[
Allan, Robin, Philip Holmes & Tom Lundskaer-Nielsen. 1995. Danish: A comprehensive grammar. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aoun, Joseph E., Elabbas Benmamoun & Lina Choueiri. 2010. The syntax of Arabic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511691775
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, Mark C. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baker, Mark C. 2003. Agreement, dislocation, and partial configurationality. In Andrew Carnie, Heidi Harley & MaryAnn Willie (eds.), Formal approaches to function in grammar, 107–134. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.62.09bak
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berwick, Robert C. & Noam Chomsky. 2016. Why only us: Language and evolution. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262034241.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Biberauer, Theresa, Anders Holmberg & Ian Roberts. 2014. A syntactic universal and its consequences. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 169–225.10.1162/LING_a_00153
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cecchetto, C. 1999. A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53. 40–67.10.1111/1467-9582.00039
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Robert Freidin, Carlos Peregrin Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds.), Foundational issues in linguistic theory: Essays in honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, 291–321. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/9780262062787.003.0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2019. Some puzzling foundational issues: The reading program. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, special issue. 263–285.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 2020. The UCLA lectures. https://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/005485 (accessed 6 January 2021).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam, Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott. 2019. Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges. Catalan Journal of Linguistics, special issue. 229–261.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christensen, Kirsti Koch. 1986. Norwegian ingen: A case of post-syntactic lexicalization. In Östen Dahl & Anders Holmberg (eds.), Scandinavian syntax, 21–35. Stockholm: Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8. 397–412.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A’-Dependencies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36. 315–332.10.1162/0024389054396917
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2009. The fundamental left-right asymmetry of natural languages. In Sergio Scalise, Elisabetta Magni & Antonietta Bisetto (eds.), Universals of language today, 165–184. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-8825-4_9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2020a. The syntax of relative clauses: A unified analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781108856195
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2020b. Word order variation: towards a restrictive theory. Unpublished manuscript, University of Venice.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Couquaux, Daniel. 1981. French predication and linguistic theory. In Robert May & Jan Koster (eds.), Levels of syntactic representation, 33–64. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110874167-004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Craig, Colette Grinevald. 1977. The structure of Jacaltec. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diesing, Molly. 1992. Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Downing, Bruce T. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of Human Language, vol. 4, Syntax, 375–418. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dryer, Matthew S. 1992. The Greenbergian word order correlations. Language 68. 81–138.10.1353/lan.1992.0028
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gildersleeve, Basil L. & Gonzalez Lodge. 1895. Gildersleeve’s Latin grammar, reprint of the 3rd edn. Wauconda, IL: Bolchazy-Carducci.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Giorgi, Alessandra & Sona Haroutyunian. 2020. Verb second and verb third in Modern Eastern Armenian. In Rebecca Woods & Sam Wolfe (eds.), Rethinking verb second, 642–664. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198844303.003.0027
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1966. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), Universals of language, 2nd edn, 73–113. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haegeman, Liliane. 2001. Antisymmetry and verb-final order in West Flemish. The Journal of Comparative Germanic linguistics 3. 207–232.10.1023/A:1011912402857
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. West Flemish negation and the derivation of SOV order in West Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 25. 154–189.10.1080/033258602321093355
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1998. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. New York: Garland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hyman, Larry M. & Daniel J. Magaji. 1970. Essentials of Gwari grammar. Ibadan: Institute of African Studies, University of Ibadan.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Iatridou, S. 1990. About Agr(P). Linguistic Inquiry 21. 551–577.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingason, Anton Karl & Jim Wood. 2017. Clause-bounded movement: Stylistic fronting and phase theory. Linguistic Inquiry 48. 529–541.10.1162/ling_a_00253
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jayaseelan, K.A. 1991. The pronominal system of Malayalam. CIEFL Occasional Papers in Linguistics 3. 68–107.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jayaseelan, K.A. 2001. IP-internal topic and focus phrases. Studia Linguistica 55. 39–75.10.1111/1467-9582.00074
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johannessen, Janne Bondi. 1998. Coordination. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, Kyle. 1991. Object positions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 9. 577–636.10.1007/BF00134751
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kandybowicz, Jason & Mark C. Baker. 2003. On directionality and the structure of the verb phrase: Evidence from Nupe. Syntax 6. 115–155.10.1111/1467-9612.00058
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 1975. French syntax: The transformational cycle. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 1981. Unambiguous paths. In Robert May & Jan Koster (eds.), Levels of syntactic representation, 143–183. Dordrecht: Foris (reprinted in Kayne (1984)).10.1515/9783110874167-006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 1983. Connectedness. Linguistic Inquiry 14. 223–249 (reprinted in Kayne (1984)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783111682228
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22. 647–686 (reprinted in Kayne (2000)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Parameters and universals. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2002. Pronouns and their antecedents. In Samuel Epstein & Daniel Seely (eds.), Derivation and explanation in the minimalist program, 133–166. Malden, MA: Blackwell. (reprinted in Kayne (2005b)).10.1002/9780470755662.ch7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2003. Some remarks on agreement and on heavy-NP-shift. In Masatomo Ukaji, Masayuki Ike-Uchi & Yoshiki Nishimara (eds.), Current issues in English linguistics (Special publications of the English Linguistic Society of Japan, volume 2), 67–86. Tokyo: Kaitakusha (reprinted in Kayne (2005b)).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2005a. On the syntax of quantity in English. In Kayne 2005b, 177–214. (also in Josef Bayer, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & M. T. Hany Babu (eds.), Linguistic theory and South-Asian languages: Essays in honour of K.A. Jayaseelan, 73–105. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.)10.1075/la.102.09kay
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2005b. Movement and silence. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195179163.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2011. Why are there no directionality parameters? In Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds.), Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 1–23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project (reprinted in Kayne 2019b).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2016. The silence of heads. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37. 1–37 (reprinted in Kayne 2019b).10.1515/scl-2016-0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2019a. The place of linear order in the language faculty. Linguistic Analysis 42. 441–472.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kayne, Richard S. 2019b. Questions of syntax. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keenan, Edward L. 1985. Relative clauses. In Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, vol. II, Complex constructions, 141–170. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koopman, Hilda. 1992. On the absence of case chains in Bambara. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 10. 555–594.10.1007/BF00133330
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 2000. Locating relative agreement in Turkish and Turkic. In Aslı Göksel & Celia Kerslake (eds.), Studies on Turkish and Turkic languages, 189–196. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koster, Jan. 1994. Predicate incorporation and the word order of Dutch. In Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds.), Paths toward universal grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne, 255–276. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Langacker, Ronald W. 1969. On pronominalization and the chain of command. In David Reibel & Sanford Schane (eds.), Modern studies in English: Readings in transformational grammar, 160–186. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19. 335–391.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Larson, Richard K. 1990. Double objects revisited: Reply to Jackendoff. Linguistic Inquiry 21. 589–632.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lasnik, Howard. 1976. Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2. 1–22.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mahajan, Anoop. 1992. The specificity condition and the CED. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 510–516.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McCloskey, James & Peter Sells. 1988. Control and A-chains in Modern Irish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6. 143–189.10.1007/BF00134228
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moro, Andrea, Mariacristina Musso, Volkmar Glauche, Michel Rijntjes, Jürgen Reichenbach, Christian Büchel & Cornelius Weiller. 2003. Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6. 774–781.10.1038/nn1077
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nikitina, Tatiana. 2019. Verb phrase external arguments in Mande: New evidence for obligatory extraposition. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 37. 693–734.10.1007/s11049-018-9417-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nkemnji, Michael A. 1992. Issues in the syntax of negation in Nweh. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles MA thesis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nkemnji, Michael A. 1995. Heavy pied-piping in Nweh. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nurse, Derek & Gerard Philippson (eds.). 2003. The Bantu languages. London: Routledge.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ott, Dennis. 2014. An ellipsis approach to contrastive left-dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 45. 269–303.10.1162/LING_a_00155
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paster, Mary. 2019. Phonology counts. Radical: A Journal of Phonology 1. 1–61.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pearson, Matthew. 2000. Two types of VO languages. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, 327–363. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.31.12pea
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1989. Verb movement, Universal Grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20. 365–424.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pollock, Jean-Yves. 1998. On the syntax of subnominal clitics: Cliticization and ellipsis. Syntax 1. 300–330.10.1111/1467-9612.00011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Postma, Gertjan. 1994. The indefinite reading of WH. In Reineke Bok-Bennema & Christiaan Cremers (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 1994, 187–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/avt.11.19pos
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.10.1515/9783110883718
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 2018. Intervention effects in grammar and language acquisition. Probus 30. 339–367.10.1515/probus-2018-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruwet, Nicolas. 1972. Théorie syntaxique et syntaxe du français. Paris: Editions du Seuil.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saito, Mamoru & Naoki Fukui. 1998. Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry 29. 439–474.10.1162/002438998553815
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheehan, Michelle. 2017. The final-over-final condition and adverbs. In Michelle Sheehan, Theresa Biberauer, Ian Roberts & Anders Holmberg, The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal, 97–120. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8687.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sheehan, Michelle, Theresa Biberauer, Ian Roberts & Anders Holmberg. 2017. The final-over-final condition: A syntactic universal. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8687.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shu, Chih-hsiang. 2018. Parameter preservation at the syntax-PF interface: The ba construction revisited. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 39. 29–66.10.2478/scl-2018-0002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stassen, Leon. 2000. AND-languages and WITH-languages. Linguistic Typology 4. 1–54.10.1515/lity.2000.4.1.1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Svenonius, Peter. 2000. Quantifier movement in Icelandic. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), The derivation of VO and OV, 255–292. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.31.10sve
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tamrazian, Arminé. 1994. The syntax of Armenian: Chains and the auxiliary. London: University College London dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2001. Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics 37. 551–579.10.1017/S0022226701001049
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Thráinsson, Höskuldur, Hjalmar P. Petersen, Jógvan í Lon Jacobsen & Zakaris Svabo Hansen. 2004. Faroese: An overview and reference grammar. Tórshavn: Foroya Frodskaparfelag.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torrence, Harold. 2005. On the distribution of complementizers in Wolof. Los Angeles: University of California, Los Angeles dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Travis, Lisa. 1989. Parameters of phrase structure. In Anthony S. Kroch & Mark R. Baltin (eds.), Alternative conceptions of phrase structure, 263–279. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Villalba, Xavier. 1999. Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In Olga Fullana & Francesc Roca Urgell (eds.), Studies on the syntax of central Romance languages: Proceedings of the III Symposium on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, 227–241. Girona: Universitat de Girona.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Whitman, John. 2005. Preverbal elements in Korean and Japanese. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 880–902. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wilder, Chris. 1997. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Artemis Alexiadou & T. Alan Hall (eds.), Studies on universal grammar and typological variation, 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.13.04wil
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zhang, Niina Ning. 2010. Coordination in syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2007. Some notes on the origin and distribution of the IPP-effect. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 45. 77–99.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2009. Relevance of typology to minimalist inquiry. Lingua 119. 1589–1606.10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.011
]Search in Google Scholar
