Acceso abierto

Young Women’s Attitude Towards Counterfeiting Cosmetics: An Empirical Study


Cite

Figure 1.

Basic model for PLS path modelling processing
Source: Elaboration by the authors. PLS, partial least squares.
Basic model for PLS path modelling processing Source: Elaboration by the authors. PLS, partial least squares.

Sociodemographic characteristics

Nb. cit. Freq. (%)
Age (years) 18–24 144 61.3
25–29 61 26.0
30–34 19 8.1
35–39 11 4.7
Salary No income 131 55.7
Less than 25,000 DA 49 20.9
Between 26,000 DA and 45,000 DA 45 19.1
Between 46,000 DA and 65,000 DA 8 3.4
Between 66,000 DA and 85,000 DA 1 0.4
More than 86,000 DA 1 0.4
Socio professional category Farmer 0 0.0
Employee 58 24.7
Trader 2 0.9
Frame 3 1.3
Student 138 58.7
Workwomen 0 0.0
Unemployed 10 4.3
Administrative 19 8.1
Other 5 2.1
Total 235 235

j.minib-2023-0024.tab.005

Variables Items Questions Reference
Attachment Att1 • I have a lot of affection for this brand. Lacoeuilhe (2000)
Att2 • I find some comfort in buying or owning this brand.
Att3 • I relate to this brand very much.
Att4 • I am very attracted to this brand.
Differentiation Diff1 • Counterfeiting is not solid. Mourad (2014)
Diff2 • Counterfeiting can never match a luxury product.
Psychological risk RisP1 • When I think about buying a product, I get anxious. Stone and Gronhung (1993)
RisP2 • The purchase of a product makes me psychologically uncomfortable.
RisP3 • Thinking about buying a product makes me feel tense.

Reliability of measures (CR and AVE)

Latent variable CR AVE
Threshold >0.7 >0.5
Excessive 0.89 0.73
Affective 0.93 0.87
Attachment 0.88 0.66
Low price 0.89 0.80
Cognitive 0.85 0.73
Past behaviour 0.85 0.74
Differentiation 0.81 0.68
Physical risk 0.92 0.78
Psychological risk 0.87 0.69
Rejection 0.82 0.60

Discriminant validity √AVE > Cor

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Criterion validity √AVE > Cor
Excessive 0.85
Affective 0.09 0.93
Attachment –0.07 –0.27 0.81
Low price 0.34 0.35 –0.07 0.90
Cognitive 0.04 0.48 –0.17 0.33 0.86
Past behaviour 0.10 0.40 –0.12 0.16 0.23 0.86
Differentiation 0.04 –0.16 0.25 –0.18 –0.24 –0.03 0.83
Physical risk 0.08 –0.20 0.29 –0.12 –0.27 –0.01 0.26 0.89
Psychological risk –0.07 –0.25 0.41 0.01 –0.06 –0.21 0.09 0.22 0.83
Rejection 0.05 –0.27 0.43 –0.02 –0.21 –0.17 0.30 0.15 0.37 0.78

Path coefficients and their significance

Relation Standard error T-values
H1 Insensitivity ⟹ Attitude 0.072 3.235
H2 Attachment ⟹ Attitude 0.071 1.035
H3 Economic Aspect ⟹ Attitude 0.063 4.097
H4 Perceived Risk ⟹ Attitude 0.073 2.010
H5 Attitude ⟹ Purchase Intention 0.076 0.617