[Aboh, Enoch O. & Roland Pfau. 2010. What’s a Wh-word go to do with it? In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds.), Mapping the left periphery, 91–124. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199740376.003.0004]Search in Google Scholar
[Allan, Keith. 2006. Clause-type, primary illocution, and mood-like operators in English. Language Sciences 28(1). 1–50.10.1016/j.langsci.2004.12.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Arndt, Walter. 1960. “Modal particles” in Russian and German. Word 16. 323–336.10.1080/00437956.1960.11659734]Search in Google Scholar
[Bailey, Laura R. 2010. Sentential word order and the syntax of question particles. Newcasltle Working Papers in Linguistics 16. 23–43.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bayer, Josef & Hans-Georg Obenauer. 2011. Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28. 449–491.10.1515/tlir.2011.013]Search in Google Scholar
[Besemeres, Mary & Anna Wierzbicka. 2003. The meaning of the particle lah in Singapore English. Pragmatics & Cognition 11(1). 3–38.10.1075/pc.11.1.03bes]Search in Google Scholar
[Cheung, H. Samuel. 2007. Xianggang Yueyu yufa de yanjiu [A grammar of Cantonese as spoken in Hong Kong], revised edn. Hong Kong: The Chinese University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chor, Winnie Oi-Wan, Foong Ha Yap & Tak-Sum Wong. 2016. Chinese interrogative particles as talk coordinators at the right periphery: A discourse-pragmatic perspective. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17(2). 178–207.10.1075/jhp.17.2.02cho]Search in Google Scholar
[Del Gobbo, Francesca, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto. 2015. On sentential particles: A crosslinguistic study. In Sylvie Hancil, Alexander Haselow & Margje Post (eds.), Final particles, 360–386. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.10.1515/9783110375572-015]Search in Google Scholar
[Fung, Roxana Suk-yee. 2000. Final particles in Standard Cantonese: Semantic extension and pragmatic inference. Columbus, OH: The Ohio State University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goddard, Cliff. 2011. Semantic analysis: A practical introduction, 2nd edn. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Goddard, Cliff. 2014. Interjections and emotion (with special reference to “Surprise” and “Disgust”). Emotion Review 6(1). 53–63.10.1177/1754073913491843]Search in Google Scholar
[Gunlogson, Christine. 2003. True to form: Rising and falling declaratives as questions in English. New York & London: Routledge.10.4324/9780203502013]Search in Google Scholar
[Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill. 2013. The syntactization of discourse. In Raffaella Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds.), Syntax and its limits, 370–390. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Haegeman, Liliane. 1997. Elements of grammar. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 1–71. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_1]Search in Google Scholar
[Haegeman, Liliane. 2014. West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 116–139.10.1111/stul.12023]Search in Google Scholar
[Heim, Johannes, Hermann Keupdjio, Zoe Wai-Man Lam, Adriana Osa-Gómez, Sonja Thoma & Martina Wiltschko. 2016. Intonation and particles as speech act modifiers: A syntactic analysis. Studies in Chinese Linguistics 37(2). 109–129.10.1515/scl-2016-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Hirst, Daniel. 1983. Interpreting intonation: A modular approach. Journal of Semantics 2(2). 171–182.10.1093/semant/2.2.171]Search in Google Scholar
[Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li & Yafei Li. 2009. The syntax of Chinese. New York: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139166935]Search in Google Scholar
[Iida, Maki. 2017. Yueyu jumo zhuci ge2 de yuyi he yufahua tujing [The meaning and grammaticalization path of the sentence-final particle ge2 in Cantonese]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 4. 421–437, 511.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kuong, Io-Kei Joaquim. 2008. Yes/no questions particles revisited: The grammatical functions of mo4, me1, and maa3. In Marjorie K.M. Chan & Hana Kang (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th North American Conference on Chinese Linguistics (NACCL-20), vol. 2, 715–733. Columbus, Ohio: The Ohio State University.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kwok, Helen. 1984. Sentence particles in Cantonese. Hong Kong: Centre of Asian Studies, University of Hong Kong.]Search in Google Scholar
[Law, Ann. 2002. Cantonese sentence-final particles and the CP domain. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 14. 375–398.]Search in Google Scholar
[Law, Ann. 2004. Sentence-final focus particles in Cantonese. London: University College London dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Law, Paul. 2006. Adverbs in A-not-A questions in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 15(2). 97–136.10.1007/s10831-005-4916-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Law, Sam-Po. 1990. The syntax and phonology of Cantonese sentence-final particles. Boston, MA: Boston University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, Peppina Po-lun. 2019. Focus manifestation in Mandarin Chinese and Cantonese: A comparative perspective. Oxon & New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203705223]Search in Google Scholar
[Leung, Chung-sum. 2005 [1992]. Dangdai Xianggang Yueyu yuzhuci de yanjiu [A study of the utterance particles in Cantonese as spoken in Hong Kong]. Hong Kong: Language Information Sciences Research Centre, City University of Hong Kong.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Boya. 2006. Chinese final particles and the syntax of the periphery. Leiden: Leiden University dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Li, Charles N. & Sandra A. Thompson. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A functional reference grammar. London: University of California Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Matthews, Stephen & Virginia Yip. 2011. Cantonese: A comprehensive grammar, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge.]Search in Google Scholar
[Munaro, Nicola. 2010. On the edge-feature of particles, interjections, and short answers. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds.), Edges, heads, and projections, 67–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.156.07mun]Search in Google Scholar
[Munaro, Nicola & Jean-Yves Pollock. 2005. Qu’est-ce-que (qu)-est-ce-que? A case study in comparative Romance interrogative syntax. In Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds.), The Oxford handbook of comparative syntax, 542–606. New York: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Obenauer, Hans-Georg. 2006. Special interrogatives – Left periphery, Wh-doubling, and (apparently) optional elements. In Jenny Doetjes & Paz González (eds.), Romance languages and linguistic theory 2004: Selected papers from ‘Going Romance’, Leiden, 9–11 December 2004, 247–273. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/cilt.278.12obe]Search in Google Scholar
[Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles area not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of split CP. Studia Linguistica 68(1). 77–115.10.1111/stul.12020]Search in Google Scholar
[Poletto, Cecilia & Jean-Yves Pollock. 2000. On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 10(2). 115–182.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar: Handbook in generative syntax, 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-011-5420-8_7]Search in Google Scholar
[Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. On the position of Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds.), Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to Lorenzo Renzi, 287–296. Leiden: Brill.10.1163/9780585473949_016]Search in Google Scholar
[Schubiger, Maria. 1965. English intonation and German modal particles: A comparative study. Phonetica 12(2). 65–84.10.1159/000258414]Search in Google Scholar
[Simpson, Andrew. 2014. Sentence-final Particles. In C.-T. James Huang, Y. -H. Audrey Li & Andrew Simpson (eds.), The handbook of Chinese linguistics, 156–179. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.10.1002/9781118584552.ch7]Search in Google Scholar
[Smith, Carlota S. 2007. Reference time without tense. In Louis de Saussure, Jacques Moeschler & Genoveva Puskás (eds.), Recent advances in the syntax and semantics of tense, aspect and modality, 229–250. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.]Search in Google Scholar
[Speas, Margaret. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114(3). 255–276.10.1016/S0024-3841(03)00030-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Speas, Peggy & Carole Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anna Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, vol. 1, Syntax and semantics, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.10.1075/la.57.15spe]Search in Google Scholar
[Sybesma, Rint & Boya Li. 2007. The dissection and structural mapping of Cantonese sentence final particles. Lingua 117(10). 1739–1783.10.1016/j.lingua.2006.10.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Sybesma, Rint. 2004. Exploring Cantonese tense. Linguistics in the Netherlands 2004 21. 169–180.10.1075/avt.21.19syb]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 1998. Parametrization of features in syntax. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine dissertation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2002. Yueyu jumo zhuci de buduicheng fenbu [Asymmetric distribution of Cantonese sentence final particles]. Zhongguo Yuwen Yanjiu [Studies in Chinese linguistics] 2(14). 75–84.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2006. Yueyu yiwenju “xian” de jufa tedian [Syntactic properties of sin in Cantonese interrogatives]. Zhongguo Yuwen [Studies of the Chinese language] 312(3). 225–232.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2010. Hanyu julei he yuqi de jufa fenxi [A syntactic analysis of clause types and mood in Chinese]. Hanyu Xuebao [Chinese linguistics] 29(1). 59–63.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2011. Cartographic syntax of interjections in Cantonese. Paper presented at the Fifth International Conference on Formal Linguistics (ICFL-5), Guangdong University of Foreign Studies, 10–12 December.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2015. Cartographic syntax of pragmatic projections. In Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (eds.), Chinese syntax in a cross-linguistic perspective, 429–441. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199945658.003.0016]Search in Google Scholar
[Tang, Sze-Wing. 2020. Cartographic syntax of performative projections: Evidence from Cantonese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 29. 1–30.10.1007/s10831-019-09202-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Wakefield, John C. 2011. Disentangling the meanings of two Cantonese evidential particles. Chinese Language & Discourse 2(2). 250–293.10.1075/cld.2.2.05wak]Search in Google Scholar
[Wakefield, John C. 2014. The forms and meanings of English rising declaratives: Insights from Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 42(1). 109–149.]Search in Google Scholar
[Wakefield, John C. 2020. Intonational morphology. Singapore: Springer. Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. The semantics of interjection. Journal of Pragmatics 18. 159–192.10.1016/0378-2166(92)90050-L]Search in Google Scholar
[Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Yiu, Carine Yuk-man. 2001. Cantonese final particles “LEI”, “ZYU” and “LAA”: An aspectual study. Hong Kong: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology Mphil thesis.]Search in Google Scholar
