<abstract xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><sec id="j_1905-7415.0903.406_s_001_w2aab3b7c12b1b6b1aab1c17b1Aa"><h3>Background</h3><p>Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is an accurate and noninvasive method used to screen for renal artery stenosis (RAS). Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) and noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NC-MRA) are considered noninvasive imaging modalities, which require no contrast medium injection.</p></sec><sec id="j_1905-7415.0903.406_s_002_w2aab3b7c12b1b6b1aab1c17b2Aa"><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To compare NC-MRA with CDUS for screening for RAS using CE-MRA as a reference standard.</p></sec><sec id="j_1905-7415.0903.406_s_003_w2aab3b7c12b1b6b1aab1c17b3Aa"><h3>Methods</h3><p>The study was approved by our institutional review board with written informed consent was obtained from all patient participants. We prospectively enrolled 42 consecutive patients who were suspected of having RAS. All patients underwent CDUS, NC-MRA, and CE-MRA of renal arteries. The attending radiologist interpreted the CDUS after scanning the patient. CE-MRA and NC-MRA were separately interpreted by consensus between two radiologists. Data including (1) number of visualized renal arteries, (2) agreement between CDUS and NC-MRA compared with CE-MRA, and (3) time taken for examination, were evaluated.</p></sec><sec id="j_1905-7415.0903.406_s_004_w2aab3b7c12b1b6b1aab1c17b4Aa"><h3>Results</h3><p>We included 102 renal arteries and 306 renal artery segments in the study. NC-MRA visualized significantly more renal artery segments (258 segments) than CDUS (286 segments, P = 0.0004). NC-MRA and CDUS were in good agreement with CE-MRA when determining the degree of stenosis (K<sub>w</sub> = 0.71 and K<sub>w</sub> = 0.66, respectively). NC-MRA took a significantly shorter time for examination (21.2 minutes) than CDUS (47.5 minutes, P &lt;0.0001).</p></sec><sec id="j_1905-7415.0903.406_s_005_w2aab3b7c12b1b6b1aab1c17b5Aa"><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>NC-MRA is comparable to CDUS for screening for renal artery stenosis. However, NC-MRA can visualize more renal artery segments and require shorter examination time than CDUS.</p></sec></abstract>

BackgroundContrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is an accurate and noninvasive method used to screen for renal artery stenosis (RAS). Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) and noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (NC-MRA) are considered noninvasive imaging modalities, which require no contrast medium injection.ObjectivesTo compare NC-MRA with CDUS for screening for RAS using CE-MRA as a reference standard.MethodsThe study was approved by our institutional review board with written informed consent was obtained from all patient participants. We prospectively enrolled 42 consecutive patients who were suspected of having RAS. All patients underwent CDUS, NC-MRA, and CE-MRA of renal arteries. The attending radiologist interpreted the CDUS after scanning the patient. CE-MRA and NC-MRA were separately interpreted by consensus between two radiologists. Data including (1) number of visualized renal arteries, (2) agreement between CDUS and NC-MRA compared with CE-MRA, and (3) time taken for examination, were evaluated.ResultsWe included 102 renal arteries and 306 renal artery segments in the study. NC-MRA visualized significantly more renal artery segments (258 segments) than CDUS (286 segments, P = 0.0004). NC-MRA and CDUS were in good agreement with CE-MRA when determining the degree of stenosis (Kw = 0.71 and Kw = 0.66, respectively). NC-MRA took a significantly shorter time for examination (21.2 minutes) than CDUS (47.5 minutes, P <0.0001).ConclusionsNC-MRA is comparable to CDUS for screening for renal artery stenosis. However, NC-MRA can visualize more renal artery segments and require shorter examination time than CDUS.

Noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is comparable to color Doppler ultrasound for screening for renal artery stenosis, but is faster and shows more segments

Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine

Asian Biomedicine

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

BackgroundContrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) is an accurate and noninvasive method used to screen for renal artery stenosis (RAS). Color...

Noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is comparable to color Doppler ultrasound for screening for renal artery stenosis, but is faster and shows more segments

Article Category: Brief communication (Original)

Publicado en línea: 31 ene 2017

Páginas: 373 - 378

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0903.406

Palabras clave
Color Doppler ultrasonography, non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, renal artery stenosis

© 2015 Siripat Saejeung, Kawalee Sasiwimolphan, Laddawan Vajragupta, Somjai Wangsuphachart, Monravee Tumkosit

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Noncontrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography is comparable to color Doppler ultrasound for screening for renal artery stenosis, but is faster and shows more segments

Article Category: Brief communication (Original)

Publicado en línea: 31 ene 2017

Páginas: 373 - 378

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5372/1905-7415.0903.406

Palabras claveColor Doppler ultrasonography, non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, renal artery stenosis

© 2015 Siripat Saejeung, Kawalee Sasiwimolphan, Laddawan Vajragupta, Somjai Wangsuphachart, Monravee Tumkosit

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Palabras clave
Color Doppler ultrasonography, non-contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, renal artery stenosis