This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Ali MM, Park MH, Ngo TD. Levels and determinants of switching following intrauterine device discontinuation in 14 developing countries. Contraception. 2014 Jul;90(1):47–53. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.008AliMMParkMHNgoTDLevels and determinants of switching following intrauterine device discontinuation in 14 developing countries2014Jul901475310.1016/j.contraception.2014.03.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Atileh LIA, Mourad MA, Haj-Yasin D, Shlash L, Kaylani LZ, Fadila N. Intrauterine Contraceptive Device Perforating the Cecum, a Pregnancy Complication? Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2019 Apr–Jun;8(2):83–85. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_109_18AtilehLIAMouradMAHaj-YasinDShlashLKaylaniLZFadilaNIntrauterine Contraceptive Device Perforating the Cecum, a Pregnancy Complication?2019Apr–Jun82838510.4103/GMIT.GMIT_109_18Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Asto MRD, Habana MAE. Hysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital. Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2018 Apr–Jun;7(2):56–60. doi: 10.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18AstoMRDHabanaMAEHysteroscopic-guided Removal of Retained Intrauterine Device: Experience at an Academic Tertiary Hospital2018Apr–Jun72566010.4103/GMIT.GMIT_11_18Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Bozkurt M, Yumru AE, Coskun EI, Ondes B. Laparoscopic management of a translocated intrauterine device embedded in the gastric serosa. J Pak Med Assoc. 2011 Oct;61(10):1020–1022. Available at: https://jpma.org.pk/article-details/3027?article_id=3027BozkurtMYumruAECoskunEIOndesBLaparoscopic management of a translocated intrauterine device embedded in the gastric serosa2011Oct611010201022Available at: https://jpma.org.pk/article-details/3027?article_id=3027Search in Google Scholar
Rowlands S, Oloto E, Horwell DH. Intrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives. Open Access J Contracept. 2016 Mar 16;7:19–32. doi: 10.2147/OAJC.S85546RowlandsSOlotoEHorwellDHIntrauterine devices and risk of uterine perforation: current perspectives2016Mar167193210.2147/OAJC.S85546Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zakin D, Stern WZ, Rosenblatt R. Complete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1981 Jul;36(7):335–353. doi: 10.1097/00006254-198107000-00001ZakinDSternWZRosenblattRComplete and partial uterine perforation and embedding following insertion of intrauterine devices. I. Classification, complications, mechanism, incidence, and missing string1981Jul36733535310.1097/00006254-198107000-00001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Harrison-Woolrych M, Ashton J, Coulter D. Uterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported? Contraception. 2003 Jan;67(1):53–56. doi: 10.1016/s0010-7824(02)00417-1Harrison-WoolrychMAshtonJCoulterDUterine perforation on intrauterine device insertion: is the incidence higher than previously reported?2003Jan671535610.1016/s0010-7824(02)00417-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mathew RP, Sam M, Alexander T, Patel V, Low G. Abdominal and pelvic radiographs of medical devices and materials-part 2: neurologic and genitourinary devices and materials. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2020 May;26(3):160–167. doi: 10.5152/dir.2019.19391MathewRPSamMAlexanderTPatelVLowGAbdominal and pelvic radiographs of medical devices and materials-part 2: neurologic and genitourinary devices and materials2020May26316016710.5152/dir.2019.19391Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sezer SD, Odabaşi AR, Küçük M, Yüksel H. Lost intrauterine contraceptive device inserted 42 years before: a case report. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2011;38(1):90–93. Available at: https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/38/1/pii/1630488485079-800055310SezerSDOdabaşiARKüçükMYükselHLost intrauterine contraceptive device inserted 42 years before: a case report20113819093Available at: https://www.imrpress.com/journal/CEOG/38/1/pii/1630488485079-800055310Search in Google Scholar
Gill RS, Mok D, Hudson M, Shi X, Birch DW, Karmali S. Laparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review. Contraception. 2012 Jan;85(1):15–18. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.015GillRSMokDHudsonMShiXBirchDWKarmaliSLaparoscopic removal of an intra-abdominal intrauterine device: case and systematic review2012Jan851151810.1016/j.contraception.2011.04.015Open DOISearch in Google Scholar