1. bookVolume 8 (2015): Edition 1 (June 2015)
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1313-9053
Première parution
08 Sep 2014
Périodicité
2 fois par an
Langues
Anglais
Accès libre

Perioperative Outcomes Of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: Comparison With Abdominal, Vaginal, And Robot-Assisted Surgical Approaches

Publié en ligne: 10 Dec 2015
Volume & Edition: Volume 8 (2015) - Edition 1 (June 2015)
Pages: 52 - 60
Reçu: 23 Mar 2015
Accepté: 18 May 2015
Détails du magazine
License
Format
Magazine
eISSN
1313-9053
Première parution
08 Sep 2014
Périodicité
2 fois par an
Langues
Anglais

1. Semm K. Operationslehre fuer endoscopische abdominal Chirurgie. Operative Pelviscopie. Stuttgart; Schattauer; 1984.Search in Google Scholar

2. Reich H, De Caprio J, McGlynn F. Laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Gynaecol Surg. 1989;5:213-6.10.1089/gyn.1989.5.213Search in Google Scholar

3. Garry R, Fountain J, Brown J, Manca A, Mason S, Sculpher M et al. EVALUATE hysterectomy trial: A multicenter randomized trial comparing abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic methods of hysterectomy. Health Technol Assess. 2004;8(26):1-154.10.3310/hta8260Search in Google Scholar

4. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (3):CD003677. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4.10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4Search in Google Scholar

5. Landeen LB, Bell MC, Hubert HB, Bennis LY, Knutsen-Larson SS, Seshadri-Kreaden U. Clinical and cost comparisons for hysterectomy via abdominal, standard laparoscopic, vaginal and robot-assisted approaches. S D Med. 2011;64(6):197-9, 201, 203 passim.Search in Google Scholar

6. Wright KN, Jonsdottir GM, Jorgensen S, Shah N, Einarsson JI. Cost and outcomes of abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic and robotic hysterectomies. JSLS. 2012;16(4):519-24.10.4293/108680812X13462882736736Search in Google Scholar

7. Jacoby VL, Autry A, Jacobson G, Domush R, Nakagawa S, Jacoby A. Nationwide use of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal and vaginal approaches. Obstet Gynecol. 2009;114(5):1041-8.10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b9d222Search in Google Scholar

8. Maresh MJ, Metcalfe MA, McPherson K, Overton C, Hall V, Hargreaves J, et al. The VALUE national hysterectomy study: description of the patients and their surgery. BJOG. 2002;109(3):302-12.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01282.xSearch in Google Scholar

9. Mäkinen J, Johansson J, Tomás C, Tomás E, Heinonen PK, Laatikainen T et al. Morbidity of 10110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Hum Reprod. 2001;16(7):1473-8.10.1093/humrep/16.7.1473Search in Google Scholar

10. Wu JM, Wechter ME, Geller EJ, Nguyen TV, Visco AG. Hysterectomy rates in the United States, 2003. Obstet Gynecol. 2007;110(5):1091-5.10.1097/01.AOG.0000285997.38553.4bSearch in Google Scholar

11. Smorgick N, Patzkowsky KE, Hoffman MR, Advincula AP, Song AH, As-Sanie S. The increasing use of robot-assisted approach for hysterectomy results in decreasing rates of abdominal hysterectomy and traditional laparoscopic hysterectomy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014;289(1):101-5.10.1007/s00404-013-2948-zSearch in Google Scholar

12. Reich H, Roberts L. Laparoscopic hysterectomy in current gynecological practice. Rev Gynecol Pract. 2003;3(1):32-40.10.1016/S1471-7697(03)00008-XSearch in Google Scholar

13. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr L, Garry R. Methods of hysterectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330(7506):1478.10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478Search in Google Scholar

14. Olive DL, Parker WH, Cooper JM, Levine RL. The AAGL classification system for hysterectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2000;7(1):9-15.10.1016/S1074-3804(00)80004-3Search in Google Scholar

15. Gortchev G, Tomov S, Tantchev L, Velkova A, Radionova Z. Da Vinci S robotic surgery in the treatment of benign and malignant gynecologic tumors. Gynecol Surg. 2010;7(2):153-7.10.1007/s10397-009-0535-xSearch in Google Scholar

16. Rock JA, Jones HW, editors. TeLinde's Operative Gynecology. 9th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.Search in Google Scholar

17. Schutz K, Possover M, Merker A, Michels A, Schneider A. Prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) with abdominal hysterectomy (AH) for treatment of the uterus weighing >200 g. Surg Endosc. 2002;16(1):121-5.10.1007/s00464-001-0049-8Search in Google Scholar

18. Seracchioli R, Venturoli S, Vianello F, Govoni F, Cantarelli M, Gualerzi B, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with abdominal hysterectomy in the presence of a large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(3):333-8.10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60413-6Search in Google Scholar

19. Tsai EM, Chen HS, Long CY, Yang CH, Hsu SC, Wu CH, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A study of 100 cases on light-endorsed transvaginal section. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2003;55(2):105-9.10.1159/000070182Search in Google Scholar

20. Darai E, Soriano D, Kimata P, Laplace C, Lecuru F. Vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri, with or without laparoscopic assistance: randomized study. Obstet Gynecol. 2001;97(5 Pt 1):712-6.10.1097/00006250-200105000-00013Search in Google Scholar

21. Soriano D, Goldstein A, Lecuru F, Darai E. Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopic-assisted hysterectomy: A prospective, randomized, multicenter study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2001;80(4):337-41.Search in Google Scholar

22. Benassi L, Rossi T, Kaihura CT, Ricci L, Bedocchi L, Galanti B, Vadora E. Abdominal or vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uteri: A randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;187(6):1561-5.10.1067/mob.2002.127596Search in Google Scholar

23. Müller A, Thiel FC, Renner SP, Winkler M, Häberle L, Beckmann MW. Hysterectomy – a comparison of approaches. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2010;107(20):353-359.Search in Google Scholar

24. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, Hawe J, Napp V, Abbott J, et al. The eVALuate study: Two parallel randomized trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ. 2004;328(7432):129.10.1136/bmj.37984.623889.F6Search in Google Scholar

25. Ribeiro SC, Ribeiro RM, Santos NC, Pinotti JA. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003;83(1):37-43.10.1016/S0020-7292(03)00271-6Search in Google Scholar

26. Krizova A, Clarke BA, Bernardini MQ, James S, Kalloger SE, Boerner SL, et al. Histologic artifacts in abdominal, vaginal, laparoscopic, and robotic hysterectomy specimens: a blinded, retrospective review. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(1):115-26.10.1097/PAS.0b013e31820273dcSearch in Google Scholar

27. Vaisbuch E, Goldchmit C, Ofer D, Agmon A, Hagay Z. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006;126(2):234-8.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.10.009Search in Google Scholar

28. Gyr T, Ghezzi F, Arslanagic S, Leidi L, Pastorelli G, Franchi M. Minimal invasive laparoscopic hysterectomy with ultrasonic scalpel. Am J Surg. 2001;181(6):516-9.10.1016/S0002-9610(01)00636-5Search in Google Scholar

29. O'Hanlan KA, Huang GS, Garnier AC, Dibble SL, Reuland ML, Lopez L, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: Cohort review of patients with uterine neoplasia. JSLS. 2005;9(3):277-86.Search in Google Scholar

30. Cardenas-Goicoechea J, Adams S, Bhat SB, Randall TC. Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center. Gynecol Oncol. 2010; 117(2): 224-8.10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.01.009Search in Google Scholar

31. Giep BN, Giep HN, Hubert HB. Comparison of minimally invasive surgical approaches for hysterectomy at a community hospital: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy. J Robot Surg. 2010;4(3):167-75.10.1007/s11701-010-0206-ySearch in Google Scholar

32. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Gemer O, Bhagan L, Nezhat C. Laparoscopic hysterectomy with and without a robot: Stanford experience. JSLS. 2009;13(2):125-8.Search in Google Scholar

33. Wattiez A, Joranio D, Cohen SB. The learning curve of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: Comperative analysis of 1647 cases. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2002;9(3):339-45.10.1016/S1074-3804(05)60414-8Search in Google Scholar

34. Sesti F, Ruggeri V, Pietropolli A, Piccione E. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. JSLS. 2008;12(3): 246-51.Search in Google Scholar

35. Leonard F, Fotso A, Borghese B, Chopin N, Foulot H, Chapron C. Ureteral complications from laparoscopic hysterectomy indicated for benign uterine pathologies: A 13-year experience in a continuous series of 1300 patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(7):2006-11.10.1093/humrep/dem11117488781Search in Google Scholar

Articles recommandés par Trend MD

Planifiez votre conférence à distance avec Sciendo