Concepts and action: where does the embodiment debate leave us?

Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16, 1818-1823.10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1982). Context-independent and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition, 10, 82-93.10.3758/BF03197629Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211-227.10.3758/BF03196968Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 637-660.10.1017/S0140525X99532147Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617-645.10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639Search in Google Scholar

Barsalou, L. W. (2016). On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1122-1142.10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3Search in Google Scholar

Bergen, B., & Wheeler, K. (2010). Grammatical aspect and mental simulation. Brain and Language, 112, 150-158.10.1016/j.bandl.2009.07.002Search in Google Scholar

Binder, J. R. (2016). In defense of abstract conceptual representations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1096-1108.10.3758/s13423-015-0909-1Search in Google Scholar

Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 527-536.10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001Search in Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M. (2004). Object concepts and action: Extracting affordances from objects parts. Acta Psychologica, 115, 69-96.10.1016/j.actpsy.2003.11.004Search in Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Bonfiglioli, C., Lugli, L., Ricciardelli, P., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2007). Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information?: Studies with hand primes. Neuroscience Letters, 411, 17-21.10.1016/j.neulet.2006.10.003Search in Google Scholar

Borghi, A. M., Flumini, A., Natraj, N., & Wheaton, L. A. (2012). One hand, two objects: emergence of affordance in contexts. Brain & Cognition, 80, 64-73.10.1016/j.bandc.2012.04.007Search in Google Scholar

Borreggine, K. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action-sentence compatibility effect: It's all in the timing. Cognitive Science, 30, 1097-1112.10.1207/s15516709cog0000_91Search in Google Scholar

Bub, D., & Masson, M. (2006). Gestural knowledge evoked by objects as part of conceptual representations. Aphasiology, 20, 1112-1124.10.1080/02687030600741667Search in Google Scholar

Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. (2010). On the nature of hand-action representations evoked during written sentence comprehension. Cognition, 116, 394-408.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. (2012). On the dynamics of action representations evoked by names of manipulable objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 502-517.10.1037/a0026748Search in Google Scholar

Bub, D. N., Masson, M. E., & Cree, G. S. (2008). Evocation of functional and volumetric gestural knowledge by objects and words. Cognition, 106, 27-58.10.1016/j.cognition.2006.12.010Search in Google Scholar

Buxbaum, L. J., & Saffran, E. M. (2002). Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects. Brain & Language, 82, 179-199.10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00014-7Search in Google Scholar

Buxbaum, L. J., Veramonti, T., & Schwartz, M. F. (2000). Function and manipulation tool knowledge in apraxia: knowing ‘what for’ but not ‘how’. Neurocase, 6, 83-97.10.1080/13554790008402763Search in Google Scholar

Campanella, F., & Shallice, T. (2011). Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature? Experimental Brain Research, 208, 369-383.10.1007/s00221-010-2489-7Search in Google Scholar

Canessa, N., Borgo, F., Cappa, S. F., Perani, D., Falini, A., Buccino, G., Tettamanti, M., & Shallice, T. (2008). The different neural correlates of action and functional knowledge in semantic memory: an FMRI study.10.1093/cercor/bhm110Search in Google Scholar

Cerebral Cortex, 18, 740-751.Search in Google Scholar

Chao, L. L., & Martin, A. (2000). Representation of manipulable man-made objects in the dorsal stream. Neuroimage, 12, 478-484.10.1006/nimg.2000.0635Search in Google Scholar

Damasio, A. R. (1989). Time-locked multiregional retroactivation: A systemslevel proposal for the neural substrates of recall and recognition. Cognition, 33, 25-62.10.1016/0010-0277(89)90005-XSearch in Google Scholar

De Scalzi, M., Rusted, J., & Oakhill, J. (2015). Embodiment effects and language comprehension in Alzheimer's disease. Cognitive Science, 39, 890-917.10.1111/cogs.12187Search in Google Scholar

Ellis, R., & Tucker, M. (2000). Micro-affordance: The potentiation of components of action by seen objects. British Journal of Psychology, 91, 451-471.10.1348/000712600161934Search in Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 1-19.10.1017/S0140525X97000010Search in Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M. (2015). Few believe the world is flat: How embodiment is changing the scientific understanding of cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/ Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 69, 165-171.10.1037/cep0000056Search in Google Scholar

Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558-565.10.3758/BF03196313Search in Google Scholar

Goldinger, S. D., Papesh, M. H., Barnhart, A. S., Hansen, W. A., & Hout, M. C. (2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 959-978.10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1Search in Google Scholar

Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 42, 335-346.10.1016/0167-2789(90)90087-6Search in Google Scholar

Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301-307.10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9Search in Google Scholar

Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2006). The role of action representations in visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 174, 221-228.10.1007/s00221-006-0443-5Search in Google Scholar

Helbig, H. B., Steinwender, J., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2010). Action observation can prime visual object recognition. Experimental Brain Research, 200, 251-258.10.1007/s00221-009-1953-8Search in Google Scholar

Iachini, T., Borghi, A. M., & Senese, V. P. (2008). Categorization and sensorimotor interaction with objects. Brain & Cognition, 67, 31-43.10.1016/j.bandc.2007.11.002Search in Google Scholar

Jax, S. A., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2010). Response interference between functional and structural actions linked to the same familiar object. Cognition, 115, 350-355.10.1016/j.cognition.2010.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 883-895.10.1080/17470210701623852Search in Google Scholar

Kemmerer, D. (2015). Are the motor features of verb meanings represented in the precentral motor cortices? Yes, but within the context of a flexible, multilevel architecture for conceptual knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22, 1068-1075.10.3758/s13423-014-0784-1Search in Google Scholar

Kripke, S. A. (1972). Naming and necessity. In D. Davidson & G. Harman (Eds), Semantics of natural language, Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-010-2557-7_9Search in Google Scholar

Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: an exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99, 22-44.10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.22Search in Google Scholar

Lebois, L. A., Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., & Barsalou, L. W. (2015). Are automatic conceptual cores the gold standard of semantic processing? The context-dependence of spatial meaning in grounded congruency effects. Cognitive Science, 39, 1764-1801.10.1111/cogs.12174Search in Google Scholar

Lee, C., Middleton, E., Mirman, D., Kalénine, S., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2013). Incidental and context-responsive activation of structure- and functionbased action features during object identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 257-270.10.1037/a0027533Search in Google Scholar

Leshinskaya, A., & Caramazza, A. (2016). For a cognitive neuroscience of concepts: Moving beyond the grounding issue. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 991-1001.10.3758/s13423-015-0870-zSearch in Google Scholar

Machery, E. (2016). The amodal brain and the offloading hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1090-1095.10.3758/s13423-015-0878-4Search in Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z. (2015a). The burden of embodied cognition. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie Expérimentale, 69, 172-178.10.1037/cep0000060Search in Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z. (2015b). What is embodied about cognition? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30, 420-429.10.1080/23273798.2014.987791Search in Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology-Paris, 102, 59-70.10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004Search in Google Scholar

Mahon, B. Z., & Hickok, G. (2016). Arguments about the nature of concepts: Symbols, embodiment, and beyond. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 941-958.10.3758/s13423-016-1045-2Search in Google Scholar

Martin, A. (2016). GRAPES - Grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 979-990.10.3758/s13423-015-0842-3Search in Google Scholar

Martin, A., Haxby, J. V., Lalonde, F. M., Wiggs, C. L., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995). Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science, 270, 102-105.10.1126/science.270.5233.102Search in Google Scholar

Masson, M. E., Bub, D. N., & Newton-Taylor, M. (2008). Language-based access to gestural components of conceptual knowledge. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 869-882.10.1080/17470210701623829Search in Google Scholar

Myung, J., Blumstein, S. E., & Sedivy, J. C. (2006). Playing on the typewriter, typing on the piano: manipulation knowledge of objects. Cognition, 98, 223-243.10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.010Search in Google Scholar

Osiurak, F., Roche, K., Ramone, J., & Chainay, H. (2013). Handing a tool to someone can take more time than using it. Cognition, 128, 76-81.10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.005Search in Google Scholar

Pellicano, A., Iani, C., Borghi, A. M., Rubichi, S., & Nicoletti, R. (2010). Simon-like and functional affordance effects with tools: The effects of object perceptual discrimination and object action state. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 2190-2201.10.1080/17470218.2010.486903Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, J. C., & Ward, R. (2002). S-R correspondence effects of irrelevant visual affordance: Time course and specificity of response activation. Visual Cognition, 9, 540-558.10.1080/13506280143000575Search in Google Scholar

Proctor, R. W., & Miles, J. D. (2014). Does the concept of affordance add anything to explanations of stimulus-response compatibility effects?. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 60, pp. 227-266). Academic Press.10.1016/B978-0-12-800090-8.00006-8Search in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, F. (1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 253-279.10.1017/S0140525X9900182XSearch in Google Scholar

Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793-797.10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03900.xSearch in Google Scholar

Putnam, H. (1973). Meaning and reference. The Journal of Philosophy, 70, 699-711.10.2307/2025079Search in Google Scholar

Rueschemeyer, S. A., Lindemann, O., van Rooij, D., van Dam, W., & Bekkering, H. (2010). Effects of intentional motor actions on embodied language processing. Experimental Psychology, 57, 260-266.10.1027/1618-3169/a000031Search in Google Scholar

Schwarzkopf, S., Weldle, H., Müller, D., & Koniezcny, L. (2011). Mental simulation of spatial perspective during sentence comprehension. In L. Carlson, C. Hőlscher, & T. F. Shipley (Eds), Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 937-942). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Search in Google Scholar

Shin, H. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity-scaling studies of dot-pattern classification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 278-304.10.1037/0096-3445.121.3.278Search in Google Scholar

Sim, E. J., Helbig, H. B., Graf, M., & Kiefer, M. (2015). When action observation facilitates visual perception: activation in visuo-motor areas contributes to object recognition. Cerebral Cortex, 25, 2907-2918.10.1093/cercor/bhu087Search in Google Scholar

Taylor, L. J., & Zwaan, R. A. (2010). Grasping spheres, not planets. Cognition, 115, 39-45.10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.006Search in Google Scholar

Tettamanti, M., Buccino, G., Saccuman, M. C., Gallese, V., Danna, M., Scifo, P.,Fazio, F., Rizzolatti, G., Cappa, S. F., & Perani, D. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences activates fronto-parietal motor circuits. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 273-281.10.1162/0898929053124965Search in Google Scholar

Thelen, E., Schöner, G., Scheier, C., & Smith, L. B. (2001). So what's a modeler to do? Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 24(1), 70-80.10.1017/S0140525X01553911Search in Google Scholar

Tomasino, B., & Rumiati, R. I. (2013). At the mercy of strategies: the role of motor representations in language understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1-13.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00027Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (1998). On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 830-846.10.1037/0096-1523.24.3.830Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2001). The potentiation of grasp types during visual object categorization. Visual Cognition, 8, 769-800.10.1080/13506280042000144Search in Google Scholar

Tucker, M., & Ellis, R. (2004). Action priming by briefly presented objects. Acta Psychologica, 116, 185-203.10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.01.004Search in Google Scholar

Vainio, L., Symes, E., Ellis, R., Tucker, M., & Ottoboni, G. (2008). On the relations between action planning, object identification, and motor representations of observed actions and objects. Cognition, 108, 444-465.10.1016/j.cognition.2008.03.007Search in Google Scholar

Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625-636.10.3758/BF03196322Search in Google Scholar