[Ahmadpour, A., Heshmati, G.A., (2016). Struvture, Functions and Their Relations in Ecosystems, a viewpoint. Unpublished study.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bodin, P., Wiman, B.L.B., (2007). The usefulness of stability concepts in forest management when coping with increasing climate uncertainties. Forest Ecology and Management 242, 541-552.10.1016/j.foreco.2007.01.066]Search in Google Scholar
[Bradshaw, A.D., (1984). Ecological principles and land reclamation practice. Landscape Planning, 11, 35-48.10.1016/0304-3924(84)90016-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Chomitz, K., Kumari, K., (1996). The Domestic Benefits of Tropical Forests: a Critical Review,Working paper 96- 19, CSERGE, University of East Anglia and University College London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ciais, P.H., Reichstein, M., Viovy, N., Granier, A., Oge´e, J., Allard, V., Aubinet, M., Buchmann, N., Bernhofer, Chr., Carrara, A., Chevallier, F., De Noblet, N., Friend, A.D., Friedlingstein, P., Gru¨nwald, T., Heinesch, B., Keronen, P., Knohl, A., Krinner, G., Loustau, D., Manca, G., Matteucci, G., Miglietta, F., Ourcival, J.M., Papale, D., Pilegaard, K., Rambal, S., Seufert, G., Soussana, J.F., Sanz, M.J., Schulze, E.D., Vesala, T., Valentini, R., (2005). Europe-wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature, 437, 529-533.10.1038/nature03972]Search in Google Scholar
[Clements, F.E., (1916). Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Inst., Washington Pub., 242, 1-512.10.5962/bhl.title.56234]Search in Google Scholar
[Cortina, J., Maestre, F.T., Vallejo, R., Baeza, M.J., Valdecantos, A.L., Pe´rez-Devesa, M., (2006). Ecosystem structure, function, and restorationsuccess: Are they related? Journal for Nature Conservation, 14, 152-160.10.1016/j.jnc.2006.04.004]Search in Google Scholar
[Costanza, R, D'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, S., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R., Sutton P., van den Belt, M., (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital, Nature, 387, 253-260.10.1038/387253a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., de Groot, R.S., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P., van den Belt, M., (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-60.10.1038/387253a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Daily, G.C., Soderquist, T., Aniyar, S., Arrow, K., Dasgupta, P., Ehrlich, P.R., Folke, C., Jannson, A., Jansson, B.O., Kautsky, N., Levin, S., Lubchenco, J., Maler, K.G., David, S., Starrett, D., Tilman, D., Walker, B., (2000). The value of nature and the nature of value. Science, 289, 395-396.10.1126/science.289.5478.395]Search in Google Scholar
[de Groot, R.S., (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management and Decision-Making. Wolters Noordhoff BV, Groningen, The Netherlands.]Search in Google Scholar
[de Groot, R.S., Wilson, M., Boumans, R., (2002). A typology for the description, classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Economics, 41, 393-408.10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00089-7]Search in Google Scholar
[DSEWPC, Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities, (2011). ACRIS Landscape Function Update 2006-2010: Updated Information to That Provided in Rangelands 2008- Taking the Pulse. Commonwealth of Australia. 37p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elsasser, P., (1999). Recreational benefits of forests in Germany, in C.Roper and A.Park (eds), The Living Forest: the Non-market Benefits of Forestry (pp. 175-188), London: The Stationery Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Francis, G.R., Magnuson, J.J., Regier, H.A., Talhelm, D.R., (1979). Rehabilitating Great Lakes Ecosystems. Great Lakes Fishery Commision. Technical Report 37, Ann Arbor, MI., pp. 1-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedel, M. H., (1991). Range condition assessment and the concept of threshold -a viewpoint. J. Range Manage. 44:422-426.]Search in Google Scholar
[GES, Glossary of Environment Statistics, (1997). Studies in Methods, Series F, No. 67, United Nations, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gram, S., (2001). Economic valuation of special forest products: an assessment of methodological shortcomings, Ecological Economics, 36, 109-117.10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00213-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunawardena, U., Edwards-Jones, G and McGregor, M., (1999). A contingent valuation approach for a tropical rainforest: a case study of Sinharaja rainforest reserve in Sri Lanka, In Roper S and Park, A (eds), The Living Forest: the Non-Market Benefits of Forestry (pp. 275-284),London: The Stationery Office.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hacket, S., C., (2006). Environmentas and Natural Resources Economics. London: Armonk, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hanley, N., Shogren, J., White, B., (2007). Environmental Economics in Theory and Practice, Palgrave, London.]Search in Google Scholar
[Harris, J., (2006). Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach. Houghton Mifflin Company.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hobbs, R.J., Norton, D.A., (1996). Towards a conceptual framework for restoration ecology. Restor. Ecol., 4(2), 93-110.10.1111/j.1526-100X.1996.tb00112.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Hooper, D.U., Chapin III, F.S., Hector, A., Inchausti, P., Lavorel, S., Lawton, J.H., Lodge, D.M., Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Schmid, B., Seta¨la¨, H., Symstad, A.J., Vandermeer, J., Wardle, D.A., (2005). Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr., 75, 3-35.10.1890/04-0922]Search in Google Scholar
[IFRO, Iranian Forest and Rangelands Organization, (2013). Reports of rangelands and watersheds comprehensive plans in Khorasan Province, Mashhad. In Persian.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jameson, D. A., (1970). Land management policy and development of ecological concepts. J. Range Manage. 23:316-321.]Search in Google Scholar
[Joyce, L. A., (1993). The life cycle of the range condition concept. Journal of Range Management, 46:132-138.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lipton, D.W., K. Wellman, I.C. Sheifer, R.F. Weiher, (1995). Economic valuation of natural resources: a handbook for coastal resource policymakers. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Coastal Ocean Office, Silver Springs, MD.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lockwood, J.L., Samuels, C.L., (2004). Assembly Models and the Practice of Restoration. In V.M., Temperton, R.J., Hobbs, T., Nuttle, S., Halle, (Eds.), Assembly Rules and Restoration Ecology (pp. 34-54). Washington: Island Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Loreau, M., (2000). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos, 91, 3-17.10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910101.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Loreau, M., Naeem, S., Inchausti, P., Bengtsson, J., Grime, J.P., Hector, A., Hooper, D.U., Huston, M.A., Raffaelli, D., Schmid, B., Tilman, D.,Wardle, D.A., (2001). Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science, 294, 804-808.10.1126/science.1064088]Search in Google Scholar
[Love, R.M., (1961). The range-natural plant communities or modified ecosystems? J. Brit. Grassl. Soc., 16:89-99.]Search in Google Scholar
[Macleod, N.D. and Johnston, B.G., (1990). An economic framework for the evaluation of rangeland restoration projects. The Australian Rangeland Journal, 12(1) 40 - 53.10.1071/RJ9900040]Search in Google Scholar
[Mankiw, N.G. (2012). Principles of Microeconomics, South- Western Cengage Learning, 6th Ed.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mattson, L and Li, C., (1993). The non-timber value of Northern Swedish forests, Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 8, 426-434.10.1080/02827589309382789]Search in Google Scholar
[Moghaddan, M.R., (2001). Range and Range Management. 2nd ed., University of Tehran. In Persian.]Search in Google Scholar
[Neumann, R and Hirsch, E., (2000). Commercialisation of Non-Timber Forest Products: Review and Analysis of Research, Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.]Search in Google Scholar
[NRC, National Research Council, (1994). Rangeland Health. New Methods to Classify, Inventory, and Monitor Rangelands. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.]Search in Google Scholar
[Pellant, M., P. Shaver, D.A. Pyke, and J.E. Herrick, (2005). Interpreting indicators of rangeland health, version 4. Technical Reference 1734-6. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, National Science and Technology Center, Denver, CO. BLM/WO/ST-00/001+1734/REV05. 122 p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schacht, W. H., (1993). A new approach for range condition assessment is needed. Rangelands, 15, 245-247.]Search in Google Scholar
[Scarnecchia, D. L., (1995). Viewpoint: the rangeland condition concept and range sciences search for identity: a system viewpoint. Journal of Range Management, 48:181-186.]Search in Google Scholar
[SCBD, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, (2001). The Value of Forest Ecosystems. CBD Technical Series no. 4. Montreal, SCBD, 67p.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schacht, W. H., (1993). A new approach for range condition assessment is needed. Rangelands,15:245-247.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, E.L., (1978). A critical evaluation of the range condition concept. In: D.N. Hyder (Ed). Proc. First Int. Rangeland Congr. Soc. Range Manage (pp 266-267). Denver, Colo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, E.L., (1979). Evaluation of the range condition concept. Rangelands. 1, 52-54.]Search in Google Scholar
[Srivastava, D.S., Vellend, M., (2005). Biodiversity-Ecosystem function research: Is it relevant to conservation. Annu. Rev. Evol. Syst., 36, 267-294.10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.102003.152636]Search in Google Scholar
[SRM, Society for Range Management, Task Group in Concepts and Terminology, (1995). New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. Journal of Range Management 48:271-282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stoddart, L.A., Smith, A.D., Box, T.W., (1955). Range Management. 2nd ed., Mc Graw Hill Book Company. New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[TGUCT, Task Group for Unity in Concepts and Terminology, (1995). New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. J. Range Manage., 48, 271-282.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thurow, T.L., (2000). Hydrologic effects on rangeland degradation and restoration processes. In:Rangeland Desertification (eds. Arnalds, O. and Arc her, S.). Kluwer Academic Publishers (pp. 53-66), Dordrecht.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tietenberg, T., (2006). Environmental and natural resource economics. Boston Pearson/Addison Wesley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tilman, D., (1999). The ecological consequences of changes in biodiversity: a search for general principles. Ecology, 80, 1455-1474.10.2307/176540]Search in Google Scholar
[Tilman, D., Wedin, D., Knops, J. (1996). Productivity and sustainability inuenced by bio-diversity in grassland ecosystems. Nature, 379, 718-720.10.1038/379718a0]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, K., R., Pearce, D., Baterman, I., (1999). Environmental economics, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press, 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turner, R.K., Paavola, J., Cooper, P., Farber, S., Jessamy, V., Georgiou, S., (2003). Valuing nature: lessons learned and future research directions. Ecological Economics, 46, 493-510.10.1016/S0921-8009(03)00189-7]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA, Soil Conservation Service, (1977). Grazing guide for potential climax forest sites and condition classes, Montana foothills and mountains area. Bozeman, Mont.]Search in Google Scholar
[USDA, U.S. Forest Service, (1987). Ecosystem classification handbook. Chapter four-Ecodata sampling method. FSH 12/87 R-1. Missoula, Mont.]Search in Google Scholar
[Valentine, J.F., (1971). Range development and improvements. 2nd ed., UT: Brigham Young University Press; 545 p. Provo, Utah.]Search in Google Scholar
[Walker, B.H., (1992). Biodiversity and ecological redundancy. Conserv. Biol., 6, 18-23.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610018.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Weitzman, M.L., (2000). Economic profitability versus ecological entropy. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(1): 237-263.]Search in Google Scholar
[Westoby, M., Walker, B., Noy-Meir, I., (1989). Opportunistic management for rangelands not at equilibrium. Journal of Range Management, 42(4), 266-274.10.2307/3899492]Search in Google Scholar
[Workman, John P., (1984). Criteria for investment feasibility and selection. In: Developing Strategies for Rangeland Management (p. 1475-1507), National Research Council/National Academy of Science. Westview Press, Boulder, Colo.]Search in Google Scholar
[Workman, John P. and John A. Tanaka, (1991). Economic feasibility and management considerations in range revegetation. Journal of Range Management, 44(6):566-573.]Search in Google Scholar
[Zedler, J.B., Callaway, J.C., (1999). Tracking wetland restoration: Do mitigation sites follow desired trajectories? Restoration Ecology, 7, 69-73. 10.1046/j.1526-100X.1999.07108.x]Search in Google Scholar