[Aliki. 1990. Manners. New York, Greenwillow Books.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ardoin N.M., Wheaton M., Bowers A.W., Hunt C.A., Durham W.H. 2015. Nature-based tourism's impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. J. Sustain. Tourism, 236: 838-858.10.1080/09669582.2015.1024258]Search in Google Scholar
[Bethel E. 2011. My choice [kindle version]. Mochibooks. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.com]Search in Google Scholar
[Bratanova B., Loughnan S., Gatersleben B. 2012. The moral circle as a common motivational cause of cross-situational pro-environmentalism. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 425: 539-545.]Search in Google Scholar
[Clayton S., Devine-Wright P., Stern P.C., Whitmarsh L., Carrico A., Steg L., Bonnes M. 2015. Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 57: 640-646.]Search in Google Scholar
[Collado S., Evans G.W., Corraliza J.A., Sorrel M.A. 2015. The role played by age on children's pro-ecological behaviors: An exploratory analysis. J. Environ. Psychol., 44: 85-94.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ergazaki M., Andriotou E. 2010. From “forest fires” and “hunting” to disturbing “habitats” and “food chains”: Do young children come up with any ecological interpretations of human interventions within a forest? Res. Sci. Educ., 402: 187-201.]Search in Google Scholar
[Frost R., Koeppen P. 1994. Swinger of birches. Gilsum, Stemmer House Publ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gifford R. 2014. Environmental psychology matters. Psychology, 651: 541.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gifford R., Nilsson A. 2014. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. Int. J. Psychol., 493: 141-157. doi:10.1002/ijop.1203410.1002/ijop.1203424821503]Search in Google Scholar
[Gomboli M. 1997. Ecoeducación. Madrid, Bruño.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haidt J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1084: 814.10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814]Search in Google Scholar
[Haidt J., Bjorklund F. 2008. Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. [in:] Sinnott-Armstrong W. (ed.) Moral psychology. the cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 181-217.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heiphetz L., Young L. 2014. A social cognitive developmental perspective on moral judgment. Behaviour, 1512-3: 315-335.]Search in Google Scholar
[Helion C., Pizarro D.A. 2014. Beyond dual-processes: The interplay of reason and emotion in moral judgment. [in:] Levy N., Clausen J. (eds.) Handbook for neuroethics. Netherlands, Springer: 109-125. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_16010.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_160]Search in Google Scholar
[Ho F.J., Lin Y.J., Kuo H.Y., Huang Y.C., Chung C.Y., Lai W.L., Liao S.W. 2014. Using structural equation modeling to analyze knowledge, attitudes, and behavior concerning wetland conservation. Adv. Mater. Res., 955-959: 1418-1422.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hussar K.M., Horvath J.C. 2011. Do children play fair with mother nature? understanding children’s judgments of environmentally harmful actions. J. Environ. Psychol., 314: 309-313. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.00110.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Killen M., Rizzo M.T. 2014. Morality, intentionality and intergroup attitudes. Behaviour, 1512-3: 337-359.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kline R.B. 2004. Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.10.1037/10693-000]Search in Google Scholar
[Leavitt K., Zhu L., Aquino K. 2015. Good without knowing it: Subtle contextual cues can activate moral identity and reshape moral intuition. J. Bus. Ethics, 137: 785. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2746-610.1007/s10551-015-2746-6]Search in Google Scholar
[Leddon E.M., Waxman S.R., Medin D.L. 2009. Unmasking “alive”: Children's appreciation of a concept linking all living things. J. Cognition Dev., 94: 461-473.]Search in Google Scholar
[Llewellyn C. 2001. Why should I share? New York, Barron’s Educational Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[Maherally U.N. 2014. Development and validation of the life sciences assessment: A measure of preschool children's conceptions of basic life sciences. Unpublished University of Cincinnati, Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/]Search in Google Scholar
[Margett T.E., Witherington D.C. 2011. The nature of preschoolers' concept of living and artificial objects. Child Dev., 826: 2067-2082. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01661.x; 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01661.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Martin J.F. 2015. Adolescents' and young adults' understanding of others' moral decisions. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. UC Berkeley, Berkeley.]Search in Google Scholar
[Martínez-Losada C., García-Barros S., Garrido M. 2014. How children characterise living beings and the activities in which they engage. J. Biol. Educ., 484: 201-210. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.84928110.1080/00219266.2013.849281]Search in Google Scholar
[McKissack P.C., McKissack F., McKissack P. 1988. Messy bessey's school desk. Chicago, Children's Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Morse D.T. 1999. MINSIZE2: A computer program for determining effect size and minimum sample size for statistical significance for univariate, multivariate, and nonparametric tests. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 593: 518-531.]Search in Google Scholar
[Osborne R., Freyberg P. 1985. Learning in science. The implications of children's science. Auckland, Heinemann Education.]Search in Google Scholar
[Prajapati B., Dunne M., Armstrong R. 2010. Sample size estimation and statistical power analyses. Optometry Today, 1607.]Search in Google Scholar
[Robelia B., Murphy T. 2012. What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environ. Educ. Res., 183: 299-321.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schroeder M., Graham S.A., McKeough A., Stock H., Palmer J. 2010. Gender differences in preschoolers' understanding of the concept of life. J. Early Childhood Res., 83: 227-238. doi:10.1177/1476718X1036676610.1177/1476718X10366766]Search in Google Scholar
[Siegel S., Castellan N.J. 1988. Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smetana J., Jambon M., Ball C. 2014. The social domain approach to children's moral and social judgments. [in:] Killen M., Smetana J. (eds.) Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, Erlbaum: 23-45.]Search in Google Scholar
[Smetana J.G. 2006. Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. [in:] Killen M., Smetana J. (eds.) Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, Erlbaum: 119-153.]Search in Google Scholar
[Szekely R.D., Miu, A.C. 2015. Bridging cognition and emotion in moral decision making: Role of emotion regulation. [in:] Bryant M. L. (ed.) Handbook on emotion regulation: Processes, cognitive effects and social consequences. New York, Nova Science: 199-216.]Search in Google Scholar
[Thomas P., Harker H. 2000. Stop picking on me. New York, Barron’s Educational Series.]Search in Google Scholar
[Turiel E. 1983. The development of social knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Villarroel J.D. 2013. Environmental judgment in early childhood and its relationship with the understanding of the concept of living beings. Springerplus, 21: 87-1801-2-87. Epub 2013 Mar 7. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-8710.1186/2193-1801-2-87360263423525605]Search in Google Scholar
[Villarroel J.D., Infante G. 2014. Early understanding of the concept of living things: An examination of young children’s drawings of plant life. J. Biol. Educ., 483: 119-126. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.83740610.1080/00219266.2013.837406]Search in Google Scholar
[Volker M.A. 2006. Reporting effect size estimates in school psychology research. Psychol. Schools, 436: 653-672.]Search in Google Scholar
[Welkowitz J., Cohen B.H., Ewen R.B. 1996. Introductory Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. (6th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wolschke-Bulmahn J., Gröning G. 1994. Children's comics: An opportunity for education to know and to care for nature? Children's Environ., 113: 232-242. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41515265]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright K., Poulin-Dubois D., Kelley E. 2015. The animate-inanimate distinction in preschool children. British J. Dev. Psychol, 331: 73-91. doi:10.1111/bjdp.1206810.1111/bjdp.1206825329437]Search in Google Scholar
[Wright W. 2013. Farting book: Are you smart when you fart? [kindle version]. Retrieved from Amazon Digital Services.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yorek N., Sahin M., Aydin H. 2009. Are animals ‘more alive’ than plants? animistic-anthropocentric construction of life concept. Eurasia J. Math., Sci. Tech. Educ., 54: 369-378.]Search in Google Scholar