This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Adamiec G, Heer AJ and Bluszcz A, 2012. Statistics of count numbers from a photomultiplier tube and its implications for error estimation. Radiation Measurements 47(9): 746–751, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2011.12.009.AdamiecGHeerAJBluszczA2012Statistics of count numbers from a photomultiplier tube and its implications for error estimation47974675110.1016/j.radmeas.2011.12.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Annis J, Miller BJ and Palmeri TJ, 2017. Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions. Behaviour research methods 49(3): 863–886, DOI 10.3758/s13428-016-0746-9.AnnisJMillerBJPalmeriTJ2017Bayesian inference with Stan: A tutorial on adding custom distributions49386388610.3758/s13428-016-0746-9514911827287444Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Arnold LJ, Bailey RM and Tucker GE, 2007. Statistical treatment of fluvial dose distributions from southern Colorado arroyo deposits. Quaternary Geochronology 2(1–4): 162–167, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2006.05.003.ArnoldLJBaileyRMTuckerGE2007Statistical treatment of fluvial dose distributions from southern Colorado arroyo deposits21–416216710.1016/j.quageo.2006.05.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Arnold LJ and Roberts RG, 2009. Stochastic modelling of multi-grain equivalent dose (De) distributions: Implications for OSL dating of sediment mixtures. Quaternary Geochronology 4(3): 204–230, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2008.12.001.ArnoldLJRobertsRG2009Stochastic modelling of multi-grain equivalent dose (De) distributions: Implications for OSL dating of sediment mixtures4320423010.1016/j.quageo.2008.12.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Arnold LJ, Roberts RG, Galbraith RF and DeLong SB, 2009. A revised burial dose estimation procedure for optical dating of young and modern-age sediments. Quaternary Geochronology 4(4): 306–325, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2009.02.017.ArnoldLJRobertsRGGalbraithRFDeLongSB2009A revised burial dose estimation procedure for optical dating of young and modern-age sediments4430632510.1016/j.quageo.2009.02.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bayliss A and Ramsey CB, 2004. Pragmatic Bayesians: a decade of integrating radiocarbon dates into chronological models. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer, London. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_2.BaylissARamseyCB2004Lecture Notes in Statistics, SpringerLondon10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bluszcz A, Adamiec G and Heer AJ, 2015. Estimation of equivalent dose and its uncertainty in the OSL SAR protocol when count numbers do not follow a Poisson distribution. Radiation Measurements 81: 46–54, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.01.004.BluszczAAdamiecGHeerAJ2015Estimation of equivalent dose and its uncertainty in the OSL SAR protocol when count numbers do not follow a Poisson distribution81465410.1016/j.radmeas.2015.01.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Brill D, Jankaew K and Brückner H, 2015. Holocene evolution of Phra Thong's beach-ridge plain (Thailand) — Chronology, processes and driving factors. Geomorphology 245: 117–134, DOI 10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.035.BrillDJankaewKBrücknerH2015Holocene evolution of Phra Thong's beach-ridge plain (Thailand) — Chronology, processes and driving factors24511713410.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.035Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Christophe C, Philippe A, Guérin G, Mercie N and Guibert P, 2018. Bayesian approach to OSL dating of poorly bleached sediment samples: Mixture Distribution Models for Dose (MD2). Radiation Measurements 108: 59–73, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2017.10.007.ChristopheCPhilippeAGuérinGMercieNGuibertP2018Bayesian approach to OSL dating of poorly bleached sediment samples: Mixture Distribution Models for Dose (MD2)108597310.1016/j.radmeas.2017.10.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Combès B and Philippe A, 2017. Bayesian analysis of individual and systematic multiplicative errors for estimating ages with stratigraphic constraints in optically stimulated luminescence dating. Quaternary Geochronology 39: 24–34, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2017.02.003.CombèsBPhilippeA2017Bayesian analysis of individual and systematic multiplicative errors for estimating ages with stratigraphic constraints in optically stimulated luminescence dating39243410.1016/j.quageo.2017.02.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Combès B, Philippe A, Lanos P, Mercier N, Tribolo C, Guerin G, Guibert P and Lahaye C, 2015. A Bayesian central equivalent dose model for optically stimulated luminescence dating. Quaternary Geochronology 28: 62–70, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2015.04.001.CombèsBPhilippeALanosPMercierNTriboloCGuerinGGuibertPLahayeC2015A Bayesian central equivalent dose model for optically stimulated luminescence dating28627010.1016/j.quageo.2015.04.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cunningham AC, Evans M and Knight J, 2015b. Quantifying bleaching for zero-age fluvial sediment: A Bayesian approach. Radiation Measurements 81: 55–61, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.04.007.CunninghamACEvansMKnightJ2015bQuantifying bleaching for zero-age fluvial sediment: A Bayesian approach81556110.1016/j.radmeas.2015.04.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cunningham AC and Wallinga J, 2012. Realizing the potential of fluvial archives using robust OSL chronologies. Quaternary Geochronology 12: 98–106, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.05.007.CunninghamACWallingaJ2012Realizing the potential of fluvial archives using robust OSL chronologies129810610.1016/j.quageo.2012.05.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cunningham AC, Wallinga J, Hobo N, Versendaal AJ, Makaske B and Middelkoop H, 2015a. Re-evaluating luminescence burial doses and bleaching of fluvial deposits using Bayesian computational statistics. Earth Surface Dynamics 3(1): 55–65, DOI 10.5194/esurf-3-55-2015.CunninghamACWallingaJHoboNVersendaalAJMakaskeBMiddelkoopH2015aRe-evaluating luminescence burial doses and bleaching of fluvial deposits using Bayesian computational statistics31556510.5194/esurf-3-55-2015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Galbraith RF and Green PF, 1990. Estimating the component ages in a finite mixture. Nuclear Tracks and Radiation Measurements 17(3): 197–206, DOI 10.1016/1359-0189(90)90035-V.GalbraithRFGreenPF1990Estimating the component ages in a finite mixture17319720610.1016/1359-0189(90)90035-VOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Galbraith RF and Roberts RG, 2012. Statistical aspects of equivalent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating: An overview and some recommendations. Quaternary Geochronology 11: 1–27, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.020.GalbraithRFRobertsRG2012Statistical aspects of equivalent dose and error calculation and display in OSL dating: An overview and some recommendations1112710.1016/j.quageo.2012.04.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Galbraith RF, Roberts RG, Laslett GM, Yoshida H and Olley JM, 1999. Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part I, experimental design and statistical models. Archaeometry 41(2): 339–364, DOI 10.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.x.GalbraithRFRobertsRGLaslettGMYoshidaHOlleyJM1999Optical dating of single and multiple grains of quartz from Jinmium rock shelter, northern Australia: Part I, experimental design and statistical models41233936410.1111/j.1475-4754.1999.tb00987.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Galbraith RF, Roberts RG and Yoshida H, 2005. Error variation in OSL palaeodose estimates from single aliquots of quartz: a factorial experiment. Radiation Measurements 39(3): 289–307, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.03.023.GalbraithRFRobertsRGYoshidaH2005Error variation in OSL palaeodose estimates from single aliquots of quartz: a factorial experiment39328930710.1016/j.radmeas.2004.03.023Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Dunson DB, Vehtari A and Rubin DB, 2014. Bayesian data analysis. Boca Raton, FL, CRC press.GelmanACarlinJBSternHSDunsonDBVehtariARubinDB2014Boca Raton, FLCRC press10.1201/b16018Search in Google Scholar
Gelman A, Lee D and Guo JQ, 2015. Stan: A probabilistic programming language for Bayesian inference and optimization. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 40(5): 530–543, DOI 10.3102/1076998615606113.GelmanALeeDGuoJQ2015Stan: A probabilistic programming language for Bayesian inference and optimization40553054310.3102/1076998615606113Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gelman A and Rubin DB, 1992. Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science 7(4): 457–472, DOI 10.1214/ss/1177011136.GelmanARubinDB1992Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences7445747210.1214/ss/1177011136Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guérin G, Christophe C, Philippe A, Murray AS, Thomsen KJ, Tribolo C, Urbanova P, Jain M, Guibert P, Mercier N, Kreutzer S and Lahaye C, 2017. Absorbed dose, equivalent dose, measured dose rates and implications for OSL age estimates: Introducing the Average Dose Model. Quaternary Geochronology 41: 163–173, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2017.04.002.GuérinGChristopheCPhilippeAMurrayASThomsenKJTriboloCUrbanovaPJainMGuibertPMercierNKreutzerSLahayeC2017Absorbed dose, equivalent dose, measured dose rates and implications for OSL age estimates: Introducing the Average Dose Model4116317310.1016/j.quageo.2017.04.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Guérin G, Combès B, Lahaye C, Thomsen KJ, Tribolo C, Urbanova P, Guibert P, Mercier N and Vallada H, 2015. Testing the accuracy of a Bayesian central-dose model for single-grain OSL, using known-age samples. Radiation Measurements 81: 62–70, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.04.002.GuérinGCombèsBLahayeCThomsenKJTriboloCUrbanovaPGuibertPMercierNValladaH2015Testing the accuracy of a Bayesian central-dose model for single-grain OSL, using known-age samples81627010.1016/j.radmeas.2015.04.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Huntriss A, 2008. A Bayesian analysis of luminescence dating. Doctoral dissertation, Durham University.HuntrissA2008Doctoral dissertation,Durham UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Jacobs Z, Duller GAT and Wintle AG, 2006. Interpretation of single grain De distributions and calculation of De. Radiation Measurements 41(3): 264–277, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2005.07.027.JacobsZDullerGATWintleAG2006Interpretation of single grain De distributions and calculation of De41326427710.1016/j.radmeas.2005.07.027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kunz A, Pflanz D, Weniger T, Urban B, Krüger F, Chen YG, 2013. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of young fluvial deposits of the Middle Elbe River Flood Plains using different age models. Geochronometria 41(1): 36–56, DOI 10.2478/s13386-013-0140-7.KunzAPflanzDWenigerTUrbanBKrügerFChenYG2013Optically stimulated luminescence dating of young fluvial deposits of the Middle Elbe River Flood Plains using different age models411365610.2478/s13386-013-0140-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lanos P and Philippe A, 2015. Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for combining Dates in archaeological context. Journal de la société française de statistique 158(2): 72–88.LanosPPhilippeA2015Hierarchical Bayesian modeling for combining Dates in archaeological context15827288Search in Google Scholar
Li B, 2007. A note on estimating the error when subtracting background counts from weak OSL signals. Ancient TL 25(1): 9–14.LiB2007A note on estimating the error when subtracting background counts from weak OSL signals251914Search in Google Scholar
Li B, Jacobs Z, Roberts RG, Galbraith R and Peng, J, 2017. Variability in quartz OSL signals caused by measurement uncertainties: Problems and solutions. Quaternary Geochronology 41: 11–25, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2017.05.006.LiBJacobsZRobertsRGGalbraithRPengJ2017Variability in quartz OSL signals caused by measurement uncertainties: Problems and solutions41112510.1016/j.quageo.2017.05.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mercier N, Kreutzer S, Christophe C, Guérin G, Guibert P, Lahaye C, Lanos P, Philippe P and Tribolo C, 2016. Bayesian statistics in luminescence dating: The “baSAR”-model and its implementation in the R package “Luminescence”. Ancient TL 34(2): 14–21.MercierNKreutzerSChristopheCGuérinGGuibertPLahayeCLanosPPhilippePTriboloC2016Bayesian statistics in luminescence dating: The “baSAR”-model and its implementation in the R package “Luminescence”3421421Search in Google Scholar
Millard AR, 2004. Taking Bayes beyond radiocarbon: Bayesian approaches to some other chronometric methods. Lecture Notes in Statistics, Springer, London. DOI 10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_11.MillardAR2004Lecture Notes in Statistics, SpringerLondon10.1007/978-1-4471-0231-1_11Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Murray AS and Wintle AG, 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32(1): 57–73, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-X.MurrayASWintleAG2000Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol321577310.1016/S1350-4487(99)00253-XOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Olley JM, Roberts RG, Yoshida H and Bowler JM, 2006. Single-grain optical dating of grave-infill associated with human burials at Lake Mungo, Australia. Quaternary Science Reviews 25(19–20): 2469–2474, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.022.OlleyJMRobertsRGYoshidaHBowlerJM2006Single-grain optical dating of grave-infill associated with human burials at Lake Mungo, Australia2519–202469247410.1016/j.quascirev.2005.07.022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Peng J and Dong ZB, 2014. A simple Bayesian method for assessing the standard error of equivalent dose estimates. Ancient TL 32(2): 17–23.PengJDongZB2014A simple Bayesian method for assessing the standard error of equivalent dose estimates3221723Search in Google Scholar
Peng J, Dong ZB and Han FQ, 2016a. Application of slice sampling method for optimizing OSL age models used for equivalent dose determination. Progress in Geography 35(1): 78–88. (in Chinese)PengJDongZBHanFQ2016aApplication of slice sampling method for optimizing OSL age models used for equivalent dose determination3517888(in Chinese)Search in Google Scholar
Peng J, Dong ZB and Han FQ, 2016b. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of sandy deposits from Gulang county at the southern margin of the Tengger Desert, China. Journal of Arid Land 8(1): 1–12, DOI 10.1007/s40333-015-0137-6.PengJDongZBHanFQ2016bOptically stimulated luminescence dating of sandy deposits from Gulang county at the southern margin of the Tengger Desert, China8111210.1007/s40333-015-0137-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Peng J, Dong ZB, Han FQ, Long H and Liu XJ, 2013. R package numOSL: numeric routines for optically stimulated luminescence dating. Ancient TL 31(2): 41–48.PengJDongZBHanFQLongHLiuXJ2013R package numOSL: numeric routines for optically stimulated luminescence dating3124148Search in Google Scholar
Peng J and Li B, 2017. Single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) and standardised growth curve (SGC) equivalent dose determination in a batch model using the R package “numOSL”. Ancient TL 35(2): 32–53.PengJLiB2017Single-aliquot regenerative-dose (SAR) and standardised growth curve (SGC) equivalent dose determination in a batch model using the R package “numOSL”352325310.1016/j.radmeas.2016.09.006Search in Google Scholar
Philippe A, Guérin G and Kreutzer S, 2019. BayLum - An R package for Bayesian analysis of OSL ages: An introduction. Quaternary Geochronology 49: 16–24, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2018.05.009.PhilippeAGuérinGKreutzerS2019BayLum - An R package for Bayesian analysis of OSL ages: An introduction49162410.1016/j.quageo.2018.05.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ramsey CB, 1995. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2): 425–430.RamseyCB1995Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program37242543010.1017/S0033822200030903Search in Google Scholar
Ramsey C B, 2008. Deposition models for chronological records. Quaternary Science Reviews 27(1–2): 42–60, DOI 10.1016/j.quascirev.2007.01.019.RamseyCB2008Deposition models for chronological records271–2426010.1016/j.quascirev.2007.01.019Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rhodes EJ, Ramsey CB, Outram Z, Batt C, Willis L, Dockrill S and Bond J, 2003. Bayesian methods applied to the interpretation of multiple OSL dates: high precision sediment ages from Old Scatness Broch excavations, Shetland Isles. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(10–13): 1231–1244, DOI 10.1016/S0277-3791(03)00046-5.RhodesEJRamseyCBOutramZBattCWillisLDockrillSBondJ2003Bayesian methods applied to the interpretation of multiple OSL dates: high precision sediment ages from Old Scatness Broch excavations, Shetland Isles2210–131231124410.1016/S0277-3791(03)00046-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Roberts RG, Galbraith RF, Yoshida H, Laslett GM and Olley JM, 2000. Distinguishing dose populations in sediment mixtures: a test of single-grain optical dating procedures using mixtures of laboratory-dosed quartz. Radiation Measurements 32(5–6): 459–465, DOI 10.1016/S1350-4487(00)00104-9.RobertsRGGalbraithRFYoshidaHLaslettGMOlleyJM2000Distinguishing dose populations in sediment mixtures: a test of single-grain optical dating procedures using mixtures of laboratory-dosed quartz325–645946510.1016/S1350-4487(00)00104-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schmidt S, Tsukamoto S, Salomon E, Frechen M and Hetzel R, 2012. Optical dating of alluvial deposits at the orogenic front of the Andean Precordillera (Mendoza, Argentina). Geochronometria 39(1): 62–75, DOI 10.2478/s13386-011-0050-5.SchmidtSTsukamotoSSalomonEFrechenMHetzelR2012Optical dating of alluvial deposits at the orogenic front of the Andean Precordillera (Mendoza, Argentina)391627510.2478/s13386-011-0050-5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sivia DS, Burbidge C, Roberts RG and Bailey RM, 2004. A Bayesian approach to the evaluation of equivalent doses in sediment mixtures for luminescence dating. AIP Conference Proceedings 735(1): 305–311, DOI 10.1063/1.1835227.SiviaDSBurbidgeCRobertsRGBaileyRM2004A Bayesian approach to the evaluation of equivalent doses in sediment mixtures for luminescence dating735130531110.1063/1.1835227Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Stan Development Team, 2018. RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.17.3.Stan Development Team2018R package version 2.17.310.2478/msd-2018-0003Search in Google Scholar
Tamura T, Cunningham AC and Oliver TSN, 2019. Two-dimensional chronostratigraphic modelling of OSL ages from recent beach-ridge deposits, SE Australia. Quaternary Geochronology 49: 39–44, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2018.03.003.TamuraTCunninghamACOliverTSN2019Two-dimensional chronostratigraphic modelling of OSL ages from recent beach-ridge deposits, SE Australia49394410.1016/j.quageo.2018.03.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Thomsen, K.J., Murray, A.S., Bøtter-Jensen, L., 2005. Sources of variability in OSL dose measurements using single grains of quartz. Radiation Measurements 39(1): 47–61, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2004.01.039.ThomsenK.J.MurrayA.S.Bøtter-JensenL.2005Sources of variability in OSL dose measurements using single grains of quartz391476110.1016/j.radmeas.2004.01.039Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zeeden C, Dietze M and Kreutzer S, 2018. Discriminating luminescence age uncertainty composition for a robust Bayesian modelling. Quaternary Geochronology 43: 30–39, DOI 10.1016/j.quageo.2017.10.001.ZeedenCDietzeMKreutzerS2018Discriminating luminescence age uncertainty composition for a robust Bayesian modelling43303910.1016/j.quageo.2017.10.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zink A, 2013. A coarse Bayesian approach to evaluate luminescence ages. Geochronometria 40(2): 90–100, DOI 10.2478/s13386-013-0105-x.ZinkA2013A coarse Bayesian approach to evaluate luminescence ages4029010010.2478/s13386-013-0105-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zink AJC, 2015. Bayesian analysis of luminescence measurements. Radiation Measurements 81: 71–77, DOI 10.1016/j.radmeas.2015.04.009.ZinkAJC2015Bayesian analysis of luminescence measurements81717710.1016/j.radmeas.2015.04.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar