Lake Al-Manzalah is considered one of the most important outlets for inland fisheries in Egypt and is estimated to account for about 38.02% of the total fish catch from the Nile River Delta lakes. It is considered to be the second major source of fish after Lake El-Burollus. The importance of Lake Al-Manzalah fishery relies on two main targets, i.e. it is a source of protein for human consumption and a provider of employment (El-Bokhty 2010). There are five coastal lakes along the northern coast of Egypt, connected with the Mediterranean. They represent important fishing resources in Egypt. Due to human activity, these lakes are severely environmentally degraded (Abdel-Satar et al. 2017).
Lake Al-Manzalah is considered the largest and most productive lake in Egypt. Due to the increase in agricultural, municipal and industrial wastewater discharge, the fish production and water quality status of the lake have degraded (Ahmed et al. 2006; Goher et al. 2017).
Since the early 20th century, there have been continuous changes in hydrological, chemical and biological characteristics of the lake resulting from increased freshwater supplies associated with municipal and agricultural wastewater disposal (Abdel-Satar & Goher 2009). Lake Al-Manzalah is connected with five drains through its western and southern shores. These drains discharge their effluent into the lake, which affects its water quality (Abdel-Satar 2001, 2008; Ali 2008). Approximately 7500 million cubic meters of untreated industrial, domestic and agricultural drainage waters are discharged into the lake annually through the drains such as Bahr El-Baqer (industrial and domestic wastewater), Ramsis, Hadous, Faraskour and El-Serw (agricultural wastewater; Abu Khatita et al. 2015). The pollutants and wastes discharged from the drains affect the entire area of the lake (El-Naggar et al. 2016).
Several studies have addressed the ecology of Lake Al-Manzalah. These studies covered the lake water quality, hydrological system, geological aspects, benthic invertebrates, phytoplankton composition, bacterial indices, and fishery status of the lake (Yacoub et al. 2005; Abdel-Satar 2008; Abdel-Satar & Goher 2009; El-Refaie 2010; Hamed et al. 2013; Mehanna et al. 2014; Zahran et al. 2015; Orabi & Osman 2015; Hegazy et al. 2016; El-Shafei 2016).
Contamination with metals in aquatic systems has drawn particular attention due to their persistence, toxicity and biological accumulation (Zahran et al. 2015). Heavy metals enter the human body through different paths, such as the food chain, and pose both non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic health risks (Mohanta et al. 2020). Fatal diseases such as renal tumor, nephritis, osteoporosis, cancer, nasopharyngeal congestion, increased blood pressure associated with cardiovascular diseases, and malfunctions of different body systems are caused by heavy metals (Mohanta et al. 2020). Determination of heavy metal levels in environmental biota is an essential process in assessing the human health risk resulting from the presence of these contaminants in food. Pollutants can be categorized as non-carcinogens and carcinogens, and are found mainly in fish (Yu et al. 2014). Risk assessment is one of the fastest processes required to evaluate the impact of hazards on humans. The risks can be divided into non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic effects. The non-carcinogenic risk is based on the Hazard Quotient (HQ), while the carcinogenic risk is based on the Target Cancer Risk (TCR; Markmanuel & Horsfall Jnr. 2016).
Fish are considered one of the most important biomonitors in the aquatic ecosystem for assessing heavy metal pollution (Abou El-Gheit et al. 2012). Furthermore, fish are at the top of the food chain and can accumulate metals that are transferred to humans through consumption of fish, causing acute or chronic diseases (Al-Yousuf et al. 2000).
Accumulation of pollutants disrupts the physiology of fish tissues. The endpoint in assessing the risk of pollutants in the environment is the microscopic examination of target tissues through histopathological parameters (Fatima et al. 2015). Histopathological changes can be used as indicators of the impact of various anthropogenic pollutants on organisms and as a measure of the overall health of the entire aquatic ecosystem (Saad et al. 2011). Harmful effects of pollutants can be manifested in fish tissues before consequential changes in the external appearance and behavior of fish (Mahboob et al. 2020). The exposure of fish living in Lake Al-Manzalah to different types of wastes (industrial, agricultural, and sewage) resulted in several pathological changes in different fish organs (Tayel et al. 2014; Mahmoud & Abd El Rahman 2017).
The objectives of this research were: a) to determine the level of metals in the muscles and gills of
Lake Al-Manzalah is located between longitudes 31°45′E and 32°22′E and latitudes 31°00′N and 31°35′N (Fig. 1). The lake is bordered by the Mediterranean Sea to the north and northeast, by Dakahlia and Sharkia to the south, by the Suez Canal to the east and by the Nile Branch of Damietta to the west (Hossen & Negm 2016). Three outlets connect Lake Al-Manzalah with the Mediterranean Sea allowing the exchange of water and biota between the lake and the sea: El-Boughdady, El-Gamil, and new El-Gamil (Elewa et al. 2007). The lake is also connected with the Suez Canal at El-Qabouti, a few kilometers south of Port Said, and with the Nile's Damietta Branch by El-Inaniya, El-Ratma and Souffara canals (Sallam & Elsayed 2018).
The area of Qahr El-Bahr, located in the city of Port Said, is a semi-isolated area of Lake Al-Manzalah by the International Ring Road and 30 June road. It has an area of about 12.6 km2 and is fed through the El-Qabouti Channel, a narrow opening that connects the seawater with the study area, which is considered one of the deepest part of the lake. Fish samples were collected at seven sites in September 2018. The distribution of heavy metals in the water and sediment of Lake Al-Manzalah is presented in Table 1.
Distribution of heavy metals in water and sediment of Lake Al-Manzalah (Goher et al. 2017)
Metal | Lake water | Lake sediment | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Unit | Value | Unit | Value | |
Fe | μg l−1 | 216.7–862.4 | mg g−1 | 8.50–15.36 |
Mn | 8.7–34.6 | μg g−1 | 96.4–362.4 | |
Zn | 22.2–58.4 | 15.3–108.3 | ||
Cu | 4.3–15.0 | 5.6–19.0 | ||
Pb | 7.9–74.7 | 5.7–63.5 | ||
Cd | 1.0–3.7 | 1.09–4.10 | ||
Ni* | 13.99–51.54 | 10.01–62.73 |
after Elmorsi et al. (2015)
Samples of three tilapia species (
List of fish species, total length and size of tilapia fishes caught in Qahr El-Bahr, Lake Al-Manzalah
Species | Total length (cm) Mean ± SD | Body weight (g) Mean ± SD |
---|---|---|
23.51 ± 1.12 | 265.2 ± 52.6 | |
22.36 ± 0.98 | 252.4 ± 48.3 | |
13.11 ± 1.45 | 95.5 ± 15.6 |
Specimens of muscles and gills of different fish species were dried in an oven at 105°C for about 24 h. The dried specimens were then ground to a fine powder. A representative sample of 1 g dry weight of muscles or gills was taken from fish specimens. The samples were digested according to the method described by Goldberg et al. (1983), during which concentrated nitric and perchloric acid (AR grade) in the 5:5 ratio was used in Teflon beakers on a hot plate at 50°C for about 5 h till complete decomposition of organic matter. The digested solutions were cooled to room temperature, filtered and diluted to a final volume of 50 ml with deionized distilled water. The concentrations of Fe, Pb, Mn, Zn, Cu, Cd and Ni were measured by an Australian GBC atomic absorption reader (model Savant AA-AAS) with a GF 5000 graphite furnace and expressed in mg kg−1 dry weight.
The precision of the analyzed metal values was controlled by including triplicate samples in analytical batches. Standard deviations for mean values of triplicate measurements were up to 5%, which was regarded as an acceptable precision. Practical quantitation limits for the analysis of heavy metals were in the range of 0.02–0.05 μg g−1.
In the present study, the muscles of tilapia species were specifically selected for heavy metal analysis because they are the only edible tissue, therefore the level of toxicants present in this tissue is particularly relevant.
The estimated daily intake (mg kg−1 body weight) for heavy metals was calculated in fish muscle samples using the following formula (Shaheen et al. 2016):
The non-carcinogenic risk for each metal in the muscles was assessed by the hazard quotient (HQ) (USEPA 2000) using the following equation:
The overall potential for non-carcinogenic effects from all studied metals was assessed using the hazard index (HI). The hazard index was expressed as the sum of the hazard quotients (USEPA 2000) using the following equation:
The carcinogen risk was estimated using the target carcinogenic risk (TCR; USEPA 2000), which was derived from the intake of Pb and Cd using the following equation:
The relative risk (RR) of pollutants, defined by Yu et al. (2014), can be helpful in identifying the most harmful metals. The RR was calculated according to the following equation:
Human health risk from fish consumption should increase as the relative risk values increase (Yu et al. 2014).
Muscles, gills and liver of the fish
The results were tested for significant differences for metals between different sites and species using one-way ANOVA, and
Salts of heavy metals constitute a very serious form of pollution. They can bioaccumulate in fish tissues and the extent of bioaccumulation depends on species, age and trophic transfer (Islam et al. 2017). It was difficult to compare the contamination with trace metals in all fish species at different sites. Therefore, tilapia species were selected as indicators to account for the degree of pollution by heavy metals in the area of Qahr El-Bahr in Lake Al-Manzalah, where they were successfully obtained from all sampling sites. The concentrations of metals (Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, Pb, Cd and Ni) in different fish species are listed in Table 3.
Metal concentration (mg kg−1) in the muscles and gills of fish species collected from Qahr El-Bahr
Fish species (muscle) | Fe | Zn | Cu | Mn | Pb | Cd | Ni | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Range |
36.4–83.9 |
28.5–41.5 |
2.0–4.2 |
2.9–6.9 |
1.5–3.3 |
0.4–1.1 |
4.39–6.01 |
|
Range |
37.9–84.3 |
30.7–45.6 |
2.3–6.4 |
2.9–7.5 |
1.6–4.8 |
0.4–1.4 |
4.68–6.65 |
|
Range |
60.9–98.3 |
39.8–50.1 |
3.3–4.8 |
4.7–8.1 |
2.2–4.9 |
1.0–1.4 |
5.52–6.73 |
|
Fish species (gills) | Fe | Zn | Cu | Mn | Pb | Cd | Ni | |
Range |
119.3–220.0 |
55.0–76.6 |
4.8–7.7 |
21.3–54.2 |
3.6–6.0 |
1.0–1.4 |
11.6–13.8 |
|
Range |
131.5–221.5 |
52.6–105.2 |
5.9–10.1 |
30.7–61.3 |
5.5–7.2 |
1.4–2.1 |
11.4–14.0 |
|
Range |
189.5–291.2 |
66.9–105.2 |
4.7–8.2 |
35.9–68.9 |
4.3–7.2 |
1.4–2.3 |
12.5–15.9 |
There were no differences in the order of heavy metal levels in the muscles and gills of the three fish species. Fe accumulated the most in the muscles and gills of the three tilapia species, and was followed by Zn, Ni, Mn, Cu, Pb, and Cd. The levels of essential elements (Fe, Zn, Ni, Mn, Cu) were higher than those of the non-essential ones (Pb, and Cd). The overall concentrations of the studied metals in the muscles and gills of the fish species were in the following descending order:
Iron is the most important metal for biological life. It plays a greater biological role than any other heavy metal. Its toxicity causes diarrhea, hemorrhagic gastroenteritis, liver necrosis and leads to death by hepatic coma (Clarke et al. 1981). According to WHO (1989), the permissible limit of Fe concentrations in fish species is about 100 mg kg−1. The concentrations of Fe in tissues of tilapia species are still below this limit and the fish can be considered as uncontaminated (< 100; Table 3).
Zn and Cu are essential micronutrients for all organisms. They are required at considerable levels as constituents of various enzymes in organisms to maintain certain biological functions. Zn was found in high concentrations in samples of some fish species, exceeding the limit (40 mg kg−1) specified by FAO (1983). Zn levels were higher than the permissible limit in 14.2%, 28.4%, and 71.1% of the muscle samples of
Mn deficiency causes reproductive and skeletal abnormalities. Daily intake of small amounts of Mn is recommended for growth and good health of children. However, excess consumption of Mn can lead to neurologic and psychological disorders (Ahmed et al. 2016). Mn concentrations in the muscles of the studied fish were higher than the permissible concentration (1 mg kg−1) recommended by WHO (1989). The increase in Mn levels in fish gills and muscles is related to a large amount of agricultural drainage water entering Lake Al-Manzalah. Our results are consistent with those of Mahmoud & Abd El Rahman (2017) for the fish species
Pb and Cd play no role in biological processes of living organisms and are highly toxic non-essential elements even at low concentrations (Dimari et al. 2008). They are also potent mutagenic and carcinogenic agents (Markmanuel & Horsfall 2016). Pb inhibits impulse conductivity by inhibiting the activity of acetylcholine esterase and monoamine oxidase, leading to pathological changes in organs and tissues (Rubio et al. 1991). It also impairs the larval and embryonic growth of fish species (Dave & Xiu 1991).
Pb and Cd concentrations in the muscles and gills of the three fish species were higher than the permissible limits recommended by FAO (1983) as criteria for human health protection, indicating that Pb and Cd may pose a risk to humans through the consumption of these contaminated fish species. Cd concentrations in fish muscles of the collected species were higher than its permissible limit (0.5 mg kg−1), while Pb concentrations were 3 to 10 times higher than the limit of 0.5 mg kg−1 recommended by FAO (1983) in the muscles of all species.
Ni is a well-known essential metal necessary for enzymes and other cell components with critical functions for living organisms, yet very high intakes can lead to serious health problems (Elnabris et al. 2013), therefore IARC (2012) classified Ni as a human carcinogen. Ni concentrations in the muscles (4.39–6.73 mg kg−1) and gills (11.4–15.6 mg kg−1) of tilapia species were found to be lower than the limit (70–80 mg kg−1) recommended by USFDA (1993).
Correlation coefficients were calculated to clarify the relationships between the analyzed metals. Matrix analysis showed significant positive correlations (n = 7;
As fish consumption is a possible source of heavy metal accumulation in humans, it is important to consider the daily intake of metals through fish consumption (Elnabris et al. 2013). The EDI was estimated by considering that a 70 kg person consumes 57 g fish per day. The EDI of heavy metals through the consumption of three tilapia fish species by humans is presented in Table 4. The results revealed that Mn, Ni, Cu, Pb, and Cd constituted the lowest daily intake, while Fe and Zn – the highest daily intake. The EDI values of Fe, Pb, and Cd in the selected fish species were higher than the maximum tolerable daily intake (MTDI) values recommended by FAO\WHO (2011) for a 70 kg person (MTDI-70), indicating a high human health risk associated with the consumption of the examined fish. Whereas the estimated daily intake of Zn, Cu, Mn and Ni in the muscles of tilapia species was below the corresponding permissible tolerable daily intake (Table 4).
Estimated daily intakes of heavy metals for consumable fish collected from Qahr El-Bahr, the oral reference dose (RfD) and the maximum tolerable daily intake (MTDI)
Estimated Daily Intakes (EDIs; mg kg−1) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Species | Fe | Zn | Cu | Mn | Pb | Cd | Ni | |
Range |
29.7–68.3 |
23.2–33.8 |
1.7–3.4 |
2.3–5.6 |
1.2–2.7 |
0.3–0.9 |
3.6–4.9 |
|
Range |
30.9–68.6 |
25.9–37.1 |
1.9–5.2 |
2.4–6.1 |
1.3–3.9 |
0.3–1.1 |
3.8–5.4 |
|
Range |
49.6–80.0 |
32.4–40.8 |
2.7–3.9 |
3.8–6.6 |
1.8–4.0 |
0.8–1.2 |
4.5–5.5 |
|
RfD* | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.037 | 0.14 | 0.0035 | 0.001 | 0.02 | |
MTDI** | 0.8 | 1 | 0.5 | 1 | 0.003 | 0.0008 | 5 | |
MTDI-70 | 56 | 70 | 35 | 70 | 0.21 | 0.056 | 350 |
MTDI-70 – maximum tolerable daily intake for a 70 kg person (mg day−1) = MTDI × 70 kg
The health risk assessment was carried out to determine potential risks resulting from the consumption of the three fish species collected from the selected section of Lake Al-Manzalah. The results of the health risk assessment using the hazard quotient index are shown in Table 5. The HQ values for Fe, Zn, Mn, Cu and Ni were below 1 for all tilapia species from all sampling locations, indicating that there is no health risk associated with the exposure to these individual heavy metals. However, the HQ for Pb was above 1 in 14.3% of
Carcinogenic and non-carcinogenic risk of metals due to fish consumption based on fish samples collected from Qahr El-Bahr
Species | HQ | HI | TCR | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fe | Zn | Cu | Mn | Pb | Cd | Ni | Pb | Cd | Ni | |||
Range | 0.04–0.10 | 0.08–0.11 | 0.05–0.09 | 0.02–0.04 | 0.34–0.77 | 0.33–0.90 | 0.18–0.25 | 1.21–2.10 | 1 × 10−5–2.3 × 10−5 | 1 × 10−4–3 × 10−4 | 6 × 10−3–8 × 10−3 | |
Mean ± SD | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.51 ± 0.16 | 0.53 ± 0.23 | 0.22 ± 0.01 | 1.51 ± 0.40 | 2 × 10−5 ± 5 × 10−6 | 2 × 10−4 ± 9 × 10−5 | 8 × 10−3±7 × 10−4 | |
Range | 0.04–0.10 | 0.08–0.12 | 0.05–0.14 | 0.02–0.04 | 0.37–1.11 | 0.33–1.10 | 0.19–0.27 | 1.43–2.69 | 1 × 10−5–3 × 10−5 | 1 × 10−4–4 × 10−4 | 6 × 10−3–9 × 10−3 | |
Mean ± SD | 0.06 ± 0.02 | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.08 ± 0.03 | 0.03 ± 0.01 | 0.71 ± 0.28 | 0.84 ± 0.27 | 0.23 ± 0.03 | 2.05 ± 0.50 | 2 × 10−5 ± 8 × 10−6 | 3 × 10−4 ± 1 × 10−4 | 8 × 10−3 ± 9 × 10−4 | |
Range | 0.07–0.11 | 0.11–0.14 | 0.07–0.11 | 0.03–0.05 | 0.51–1.14 | 0.84–1.16 | 0.23–0.27 | 2.08–2.84 | 2 × 10−5–3 × 10−5 | 3 × 10−4–4 × 10−4 | 8 × 10−3–9 × 10−3 | |
Mean ± SD | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.12 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.01 | 0.04 ± 0.01 | 0.89 ± 0.26 | 0.99 ± 0.12 | 0.25 ± 0.02 | 2.46 ± 0.27 | 3 × 10−5±8 × 10−6 | 4 × 10−4 ± 5 × 10−5 | 8 × 10−3 ± 7 × 10−4 |
The health risk assessment of metal exposure from the consumption of tilapia fish species from Lake Al-Manzalah should allow for the combined effects of various heavy metals studied. Therefore, the HI value is quite necessary to assess the health risk associated with fish consumption (Zhu et al. 2016). The HI was above 1 for the three fish species. The minimum HI was observed for
Although the HI for all three species falls under the medium non-cancer risk category (1 > HI < 4), the consumption of fish from Qahr El-Bahr was found unsafe when consumed for an extended period of time. Of the three species studied,
According to USEPA (2012), Fe, Mn, Zn, and Cu do not cause any carcinogenic effects as their CPSo has not yet been established. The average TCR factors for Pb over a lifetime of exposure through the consumption of contaminated
Cd poses the highest relative risk (RR) for the three tilapia species, followed by Pb and Ni, while Mn poses the lowest risk. The contribution of Pb and Cd to the overall relative risk index ranged from 34% to 41% (Figure 2). Thus, the consumption of tilapia species should be limited to avoid a potentially harmful exposure to these metals, especially Cd and Pb. Many coastal cities in Egypt rely primarily on fish as a source of protein in their meals, hence fish consumption is relatively high, so their exposure to heavy metal toxicity increases.
For field assessment, histopathology is a rapid and cost-effective method of detecting adverse, acute and chronic effects of exposure in various tissues and organs.
The muscular system constitutes the largest part of the fish body. Its overall functions include locomotion, pumping of blood, synchronized movement of skeletal components, peristaltic constriction of visceral organs and their related structures (Kadry et al. 2015). Muscles which are mainly composed of segmental myomeres are covered with skin. Each myomere is regarded as a muscle and its fibers are parallel along the body axis (Bayomy & Tayel 2007; Yacoub et al. 2008).
The results of histopathological examination of skin and muscles of
The gills are the most delicate structure of the teleost body, having an external location. They are exposed to damage and pathological abnormalities by irritants that are suspended or dissolved in water, thereby reducing their surface area and retarding the respiratory function (Tayel et al. 2014). The importance of gills as a target organ for contaminants results from their large surface area and the fact that they are in constant and direct contact with irritants. Exposure to heavy metals results in respiratory, osmoregulatory and circulatory impairment (Fernandes et al. 2008). In the present study, histopathological changes were observed in the gills of
The intralamellar hyperplasia is a consequence of excess mucus production. Penetration of contaminants activates the secondary lamellae epithelium to increase the number of mucus cells. Hyperplasia with excess mucus lamellae causes fusion, which reduces the surface area of the gills and thus affects the ability of the gas exchange (Kumari et al. 2012). The discharge of wastewater into natural water bodies containing a large amount of organic matter results in high levels of organic phosphorus (Marcogliese et al. 2015), which can reduce the gaseous exchange capacity in fish (Dalzochio et al. 2018).
The liver is the main organ of detoxification in fish, with one of the main functions being to cleanse the body of any poisons coming from the intestine (El-Naggar et al. 2009). Any damage to the fish liver ultimately leads to multiple physiological disorders and subsequent fish death (Mahboob et al. 2020). The liver of
These changes may be due to fertilizers, salts and sewage discharged into Lake Al-Manzalah. Tayel et al. (2014) and Mahmoud & Abd El Rahman (2017) found similar histopathological changes in the liver of
The study showed that tilapia fish species caught in the area of Qahr El-Bahr in Lake Al-Manzalah contained varying concentrations of metals and the degree of their accumulation varied among different tilapia species. The average level of heavy metals ranged as follows: