This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Holland R, Veling SH, Mravunac M, Hendriks JH. Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery. Cancer 1985; 56: 979-90. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::aid-cncr2820560502>3.0.co;2-nHollandRVelingSHMravunacMHendriksJH.Histologic multifocality of Tis, T1-2 breast carcinomas. Implications for clinical trials of breast-conserving surgery.Cancer1985;56:979-90.10.1002/1097-0142(19850901)56:5<979::aid-cncr2820560502>3.0.co;2-nOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Franquet T, De Miguel C, Cozcolluela R, Donoso L. Spiculated lesions of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation. RadioGraphics 1993; 13: 841-52. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.13.4.8356272FranquetTDe MiguelCCozcolluelaRDonosoL.Spiculated lesions of the breast: mammographic-pathologic correlation.RadioGraphics1993;13:841-52.10.1148/radiographics.13.4.8356272Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Moriuchi H, Yamaguchi J, Hayashi H, Ohtani H, Shimokawa I, Abiru H, et al. Cancer cell interaction with adipose tissue: Correlation with the finding of spiculation at mammography. Radiology 2016; 279: 56-64. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2015142191MoriuchiHYamaguchiJHayashiHOhtaniHShimokawaIAbiruHCancer cell interaction with adipose tissue: Correlation with the finding of spiculation at mammography.Radiology2016;279:56-64.10.1148/radiol.2015142191Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lengyel E, Makowski L, DiGiovanni J, Kolonin MG. Cancer as a matter of fat: The crosstalk between adipose tissue and tumors. Trends Cancer 2018; 4: 374-84. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2018.03.004LengyelEMakowskiLDiGiovanniJKoloninMG.Cancer as a matter of fat: The crosstalk between adipose tissue and tumors.Trends Cancer2018;4:374-84.10.1016/j.trecan.2018.03.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wu Y, Li X, Li Q, Cheng C, Zheng L. Adipose tissue-to-breast cancer crosstalk: Comprehensive insights. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer 2022; 1877: 188800. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188800WuYLiXLiQChengCZhengL.Adipose tissue-to-breast cancer crosstalk: Comprehensive insights.Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer2022;1877:188800.10.1016/j.bbcan.2022.188800Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Motrescu ER, Rio MC. Cancer cells, adipocytes and matrix metalloproteinase 11: a vicious tumor progression cycle. Biol Chem 2008; 389: 1037-41. doi: 10.1515/BC.2008.110MotrescuERRioMC.Cancer cells, adipocytes and matrix metalloproteinase 11: a vicious tumor progression cycle.Biol Chem2008;389:1037-41.10.1515/BC.2008.110Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kaushik S, Pickup MW, Weaver VM. From transformation to metastasis: deconstructing the extracellular matrix in breast cancer. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2016; 35: 655-67. doi: 10.1007/s10555-016-9650-0KaushikSPickupMWWeaverVM.From transformation to metastasis: deconstructing the extracellular matrix in breast cancer.Cancer Metastasis Rev2016;35:655-67.10.1007/s10555-016-9650-0Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Samaržija K, Jurjević Z. Association of the imaging characteristics of desmoplasia on digital breast tomosynthesis and the Ki-67 proliferation index in invasive breast cancer. Croat Med J 2021; 62: 59-67. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2021.62.59SamaržijaKJurjevićZ.Association of the imaging characteristics of desmoplasia on digital breast tomosynthesis and the Ki-67 proliferation index in invasive breast cancer.Croat Med J2021;62:59-67.10.3325/cmj.2021.62.59Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Demirkazık FB, Gülsün M, Fırat P. Mammographic features of nonpalpable spiculated lesions. Clinical Imaging 2003; 27: 293-7. doi: 10.1016/S0899-7071(02)00566-1DemirkazıkFBGülsünMFıratP.Mammographic features of nonpalpable spiculated lesions.Clinical Imaging2003;27:293-7.10.1016/S0899-7071(02)00566-1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Almasarweh S, Sudah M, Okuma H, Joukainen S, Kärjä V, Vanninen R, et al. Diagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions. Radiol Oncol 2022; 56: 461-70. doi: 10.2478/raon-2022-0036AlmasarwehSSudahMOkumaHJoukainenSKärjäVVanninenRDiagnostic performance of tomosynthesis, digital mammography and a dedicated digital specimen radiography system versus pathological assessment of excised breast lesions.Radiol Oncol2022;56:461-70.10.2478/raon-2022-0036Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Almasarweh S, Sudah M, Okuma H, Joukainen S, Vanninen R, Masarwah A. Specimen tomosynthesis provides no additional value to specimen ultrasound in ultrasound-visible malignant breast lesions. Scand J Surg 2024; 113: 237-45. doi: 10.1177/14574969241233435AlmasarwehSSudahMOkumaHJoukainenSVanninenRMasarwahA.Specimen tomosynthesis provides no additional value to specimen ultrasound in ultrasound-visible malignant breast lesions.Scand J Surg2024;113:237-45.10.1177/14574969241233435Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goldhirsch A, Wood WC, Coates AS, Gelber RD, Thürlimann B, Senn HJ. Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1736-47. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr304GoldhirschAWoodWCCoatesASGelberRDThürlimannBSennHJ.Strategies for subtypes--dealing with the diversity of breast cancer: highlights of the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2011.Ann Oncol2011;22:1736-47.10.1093/annonc/mdr304Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
American College of Radiology, D’Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA, eds. ACR BI-RADS Atlas: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ; Mammography, Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Follow-up and Outcome Monitoring, Data Dictionary. 5th edition. ACR, American College of Radiology; 2013.American College of RadiologyD’OrsiCJSicklesEAMendelsonEBMorrisEA, eds.ACR BI-RADS Atlas: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System ; Mammography, Ultrasound, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Follow-up and Outcome Monitoring, Data Dictionary.5th edition.ACR, American College of Radiology;2013.Search in Google Scholar
Udovicic M, Bazdaric K, Bilic-Zulle L, Petrovecki M. What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation? Biochem Med. 2007: 17: 10-15. doi: 10.11613/BM.2007.002UdovicicMBazdaricKBilic-ZulleLPetroveckiM.What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation?Biochem Med.2007:17:10-15.10.11613/BM.2007.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Dalberg K, Azavedo E, Svane G, Sandelin K. Mammographic features, predictors of early ipsilateral breast tumour recurrences? Eur J Surg Oncol 1996; 22: 483-90. doi: 10.1016/S0748-7983(96)92882-6DalbergKAzavedoESvaneGSandelinK.Mammographic features, predictors of early ipsilateral breast tumour recurrences?Eur J Surg Oncol1996;22:483-90.10.1016/S0748-7983(96)92882-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rong XC, Kang YH, Shi GF, Ren JL, Liu YH, Li ZG, et al. The use of mammography-based radiomics nomograms for the preoperative prediction of the histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149: 11635-45. doi: 10.1007/s00432-023-05001-9RongXCKangYHShiGFRenJLLiuYHLiZGThe use of mammography-based radiomics nomograms for the preoperative prediction of the histological grade of invasive ductal carcinoma.J Cancer Res Clin Oncol2023;149:11635-45.10.1007/s00432-023-05001-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lamb PM, Perry NM, Vinnicombe SJ, Wells CA. Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast. Clin Radiol 2000; 55: 40-4. doi: 10.1053/crad.1999.0333LambPMPerryNMVinnicombeSJWellsCA.Correlation between ultrasound characteristics, mammographic findings and histological grade in patients with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.Clin Radiol2000;55:40-4.10.1053/crad.1999.0333Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tabar L, Tony Chen HH, Amy Yen MF, Tot T, Tung TH, Chen LS, et al. Mammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer 2004; 101: 1745-59. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20582TabarLTony ChenHHAmy YenMFTotTTungTHChenLSMammographic tumor features can predict long-term outcomes reliably in women with 1-14-mm invasive breast carcinoma.Cancer2004;101:1745-59.10.1002/cncr.20582Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Landercasper J, Borgert AJ, Fayanju OM, Cody H 3rd, Feldman S, Greenberg C, et al. Factors associated with reoperation in breast-conserving surgery for cancer: A prospective study of American Society of Breast Surgeon members. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26: 3321-36. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07547-wLandercasperJBorgertAJFayanjuOMCodyH3rdFeldmanSGreenbergCFactors associated with reoperation in breast-conserving surgery for cancer: A prospective study of American Society of Breast Surgeon members.Ann Surg Oncol2019;26:3321-36.10.1245/s10434-019-07547-wOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
McEvoy MP, Landercasper J, Naik HR, Feldman S. Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic. Gland Surg 2018; 7: 536-53. doi: 10.21037/gs.2018.11.03McEvoyMPLandercasperJNaikHRFeldmanS.Update of the American Society of Breast Surgeons Toolbox to address the lumpectomy reoperation epidemic.Gland Surg2018;7:536-53.10.21037/gs.2018.11.03Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Niinikoski L, Leidenius MHK, Vaara P, Voynov A, Heikkilä P, Mattson J, et al. Resection margins and local recurrences in breast cancer: Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. Eur J Surg Oncol 2019; 45: 976-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.010NiinikoskiLLeideniusMHKVaaraPVoynovAHeikkiläPMattsonJResection margins and local recurrences in breast cancer: Comparison between conventional and oncoplastic breast conserving surgery.Eur J Surg Oncol2019;45:976-82.10.1016/j.ejso.2019.02.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lepomäki M, Karhunen-Enckell U, Tuominen J, Kronqvist P, Oksala N, Murtola T, et al. Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients. J Surg Oncol 2022; 125: 577-88. doi: 10.1002/jso.26749LepomäkiMKarhunen-EnckellUTuominenJKronqvistPOksalaNMurtolaTTumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.J Surg Oncol2022;125:577-88.10.1002/jso.26749Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Joukainen S, Laaksonen E, Vanninen R, Kaarela O, Sudah M. Dual-layer rotation: A versatile therapeutic mammoplasty technique. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29: 6716-27. doi: 10.1245/s10434-022-11977-4JoukainenSLaaksonenEVanninenRKaarelaOSudahM.Dual-layer rotation: A versatile therapeutic mammoplasty technique.Ann Surg Oncol2022;29:6716-27.10.1245/s10434-022-11977-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sturesdotter L, Sandsveden M, Johnson K, Larsson AM, Zackrisson S, Sartor H. Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtype. Sci Rep 2020; 10: 20814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-77053-7SturesdotterLSandsvedenMJohnsonKLarssonAMZackrissonSSartorH.Mammographic tumour appearance is related to clinicopathological factors and surrogate molecular breast cancer subtype.Sci Rep2020;10:20814.10.1038/s41598-020-77053-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Evans AJ, Pinder SE, James JJ, Ellis IO, Cornford E. Is Mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer? Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187: 1377-80. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.0725EvansAJPinderSEJamesJJEllisIOCornfordE.Is Mammographic spiculation an independent, good prognostic factor in screening-detected invasive breast cancer?Am J Roentgenol2006;187:1377-80.10.2214/AJR.05.0725Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Ciatto S, Morrone D, Catarzi S, Bonardi R. Breast cancer: reliability of mammographic appearance as a predictor of hormone receptor status. Radiology 1992; 182: 805-8. doi: 10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311118CiattoSMorroneDCatarziSBonardiR.Breast cancer: reliability of mammographic appearance as a predictor of hormone receptor status.Radiology1992;182:805-8.10.1148/radiology.182.3.1311118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar