[1. Novak Antolič Ž. Svet Evropske zveze porodničarjev in ginekologov v Budimpešti. ISIS 2009; 18: 81-3.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Novak Antolič Ž. Kdaj bomo imeli porodničarji in ginekologi Slovenije krovno nacionalno združenje? Taki smo kot žene alkoholikov. ISIS 2010; 19: 39-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Cruess R L, Cruess SR. Principles for designing a program for the teaching and learning of professionalism at the undergraduate level. In: Cruess RL, Cruess S, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 73-92.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Snell L. Teaching professionalism and fostering professional values during residency: The McGill experience. In: Cruess RL, Cruess SR, Steinert Y, editors. Teaching medical professionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009: 246-62.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Mahmood T. Recertification and continuing professional development: the way ahead. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 807-18.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.004]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banach MA, Knettler TR, Rattner SL, Stern DT. et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behaviour in medical school. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2673-82.10.1056/NEJMsa052596]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Vincent C, Young M, Philips A. Why do people sue doctors?: a study of patients and relatives taking legal action. Lancet 1994; 343: 1609-13.10.1016/S0140-6736(94)93062-7]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Anon. Non technical skills for surgeons. Dostopno na:: http://www. abdn.ac.uk/iprc/ notss.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Malling B, Bonderup T, Mortensen L, Ringsted C, Scherpbier A. Effects of multi source feedback on developmental plans for leaders of postgraduate medical education. Med Educ 2009; 43: 159-67.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03259.x19161487]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Anseel F, Yperen NWV, Janssen O, Duyck W. Feedback type as a moderator of the relationship between achievement goals and feedback reactions. Work 2011; 84: 703-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Kluger AN, DeNisi AS. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol Bull 1996; 119: 254-84.10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.254]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Wood L, Hassell A, Whitehouse A, Bullock A, Wall D. A literature review of multi-source feedback systems within and without health services, leading to 10 tips for their successful design. Med Teach 2006; 28: e185-91.10.1080/0142159060083428617594544]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Brečko D. Iskanje potencialov s 360 stopinjsko povratno informacijo. Dostopno na: http://www.planetgv.si/upload/ htmlarea/images/prezentacije/Brecko_Daniela.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Janjetovič Z. Zbornik 6. študentske konference Fakultete za management Koper 18.-20. november 2009. Koper - Celje - Škofja Loka. Koper: 6. študentska konferenca Fakultete za management 2009: 285-93.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Welsby P. 360-stopinjska povratna informacija v podjetju Si.Mobil. Dostopno na: http://www.psasdi.com/mktpdf/si0201.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Archer J, Davies H. Clinical management. Where medicine meets management: on reflection. Health Serv J 2004; 114: 26-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Archer J, McGraw M, Davies H. Assuring validity of multisource feedback in a national programme. Arch Dis Child 2010; 95: 330-5.10.1136/adc.2008.14620920457700]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Davies H, Archer J, Bateman A, Dewar S, Crossley J, Grant J. et al. Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1014-20.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03162.x18823521]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Eva K, Armson H, Holmboe E, Lockyer J, Loney E, Mann K. et al. Factors influencing responsiveness to feedback: on the interplay between fear, confidence, and reasoning processes. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2012; 17: 15-26.10.1007/s10459-011-9290-7327467121468778]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Lockyer J. Multisource feedback in the assessment of physicians competencies. J Cont Educ Health Prof 2003; 23: 4-12.10.1002/chp.134023010312739254]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Malling B, Mortensen L, Scherpbier A, Ringsted C. Educational climate seems unrelated to leadership skills of clinical consultants responsible of postgraduate medical education in clinical departments. BMC Med Educ 2010; 10: 62-9.10.1186/1472-6920-10-62295559520858255]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Violato C, Lockyer J, Fidler H. Changes in performance: a 5-year longitudinal study of participants in a multi-source feedback programme. Med Educ 2008; 42: 1007-13.10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03127.x18823520]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Novak Ž, Cerar VM, Rener Primec Z, Dolžan V, Steblovnik L, Hawlina M. Zakaj bi sploh šel na TTT? Vprašaj kolega! - ali izkušnje po ducatu delavnic Učenje učiteljev. Zdrav Vestn 2010; 79: 742-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Anon. NHS Modernising Medical Careers - MSF (Multi-Source Feedback). Dostopno na: http://www.mmc.nhs.uk/pages/ assessment/msf.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Anon. Dodatna navodila za specializacijo porodništva in ginekologije. 2007. Dostopno na: http://www.zdravniskazbornica. si/zs/1073/samostojnost-in-odgovornost-specializanta-pri-delu.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Stemler S. An overview of content analysis. Practical assessment, research & evaluation. Dostopno na: http://PAREonline.net/getvn. asp?v=7&n=17 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Sutton R. Ni prostora za prasce. Ljubljana: Mladinska knjiga, 2011.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Mackillop LH, Crossley J, Vivekananda-Schmidt P, Wade W, Armitage M. A single generic multi-source feedback tool for revalidation of all UK career-grade doctors: does one size fit all? Med Teach 2011; 33: e75-83.10.3109/0142159X.2010.53587021275537]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Deming W. Out of the crisis. MIT, 1982.]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Overeem K, Lombarts M, Arah O, Klazinga N, Grol R, Wollersheim H. Three methods of multi-source feedback compared: a plea for narrative comments and coworkers’ perspectives. Med Teach 2010; 32: 141-7.10.3109/0142159090314412820163230]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Mahmood T. Dealing with trainees in difficulty. FVV in ObGyn 2012; 4: 18-23. Dostopno na: http://www.fvvo.be/assets/232/04- Mahmood.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. de Bono E. Think! before It’s too late. London: Vermilion, 2009: 258.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. van der Vleuten C, Schuwirth L, Scheele F, Driessen E, Hodges B. The assessment of professional competence: building blocks for theory development. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2010; 24: 703-19.10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.00120510653]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Ramani S. Twelve tips to promote excellence in medical teaching. Med Teach 2006; 28: 19-23.10.1080/0142159050044178616627316]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Tušak M, Tušak M. Psihologija športa. Ljubljana: Filozofska fakulteta, 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Kesselheim AS, Austad KE. Residents: workers or students in the eyes of the law? N Engl J Med 2011; 364: 697-699.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Pendleton D, Wakeford R. Interviews in the selection of partners, trainees and medical students. J Roy Coll Gen Pract 1988; 38: 147-8.]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Goleman D. Working with emotional intelligence. New York: Bantam books, 1988: 464.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Cruess SR, Cruess RL, Steinert Y. Role modelling - making the most of a powerful teaching strategy. BMJ 2008; 336: 718-21.10.1136/bmj.39503.757847.BE227630218369229]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Smith G, Pell J. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systemic review of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 2003; 327: 1459-61.10.1136/bmj.327.7429.145930080814684649]Search in Google Scholar