[
Abe, Jun. 2016. Minimalist syntax for quantifier raising, topicalization and focus movement: A search and float approach for internal Merge. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-47304-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Abe, Jun. 2017. Wh-in-situ licensing. Unpublished manuscript.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Aoun, Joseph & Audrey Y.-H. Li. 1993. Wh-elements in situ: Syntax or LF. Linguistic Inquiry 24(2). 199–238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck, Sigrid. 1996. Wh-constructions and transparent logical form. Tübingen: University of Tübingen dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck, Sigrid. 2006. Intervention effects follow from focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 14. 1–56.10.1007/s11050-005-4532-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beck, Sigrid & Shin-Sook Kim. 1997. On wh- and operator scope in Korean. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 6(6). 339–384.10.1023/A:1008280026102
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bošković, Željko. 2003. On the interpretation of multiple questions. In Pierre Pica (ed.), Linguistic variation yearbook 1:1, 1–15. Amsterdam: Benjamins.10.1075/livy.1.03bos
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bošković, Željko. 2015. From the complex NP constraint to everything: On deep extractions across categories. The Linguistic Review 32(4). 603–670.10.1515/tlr-2015-0006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Choe, Jae W. 1987. LF movement and pied-piping. Linguistic Inquiry 18. 348–353.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1964. Current issues in linguistic theory. The Hague: Mouton.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In Stephen Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 232–286. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. Essays on form and interpretation. New York: North-Holland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1986. Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A’-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cresti, Diana. 1995. Extraction and reconstruction. Natural Language Semantics 3. 79–122.10.1007/BF01252885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fiengo, Robert, C.-T. James Huang, Howard Lasnik & Tanya Reinhart. 1988. The syntax of wh-in-situ. In Hagit Borer (ed.), Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, 81–98. Stanford, CA: The Center for the Study of Language and Information.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hagstrom, Paul. 1998. Decomposing questions. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Huang, C.-T. James. 1982. Logical relations in Chinese and the theory of grammar. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kiss, Katalin É. 1995. Discourse configurational languages. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780195088335.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kitagawa, Yoshihisa, Dorian Roehrs & Satoshi Tomioka. 2004. Multiple wh-interpretations. In Hang-Jin Yoon (ed.), Generative Grammar in a broader perspective: Proceedings of the 4th GLOW in Asia 2003, 209–233. Seoul: Hankook Publishing Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. Definite NPs aren’t quantifiers. Linguistic Inquiry 23. 156–163.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lahiri, Utpal. 2002. On the proper treatment of ‘expletive wh’ in Hindi. Lingua 112. 501–540.10.1016/S0024-3841(01)00059-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1984. On the nature of proper government. Linguistic Inquiry 15. 235–289.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lasnik, Howard & Mamoru Saito. 1992. Move α: Conditions on its application and output. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Liao, Wei-wen Roger & Yuyun Wang. 2007. Multiple wh-construction and its interpretation in Chinese. In Anisa Schardl, Martin Walkow & Muhammad Abdurrahman (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, volume 2. Ottawa: University of Ottawa.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Jo-Wang. 1992. The syntax of zenmeyang ‘how’ and weishenme ‘why’ in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1. 293–331.10.1007/BF00130555
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lin, Jowang. 2014. Wh-expressions in Mandarin Chinese. In James C.-T. Huang, Audrey Y.-H. Li & Andrew Simpson (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 180–207. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell Publisher.10.1002/9781118584552.ch8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 1987. Extraction from NP and the proper notion of head government. In Alessandra Giorgi & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds.), The syntax of noun phrases, 57–112. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 1997. On the nature of wh-scope. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2004. On the nature of weak islands. Unpublished manuscript, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2010. Why agree? Why move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/8116.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1986. Quantification in syntax. Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Amherst dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1990. Quantification in the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer.10.1007/978-94-009-1972-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David. 1982. Paths and categories. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David. 1987. Wh-in-situ: movement and unselective binding. In Eric J. Reuland & Alice G. B. ter Meulen (eds.), The representation of (in)definiteness, 98–129. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pesetsky, David. 2000. Phrasal movement and its kin. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.10.7551/mitpress/5365.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Reinhart, Tanya. 1997. Quantifier scope: How labor is divided between QR and Choice functions. Linguistics and Philosophy 20. 335–397.10.1023/A:1005349801431
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richards, Norvin. 2001. Movement in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Richards, Norvin. 2008. Wh-questions. In Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds.), The Oxford handbook of Japanese linguistics, 348–371. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 2006. On Intermediate positions: intervention and impenetrability. Lecture delivered at the EALing fall school 2006, Paris, 18–26 September.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rizzi, Luigi. 2013. Locality. Lingua 130. 169–186.10.1016/j.lingua.2012.12.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Roberts, Ian G. 2010. A deletion analysis of null subjects. In Theresa Biberauer, Anders Holmberg, Ian G. Roberts & Michelle Sheehan (eds.), Parametric variation: Null subjects in minimalist theory, 58–87. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511770784.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on variables in syntax. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saito, Mamoru. 2004. Some remarks on superiority and crossing. In Hang-Jin Yoon (ed.), Generative Grammar in a broader perspective: Proceedings of the 4th GLOW in Asia 2003, 571–595. Seoul: Hankook Publishing Company.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Srivastav Dayal, Veneeta. 1992. Two types of universal terms in questions. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 22, 443–457. Amherst, MA: GLSA Publication, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: A theory of locality. Geneva: University of Geneva dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Takita, Kensuke, Chisato Fuji & Barry C.-Y. Yang. 2007. Wh-questions in Chinese and Japanese I: Anti-crossing and anti-superiority. In Nanzan Linguistics, Special Issue 1(1). 99–112.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tang, Tingchi. 1988. Studies on Chinese morphology and syntax. Taipei: Student Book.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 1994. On economizing the theory of A’-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology dissertation.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tsai, W.-T. Dylan. 2015. A tale of two peripheries: Evidence from Chinese adverbials, light verbs, applicatives, and object fronting. In Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (ed.), The cartography of Chinese syntax, 1–32. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watanabe, Akira. 1992. Subjacency and S-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian linguistics 1. 255–291.10.1007/BF00130554
]Search in Google Scholar
