Intraperitoneally Retained Contraceptive Device After Uterine Perforation: A Case Report

1. Ali MM, Park MH, Ngo TD. Levels and determinants of switching following intrauterine device discontinuation in 14 developing countries. Contraception. 2014 Jul;90(1):47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.008 AliMM ParkMH NgoTD Levels and determinants of switching following intrauterine device discontinuation in 14 developing countries Contraception 2014 Jul 90 1 47 53 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.008 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

2. Atileh LIA, Mourad MA, Haj-Yasin D, Shlash L, Kaylani LZ, Fadila N. Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Perforating the Cecum, a Pregnancy Complication? Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019 Apr–Jun;8(2):83–85. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_109_18 AtilehLIA MouradMA Haj-YasinD ShlashL KaylaniLZ FadilaN Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Perforating the Cecum, a Pregnancy Complication? Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2019 Apr–Jun 8 2 83 85 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_109_18 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Asto MRD, Habana MAE. Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Apr–Jun;7(2):56–60. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18 AstoMRD HabanaMAE Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther 2018 Apr–Jun 7 2 56 60 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

4. Bozkurt M, Yumru AE, Coskun EI, Ondes B. Laparoscopic management of a translocated intrauterine device embedded in the gastric serosa. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Oct;61(10):1020–1022. Available at: https://jpma.org.pk/article-details/3027?article_id=3027 BozkurtM YumruAE CoskunEI OndesB Laparoscopic management of a translocated intrauterine device embedded in the gastric serosa J Pak Med Assoc 2011 Oct 61 10 1020 1022 Available at: https://jpma.org.pk/article-details/3027?article_id=3027 Search in Google Scholar

5. Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell DH. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Mar 16;7:19–32. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546 RowlandsS OlotoE HorwellDH Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives Open Access J Contracept 2016 Mar 16 7 19 32 10.2147/OAJC.S85546 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Jul;36(7):335–353. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198107000-00001 ZakinD SternWZ RosenblattR Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string Obstet Gynecol Surv 1981 Jul 36 7 335 353 10.1097/00006254-198107000-00001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D. Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception. 2003 Jan;67(1):53–56. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00417-1 Harrison-WoolrychM AshtonJ CoulterD Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception 2003 Jan 67 1 53 56 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00417-1 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

8. Mathew RP, Sam M, Alexander T, Patel V, Low G. Abdominal and pelvic radiographs of medical devices and materials-part 2: neurologic and genitourinary devices and materials. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 May;26(3):160–167. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.19391 MathewRP SamM AlexanderT PatelV LowG Abdominal and pelvic radiographs of medical devices and materials-part 2: neurologic and genitourinary devices and materials Diagn Interv Radiol 2020 May 26 3 160 167 10.5152/dir.2019.19391 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Sezer SD, Odabaşi AR, Küçük M, Yüksel H. Lost intrauterine contraceptive device inserted 42 years before: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):90–93. Available at: https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/38/1/pii/1630488485079-800055310 SezerSD OdabaşiAR KüçükM YükselH Lost intrauterine contraceptive device inserted 42 years before: a case report Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol 2011 38 1 90 93 Available at: https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/38/1/pii/1630488485079-800055310 Search in Google Scholar

10. Gill RS, Mok D, Hudson M, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S. Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review. Contraception. 2012 Jan;85(1):15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.015 GillRS MokD HudsonM ShiX BirchDW KarmaliS Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review Contraception 2012 Jan 85 1 15 18 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.015 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar