Utilization of spent brewer’s yeast for supplementation of distillery corn mashes

1. Dickinson, J.R. (2004). Nitrogen metabolism. In: J.R. Dickinson & M. Schweizer (Eds.), The Metabolism and MolecularPhysiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, second ed. (pp. 42-104). London: CRC Press.Search in Google Scholar

2. Kotarska, K., Czupryński, B. & Kłosowski, G. (2006). Effect of varoius activators on the course of alcoholic fermentation. J. Food Eng. 77, 965-971. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.041.10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2005.08.041Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

3. Munoz, E. & Ingledew, W.M. (1989). Effect of yeast hulls on stuck and sluggish wine fermentations: importance of the lipid component. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 55(6), 1560-1564.10.1128/aem.55.6.1560-1564.198920290416347950Search in Google Scholar

4. Kawa-Rygielska, J., Pietrzak, W., Regiel, P. & Stencel, P. (2013). Utilization of concentrate after membrane fi ltration of sugar beet thin juice for ethanol production. BioresourceTechnol. 133, 134-141. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.070.10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.07023425583Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

5. Junior, M.M., de Oliveira, J.E., Batistote, M. & Ernandes, J.R. (2012). Evaluation of Brazilian ethanol production yeasts for maltose fermentation in media containing structurally complex nitrogen sources. J. Inst. Brew. 118, 82-88. DOI: 10.1002/jib.3.10.1002/jib.3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Yao, L., Wang, T. & Wang, H. (2011). Effect of soy skim from soybean aqueous processing on the performance of corn ethanol fermentation. Bioresource Technol. 102, 9199-9205. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.071.10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.07121775137Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

7. Kawa-Rygielska, J. & Pietrzak, W. (2012). Use of dried distiller’s grains with solubles (DDGS) in the production of bioethanol. Przem. Chem. 91(9), 1876-1879.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ferreira, I.M.P.L.V.O., Pinho, O., Vieira, E. & Tavarela, J.G. (2010). Brewer’s Saccharomyces yeast biomass: characteristics and potential applications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21, 77-84. DOI: 10.1016/j.tifs.2009.10.008.10.1016/j.tifs.2009.10.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

9. Liu, H., Lin, J.P., Cen, P.L. & Pan, Y.J. (2004). Co-production of S-adenosyl-L-methionine and glutathione from spent brewer’s yeast cells. Process Biochem. 39, 1993-1997. DOI: 10.1016/j.procbio.2003.09.031.10.1016/j.procbio.2003.09.031Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. In, M., Kim, D.C. & Chae, H.J. (2005). Downstream process fort he production of yeast extract using brewer’s yeast cells. Biotechnol. Bioproc. E. 10, 85-90.10.1007/BF02931188Search in Google Scholar

11. Thanardkit, P., Khunrae, P., Suphantharika, M. & Verduyn, C. (2002). Glucan from spent brewer’s yeast: preparation, analysis and use as a potential immunostimulant in shrimp feed. World J. Microb. Biot. 18, 527-539. DOI: 10.1023/A:1016322227535.10.1023/A:1016322227535Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

12. Mussatto, S.I. (2009). Biotechnological potential of brewing industry by-products. In: P.S. Nigam & A. Pandey (Eds.) Biotechnology for agro-industrial residues utilisation, (pp. 313-326) London: Springer Science+Business Media.Search in Google Scholar

13. BS EN ISO 10520:1998. Native starch. Determination of starch content. Ewers polarimetric method, ISBN: 0 580 30395 0.Search in Google Scholar

14. Kawa-Rygielska, J., Pietrzak, W. & Czubaszek, A. (2012). Characterization of fermentation of waste wheat-rye bread mashes with the addition of complex enzymatic preparations. BiomassBioenerg. 44, 17-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.016.10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.04.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

15. Millati, R., Edebo, L. & Taherzadeh, M.J. (2005). Performance of Rhizomucor and Mucor in ethanol production from glucose, xylose and wood hydrolyzates. Enzyme Microb. Technol. 36, 294-300. DOI: 10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.09.007.10.1016/j.enzmictec.2004.09.007Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

16. Jones, A.M. & Ingledew, W.M. (1994). Fermentation of very high gravity wheat mash prepared using fresh yeast autolysate. Bioresource Technol. 50, 97-101.10.1016/0960-8524(94)90059-0Search in Google Scholar

17. Muthaiyan, A., Limayem, A. & Ricke, S.C. (2011). Antimicrobial strategies for limiting bacterial contaminations in fuel bioethanol fermentations. Prog. Energ. Combust. Sci. 37, 351-370. DOI: 10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.005.10.1016/j.pecs.2010.06.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

18. Kawa-Rygielska, J., Pietrzak, W. & Pęksa, A. (2012). Potato granules processing line by-products as a feedstock for ethanol production. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 21(5), 1249-1255.Search in Google Scholar

19. Laopaiboon, L., Nuanpeng, S., Srinophakun, P., Klanrit, P. & Laopaiboon, P. (2009). Ethanol production from sweet sorghum juice using very high gravity technology: Effects of carbon and nitrogen supplementations. Bioresource Technol., 100, 4176-4182. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.046.10.1016/j.biortech.2009.03.04619375908Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

20. Blomberg, A. & Adler, L. (1989). Roles of glycerol and glucerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (NAD+) in aquired osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 171, 1087-1092.10.1128/jb.171.2.1087-1092.19892097052644223Search in Google Scholar

21. Bely, M., Rinaldi, A. & Dubourdieu, D. (2003). Infl uence of assimilable nitrogen on volatile acidity production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae during high sugar fermentation. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 96, 507-512. DOI: 10.1263/jbb.96.5 10.1263/jbb.96.5Open DOISearch in Google Scholar