[
Croft, W. and D.A. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511803864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deli, Á. 2004. ‘Interpersonality and Textuality in Discourse’ in Eger Journal of English Studies Volume IV. É. Antal and Cs. Czeglédi (eds.). Eger: EKF Líceum Kiadó, pp. 101-114.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herczeg-Deli, Á. 2009a. ‘A Cognitive Pragmatic Review of Natural Discourse’ in Eger Journal of English StudiesVolume IX. É. Antal and Cs. Czeglédi (eds.). Eger: EKF Líceum Kiadó pp. 61-77.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Herczeg-Deli, Á. 2009b. ‘Interactive knowledge in dialogue’ in Kalba ir kontextai III (1) Language in DifferentContexts. Research papers 2009 Volume III (1). E. Račiené et al. (eds). Vilnius: Vilnius Pedagogical University, pp. 103-111.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roach, P. 2009. Phonetics and Phonology. A practical course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 2002a. ‘Relevance Theory’ in UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14, pp. 249-90.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 2002b. ‘Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading’ in Mind and Language 17/1-2, pp. 3-23.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wells, J. C. 2006. English Intonation. An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. New York: The MacMillan Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
