Why Do So Few Preliminary Questions Come From Czechia?

Lisa O’ Carroll, ‘UK government finds extra 1,400 laws to scrap under Rees-Mogg’s Brexit bill’ (The Guardian, 8 November 2022) <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/08/government-finds-extra-1400-laws-scrap-rees-mogg-brexit-bill> O’ CarrollLisa ‘UK government finds extra 1,400 laws to scrap under Rees-Mogg’s Brexit bill’ The Guardian 8 November 2022 <https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2022/nov/08/government-finds-extra-1400-laws-scrap-rees-mogg-brexit-bill> Search in Google Scholar

Petra Bárd, ‘An Analysis of the CJEU decision C-564/19 IS,’ (Verfblog, 26 November 2021) <https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sanctity-of-preliminary-references/> BárdPetra ‘An Analysis of the CJEU decision C-564/19 IS,’ Verfblog 26 November 2021 <https://verfassungsblog.de/the-sanctity-of-preliminary-references/> Search in Google Scholar

Ágoston Mohay, Á and István Szijártó, ‘Criminal procedures, preliminary references and judicial independence: A balancing act? Case C-564/19 IS.’ (2022) 29 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 629–640 Ágoston MohayÁ SzijártóIstván ‘Criminal procedures, preliminary references and judicial independence: A balancing act? Case C-564/19 IS.’ 2022 29 Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 629 640 Search in Google Scholar

Vivien Judith Rose, Lady Rose of Colmworth, DBE, 1966 and All That: Changing Our Minds in a Post-Brexit World. at King’s College London, 23 May 2022 < https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/ukael-lady-rose-speech-23-May-2022.pdf> RoseVivien Judith Lady Rose of Colmworth, DBE, 1966 and All That: Changing Our Minds in a Post-Brexit World. at King’s College London 23 May 2022 < https://www.supremecourt.uk/docs/ukael-lady-rose-speech-23-May-2022.pdf> Search in Google Scholar

Natalia Dřínovská and Zuzana Vikarská. Evropská zletilost českých (nejvyšších) soudů aneb prvních 18 let předběžných otázek z Brna. (2023) 31 Časopis pro pravní vědu a praxi 9–45. DřínovskáNatalia VikarskáZuzana Evropská zletilost českých (nejvyšších) soudů aneb prvních 18 let předběžných otázek z Brna 2023 31 Časopis pro pravní vědu a praxi 9 45 Search in Google Scholar

‘European public opinion three decades after the fall of Communism’ (Pew Research Center, 14 October 2019), <https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/the-european-union/ ‘European public opinion three decades after the fall of Communism’ Pew Research Center 14 October 2019 <https://www.pewresearch.org/global/2019/10/14/the-european-union/ Search in Google Scholar

Kathrin Yaromich, ‘Czechs and the EU: Does a ‘Czexit’ still have supporters?’ (expats.cz, 2 May 2022) <https://www.expats.cz/czech-news/article/has-putin-brought-czechs-closer-to-eu-or-is-czexit-still-on-the-table YaromichKathrin ‘Czechs and the EU: Does a ‘Czexit’ still have supporters?’ expats.cz 2 May 2022 <https://www.expats.cz/czech-news/article/has-putin-brought-czechs-closer-to-eu-or-is-czexit-still-on-the-table Search in Google Scholar

Jon Henley, ‘Support for leaving EU has fallen significantly across bloc since Brexit,’ (The Guardian, 12 January 2023), <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/12/support-for-leaving-eu-has-fallen-significantly-across-bloc-since-brexit> HenleyJon ‘Support for leaving EU has fallen significantly across bloc since Brexit,’ The Guardian 12 January 2023 <https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jan/12/support-for-leaving-eu-has-fallen-significantly-across-bloc-since-brexit> Search in Google Scholar

Eleanor Longman-Rood, ‘How Brexit made the EU stronger’ (The New European, 13 January 2023) <https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/how-brexit-made-the-eu-stronger/> Longman-RoodEleanor ‘How Brexit made the EU stronger’ The New European 13 January 2023 <https://www.theneweuropean.co.uk/how-brexit-made-the-eu-stronger/> Search in Google Scholar

Alan Dashwood, ‘From Van Duyn to Mangold via Marshall: Reducing Direct Effect to Absurdity?’ (2007) 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 81 DashwoodAlan ‘From Van Duyn to Mangold via Marshall: Reducing Direct Effect to Absurdity?’ 2007 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 81 Search in Google Scholar

Ceil Chenoy, ‘Horizontal Direct Effect of Directives’ (April 21, 2015) <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2597191 ChenoyCeil ‘Horizontal Direct Effect of Directives’ April 21 2015 <http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2597191 Search in Google Scholar

Jasper Krommendijk, ‘The interaction: dialogue or monologue?’ In National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice [Edward Elgar Publishing 2021] 111 KrommendijkJasper ‘The interaction: dialogue or monologue?’ In National Courts and Preliminary References to the Court of Justice Edward Elgar Publishing 2021 111 Search in Google Scholar

Paul Craig, Gráinne de Búrca, EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials. [UK version, 7^th edn, OUP Oxford 2020] 516 CraigPaul de BúrcaGráinne EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials UK version, 7th edn OUP Oxford 2020 516 Search in Google Scholar

Jasper Krommendijk, ‘Wide open and unguarded stand our gates: The CJEU and references for a preliminary ruling in purely internal situations,’ 18 German Law Journal (2017) 1359 KrommendijkJasper ‘Wide open and unguarded stand our gates: The CJEU and references for a preliminary ruling in purely internal situations,’ 18 German Law Journal 2017 1359 Search in Google Scholar

Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm, ‘Serving Two Masters: CJEU Case Law in Swedish First Instance Courts and National Courts of Precedence As Gatekeepers’ In: Mattias Derlén and Johan Lindholm (eds.), The Court of Justice of the European Union: Multidisciplinary Perspectives (Hart Publishing Ltds Swedish Studies in European Law 2018), 79–99 DerlénMattias LindholmJohan ‘Serving Two Masters: CJEU Case Law in Swedish First Instance Courts and National Courts of Precedence As Gatekeepers’ In: DerlénMattias LindholmJohan (eds.), The Court of Justice of the European Union: Multidisciplinary Perspectives Hart Publishing Ltds Swedish Studies in European Law 2018 79 99 Search in Google Scholar

Joshua C. Fjelstul, J.C., Matthew Gabel, and Clifford J. Carrubba, ‘The timely administration of justice: using computational simulations to evaluate institutional reforms at the CJEU’ [2022] Journal of European Public Policy 21 FjelstulJoshua C. J.C. GabelMatthew CarrubbaClifford J. ‘The timely administration of justice: using computational simulations to evaluate institutional reforms at the CJEU’ 2022 Journal of European Public Policy 21 Search in Google Scholar

Joshua C. Fjelstul, ‘How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law’ (2023) 11 Journal of Law and Courts 141–162 FjelstulJoshua C. ‘How the Chamber System at the CJEU Undermines the Consistency of the Court’s Application of EU Law’ 2023 11 Journal of Law and Courts 141 162 Search in Google Scholar

Michal Bobek, ‘The Binding Force of Babel: The Enforcement of EC Law Unpublished in the Languages of the New Member States,’ 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies (2007) 43 BobekMichal ‘The Binding Force of Babel: The Enforcement of EC Law Unpublished in the Languages of the New Member States,’ 9 The Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 2007 43 Search in Google Scholar

Nik de Boer, ‘Interview with Judge Sacha Prechal of the European Court of Justice: Part I: Working at the CJEU’ (European Law Blog, 18 December 2013) <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2013/12/18/interview-with-judge-sacha-prechal-of-the-european-court-of-justice-part-i-working-at-the-cjeu/> de BoerNik ‘Interview with Judge Sacha Prechal of the European Court of Justice: Part I: Working at the CJEU’ European Law Blog 18 December 2013 <https://europeanlawblog.eu/2013/12/18/interview-with-judge-sacha-prechal-of-the-european-court-of-justice-part-i-working-at-the-cjeu/> Search in Google Scholar

Franz C. Meyer, ‘The Ultra Vires Ruling: Decontructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP decision of 5 May 2020’ (2020) 16 European Constitutional Law Review 733 MeyerFranz C. ‘The Ultra Vires Ruling: Decontructing the German Federal Constitutional Court’s PSPP decision of 5 May 2020’ 2020 16 European Constitutional Law Review 733 Search in Google Scholar

Rob Van Gestel and Jurgen De Poorter, ‘Trust and Dialogue’ in In the Court We Trust: Cooperation, Coordination and Collaboration between the ECJ and Supreme Administrative Courts (Cambridge University Press 2019), 145 Van GestelRob De PoorterJurgen ‘Trust and Dialogue’ in In the Court We Trust: Cooperation, Coordination and Collaboration between the ECJ and Supreme Administrative Courts Cambridge University Press 2019 145 Search in Google Scholar

Urska Šadl, ‘The Role of Effet Utile in Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the Citation Web of the Pre-Accession Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’ (2015) 8 European Journal of Legal Studies 18 ŠadlUrska ‘The Role of Effet Utile in Preserving the Continuity and Authority of European Union Law: Evidence from the Citation Web of the Pre-Accession Case Law of the Court of Justice of the EU’ 2015 8 European Journal of Legal Studies 18 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 1982, CILFIT, 283/81, EU:C:1982:335 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 1982, CILFIT, 283/81, EU:C:1982:335 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 October 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:359 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 October 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:359 Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 13 March 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:112, para 67 Opinion of Advocate General Jacobs delivered on 13 March 1990, Café Hag, C-10/89, EU:C:1990:112, para 67 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 October 2012, European Commission v. Czech Republic, C-37/11, EU:C:2012:640 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 18 October 2012, European Commission v. Czech Republic, C-37/11, EU:C:2012:640 Search in Google Scholar

Czech Constitutional Court, II. ÚS 1009/08 of 8 January 2009, on the obligation of the general court to refer a preliminary question to the CJEU Czech Constitutional Court, II. ÚS 1009/08 of 8 January 2009, on the obligation of the general court to refer a preliminary question to the CJEU Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2005, Mangold, C-144/04, EU:C:2005:709 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2005, Mangold, C-144/04, EU:C:2005:709 Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 22 June 2017, Farrell, C-413/15, EU:C:2017:492 Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston delivered on 22 June 2017, Farrell, C-413/15, EU:C:2017:492 Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 15 April 2021, Consorzio Italian Management, C-561/19, EU:C:2021:291 Opinion of Advocate General Bobek delivered on 15 April 2021, Consorzio Italian Management, C-561/19, EU:C:2021:291 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 January 2023, Regiojet, C-57/21, EU:C:2023:6 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 12 January 2023, Regiojet, C-57/21, EU:C:2023:6 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 October 1987, Foto-Frost, 314/85, EU:C:1987:452 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 October 1987, Foto-Frost, 314/85, EU:C:1987:452 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of 13 May 1981, International Chemical Corporation v. Amministrazione delle fianze dello Stato, 66/80, EU:C:1981:102 Judgment of the Court of 13 May 1981, International Chemical Corporation v. Amministrazione delle fianze dello Stato, 66/80, EU:C:1981:102 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1997, Dorsch Consult, C-54/96, EU:C:1997:413 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 17 September 1997, Dorsch Consult, C-54/96, EU:C:1997:413 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 May 2022, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2022:341 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 3 May 2022, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2022:341 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2012, Westbahn Management, C136/11, EU:C:2012:740 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 November 2012, Westbahn Management, C136/11, EU:C:2012:740 Search in Google Scholar

Order of the Court of Justice of 26 November 1999, ANAS, C-192/98, EU:C:1999:589 Order of the Court of Justice of 26 November 1999, ANAS, C-192/98, EU:C:1999:589 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 31 January 2013, Belov, C-394/11, EU:C:2013:48 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 31 January 2013, Belov, C-394/11, EU:C:2013:48 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 2021, W.Ż., C-487/19, EU:C:2021:798 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 6 October 2021, W.Ż., C-487/19, EU:C:2021:798 Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 16 December 2021, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2021:1018 Opinion of Advocate General Campos Sánchez-Bordona delivered on 16 December 2021, CityRail, C-453/20, EU:C:2021:1018 Search in Google Scholar

Order of the Court of Justice of 2 May 2022, Správa železnic, C-221/21, EU:C:2022:342 Order of the Court of Justice of 2 May 2022, Správa železnic, C-221/21, EU:C:2022:342 Search in Google Scholar

Opinion of the Court of Justice of 18 December 2014, Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH, 2/13, EU:C:2014:2454 Opinion of the Court of Justice of 18 December 2014, Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH, 2/13, EU:C:2014:2454 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 September 2003, Köbler, C-224/01, EU:C:2003:513 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 30 September 2003, Köbler, C-224/01, EU:C:2003:513 Search in Google Scholar

Judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 2015, Léger, C-528/13, EU:C:2015:288 Judgment of the Court of Justice of 29 April 2015, Léger, C-528/13, EU:C:2015:288 Search in Google Scholar