[
Abdi, R., 2002. Interpersonal metadiscourse: An indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 139-145.10.1177/14614456020040020101
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Akbas, E., 2012. Exploring metadiscourse in masters’ dissertation abstracts: Cultural and linguistic variation across postgraduate writers. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12-26.10.7575/ijalel.v.1n.1p.12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alexandrov, A. and Hennerici, M., 2006. Writing good abstracts. Cerebrovascular Diseases, 2007 (23), pp. 256-259.10.1159/000098324
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alotaibi, H., 2014. Metadiscourse in Arabic and English research article abstracts. World Journal of English Language, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-8.10.5430/wjel.v5n2p1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bal-Gezegin, B., 2016. A Corpus-based investigation of metadiscourse in academic book reviews. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232 (2016), pp. 713-718.10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.097
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cao, F. and Hu, G., 2014. Interactive metadiscourse in research articles: A comparative study of paradigmatic and disciplinary influences. Journal of Pragmatics, vol. 66, pp. 15-31.10.1016/j.pragma.2014.02.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carrió-Pastor, M.L., 2021. The assessment of metadiscourse devices in English as a foreign language. Assessing Writing, vol. 50, n.p.10.1016/j.asw.2021.100560
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W., 2014. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches, 4th Ed. SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crismore, A., Markkanen, R. and Steffensen, M., 1993. Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of text written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 39-7110.1177/0741088393010001002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estaji, M. and Vafaeimehr, R., 2015. A comparative analysis of interactional metadiscourse markers in the introduction and conclusion sections of mechanical and electrical engineering research papers. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 37-56.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farahani, M. V., 2019. Metadiscourse in academic English texts: A corpus-based probe into British academic written English corpus. Studies about Languages, no. 34, pp. 56-73.10.5755/j01.sal.0.34.21816
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farahani, M. and Sabetifard, M., 2017. Metadiscourse features in English news writing among English native and Iranian writers: A comparative corpus-based inquiry. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, vol. 7, no. 12, pp. 1249-1260.10.17507/tpls.0712.12
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Farzannia, S. and Farnia, M., 2016. Metadiscourse markers in introduction sections of Persian and English mining engineering articles. English for Specific Purposes World, vol. 17, no. 49, pp. 1-16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fu, X. and Hyland, K., 2014. Interaction in two journalistic genres: A study of interactional metadiscourse. English Text Constuction, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 122-144.10.1075/etc.7.1.05fu
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gillaerts, P. and Velde, F., 2010. Interactional metadiscourse in research article abstract. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 128-139.10.1016/j.jeap.2010.02.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., 1998. Boosting, hedging and the negotiation of academic knowledge. Interdisciplinary Journal for Study Discourse, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 349-382.10.1515/text.1.1998.18.3.349
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K., 2005. Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyland, K. and Tse, P., 2004. Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 156-177.10.1093/applin/25.2.156
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kan, M.O., 2016. The use of interactional metadiscourse: A comparison of articles on Turkish education and literature. Eductional Science: Theory & Practice, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 1639-1648.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Karimi, K., Maleki, M. and Farnia, M., 2017. Metadiscourse markers in the abstract sections of Persian and English law articles. International Journal of Foreign Language & Research, vol. 5, no. 18, pp. 69-83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kawase, T., 2015. Metadiscourse in the introduction of PhD theses and research articles. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, vol. 20, pp. 114-124.10.1016/j.jeap.2015.08.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Khedri, M., Chan, S. and Ebrahimi, S., 2013. An exploration of interactive metadiscourse markers in academic research article abstracts in two disciplines. Discourse Studies, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 319-331.10.1177/1461445613480588
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhi, D. and Mojood, M., 2014. Metadiscourse in newspaper genre: A cross-linguistic study of English and Persian editorials. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 98, pp. 1046-1055.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.515
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kuhi, D. and Mousavi, Z., 2015. A diachronic study of interpersonality in research articles’ discussion sections: The field of applied linguistics. International Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 6-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kumar, R., 2011. Research methodology: A step-by-step guide for beginners. 3rd ed. SAGE.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lo, Y.Y., Othman, J. and Lim, J.W., 2020. The use of metadiscourse in academic writing by Malaysian first-year ESL doctoral students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 271-282.10.17509/ijal.v10i1.25069
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mansouri, S., Najafabadi, M. and Boroujeni, S., 2016. Metadiscourse in research article abstract: A cross lingual and disciplinary investigation. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 296-307.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McGrath, L. and Kuteeva, M., 2012. Stance and engagement in pure mathematics research articles: Linking discourse features to disciplinary practices. English for Specific Purposes, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 161-173.10.1016/j.esp.2011.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mocanu, M., 2015. An empirical analysis of metadiscourse in the abstracts of Romanian accounting research articles. Accounting and Management Information Systems, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 362-377.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moghadam, F., 2017. Persuasion in journalism: A study of metadiscourse in texts by native speaker of English and Iranian EFL writers. Theory and Practice in English Studies, vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 483-495.10.17507/tpls.0706.11
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ozdemir, N. and Longo, B., 2014. Metadiscourse use in thesis abstracts: A cross-cultural study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141 (2014), pp. 59-63.10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pooresfahani, A., Khajavy, G. and Vahidnia, F., 2012. A contrastive study of metadiscourse elements in research articles written by Iranian applied linguistics and engineering writers in English. English Linguistics Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 88-96.10.5430/elr.v1n1p88
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salar, S. and Ghonsooly, B., 2016. A comparative analysis of metadiscourse features in knowledge management research articles written in English and Persian. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 15-27.10.5861/ijrsll.2015.1154
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Samar, R. and Yazdanmehr, E., 2013. Comparing interpersonal metadiscourse in English and Persian abstracts of Iranian applied linguistics journals. International Journal of Science and Technology, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1090-1101.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vande Kopple, W., 1985. Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 82-93.10.2307/357609
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, L. and Zhang, Y., 2016. An analysis of metadiscourse in the abstract of English academic papers. Global Journals Inc., vol. 16, no. 9, pp. 8-15.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, J., 1981. Style: Ten lessons in clarity and grace. New York: Harper Collins Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xin, J. and Yan, S., 2016. Analyzing metadiscourse in the English abstracts of BA theses. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 210-215.10.17507/jltr.0701.24
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yüksel, H.G. and Kavanoz, S., 2018. Dimension of experience: Metadiscourse in the texts of novice non-native, novice native and expert native speaker. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 104-112.10.7575/aiac.alls.v.9n.3p.104
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhou, Q., 2014. A contrast study of metadiscourse in abstract. Foreign Language Research, vol. 3, pp.
]Search in Google Scholar
