seta¨la¨, H., Symstad, A.J., Vandermeer, J., Wardle, D.A., (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 3-35.10.1890/04-0922Search in Google Scholar

IFRO, Iranian Forest and Rangelands Organization, (2013). Reports of rangelands and watersheds comprehensive plans in Khorasan Province, Mashhad. In Persian.Search in Google Scholar

Jameson, D. A., (1970). Land management policy and development of ecological concepts. J. Range Manage. 23:316-321.Search in Google Scholar

Joyce, L. A., (1993). The life cycle of the range condition concept. Journal of Range Management, 46:132-138.Search in Google Scholar

Lipton, D.W., K. Wellman, I.C. Sheifer, R.F. Weiher, (1995). Economic valuation of natural resources: a handbook for coastal resource policymakers. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Coastal Ocean Office, Silver Springs, MD.Search in Google Scholar

Lockwood, J.L., Samuels, C.L., (2004). Assembly Models and the Practice of Restoration. In V.M., Temperton, R.J., Hobbs, T., Nuttle, S., Halle, (Eds.), Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology (pp. 34-54). Washington: Island Press.Search in Google Scholar

Loreau, M., (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos, 91, 3-17.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910101.xSearch in Google Scholar

Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D.,Wardle, D.A., (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804-808.10.1126/science.1064088Search in Google Scholar

Love, R.M., (1961). The range-natural plant communities or modified ecosystems? J. Brit. Grassl. Soc., 16:89-99.Search in Google Scholar

Macleod, N.D. and Johnston, B.G., (1990). An economic framework for the evaluation of rangeland restoration projects. The Australian Rangeland Journal, 12(1) 40 - 53.10.1071/RJ9900040Search in Google Scholar

Mankiw, N.G. (2012). Principles of Microeconomics, South- Western Cengage Learning, 6th Ed.Search in Google Scholar

Mattson, L and Li, C., (1993). The non-timber value of Northern Swedish forests, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 426-434.10.1080/02827589309382789Search in Google Scholar

Moghaddan, M.R., (2001). Range and Range Management. 2nd ed., University of Tehran. In Persian.Search in Google Scholar

Neumann, R and Hirsch, E., (2000). Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research, Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.Search in Google Scholar

NRC, National Research Council, (1994). Rangeland Health. New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.Search in Google Scholar

Pellant, M., P. Shaver, D.A. Pyke, and J.E. Herrick, (2005). Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, version 4. Technical Reference 1734-6. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Denver, CO. BLM/WO/ST-00/001+1734/REV05. 122 p.Search in Google Scholar

Schacht, W. H., (1993). A new approach for range condition assessment is needed. Rangelands, 15, 245-247.Search in Google Scholar

Scarnecchia, D. L., (1995). Viewpoint: the rangeland condition concept and range sciences search for identity: a system viewpoint. Journal of Range Management, 48:181-186.Search in Google Scholar

SCBD, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (2001). The Value of Forest Ecosystems. CBD Technical Series no. 4. Montreal, SCBD, 67p.Search in Google Scholar

Schacht, W. H., (1993). A new approach for range condition assessment is needed. Rangelands,15:245-247.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, E.L., (1978). A critical evaluation of the range condition concept. In: D.N. Hyder (Ed). Proc. First Int. Rangeland Congr. Soc. Range Manage (pp 266-267). Denver, Colo.Search in Google Scholar

Smith, E.L., (1979). Evaluation of the range condition concept. Rangelands. 1, 52-54.Search in Google Scholar

Srivastava, D.S., Vellend, M., (2005). Biodiversity-Ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation. Annu. Rev. Evol. Syst., 36, 267-294.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152636Search in Google Scholar

SRM, Society for Range Management, Task Group in Concepts and Terminology, (1995). New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. Journal of Range Management 48:271-282.Search in Google Scholar

Stoddart, L.A., Smith, A.D., Box, T.W., (1955). Range Management. 2nd ed., Mc Graw Hill Book Company. New York.Search in Google Scholar

TGUCT, Task Group for Unity in Concepts and Terminology, (1995). New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. J. Range Manage., 48, 271-282.Search in Google Scholar

Thurow, T.L., (2000). Hydrologic effects on rangeland degradation and restoration processes. In:Rangeland Desertification (eds. Arnalds, O. and Arc her, S.). Kluwer Academic Publishers (pp. 53-66), Dordrecht.Search in Google Scholar

Tietenberg, T., (2006). Environmental and natural resource economics. Boston Pearson/Addison Wesley.Search in Google Scholar

Tilman, D., (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455-1474.10.2307/176540Search in Google Scholar

Tilman, D., Wedin, D., Knops, J. (1996). Productivity and sustainability inuenced by bio-diversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379, 718-720.10.1038/379718a0Search in Google Scholar

Turner, K., R., Pearce, D., Baterman, I., (1999). Environmental economics, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.Search in Google Scholar

Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., (2003). Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46, 493-510.10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7Search in Google Scholar

USDA, Soil Conservation Service, (1977). Grazing guide for potential climax forest sites and condition classes, Montana foothills and mountains area. Bozeman, Mont.Search in Google Scholar

USDA, U.S. Forest Service, (1987). Ecosystem classification handbook. Chapter four-Ecodata sampling method. FSH 12/87 R-1. Missoula, Mont.Search in Google Scholar

Valentine, J.F., (1971). Range development and improvements. 2nd ed., UT: Brigham Young University Press; 545 p. Provo, Utah.Search in Google Scholar

Walker, B.H., (1992). Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol., 6, 18-23.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610018.xSearch in Google Scholar

Weitzman, M.L., (2000). Economic profitability versus ecological entropy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1): 237-263.Search in Google Scholar

Westoby, M., Walker, B., Noy-Meir, I., (1989). Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management, 42(4), 266-274.10.2307/3899492Search in Google Scholar

Workman, John P., (1984). Criteria for investment feasibility and selection. In: Developing Strategies for Rangeland Management (p. 1475-1507), National Research Council/National Academy of Science. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.Search in Google Scholar

Workman, John P. and John A. Tanaka, (1991). Economic feasibility and management considerations in range revegetation. Journal of Range Management, 44(6):566-573.Search in Google Scholar

Zedler, J.B., Callaway, J.C., (1999). Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology, 7, 69-73. 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07108.xSearch in Google Scholar