Young children’s environmental judgement and its relationship with their understanding of the concept of living things

Aliki. 1990. Manners. New York, Greenwillow Books.Search in Google Scholar

Ardoin N.M., Wheaton M., Bowers A.W., Hunt C.A., Durham W.H. 2015. Nature-based tourism's impact on environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behavior: A review and analysis of the literature and potential future research. J. Sustain. Tourism, 236: 838-858.10.1080/09669582.2015.1024258Search in Google Scholar

Bethel E. 2011. My choice [kindle version]. Mochibooks. Retrieved from https://www.amazon.comSearch in Google Scholar

Bratanova B., Loughnan S., Gatersleben B. 2012. The moral circle as a common motivational cause of cross-situational pro-environmentalism. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol., 425: 539-545.Search in Google Scholar

Clayton S., Devine-Wright P., Stern P.C., Whitmarsh L., Carrico A., Steg L., Bonnes M. 2015. Psychological research and global climate change. Nature Climate Change, 57: 640-646.Search in Google Scholar

Collado S., Evans G.W., Corraliza J.A., Sorrel M.A. 2015. The role played by age on children's pro-ecological behaviors: An exploratory analysis. J. Environ. Psychol., 44: 85-94.Search in Google Scholar

Ergazaki M., Andriotou E. 2010. From “forest fires” and “hunting” to disturbing “habitats” and “food chains”: Do young children come up with any ecological interpretations of human interventions within a forest? Res. Sci. Educ., 402: 187-201.Search in Google Scholar

Frost R., Koeppen P. 1994. Swinger of birches. Gilsum, Stemmer House Publ.Search in Google Scholar

Gifford R. 2014. Environmental psychology matters. Psychology, 651: 541.Search in Google Scholar

Gifford R., Nilsson A. 2014. Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. Int. J. Psychol., 493: 141-157. doi:10.1002/ijop.1203410.1002/ijop.1203424821503Search in Google Scholar

Gomboli M. 1997. Ecoeducación. Madrid, Bruño.Search in Google Scholar

Haidt J. 2001. The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychol. Rev., 1084: 814.10.1037/0033-295X.108.4.814Search in Google Scholar

Haidt J., Bjorklund F. 2008. Social intuitionists answer six questions about moral psychology. [in:] Sinnott-Armstrong W. (ed.) Moral psychology. the cognitive science of morality: Intuition and diversity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 181-217.Search in Google Scholar

Heiphetz L., Young L. 2014. A social cognitive developmental perspective on moral judgment. Behaviour, 1512-3: 315-335.Search in Google Scholar

Helion C., Pizarro D.A. 2014. Beyond dual-processes: The interplay of reason and emotion in moral judgment. [in:] Levy N., Clausen J. (eds.) Handbook for neuroethics. Netherlands, Springer: 109-125. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_16010.1007/978-94-007-4707-4_160Search in Google Scholar

Ho F.J., Lin Y.J., Kuo H.Y., Huang Y.C., Chung C.Y., Lai W.L., Liao S.W. 2014. Using structural equation modeling to analyze knowledge, attitudes, and behavior concerning wetland conservation. Adv. Mater. Res., 955-959: 1418-1422.Search in Google Scholar

Hussar K.M., Horvath J.C. 2011. Do children play fair with mother nature? understanding children’s judgments of environmentally harmful actions. J. Environ. Psychol., 314: 309-313. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.00110.1016/j.jenvp.2011.05.001Search in Google Scholar

Killen M., Rizzo M.T. 2014. Morality, intentionality and intergroup attitudes. Behaviour, 1512-3: 337-359.Search in Google Scholar

Kline R.B. 2004. Beyond significance testing: Reforming data analysis methods in behavioral research. Washington, DC, American Psychological Association.10.1037/10693-000Search in Google Scholar

Leavitt K., Zhu L., Aquino K. 2015. Good without knowing it: Subtle contextual cues can activate moral identity and reshape moral intuition. J. Bus. Ethics, 137: 785. doi:10.1007/s10551-015-2746-610.1007/s10551-015-2746-6Search in Google Scholar

Leddon E.M., Waxman S.R., Medin D.L. 2009. Unmasking “alive”: Children's appreciation of a concept linking all living things. J. Cognition Dev., 94: 461-473.Search in Google Scholar

Llewellyn C. 2001. Why should I share? New York, Barron’s Educational Series.Search in Google Scholar

Maherally U.N. 2014. Development and validation of the life sciences assessment: A measure of preschool children's conceptions of basic life sciences. Unpublished University of Cincinnati, Retrieved from https://etd.ohiolink.edu/Search in Google Scholar

Margett T.E., Witherington D.C. 2011. The nature of preschoolers' concept of living and artificial objects. Child Dev., 826: 2067-2082. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01661.x; 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01661.xSearch in Google Scholar

Martin J.F. 2015. Adolescents' and young adults' understanding of others' moral decisions. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation. UC Berkeley, Berkeley.Search in Google Scholar

Martínez-Losada C., García-Barros S., Garrido M. 2014. How children characterise living beings and the activities in which they engage. J. Biol. Educ., 484: 201-210. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.84928110.1080/00219266.2013.849281Search in Google Scholar

McKissack P.C., McKissack F., McKissack P. 1988. Messy bessey's school desk. Chicago, Children's Press.Search in Google Scholar

Morse D.T. 1999. MINSIZE2: A computer program for determining effect size and minimum sample size for statistical significance for univariate, multivariate, and nonparametric tests. Educ. Psychol. Meas., 593: 518-531.Search in Google Scholar

Osborne R., Freyberg P. 1985. Learning in science. The implications of children's science. Auckland, Heinemann Education.Search in Google Scholar

Prajapati B., Dunne M., Armstrong R. 2010. Sample size estimation and statistical power analyses. Optometry Today, 1607.Search in Google Scholar

Robelia B., Murphy T. 2012. What do people know about key environmental issues? A review of environmental knowledge surveys. Environ. Educ. Res., 183: 299-321.Search in Google Scholar

Schroeder M., Graham S.A., McKeough A., Stock H., Palmer J. 2010. Gender differences in preschoolers' understanding of the concept of life. J. Early Childhood Res., 83: 227-238. doi:10.1177/1476718X1036676610.1177/1476718X10366766Search in Google Scholar

Siegel S., Castellan N.J. 1988. Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Search in Google Scholar

Smetana J., Jambon M., Ball C. 2014. The social domain approach to children's moral and social judgments. [in:] Killen M., Smetana J. (eds.) Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, Erlbaum: 23-45.Search in Google Scholar

Smetana J.G. 2006. Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. [in:] Killen M., Smetana J. (eds.) Handbook of moral development. Mahwah, Erlbaum: 119-153.Search in Google Scholar

Szekely R.D., Miu, A.C. 2015. Bridging cognition and emotion in moral decision making: Role of emotion regulation. [in:] Bryant M. L. (ed.) Handbook on emotion regulation: Processes, cognitive effects and social consequences. New York, Nova Science: 199-216.Search in Google Scholar

Thomas P., Harker H. 2000. Stop picking on me. New York, Barron’s Educational Series.Search in Google Scholar

Turiel E. 1983. The development of social knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge Univ. Press.Search in Google Scholar

Villarroel J.D. 2013. Environmental judgment in early childhood and its relationship with the understanding of the concept of living beings. Springerplus, 21: 87-1801-2-87. Epub 2013 Mar 7. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-2-8710.1186/2193-1801-2-87360263423525605Search in Google Scholar

Villarroel J.D., Infante G. 2014. Early understanding of the concept of living things: An examination of young children’s drawings of plant life. J. Biol. Educ., 483: 119-126. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.83740610.1080/00219266.2013.837406Search in Google Scholar

Volker M.A. 2006. Reporting effect size estimates in school psychology research. Psychol. Schools, 436: 653-672.Search in Google Scholar

Welkowitz J., Cohen B.H., Ewen R.B. 1996. Introductory Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. (6th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Search in Google Scholar

Wolschke-Bulmahn J., Gröning G. 1994. Children's comics: An opportunity for education to know and to care for nature? Children's Environ., 113: 232-242. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/41515265Search in Google Scholar

Wright K., Poulin-Dubois D., Kelley E. 2015. The animate-inanimate distinction in preschool children. British J. Dev. Psychol, 331: 73-91. doi:10.1111/bjdp.1206810.1111/bjdp.1206825329437Search in Google Scholar

Wright W. 2013. Farting book: Are you smart when you fart? [kindle version]. Retrieved from Amazon Digital Services.Search in Google Scholar

Yorek N., Sahin M., Aydin H. 2009. Are animals ‘more alive’ than plants? animistic-anthropocentric construction of life concept. Eurasia J. Math., Sci. Tech. Educ., 54: 369-378.Search in Google Scholar