Utilizing the Consensual Assessment Technique to Compare Creativity in Drama Spaces

Advares-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., (2006). Social identity and the recognition of creativity in groups. The British journal of social psychology, 45(3), 479-497.10.1348/014466605X50184Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M. (1982). The social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997-1013.10.1037/0022-3514.43.5.997Search in Google Scholar

Amabile, T. M., Hennessey, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(1), 14.10.1037/0022-3514.50.1.14Search in Google Scholar

Peppler, K., Bender, S., & Catterall, J. (2015). Learning and achieving through the arts: A collaborative project of inner-city arts and Los Angeles Unified School District 4 (Deliverable to the U.S. Department of Education). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University.Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. (2010). Is creativity domain specific?. In the (Eds) J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg. The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Barab, S. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Smart people or smart contexts? Cognition, ability, and talent development in an age of situated approaches to knowing and learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(3), 165-182.10.1207/S15326985EP3703_3Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J., Kaufman, J. C., & Gentile, C. A. (2004). Extension of the consensual assessment technique to nonparallel creative products. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 113-117.10.1207/s15326934crj1601_11Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment technique. In Handbook of research on assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education (pp. 65-77). IGI Global.10.4018/978-1-60566-667-9.ch004Search in Google Scholar

Beghetto, R. A., & Kaufman, J. C. (2014). Classroom contexts for creativity. High Ability Studies, 25(1), 53-69.10.1080/13598139.2014.905247Search in Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.10.1007/BF02310555Search in Google Scholar

Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My current thoughts on coefficient alpha and successor procedures. Educational and psychological measurement, 64(3), 391-418.10.1177/0013164404266386Search in Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi M. (1988). Society, Culture, and Person: A Systems View of Creativity. In: The Systems Model of Creativity. Springer, DordrechtSearch in Google Scholar

Furman, A. (1998). Teacher and pupil characteristics in the perception of the creativity of classroom climate. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 32(4), 258-277.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1998.tb00821.xSearch in Google Scholar

Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationship between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7(2), 193-208.10.1080/10400419409534524Search in Google Scholar

Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 234-24410.2307/3345709Search in Google Scholar

Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171-184.10.1207/S15326934CRJ1302_5Search in Google Scholar

Issacharoff, M. (1981). Space and reference in drama. Poetics Today, 2(3), 211-224.10.2307/1772472Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, C. (2004). Creativity in drama: thinking from within. In R. Fisher & M. Williams (Eds.), Unlocking creativity: Teaching across the curriculum. London: David Fulton Publishers.Search in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-133.10.1177/1558689806298224Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Baer, J., Cole, J. C., & Sexton, J. D. (2008). A comparison of expert and nonexpert raters using the consensual assessment technique. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 171-178.10.1080/10400410802059929Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, J. C., Lee, J., Baer, J., & Lee, S. (2007). Captions, consistency, creativity, and the consensual assessment technique: New evidence of reliability. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 96-106.10.1016/j.tsc.2007.04.002Search in Google Scholar

LeBlanc, A., Jin, Y. C., Obert, M., & Siivola, C. (1997). Effect of audience on music performance anxiety. Journal of Research in Music Education, 45(3), 480-496.10.2307/3345541Search in Google Scholar

Llewelyn-Jones, L. (2002). Understanding theater space. In Essays on documenting and researching productions of Greek drama: The sources.Search in Google Scholar

Nachmanovitch, S. (1990). Free play: Improvisation in life and art. Penguin.Search in Google Scholar

Neelands, J. (2004). Miracles are happening: Beyond the rhetoric of transformation in the Western traditions of drama education. Research in Drama Education, 9(1), 47-56.10.1080/1356978042000185902Search in Google Scholar

Oreck, B. A., Owen, S. V., & Baum, S. M. (2003). Validity, reliability, and equity issues in an observational talent assessment process in the performing arts. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(1), 62-94.10.1177/016235320302700105Search in Google Scholar

Phelan, P. (2004). Marina Abramović: witnessing shadows. Theatre Journal, 56, 569-577.10.1353/tj.2004.0178Search in Google Scholar

Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., & Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 83-96.10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1Search in Google Scholar

Podlozny, A. (2000). Strengthening verbal skills through the use of classroom drama: A clear link. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 34(3/4), 239-275.10.2307/3333644Search in Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(3), 180.Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K. (2000). Improvisation and the creative process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58(2), 149-161.10.1111/1540-6245.jaac58.2.0149Search in Google Scholar

Sawyer, R. K., (2003). Group creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group: New York and London.Search in Google Scholar

Schmitt, N. (1996). Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment, 8(4), 350.10.1037/1040-3590.8.4.350Search in Google Scholar

Scruggs, M., & Gellman, M. J. (2007). Process: An improviser’s journey. Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Spicker, H. H. (1992). Identifying and enriching rural gifted children. Educational Horizons, 70(2), 60-65.Search in Google Scholar

Spolin, V. (1999). Improvisation for the theater: A handbook of teaching and directing techniques. Northwestern University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking*. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 236-262.10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.xSearch in Google Scholar

Walker, E., Tabone, C., & Weltsek, G. (2011). When achievement data meet drama and arts integration. Language Arts, 88(5), 365.Search in Google Scholar

Weltsek, G. (2005). Using Process Drama to Deconstruct “A Midsummer Night’s Dream”. English Journal, 95, 75-81.10.2307/30047402Search in Google Scholar