Uvedba 360-Stopinjskega ocenjevanja odnosa in obnašanja specializantov

1. Novak Antolič Ž. Svet Evropske zveze porodničarjev in ginekologov v Budimpešti. ISIS 2009; 18: 81-3.Search in Google Scholar

2. Novak Antolič Ž. Kdaj bomo imeli porodničarji in ginekologi Slovenije krovno nacionalno združenje? Taki smo kot žene alkoholikov. ISIS 2010; 19: 39-41.Search in Google Scholar

3. Cruess R L, Cruess SR. Principles for designing a program for the teaching and learning of professionalism at the undergraduate level. In: Cruess RL, Cruess S, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 73-92.Search in Google Scholar

4. Snell L. Teaching professionalism and fostering professional values during residency: The McGill experience. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 246-62.Search in Google Scholar

5. Mahmood T. Recertification and continuing professional development: the way ahead. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 807-18.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.004Search in Google Scholar

6. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT. et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behaviour in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2673-82.10.1056/NEJMsa052596Search in Google Scholar

7. Vincent C, Young M, Philips A. Why do people sue doctors?: a study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet 1994; 343: 1609-13.10.1016/S0140-6736(94)93062-7Search in Google Scholar

8. Anon. Non technical skills for surgeons. Dostopno na:: http://www. abdn.ac.uk/iprc/ notss.Search in Google Scholar

9. Malling B, Bonderup T, Mortensen L, Ringsted C, Scherpbier A. Effects of multi source feedback on developmental plans for leaders of postgraduate medical education. Med Educ 2009; 43: 159-67.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03259.x19161487Search in Google Scholar

10. Anseel F, Yperen NWV, Janssen O, Duyck W. Feedback type as a moderator of the relationship between achievement goals and feedback reactions. Work 2011; 84: 703-22.Search in Google Scholar

11. Kluger AN, DeNisi AS. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996; 119: 254-84.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254Search in Google Scholar

12. Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teach 2006; 28: e185-91.10.1080/0142159060083428617594544Search in Google Scholar

13. Brečko D. Iskanje potencialov s 360 stopinjsko povratno informacijo. Dostopno na: http://www.planetgv.si/upload/ htmlarea/images/prezentacije/Brecko_Daniela.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

14. Janjetovič Z. Zbornik 6. študentske konference Fakultete za management Koper 18.-20. november 2009. Koper - Celje - Škofja Loka. Koper: 6. študentska konferenca Fakultete za management 2009: 285-93.Search in Google Scholar

15. Welsby P. 360-stopinjska povratna informacija v podjetju Si.Mobil. Dostopno na: http://www.psasdi.com/mktpdf/si0201.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

16. Archer J, Davies H. Clinical management. Where medicine meets management: on reflection. Health Serv J 2004; 114: 26-7.Search in Google Scholar

17. Archer J, McGraw M, Davies H. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme. Arch Dis Child 2010; 95: 330-5.10.1136/adc.2008.14620920457700Search in Google Scholar

18. Davies H, Archer J, Bateman A, Dewar S, Crossley J, Grant J. et al. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1014-20.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03162.x18823521Search in Google Scholar

19. Eva K, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K. et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012; 17: 15-26.10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7327467121468778Search in Google Scholar

20. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physicians competencies. J Cont Educ Health Prof 2003; 23: 4-12.10.1002/chp.134023010312739254Search in Google Scholar

21. Malling B, Mortensen L, Scherpbier A, Ringsted C. Educational climate seems unrelated to leadership skills of clinical consultants responsible of postgraduate medical education in clinical departments. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 62-9.10.1186/1472-6920-10-62295559520858255Search in Google Scholar

22. Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Changes in performance: a 5-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programme. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1007-13.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03127.x18823520Search in Google Scholar

23. Novak Ž, Cerar VM, Rener Primec Z, Dolžan V, Steblovnik L, Hawlina M. Zakaj bi sploh šel na TTT? Vprašaj kolega! - ali izkušnje po ducatu delavnic Učenje učiteljev. Zdrav Vestn 2010; 79: 742-7.Search in Google Scholar

24. Anon. NHS Modernising Medical Careers - MSF (Multi-Source Feedback). Dostopno na: http://www.mmc.nhs.uk/pages/ assessment/msf.Search in Google Scholar

25. Anon. Dodatna navodila za specializacijo porodništva in ginekologije. 2007. Dostopno na: http://www.zdravniskazbornica. si/zs/1073/samostojnost-in-odgovornost-specializanta-pri-delu.Search in Google Scholar

26. Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation. Dostopno na: http://PAREonline.net/getvn. asp?v=7&n=17 2001.Search in Google Scholar

27. Sutton R. Ni prostora za prasce. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga, 2011.Search in Google Scholar

28. Mackillop LH, Crossley J, Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Wade W, Armitage M. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all? Med Teach 2011; 33: e75-83.10.3109/0142159X.2010.53587021275537Search in Google Scholar

29. Deming W. Out of the crisis. MIT, 1982.Search in Google Scholar

30. Overeem K, Lombarts M, Arah O, Klazinga N, Grol R, Wollersheim H. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers’ perspectives. Med Teach 2010; 32: 141-7.10.3109/0142159090314412820163230Search in Google Scholar

31. Mahmood T. Dealing with trainees in difficulty. FVV in ObGyn 2012; 4: 18-23. Dostopno na: http://www.fvvo.be/assets/232/04- Mahmood.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

32. de Bono E. Think! before It’s too late. London: Vermilion, 2009: 258.Search in Google Scholar

33. van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L, Scheele F, Driessen E, Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 703-19.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.00120510653Search in Google Scholar

34. Ramani S. Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Med Teach 2006; 28: 19-23.10.1080/0142159050044178616627316Search in Google Scholar

35. Tušak M, Tušak M. Psihologija športa. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta, 2003.Search in Google Scholar

36. Kesselheim AS, Austad KE. Residents: workers or students in the eyes of the law? N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 697-699.Search in Google Scholar

37. Pendleton D, Wakeford R. Interviews in the selection of partners, trainees and medical students. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 1988; 38: 147-8.Search in Google Scholar

38. Goleman D. Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam books, 1988: 464.Search in Google Scholar

39. Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Role modelling - making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ 2008; 336: 718-21.10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE227630218369229Search in Google Scholar

40. Smith G, Pell J. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systemic review of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 2003; 327: 1459-61.10.1136/bmj.327.7429.145930080814684649Search in Google Scholar