Noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is comparable to color Doppler ultrasound for screening for renal artery stenosis, but is faster and shows more segments
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
Lewandowski J. Renovascular hypertension: is it only the top of the iceberg? Pol Merkur Lekarski. 2003; 15:371-5.14974369LewandowskiJRenovascular hypertension: is it only the top of the iceberg?Pol Merkur Lekarski2003153715Search in Google Scholar
Hartman RP, Kawashima A. Radiologic evaluation of suspected renovascular hypertension. Am Fam Physician. 2009; 80:273-9.19621837HartmanRPKawashimaARadiologic evaluation of suspected renovascular hypertensionAm Fam Physician2009802739Search in Google Scholar
Plouin P, Bax L. Diagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosis. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2010; 6:151-9.10.1038/nrneph.2009.23020101256PlouinPBaxLDiagnosis and treatment of renal artery stenosisNat Rev Nephrol20106151920101256Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Eriksson P, Mohammed AA, De Geer J, Kihlberg J, Persson A, Granerus G, et al. Non-invasive investigations of potential renal artery stenosis in renal insufficiency. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010; 25: 3607-14.2048881910.1093/ndt/gfq259ErikssonPMohammedAADeGeer JKihlbergJPerssonAGranerusGet alNon-invasive investigations of potential renal artery stenosis in renal insufficiencyNephrol Dial Transplant20102536071420488819Search in Google Scholar
Stacul F, Gava S, Belgrano M, Cernic S, Pagnan L, Pozzi Mucelli F, et al. Renal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSA. Radiol Med. 2008; 113:529-46.10.1007/s11547-008-0270-918480971StaculFGavaSBelgranoMCernicSPagnanLPozziMucelli Fet alRenal artery stenosis: comparative evaluation of gadolinium-enhanced MRA and DSARadiol Med20081135294618480971Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wilson GJ, Maki JH. Non-contrast-enhanced MR imaging of renal artery stenosis at 1.5 tesla. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2009; 17:13-27.10.1016/j.mric.2009.01.00219364597WilsonGJMakiJHNon-contrast-enhanced MR imaging of renal artery stenosis at 1.5 teslaMagn Reson Imaging Clin N Am200917132719364597Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Utsunomiya D, Miyazaki M, Nomitsu Y, Komeda Y, Okigawa T, Urata J, et al. Clinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosis. Circ J. 2008; 72:1627-30.1872833410.1253/circj.CJ-08-0005UtsunomiyaDMiyazakiMNomitsuYKomedaYOkigawaTUrataJet alClinical role of non-contrast magnetic resonance angiography for evaluation of renal artery stenosisCirc J200872162730Search in Google Scholar
Glockner JF, Takahashi N, Kawashima A, Woodrum DA, Stanley DW, Takei N, et al. Non-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRA. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010; 31:1411-8.2051289410.1002/jmri.22194GlocknerJFTakahashiNKawashimaAWoodrumDAStanleyDWTakeiNet alNon-contrast renal artery MRA using an inflow inversion recovery steady state free precession technique (Inhance): comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced MRAJ Magn Reson Imaging2010311411820512894Search in Google Scholar
Ultrasound assessment of native renal vessels and renal allografts. In : Zwiebel WJ, Pellerito JS, editors. Introduction of vascular ultrasonography. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2005:618-9.Ultrasound assessment of native renal vessels and renal allograftsInZwiebelWJPelleritoJSIntroduction of vascular ultrasonography5th edPhiladelphiaSaunders20056189Search in Google Scholar
Vasbinder GBC, Nelemans PJ, Kessels AGH, Kroon AA, de Leeuw PW, van Engelshoven JMA. Diagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med. 2001; 135:401-11.10.7326/0003-4819-135-6-200109180-0000911560453VasbinderGBCNelemansPJKesselsAGHKroonAAdeLeeuw PWvanEngelshoven JMADiagnostic tests for renal artery stenosis in patients suspected of having renovascular hypertension: a meta-analysisAnn Intern Med20011354011111560453Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rountas C, Vlychou M, Vassiou K, Liakopoulos V, Kapsalak E, Koukoulis G, et al. Imaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR Angiography, and digital subtraction angiography. Ren Fail. 2007; 29:295-302.1749744310.1080/08860220601166305RountasCVlychouMVassiouKLiakopoulosVKapsalakEKoukoulisGet alImaging modalities for renal artery stenosis in suspected renovascular hypertension: prospective intraindividual comparison of color Doppler US, CT angiography, GD-enhanced MR Angiography, and digital subtraction angiographyRen Fail20072929530217497443Search in Google Scholar
Eklof H, Ahlström H, Magnusson A, Andersson LG, Andren B, Hagg A, et al. Prospective comparison of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, MRA, and CTA in assessing renal artery stenosis. Acta Radil. 2006; 47:764-74.10.1080/02841850600849092EklofHAhlströmHMagnussonAAnderssonLGAndrenBHaggAet alProspective comparison of duplex ultrasonography, captopril renography, MRA, and CTA in assessing renal artery stenosisActa Radil2006477647417050355Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Solar M, Zizka J, Krajina A, Michl A, Raupach J, Klzo L, et al. Comparison of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of significant renal artery stenosis. Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove). 2011; 54:9-12.21542417SolarMZizkaJKrajinaAMichlARaupachJKlzoLet alComparison of duplex ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of significant renal artery stenosisActa Medica (Hradec Kralove)20115491210.14712/18059694.2016.1021542417Search in Google Scholar
Mitsue M, Vivian SL. Nonenhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2008; 248:20-43.1856616810.1148/radiol.2481071497MitsueMVivianSLNonenhanced MR angiographyRadiology2008248204318566168Search in Google Scholar
Angeretti MG Lumia D, Cani A, Barresi M, Cardim Nocchi L, Piacentino F et al. Non-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Acta Radiol. 2013; 54:749-56.2355018710.1177/0284185113482690AngerettiMG Lumia DCaniABarresiMCardimNocchi LPiacentinoFet alNon-enhanced MR angiography of renal arteries: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiographyActa Radiol2013547495623550187Search in Google Scholar
Khoo MM, Deeab D, Gedroyc WM, Duncan N, Taube D, Dick EA. Renal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRA. Eur Radiol. 2011; 21:1470-6.10.1007/s00330-011-2086-621337034KhooMMDeeabDGedroycWMDuncanNTaubeDDickEARenal artery stenosis: comparative assessment by unenhanced renal artery MRA versus contrast-enhanced MRAEur Radiol2011211470621337034Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
