This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Caswel, D. J., Howard, R. A., & Pate’-Cornell, M. E. (2011). Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's. Decision Analysis, 8(1), pp. 30–45. doi: 10.1287/deca.1110.0198.CaswelD. J.HowardR. A.Pate’-CornellM. E.2011Analysis of national strategies to counter a country'sDecision Analysis81304510.1287/deca.1110.0198Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Cimbala, S. J., & McDermott, R. N. (2015). A new cold war? Missile defenses, nuclear arms reductions, and cyber war. Comparative Strategy, 34(1), pp. 95–111. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2015.994405.CimbalaS. J.McDermottR. N.2015A new cold war? Missile defenses, nuclear arms reductions, and cyber warComparative Strategy3419511110.1080/01495933.2015.994405Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Davis, P. K., Wislon, P. A., Kim, J., & Park, J. (2016). Deterrence and stability for the Korean Peninsula. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 28(1), pp. 1–23.DavisP. K.WislonP. A.KimJ.ParkJ.2016Deterrence and stability for the Korean PeninsulaThe Korean Journal of Defense Analysis281123Search in Google Scholar
Department of Defense. (2006). Deterrence Operations Joint Operating Concept. Plans and Policy Directorate, United States Strategic Command. United States Department of Defense, Washngton, DC. Available at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/joc_deterrence.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-162015-337.Department of Defense2006Deterrence Operations Joint Operating ConceptPlans and Policy Directorate, United States Strategic Command.United States Department of DefenseWashngton, DCAvailable at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/joc_deterrence.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-162015-337.Search in Google Scholar
Ducote, B. M. (2010). Challenging the Application of PMESII-PT in a Complex Environment. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA523040.DucoteB. M.2010Challenging the Application of PMESII-PT in a Complex EnvironmentArmy Command and General Staff CollegeFort Leavenworth, KSAvailable at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA523040.10.21236/ADA523040Search in Google Scholar
Ewers, R. (2016). Ensuring Strategic Stability In The Second Nuclear Age. Air War College. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Defense Technical Information Center. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD1037271.EwersR.2016Ensuring Strategic Stability In The Second Nuclear AgeAir War College.Maxwell Air Force Base, ALDefense Technical Information CenterAvailable at https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD1037271.Search in Google Scholar
Gallagher, M. A., & Sorice, J. E. (2014). Considering alternative nuclear targeting strategies. Comparative Strategy, 33(5), pp. 451–465. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2014.962964.GallagherM. A.SoriceJ. E.2014Considering alternative nuclear targeting strategiesComparative Strategy33545146510.1080/01495933.2014.962964Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Gray, C. S. (2007). Nuclear strategy: What is true, what is false, what is arguable. Comparative Strategy, 9(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1080/01495939008402798.GrayC. S.2007Nuclear strategy: What is true, what is false, what is arguableComparative Strategy9113210.1080/01495939008402798Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hartley, D. S. (2015). DIME/PMESII models. In: Conflict and Complexity. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 111–136.HartleyD. S.2015DIME/PMESII modelsIn:Conflict and ComplexitySpringerNew York, NY11113610.1007/978-1-4939-1705-1_5Search in Google Scholar
Hefty, K. E., Dickey, T. M., Gallagher, M. A., & Garcia, F. E. (2015). Modeling a nuclear detonation in a conventionl campaign simulation. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulations: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 13(1), pp. 109–117. doi: 10.1177/1548512915588571.HeftyK. E.DickeyT. M.GallagherM. A.GarciaF. E.2015Modeling a nuclear detonation in a conventionl campaign simulationThe Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulations: Applications, Methodology, Technology13110911710.1177/1548512915588571Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hillson, R. (2009). The DIME/PMESII Model Suite Requirements Project. Information Technology Division. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA525056.HillsonR.2009The DIME/PMESII Model Suite Requirements ProjectInformation Technology Division.Naval Research LaboratoryWashington, DCAvailable at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA525056.Search in Google Scholar
Hollerich, J.-C., & Cantu’, O. (2017). Nuclear Disarmament: Seeking Human Security. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Available at http://www.usccb.org/.HollerichJ.-C.Cantu’O.2017Nuclear Disarmament: Seeking Human SecurityUnited States Conference of Catholic BishopsAvailable at http://www.usccb.org/.Search in Google Scholar
Jo, D.-J., & Gartzke, E. (2007). Determinants of nuclear weapons proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(1), pp. 167–194. doi: 10.1177/0022002706296158.JoD.-J.GartzkeE.2007Determinants of nuclear weapons proliferationJournal of Conflict Resolution51116719410.1177/0022002706296158Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2018). Chinese nuclear forces, 2018. Nuclear Notebook, pp. 289–295. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486620.KristensenH. M.NorrisR. S.2018Chinese nuclear forces, 2018Nuclear Notebook28929510.1080/00963402.2018.1486620Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lawrence, J. D., & Murdock, J. L. (2009). Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, Information (PMESII) Effects Forecasting for Course of Action (COA) Evaluation. SRI International Incorporated, Menlo Park, CA. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA501499.LawrenceJ. D.MurdockJ. L.2009Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, Information (PMESII) Effects Forecasting for Course of Action (COA) EvaluationSRI International IncorporatedMenlo Park, CAAvailable at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA501499.Search in Google Scholar
Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2017). The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrence. International Security, 41(4), 9–49. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00273.LieberK. A.PressD. G.2017The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrenceInternational Security41494910.1162/ISEC_a_00273Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Long, A., & Green, R. (2015). Stalking the secure second strike: intelligence, counterforce, and nuclear strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38, pp. 38–73. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2014.958150.LongA.GreenR.2015Stalking the secure second strike: intelligence, counterforce, and nuclear strategyJournal of Strategic Studies38387310.1080/01402390.2014.958150Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lonsdale, D. J. (2019). The 2018 nuclear posture review: A return to nuclear warfighting? Comparative Strategy, 38(2), pp. 98–117. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2019.1573074.LonsdaleD. J.2019The 2018 nuclear posture review: A return to nuclear warfighting?Comparative Strategy3829811710.1080/01495933.2019.1573074Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Lowther, A. B., & Cimbala, S. J. (2017). Missile defenses and strategic nuclear arms control: Technology and policy challenges. In: Lowther, A. B., & Cimbala, S. J. (eds.). Defending Why America's Nuclear Modernization Still Matters. Routledge: New York, pp. 127–144.LowtherA. B.CimbalaS. J.2017Missile defenses and strategic nuclear arms control: Technology and policy challengesIn:LowtherA. B.CimbalaS. J.(eds.).Defending Why America's Nuclear Modernization Still MattersRoutledgeNew York12714410.4324/9781315460697-19Search in Google Scholar
Martino, J. P. (1988). A Fighting Chance: TheMoral Use of Nuclear-Weapons. Ignatius Press, San Francisco.MartinoJ. P.1988A Fighting Chance: TheMoral Use of Nuclear-WeaponsIgnatius PressSan FranciscoSearch in Google Scholar
Mazarr, M. J. (2007). Beyond counterforce. Comparative Strategy, 9(2), pp. 147–162. doi: 10.1080/01495939008402806.MazarrM. J.2007Beyond counterforceComparative Strategy9214716210.1080/01495939008402806Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Mazarr, M. J. (1991). Targeting policy. In: START and the Future of Deterrence. London: Palgrave MacMillian, pp. 77–105.MazarrM. J.1991Targeting policyIn:START and the Future of DeterrenceLondonPalgrave MacMillian7710510.1007/978-1-349-11524-2_4Search in Google Scholar
Mazarr, M. J. (1995). Going just a little nuclear: Nonproliferation lessons from North Korea. International Security, 20(2), pp. 92–122. doi: 10.2307/2539230.MazarrM. J.1995Going just a little nuclear: Nonproliferation lessons from North KoreaInternational Security2029212210.2307/2539230Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Morgan, F. E., Orletsky, D. T., Henry, R., Molander, R. C., Ratner, E., Reardon, R., et al. (2015). Confronting Emergent Nuclear-Armed Regional Adversaries. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR974.html.MorganF. E.OrletskyD. T.HenryR.MolanderR. C.RatnerE.ReardonR.2015Confronting Emergent Nuclear-Armed Regional AdversariesRAND CorporationSanta Monica, CAAvailable at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR974.html.Search in Google Scholar
Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2019). 2019 Missile Defense Review. Washington DC. Available at https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2018/11-2019-Missile-Defense-Review/The%202019%20MDR_Executive%20Summary.pdf. [accessed 27 August, 2019].Office of the Secretary of Defense20192019 Missile Defense ReviewWashington DCAvailable at https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2018/11-2019-Missile-Defense-Review/The%202019%20MDR_Executive%20Summary.pdf. [accessed 27 August, 2019].Search in Google Scholar
Rauchhaus, R. (2009). Evaluating the nuclear peace hypothesis: A quantitative approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), pp. 258–277. doi: 10.1177/0022002708330387.RauchhausR.2009Evaluating the nuclear peace hypothesis: A quantitative approachJournal of Conflict Resolution53225827710.1177/0022002708330387Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Sagan, S. D., & Weiner, A. S. (2021). The rule of law and the role of strategy in U.S. nuclear doctrine. International Security, 45(4), pp. 126–166. doi: 10.1162/isec_a_00407.SaganS. D.WeinerA. S.2021The rule of law and the role of strategy in U.S. nuclear doctrineInternational Security45412616610.1162/isec_a_00407Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Talmadge, C. (2017). Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional war with the United States. International Security, 41(4), pp. 50–92. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00274.TalmadgeC.2017Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional war with the United StatesInternational Security414509210.1162/ISEC_a_00274Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Zala, B. (2019). How the next nuclear arms race will be different from the last one. Bullentin of the Atomic Scientists, pp. 36–43. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1555999.ZalaB.2019How the next nuclear arms race will be different from the last oneBullentin of the Atomic Scientists364310.1080/00963402.2019.1555999Open DOISearch in Google Scholar