This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Lisa O’ Carroll, ‘UK government finds extra 1,400 laws to scrap under Rees-Mogg’s Brexit bill’ (The Guardian, 8 November 2022) <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/08/government-finds-extra-1400-laws-scrap-rees-mogg-brexit-bill>O’ CarrollLisaThe Guardian8November2022<https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/08/government-finds-extra-1400-laws-scrap-rees-mogg-brexit-bill>Search in Google Scholar
Petra Bárd, ‘An Analysis of the CJEU decision C-564/19 IS,’ (Verfblog, 26 November 2021) <https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sanctity-of-preliminary-references/>BárdPetraVerfblog26November2021<https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sanctity-of-preliminary-references/>Search in Google Scholar
Ágoston Mohay, Á and István Szijártó, ‘Criminal procedures, preliminary references and judicial independence: A balancing act? Case C-564/19 IS.’ (2022) 29 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 629–640Ágoston MohayÁSzijártóIstván‘Criminal procedures, preliminary references and judicial independence: A balancing act? Case C-564/19 IS.’202229629640Search in Google Scholar
Vivien Judith Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth, DBE, 1966 and All That: Changing Our Minds in a Post-Brexit World. at King’s College London, 23 May 2022 < https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/ukael-lady-rose-speech-23-May-2022.pdf>RoseVivien Judith23May2022< https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/ukael-lady-rose-speech-23-May-2022.pdf>Search in Google Scholar
Natalia Dřínovská and Zuzana Vikarská. Evropská zletilost českých (nejvyšších) soudů aneb prvních 18 let předběžných otázek z Brna. (2023) 31 Časopis pro pravní vědu a praxi 9–45.DřínovskáNataliaVikarskáZuzanaEvropská zletilost českých (nejvyšších) soudů aneb prvních 18 let předběžných otázek z Brna202331945Search in Google Scholar
‘European public opinion three decades after the fall of Communism’ (Pew Research Center, 14 October 2019), <https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/the-european-union/Pew Research Center14October2019<https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/the-european-union/Search in Google Scholar
Kathrin Yaromich, ‘Czechs and the EU: Does a ‘Czexit’ still have supporters?’ (expats.cz, 2 May 2022) <https://www.expats.cz/czech-news/article/has-putin-brought-czechs-closer-to-eu-or-is-czexit-still-on-the-tableYaromichKathrinexpats.cz2May2022<https://www.expats.cz/czech-news/article/has-putin-brought-czechs-closer-to-eu-or-is-czexit-still-on-the-tableSearch in Google Scholar
Jon Henley, ‘Support for leaving EU has fallen significantly across bloc since Brexit,’ (The Guardian, 12 January 2023), <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/12/support-for-leaving-eu-has-fallen-significantly-across-bloc-since-brexit>HenleyJonThe Guardian12January2023<https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/12/support-for-leaving-eu-has-fallen-significantly-across-bloc-since-brexit>Search in Google Scholar
Eleanor Longman-Rood, ‘How Brexit made the EU stronger’ (The New European, 13 January 2023) <https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/how-brexit-made-the-eu-stronger/>Longman-RoodEleanorThe New European13January2023<https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/how-brexit-made-the-eu-stronger/>Search in Google Scholar
Alan Dashwood, ‘From Van Duyn to Mangold via Marshall: Reducing Direct Effect to Absurdity?’ (2007) 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 81DashwoodAlan‘From Van Duyn to Mangold via Marshall: Reducing Direct Effect to Absurdity?’2007981Search in Google Scholar
Ceil Chenoy, ‘Horizontal Direct Effect of Directives’ (April 21, 2015) <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2597191ChenoyCeilApril212015<http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2597191Search in Google Scholar
Jasper Krommendijk, ‘The interaction: dialogue or monologue?’ In National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice [Edward Elgar Publishing 2021] 111KrommendijkJasper‘The interaction: dialogue or monologue?’InEdward Elgar Publishing2021111Search in Google Scholar
Paul Craig, Gráinne de Búrca, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [UK version, 7th edn, OUP Oxford 2020] 516CraigPaulde BúrcaGráinneUK version,7th ednOUPOxford2020516Search in Google Scholar
Jasper Krommendijk, ‘Wide open and unguarded stand our gates: The CJEU and references for a preliminary ruling in purely internal situations,’ 18 German Law Journal (2017) 1359KrommendijkJasper‘Wide open and unguarded stand our gates: The CJEU and references for a preliminary ruling in purely internal situations,’1820171359Search in Google Scholar
Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm, ‘Serving Two Masters: CJEU Case Law in Swedish First Instance Courts and National Courts of Precedence As Gatekeepers’ In: Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm (eds.), The Court of Justice of the European Union: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Hart Publishing Ltds Swedish Studies in European Law 2018), 79–99DerlénMattiasLindholmJohan‘Serving Two Masters: CJEU Case Law in Swedish First Instance Courts and National Courts of Precedence As Gatekeepers’In:DerlénMattiasLindholmJohan(eds.),Hart Publishing Ltds Swedish Studies in European Law20187999Search in Google Scholar
Joshua C. Fjelstul, J.C., Matthew Gabel, and Clifford J. Carrubba, ‘The timely administration of justice: using computational simulations to evaluate institutional reforms at the CJEU’ [2022] Journal of European Public Policy 21FjelstulJoshua C.J.C.GabelMatthewCarrubbaClifford J.‘The timely administration of justice: using computational simulations to evaluate institutional reforms at the CJEU’202221Search in Google Scholar
Joshua C. Fjelstul, ‘How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law’ (2023) 11 Journal of Law and Courts 141–162FjelstulJoshua C.‘How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law’202311141162Search in Google Scholar
Michal Bobek, ‘The Binding Force of Babel: The Enforcement of EC Law Unpublished in the Languages of the New Member States,’ 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies (2007) 43BobekMichal‘The Binding Force of Babel: The Enforcement of EC Law Unpublished in the Languages of the New Member States,’9200743Search in Google Scholar
Nik de Boer, ‘Interview with Judge Sacha Prechal of the European Court of Justice: Part I: Working at the CJEU’ (European Law Blog, 18 December 2013) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2013/12/18/interview-with-judge-sacha-prechal-of-the-european-court-of-justice-part-i-working-at-the-cjeu/>de BoerNikEuropean Law Blog18December2013<https://europeanlawblog.eu/2013/12/18/interview-with-judge-sacha-prechal-of-the-european-court-of-justice-part-i-working-at-the-cjeu/>Search in Google Scholar
Franz C. Meyer, ‘The Ultra Vires Ruling: Decontructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP decision of 5 May 2020’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review 733MeyerFranz C.‘The Ultra Vires Ruling: Decontructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP decision of 5 May 2020’202016733Search in Google Scholar
Rob Van Gestel and Jurgen De Poorter, ‘Trust and Dialogue’ in In the Court We Trust: Cooperation, Coordination and Collaboration between the ECJ and Supreme Administrative Courts (Cambridge University Press 2019), 145Van GestelRobDe PoorterJurgen‘Trust and Dialogue’inCambridge University Press2019145Search in Google Scholar
Urska Šadl, ‘The Role of Effet Utile in Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the Citation Web of the Pre-Accession Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’ (2015) 8 European Journal of Legal Studies 18ŠadlUrska‘The Role of Effet Utile in Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the Citation Web of the Pre-Accession Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’2015818Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 1982, CILFIT, 283/81, EU:C:1982:335Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 October 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:359Search in Google Scholar
Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 13 March 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:112, para 67Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 October 2012, European Commission v. Czech Republic, C-37/11, EU:C:2012:640Search in Google Scholar
Czech Constitutional Court, II. ÚS 1009/08 of 8 January 2009, on the obligation of the general court to refer a preliminary question to the CJEUSearch in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2005, Mangold, C-144/04, EU:C:2005:709Search in Google Scholar
Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 22 June 2017, Farrell, C-413/15, EU:C:2017:492Search in Google Scholar
Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 15 April 2021, Consorzio Italian Management, C-561/19, EU:C:2021:291Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 January 2023, Regiojet, C-57/21, EU:C:2023:6Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 October 1987, Foto-Frost, 314/85, EU:C:1987:452Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of 13 May 1981, International Chemical Corporation v. Amministrazione delle fianze dello Stato, 66/80, EU:C:1981:102Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1997, Dorsch Consult, C-54/96, EU:C:1997:413Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 May 2022, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2022:341Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2012, Westbahn Management, C136/11, EU:C:2012:740Search in Google Scholar
Order of the Court of Justice of 26 November 1999, ANAS, C-192/98, EU:C:1999:589Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 31 January 2013, Belov, C-394/11, EU:C:2013:48Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 2021, W.Ż., C-487/19, EU:C:2021:798Search in Google Scholar
Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 16 December 2021, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2021:1018Search in Google Scholar
Order of the Court of Justice of 2 May 2022, Správa železnic, C-221/21, EU:C:2022:342Search in Google Scholar
Opinion of the Court of Justice of 18 December 2014, Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH, 2/13, EU:C:2014:2454Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 September 2003, Köbler, C-224/01, EU:C:2003:513Search in Google Scholar
Judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 2015, Léger, C-528/13, EU:C:2015:288Search in Google Scholar