Cite

Introduction

Bacteria constitute a major proportion of biodiversity in soil ecosystems; they are the main driving force for the conversion and circulation of carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus, and also the prominent participants in biochemical processes of soil organic matter decomposition and humus formation (Fulthorpe et al. 2008; Řeháková et al. 2015; Malard et al. 2019). Bacterial assemblages are essential components of soils in arid ecosystems, especially in remote high-elevation mountains (Margesin et al. 2009; Yuan et al. 2014). While global surveys of microbial diversity and functional activity have already been conducted (Bodelier 2011; Delgado-Baquerizo et al. 2018), the number of Qinghai-Tibet Plateau samples is restricted, and, therefore bacterial data is still lacking in this area, especially in the most high-altitude area (Zhang et al. 2016).

Highland barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) is the fourth most consumed grain worldwide, only ranked after rice, wheat, and maize (Shen et al. 2016; Deng et al. 2020). Highland barley is a hulless barley cultivar and used as the main staple food for the Tibetan people widely grown in Qinghai-Tibet Plateau in China (He et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2019). Extreme environments such as cold and hypoxia in Tibet have promoted the unique ecological environment and soil bacterial composition (Zhang et al. 2007; 2010a). However, the extreme environments also have led to the decline of soil bacterial activity and the impoverishment of soil for growing highland barley (Yu et al. 2009; Zhao et al. 2014). The research of soil bacteria in the highland barley planting field has important significance for highland barley yield increase, pest control, and soil quality improvement (Bailly and Weisskopf 2012). At present, there were few studies on bacteria in the soil of the highland barley-planting field (Liu et al. 2019). Significantly, the culturable bacteria isolated from highland barley cultivation soil have not been reported systematically.

The Qamdo region’s temperature is between 20°C and 28°C from June to September, a significant growth period for highland barley. While the temperature is below 10°C from November to March, no crops were planted on the land during this period. So the culturable bacteria were isolated from a high-altitude highland barley cultivation soil collected in Qamdo using 15 media at 4°C and 25°C to simulate the temperature conditions over these two periods in this study. The composition of bacterial communities was characterized based on the 16S rRNA gene (Furlong et al. 2002; Li et al. 2019). Our aims were: (1) to reveal the diversity of culturable bacteria isolated from highland barley cultivation soil in the high-altitude area; and (2) to study the effect of different culture temperatures on the species of culturable bacteria in highland barley cultivation soil.

Experimental
Materials and Methods

Study site and samples collection. The sampling site was located in the Zhu Village, Banbar County, Qamdo, Tibet Autonomous Region (30°55’48.9’N, 94°58’13.4’E, Altitude: 4,011 m); the sampling site is the typical high-altitude patches farmland in Qamdo, which is about one-third of Qamdo’s farmland. The sample site belongs to the plateau temperate subhumid climate type, the air temperature range is –40–29°C, the annual average air temperature is –1°C, and the yearly frozen period is from September to April. The soil type was sandy loam, and the pH value is 7.6. The previous crop was highland barley, and the yield is about 1,000–1,800 kg/hm2 in this area. A highland barley cultivation soil sample was collected from a depth of 5–15 cm using the five-point method and kept in sterilized paper bags in April 2018. Once retrieved, the soil sample was immediately stored at 4°C, and bacteria were isolated in the laboratory in Lhasa in May and June 2018.

Isolation and maintenance of bacteria. The bacteria in highland barley cultivation soil sample were isolated using X1, R, L1, ISP2, GW1, DSM372, F1, F2, M1, M5, M6, M7, M8, HV, and GS media, as shown in Table I. Gram-negative bacteria and Actinobacteria were isolated by using the dilution plating technique as described by Kuklinsky-Sobral et al. (2004) and Zhang et al. (2016), respectively, with some modifications. 0.2 ml of 10–2, 10–3, and 10–4 soil suspensions were spread onto F1, F2, M1, M5, M6, M7, M8, HV, and GS media to isolate Actinobacteria. While, 0.2 ml of 10–4, 10–5, and 10–6 soil suspension was spread onto X1, R, L1, ISP2, GW1, and DSM372 media to isolate Gram-negative bacteria. Two sets of plates were incubated at 4°C and 25°C, respectively; the bacterial strains were obtained across 3–60 days. The pure culture isolates were preserved in glycerol suspensions (20%, v/v) at –80°C for further research.

Isolation media.

MediaComposition
X1peptone 2.0 g, yeast extract 0.5 g, FePO4 · 4H2O 0.1 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, CaCO3 0.2 g, NaCl 0.5 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.0
Rpeptone 10.0 g, yeast extract 5.0 g, maltose extract 5.0 g, casein amino acid 5.0 g, beef extract 2.0 g, glycerol 2.0 g, Tween-80 50.0 mg, MgSO4 · 7H2O 1.0 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.6
L1NaCl 100.0 g, K2HPO4 5.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 7.5 g, hydrolyzed casein 1.0 g, yeast extract 5.0 g, Na3C6H5O7 · 2H2O 3.0 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.1 g, MnCl2 · 4H2O 0.1 g, ZnSO4 · 7H2O 0.1 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.0-8.0
ISP2NaCl 100.0 g, dextrose 4.0 g, yeast extract 4.0 g, maltose extract 10.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, CaCO3 2.0 g, FeSO4 10 mg, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.0-8.0
GW1NaCl 100.0 g, casein 0.3 g, mannitol 1.0 g, NaHCO3 2.0 g, CaCO3 0.2 g, (NH4)2SO4 2.0 g, KNO3 2.0 g, K2HPO41.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 2.0 g, FeSO4 10.0 mg, Trace-salt 10.0 mg/l, Agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH natural
DSM372NaCl 100.0 g, hydrolyzed casein 5.0 g, yeast extract 5.0 g, Na3C6H5O7 · 2H2O 3.0 g, Na2CO3 · 10H2O 8.0 g, NaC5H8NO4 1.0 g, KCl 2.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 2.0 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH natural
F1glycerol 5.0 g, alanine 3.0 g, arginine 1.0 g, (NH4)2SO4 2.64 g, KH2PO4 2.38 g, K2HPO4 5.65 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 1.0 g, CuSO4 · 5H20 0.0064 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.0011 g, MnCl2 · 4H2O 0.0079 g, ZnSO4 · 7H2O 0.0015 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
F2MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, CaCO3 0.2 g, FeSO4 10.0 mg, NaCl 0.5 g, MnCl2 · 4H2O 1.4 g, Na2MoO4 · 2H2O 0.39 g, Co(NO3)2 · 6H2O 0.025 g, ZnSO3 · 7H2O 0.222 g, NaHCO3 2.0 g, NaH2PO4 · 2H2O 0.05 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH natural (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
M1soluble starch 10.0 g, casein 0.3 g, KNO3 2.0 g, K2HPO4 2.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.05 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
M5yeast extract 4.0 g, soluble starch 15.0 g, K2HPO4 1.0g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.6 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
M6raffinose 10.0 g, L-histidine 1.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
M7L-aspartic acid 0.1 g, peptone 2.0 g, sodium propionate 4.0 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
M8glycerine 6.0 ml, arginine 1.0 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
HVhumic acid 1.0g, Na2HPO4 0.5 g, KCl 1.7 g, MgSO4 0.5 g, FeSO4 0.01 g, CaCO3 0.02 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.2-7.4 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)
GSsoluble starch 20.0 g, NaCl 0.5 g, KNO3 1.0 g, K2HPO4 · 3H2O 0.5 g, MgSO4 · 7H2O 0.5 g, FeSO4 · 7H2O 0.01 g, agar 18.0 g, ddwater 1,000 ml, pH 7.4-7.6 (add 25 μg/ml nalidixic acid and 100 μg/ml nystatin)

PCR amplification and sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene. According to the manufacturer’s protocol, the genomic DNA of bacteria was extracted using a bacterial genomic DNA FastPrep Extraction Kit (TIAN-GEN DP302). Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification of the partial 16S rRNA gene was performed using the universal primers 27F (5’-AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3’) and 1492R (5’-GGTTACCTTGTTACGAC TT-3’), PCR was performed using the extracted highly purified genomic DNA as a template under the following conditions: 95°C for 10 min, followed by 94°C for 45 s, 55°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 90 s for 30 cycles with a final 10 min extension at 72°C. The PCR products were detected by agarose gel electrophoresis and then sent to GENEWIZ.lnc for the 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The phylogenetic status of the species was determined by a reaction of 700–750 bp (V1-V4) using the universal primers 27F, if the similarity was less than 98.65% (Kim et al. 2014), then the phylogenetic status of the species was further analyzed by nearly full-length 16S rRNA gene (1,300–1,400 bp).

Phylogenetic analysis. Similarity searches of the 16S rRNA gene sequences were performed in the NCBI and EzBiocloud database for BLAST, then the 16S rRNA gene sequences with the highest homology were obtained for phylogenetic analysis. The sequence alignments were performed using Clustal X, the phylogenetic trees were constructed from evolutionary distances using the neighbor-joining method with a bootstrap of 1,000 repetitions, and the phylogenetic analysis was conducted using the MEGA 7 software (Kumar et al. 2016b).

Nucleotide sequence accession numbers. The full and partial 16S rRNA gene sequences of the strains were submitted to the NCBI GenBank database under the accession numbers (MT611248-MT611324).

Results

The isolated strains. Bacterial populations were successfully isolated from the highland barley cultivation soil sample using fifteen kinds of media, a total of 830 individual strains were obtained at different culture temperatures (4°C and 25°C) (Fig. 1A). Eighty-three and 747 strains of bacteria were isolated from these media at 4°C and 25°C, respectively. The results showed that X1, R, F1, M1, M5, M8, and GS culture media had a better effect on isolating bacteria at 25°C; however, X1, R, and M5 culture media had a better effect on isolating bacteria at 4°C, none of the bacteria was isolated from the F2, M7, HV, and GS media at 4°C.

Fig. 1.

The number and diversity of bacteria.

A) The numbers of bacteria isolated from different media at 4° and 25°. B) Diversity of bacteria isolated from different culture media. C) Diversity of bacteria isolated from different temperature. D) The numbers of dominant species isolated from 4° and 25°.

Phylogenetic analysis of culturable strains by the 16S rRNA gene sequence. According to the morphological characteristics of bacteria, 330 strains were screened for the 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis using the universal primers 27F/1492R, and 98.65% of the 16S rRNA gene sequences were used as the species boundary of prokaryotes. After combining more than 98.65% of the 16S rRNA gene sequences with the same species, the sequences of 77 species were obtained, which belonged to 42 genera and four phyla (Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, and Bacteroidetes), as shown in Table II. Phylogenetic tree based on the 16S rRNA gene sequences of representative bacteria strains were shown (Fig. 2).

Genera distributed in each of the four phyla.

ActinobacteriaProteobacteriaFirmicutesBacteroidetes
ActinoplanesMicrococcusKaistiaBacillusHymenobacter
AeromicrobiumMicromonosporaLuteimonasExiguobacterium
AgromycesNocardiaNeorhizobiumMacrococcus
ArthrobacterNocardioidesPararhizobiumPaenibacillus
DietziaPaenarthrobacterPhyllobacteriumPeribacillus
GlycomycesPromicromonosporaPseudomonasStaphylococcus
GordoniaPseudarthrobacterPseudoxanthomonas
KocuriaRhodococcusSkermanella
KribbellaStreptomycesSphingopyxis
KytococcusTerrabacterVariovorax
LeifsoniaUmezawaea
LongisporaYinghuangia
Microbacterium

Fig. 2.

Phylogenetic tree based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of soil isolates and related species.

There were 53 species and 25 genera in Actinobacteria, accounting for 68.82% of the species’ total number. The predominant genus was Streptomyces (22.08%, 17 species), followed by Micromonospora (5.19%, four species), Microbacterium (5.19%, four species), and Kribbella (3.90%, three species). Some rare Actinobacteria were also isolated, for example, Leifsonia, Longispora, Nocardia, Nocardioides, Terrabacter, Umezawaea, and Kribbella. There were 12 species and ten genera in Proteobacteria, accounting for 15.59% of the total number of species, but no dominant genus was found in Proteobacteria. There were 11 species and six genera in Firmicutes, accounting for 14.29% of the total number of species; the predominant genus was Bacillus (6.49%, five species). Only one species was found in Bacteroidetes, classified as Hymenobacter (1.30%, one species) (Table III).

BLAST results based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of 77 bacterial species.

Strain numberName of strain having the highest 16S rRNA gene similarityThe highest similarity (%)
T74*Actinoplanes digitatis IFO 12512      98.82
T203Aeromicrobium ginsengisoli Gsoil 098      99.82
T96*Agromyces binzhouensis OAct353      98.62
T229*Agromyces humatus CD5      98.74
T805Arthrobacter crystallopoietes DSM 20117      99.85
T763Arthrobacter humicola KV-653100
T65Bacillus siamensis KCTC 13613100
T94Bacillus cereus ATCC 14579100
T228*Bacillus drentensis LMG 21831      99.34
T59Bacillus pumilus ATCC 7061100
T115Bacillus selenatarsenatis SF-1    99.6
T822Dietzia kunjamensis subsp DSM 44907      99.86
T230Exiguobacterium mexicanum 8NT100
T183*Glycomyces algeriensis NRRL B-16327      98.9
T64Gordonia otitidis NBRC 100426100
T830*Hymenobacter humi DG31A      98.60
T769*Kaistia defluvii B6-12      99.72
T144Kocuria sediminis FCS-11      99.43
T145Kribbella albertanoniae BC640100
T214*Kribbella catacumbae DSM 19601    99.6
T422Kribbella karoonensis Q41      99.87
T823Kytococcus schroeteri DSM 13884      99.73
T781Leifsonia flava SYP-B2174      99.73
T146Longispora urticae NEAU-PCY-3      99.88
T181*Luteimonas composti CC-YY255    98.9
T156Macrococcus canis KM 45013      99.86
T489Microbacterium maritypicum DSM 12512      99.55
T773Microbacterium natoriense TNJL143-2      99.87
T804Microbacterium phyllosphaerae DSM 13468      99.73
T133Microbacterium thalassium IFO 16060      98.93
T226Micrococcus luteus NCTC 2665      99.63
T47Micromonospora cremea DSM 45599      99.87
T206Micromonospora luteifusca GUI2      99.87
T197*Micromonospora palomenae NEAU-CX1      98.74
T92Micromonospora saelicesensis Lupac 09100
T786*Neorhizobium vignae CCBAU 05176      98.70
T62Nocardia salmonicida subsp R89      99.47
T105*Nocardioides caeni MN8      98.01
T218Paenibacillus odorifer DSM 15391      99.63
T608Paenarthrobacter aurescens NBRC 12136      99.07
T236Paenarthrobacter nitroguajacolicus G2-1100
T808*Pararhizobium herbae CCBAU 83011      98.79
T209Peribacillus simplex NBRC 15720100
T811Phyllobacterium ifriqiyense STM 370100
T274*Phyllobacterium zundukense Tri-48      98.57
T63Promicromonospora alba 1C-HV12100
T193*Pseudarthrobacter siccitolerans 4J27      99.34
T755Pseudomonas laurylsulfativorans AP3_22      99.73
T776Pseudomonas lini CFBP 5737100
T174*Pseudoxanthomonas sacheonensis BD-c54      99.34
T127*Rhodococcus jostii DSM 44719      99.32
T788Rhodococcus qingshengii JCM 15477100
T185*Skermanella aerolata 5416T-32    98.86
T93Sphingopyxis fribergensis Kp5.2      99.87
T45Staphylococcus caprae ATCC 35538100
T61Staphylococcus cohnii subsp ATCC 49330100
T666Streptomyces albogriseolus NRRL B-1305100
T313Streptomyces atroolivaceus NRRL ISP-5137100
T234Streptomyces bottropensis ATCC 25435      99.87
T130Streptomyces caniferus NBRC 15389      99.87
T235Streptomyces canus DSM 40017      99.73
T690Streptomyces dioscori A217      99.47
T532Streptomyces flavovirens NBRC 3716      99.85
T674*Streptomyces humidus NBRC 12877      98.8
T296Streptomyces hydrogenans NBRC 13475      99.46
T219Streptomyces hypolithicus HSM10      99.46
T426Streptomyces kurssanovii NBRC 13192      99.6
T569Streptomyces lunaelactis MM109      99.2
T348Streptomyces niveus NRRL 2466      99.46
T84Streptomyces phaeoluteigriseus DSM 41896      99.6
T581Streptomyces turgidiscabies ATCC 700248100
T110*Streptomyces xanthochromogenes NRRL B-5410      98.97
T100Streptomyces xanthophaeus NRRL B-5414      99.71
T111*Terrabacter ginsengisoli Gsoil 653      99.19
T160Umezawaea tangerina NRRL B-24463      99.18
T812Variovorax boronicumulans BAM-48      99.47
T134*Yinghuangia seranimata YIM 45720      98.73

– shown that the full length 16S rRNA gene of this bacterium was sequenced

Diversity of culturable strains recovered from different culture media. Among the 330 identified bacteria strains, the number of bacterial isolates recovered from M1 was the largest (21.82%, 72 strains), followed by R (14.55%, 48 strains), M8 (13.64%, 45 strains), X1 (12.73%, 42 strains), M5 (12.73%, 42 strains), GS (10.00%, 33 strains), F1 (4.55%, 15 strains), L1 (1.52%, five strains), F2 (1.52%, five strains), HV (1.52%, five strains), ISPT2 (1.21%, four strains), M6 (1.21%, four strains), M7 (1.21%, four strains), GW1 (1.21%, four strains), and DSM372 (0.61%, two strains). The number of bacteria isolated from M1, M8, and GS was larger, while the main genus was only Streptomyces. The R, X1, and M5 yielded higher genera diversity (21 genera, 20 genera, and 17 genera, respectively). Meanwhile, media R, X1, and M5 were more useful than other media for isolation of rare genera of bacteria, such as Nocardioides, Leifsonia, Terrabacte, Umezawaea, Variovorax, Neorhizobium, and Pararhizobium (Fig. 1B). Here, we presumed that single-nutrition was the main reason, especially when non-monosaccharide was used as the carbon source (Zhang et al. 2010b; Kurm et al. 2019). This study demonstrated that it is necessary to use various isolation media types to increase the number and diversity of bacteria from highland barley cultivation soil samples.

Diversity of culturable strains at different temperature. There were 62 species and 33 genera bacteria isolated at 25°C, accounting for 80.52% of the species’ total number. The predominant genus was Streptomyces (22.08%, 17 species), followed by Bacillus (6.49%, five species), Micromonospora (5.19%, four species), Kribbella (3.90%, three species), and Paenarthrobacter (3.90%, three species). There were 23 species and 18 genera bacteria isolated at 4°C, accounting for 29.87% of the total species, but no dominant genus was found. Meanwhile, only eight species and six genera of bacteria could be isolated at 25°C and 4°C (Fig. 1C). Most common bacteria could be isolated at 25°C, but some rare bacteria could be isolated at 4°C without the inhibitory effect of dominant species, promoting the diversity of bacteria (Margesin 2012; Collins and Margesin 2019). The numbers of dominant species mainly isolated at 4°C were Arthrobacter humicola (7.25%, 24 strains), while the numbers of dominant species mainly isolated at 25°C were Streptomyces flavovirens (8.19%, 27 strains), Streptomyces xanthophaeus (7.58%, 25 strains), Streptomyces canus (6.36%, 21 strains), and Bacillus siamensis (4.24%, 14 strains) (Fig. 1D). The species of culturable bacteria and the numbers of dominant species were significantly different at 4°C and 25°C in this study.

Potential new species information. Among the 77 species, four bacterial strains exhibited low 16S rRNA gene sequence similarities (< 98.65 %) with validly described species based on the results of the BLAST search in EzBiocloud (Table IV), which indicated that these isolates could represent novel taxa. Neorhizobium gen. nov. was a new genus of rhizobia established by Mousavi et al. (2014); so far, only five species had been published. The T786 strain had 98.70%, 98.47%, 98.24%, 98.16%, 97.79%, and 96.55% sequence similarity with Neorhizobium vignae CCBAU 05176T (GU128881), Neorhizobium alkalisoli CCBAU01393T (EU074168), Neorhizobium tomejilense T17_20T (PVBG01000052), Neorhizobium huautlense S02T (AF025852), Neorhizobium galegae ATCC43677T(D11343), and Neorhizobium lilium 24NRT (MK386721), respectively (Fig. 3). Further data analysis suggested that the dDDH and ANI values between strain T786 and N. vignae CCBAU 05176T, N. alkalisoli CCBAU 01393T, N. tomejilense T17_20T, N. huautlense S02T, and N. galegae ATCC 43677T were 20.20–20.50% and 76.64–80.01%, respectively, which were lower than the threshold values of 70% and 95–96% for species discrimination (unpublished). Pararhizobium gen. nov. was a new genus of rhizobia also established by Mousavi et al. (2015); so far, only seven species had been published. The T808 strain had high similarity with Pararhizobium herbae CCBAU83011T (GU565534) (98.79%), Pararhizobium polonicum F5.1T (LGLV01000030) (98.65%), and Pararhizobium giardinii H152T (ARBG01000149) (98.50%). The 16S rRNA sequence of strain T808 had about 40 more bases in the V1-V2 region than the seven validly published species of Pararhizobium, while the NCBI database showed that T808 had 98.54–99.15% similarity with Uncultured bacterium clone barrow_ FF_26 (JX668750.1), Rhizobium sp.Ia8 (KF444807), and Rhizobiaceae bacterium strain FW305-C-27(MN067584), all of which were uncultured bacteria without lacking the 40 bases in V1-V2 region (Fig. 4). Based on the above analysis, T808 might be a potentially new species of Pararhizobium. Neorhizobium and Pararhizobium were important non-symbiotic species of rhizobia with poor nodulation or nitrogen fixation genes, which have the important microbial niche value (Shen et al. 2018; Soenens et al. 2019).

The sequence analyses based on almost full-length of the 16S rRNA gene of six potential new species.

Strain numberName of strain having the highest 16S rRNA gene similaritySeparation mediumThe highest similarity (%)Separation temperature (°C)
T96Agromyces binzhouensis OAct353T98.62M525
T105Nocardioides caeni MN8T98.01M525
T274Phyllobacterium zundukense Tri-48T98.57M825
T786Neorhizobium vignae CCBAU 05176T98.70R4
T808Pararhizobium herbae CCBAU 83011T98.79M54
T830Hymenobacter humi DG31AT98.60F14

Fig. 3.

Phylogenetic tree based on the16S rRNA gene sequences of new candidates and related species.

Fig. 4.

The Clustal X analysis of strain T808.

Three potential new species were isolated from media M5, and one species was isolated from media M8, R, and F1, respectively. Half of six potential new species were cultured at 4°C, while others were cultured at 25°C. The culture medium and temperature have a significant influence on the separation of new species. All six potential new species will be further identified with a polyphasic approach (including chemotaxonomic properties, DNA-DNA hybridization analysis) to determine their taxonomic positions.

Discussion

Together with the incubation of the highland barley cultivation soil sample using fifteen kinds of media at 25°C and 4°C, a total of 830 individual strains were purified. The 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis results are consistent with a previous report, in which Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes were found to be dominant phyla in the arctic-alpine area, especially in the Qinghai-Tibet plateau (Jiang et al. 2006; Kumar et al. 2016a; Tang et al. 2016). The predominant genus was Streptomyces, followed by Bacillus, Micromonospora, and Microbacterium. The most diverse isolates belonged to high the G+C Gram-positive group; in particular, the Streptomyces genus is a dominant genus in the high G+C Gram-positive group. The bacteria in arctic-alpine areas are mainly the spore producing, stress-resistant, and thick cell walls microorganisms (Zhang et al. 2010b; Rao et al. 2016).

The Actinobacteria are widely dispersed throughout the highland barley cultivation soil, while few studies are on it. The bacteria in highland barley cultivation soil in Lhasa analyzed by high-throughput sequencing technology showed that the main actinomycetes were Gaiiella, Arthrobacter, and Nocardioides (Liu et al. 2020), which was quite different from our study using the culturable technique. In other previous reports, the main genus in the highland barley cultivation soil was Streptomyces, Arthrobacter,and Nocardioides.Most Actinomycetes had a wide spectrum of inhibitory activity against pathogenic bacteria, highly IAA production, and phosphate solubilization, which were in similarity with our study (Qi et al. 2017; Yin et al. 2017; Gao et al. 2019). As the most well-known genus in Actinobacteria, Streptomyces contains 960 species (http://www.bacterio.net/streptomyces) and 4227 genome assemblies available (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genome/streptomyces) at the time of writing. Members of the genus Streptomyces are well known as the primary sources of antibiotics with diverse biological activities and chemical structures (Jones and Elliot 2017; Li et al. 2018). In this study, 17 species of Streptomyces were found in the highland barley cultivation soil, the larger numbers of dominant species of Streptomyces were Streptomyces flavovirens, Streptomyces xanthophaeus and Streptomyces canus, which were mainly isolated at 25°C. The Qamdo region’s temperature is between 20°C and 28°C from June to September, which is also a critical growth period for highland barley. We believe that these Streptomyces that can produce many biological activities have an essential role in the growth of highland barley in this period. The other dominant isolates in highland barley cultivation soil were Arthrobacter humicola and Bacillus siamensis, which are important plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (Bai et al. 2015).

Meanwhile, Arthrobacter humicola was mainly isolated at 4°C, producing cold lipase and biopolymeric flocculant (Agunbiade et al. 2017). The low-temperature adaptation and ecological function of A. humicola in highland barley cultivation soil need to be studied in-depth. Some rare Actinobacteria were also isolated from the soil sample, for example, Leifsonia, Longispora, Nocardia, Nocardioides, Terrabacter, Umezawaea, and Kribbella. Rare Actinobacteria are also important sources in discovering novel antibiotics and have been seldom studied (Cai et al. 2018; Bundale et al. 2019).

In summary, this study has demonstrated a rich diversity of bacteria (especially Actinobacteria) and some undiscovered bacteria species in the highland barley cultivation soil of Qinghai-Tibet plateau it suggests that these strains might represent a valuable source of new taxa for further microbial development and utilization. Additionally, this study indicates that cultivating Actinobacteria in highland barley cultivation soil of Qinghai-Tibet plateau could be interesting for further study.

eISSN:
2544-4646
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Life Sciences, Microbiology and Virology