Nuclear warfare beyond counterforce

Caswel, D. J., Howard, R. A., & Pate’-Cornell, M. E. (2011). Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's. Decision Analysis, 8(1), pp. 30–45. doi: 10.1287/deca.1110.0198. CaswelD. J. HowardR. A. Pate’-CornellM. E. 2011 Analysis of national strategies to counter a country's Decision Analysis 8 1 30 45 10.1287/deca.1110.0198 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cimbala, S. J., & McDermott, R. N. (2015). A new cold war? Missile defenses, nuclear arms reductions, and cyber war. Comparative Strategy, 34(1), pp. 95–111. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2015.994405. CimbalaS. J. McDermottR. N. 2015 A new cold war? Missile defenses, nuclear arms reductions, and cyber war Comparative Strategy 34 1 95 111 10.1080/01495933.2015.994405 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Davis, P. K., Wislon, P. A., Kim, J., & Park, J. (2016). Deterrence and stability for the Korean Peninsula. The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis, 28(1), pp. 1–23. DavisP. K. WislonP. A. KimJ. ParkJ. 2016 Deterrence and stability for the Korean Peninsula The Korean Journal of Defense Analysis 28 1 1 23 Search in Google Scholar

Department of Defense. (2006). Deterrence Operations Joint Operating Concept. Plans and Policy Directorate, United States Strategic Command. United States Department of Defense, Washngton, DC. Available at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/joc_deterrence.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-162015-337. Department of Defense 2006 Deterrence Operations Joint Operating Concept Plans and Policy Directorate, United States Strategic Command. United States Department of Defense Washngton, DC Available at https://www.jcs.mil/Portals/36/Documents/Doctrine/concepts/joc_deterrence.pdf?ver=2017-12-28-162015-337. Search in Google Scholar

Ducote, B. M. (2010). Challenging the Application of PMESII-PT in a Complex Environment. Army Command and General Staff College, Fort Leavenworth, KS. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA523040. DucoteB. M. 2010 Challenging the Application of PMESII-PT in a Complex Environment Army Command and General Staff College Fort Leavenworth, KS Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA523040. 10.21236/ADA523040 Search in Google Scholar

Ewers, R. (2016). Ensuring Strategic Stability In The Second Nuclear Age. Air War College. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL: Defense Technical Information Center. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD1037271. EwersR. 2016 Ensuring Strategic Stability In The Second Nuclear Age Air War College. Maxwell Air Force Base, AL Defense Technical Information Center Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/docs/citations/AD1037271. Search in Google Scholar

Gallagher, M. A., & Sorice, J. E. (2014). Considering alternative nuclear targeting strategies. Comparative Strategy, 33(5), pp. 451–465. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2014.962964. GallagherM. A. SoriceJ. E. 2014 Considering alternative nuclear targeting strategies Comparative Strategy 33 5 451 465 10.1080/01495933.2014.962964 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gray, C. S. (2007). Nuclear strategy: What is true, what is false, what is arguable. Comparative Strategy, 9(1), 1–32. doi: 10.1080/01495939008402798. GrayC. S. 2007 Nuclear strategy: What is true, what is false, what is arguable Comparative Strategy 9 1 1 32 10.1080/01495939008402798 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hartley, D. S. (2015). DIME/PMESII models. In: Conflict and Complexity. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 111–136. HartleyD. S. 2015 DIME/PMESII models In: Conflict and Complexity Springer New York, NY 111 136 10.1007/978-1-4939-1705-1_5 Search in Google Scholar

Hefty, K. E., Dickey, T. M., Gallagher, M. A., & Garcia, F. E. (2015). Modeling a nuclear detonation in a conventionl campaign simulation. The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulations: Applications, Methodology, Technology, 13(1), pp. 109–117. doi: 10.1177/1548512915588571. HeftyK. E. DickeyT. M. GallagherM. A. GarciaF. E. 2015 Modeling a nuclear detonation in a conventionl campaign simulation The Journal of Defense Modeling and Simulations: Applications, Methodology, Technology 13 1 109 117 10.1177/1548512915588571 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hillson, R. (2009). The DIME/PMESII Model Suite Requirements Project. Information Technology Division. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA525056. HillsonR. 2009 The DIME/PMESII Model Suite Requirements Project Information Technology Division. Naval Research Laboratory Washington, DC Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA525056. Search in Google Scholar

Hollerich, J.-C., & Cantu’, O. (2017). Nuclear Disarmament: Seeking Human Security. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Available at http://www.usccb.org/. HollerichJ.-C. Cantu’O. 2017 Nuclear Disarmament: Seeking Human Security United States Conference of Catholic Bishops Available at http://www.usccb.org/. Search in Google Scholar

Jo, D.-J., & Gartzke, E. (2007). Determinants of nuclear weapons proliferation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 51(1), pp. 167–194. doi: 10.1177/0022002706296158. JoD.-J. GartzkeE. 2007 Determinants of nuclear weapons proliferation Journal of Conflict Resolution 51 1 167 194 10.1177/0022002706296158 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Kristensen, H. M., & Norris, R. S. (2018). Chinese nuclear forces, 2018. Nuclear Notebook, pp. 289–295. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486620. KristensenH. M. NorrisR. S. 2018 Chinese nuclear forces, 2018 Nuclear Notebook 289 295 10.1080/00963402.2018.1486620 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lawrence, J. D., & Murdock, J. L. (2009). Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, Information (PMESII) Effects Forecasting for Course of Action (COA) Evaluation. SRI International Incorporated, Menlo Park, CA. Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA501499. LawrenceJ. D. MurdockJ. L. 2009 Political, Military, Economic, Social, Infrastructure, Information (PMESII) Effects Forecasting for Course of Action (COA) Evaluation SRI International Incorporated Menlo Park, CA Available at https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/citations/ADA501499. Search in Google Scholar

Lieber, K. A., & Press, D. G. (2017). The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrence. International Security, 41(4), 9–49. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00273. LieberK. A. PressD. G. 2017 The new era of counterforce: Technological change and the future of nuclear deterrence International Security 41 4 9 49 10.1162/ISEC_a_00273 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Long, A., & Green, R. (2015). Stalking the secure second strike: intelligence, counterforce, and nuclear strategy. Journal of Strategic Studies, 38, pp. 38–73. doi: 10.1080/01402390.2014.958150. LongA. GreenR. 2015 Stalking the secure second strike: intelligence, counterforce, and nuclear strategy Journal of Strategic Studies 38 38 73 10.1080/01402390.2014.958150 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lonsdale, D. J. (2019). The 2018 nuclear posture review: A return to nuclear warfighting? Comparative Strategy, 38(2), pp. 98–117. doi: 10.1080/01495933.2019.1573074. LonsdaleD. J. 2019 The 2018 nuclear posture review: A return to nuclear warfighting? Comparative Strategy 38 2 98 117 10.1080/01495933.2019.1573074 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Lowther, A. B., & Cimbala, S. J. (2017). Missile defenses and strategic nuclear arms control: Technology and policy challenges. In: Lowther, A. B., & Cimbala, S. J. (eds.). Defending Why America's Nuclear Modernization Still Matters. Routledge: New York, pp. 127–144. LowtherA. B. CimbalaS. J. 2017 Missile defenses and strategic nuclear arms control: Technology and policy challenges In: LowtherA. B. CimbalaS. J. (eds.). Defending Why America's Nuclear Modernization Still Matters Routledge New York 127 144 10.4324/9781315460697-19 Search in Google Scholar

Martino, J. P. (1988). A Fighting Chance: TheMoral Use of Nuclear-Weapons. Ignatius Press, San Francisco. MartinoJ. P. 1988 A Fighting Chance: TheMoral Use of Nuclear-Weapons Ignatius Press San Francisco Search in Google Scholar

Mazarr, M. J. (2007). Beyond counterforce. Comparative Strategy, 9(2), pp. 147–162. doi: 10.1080/01495939008402806. MazarrM. J. 2007 Beyond counterforce Comparative Strategy 9 2 147 162 10.1080/01495939008402806 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Mazarr, M. J. (1991). Targeting policy. In: START and the Future of Deterrence. London: Palgrave MacMillian, pp. 77–105. MazarrM. J. 1991 Targeting policy In: START and the Future of Deterrence London Palgrave MacMillian 77 105 10.1007/978-1-349-11524-2_4 Search in Google Scholar

Mazarr, M. J. (1995). Going just a little nuclear: Nonproliferation lessons from North Korea. International Security, 20(2), pp. 92–122. doi: 10.2307/2539230. MazarrM. J. 1995 Going just a little nuclear: Nonproliferation lessons from North Korea International Security 20 2 92 122 10.2307/2539230 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Morgan, F. E., Orletsky, D. T., Henry, R., Molander, R. C., Ratner, E., Reardon, R., et al. (2015). Confronting Emergent Nuclear-Armed Regional Adversaries. RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA. Available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR974.html. MorganF. E. OrletskyD. T. HenryR. MolanderR. C. RatnerE. ReardonR. 2015 Confronting Emergent Nuclear-Armed Regional Adversaries RAND Corporation Santa Monica, CA Available at https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR974.html. Search in Google Scholar

Office of the Secretary of Defense. (2019). 2019 Missile Defense Review. Washington DC. Available at https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2018/11-2019-Missile-Defense-Review/The%202019%20MDR_Executive%20Summary.pdf. [accessed 27 August, 2019]. Office of the Secretary of Defense 2019 2019 Missile Defense Review Washington DC Available at https://www.defense.gov/Portals/1/Interactive/2018/11-2019-Missile-Defense-Review/The%202019%20MDR_Executive%20Summary.pdf. [accessed 27 August, 2019]. Search in Google Scholar

Rauchhaus, R. (2009). Evaluating the nuclear peace hypothesis: A quantitative approach. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(2), pp. 258–277. doi: 10.1177/0022002708330387. RauchhausR. 2009 Evaluating the nuclear peace hypothesis: A quantitative approach Journal of Conflict Resolution 53 2 258 277 10.1177/0022002708330387 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sagan, S. D., & Weiner, A. S. (2021). The rule of law and the role of strategy in U.S. nuclear doctrine. International Security, 45(4), pp. 126–166. doi: 10.1162/isec_a_00407. SaganS. D. WeinerA. S. 2021 The rule of law and the role of strategy in U.S. nuclear doctrine International Security 45 4 126 166 10.1162/isec_a_00407 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Talmadge, C. (2017). Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional war with the United States. International Security, 41(4), pp. 50–92. doi: 10.1162/ISEC_a_00274. TalmadgeC. 2017 Would China go nuclear? Assessing the risk of Chinese nuclear escalation in a conventional war with the United States International Security 41 4 50 92 10.1162/ISEC_a_00274 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zala, B. (2019). How the next nuclear arms race will be different from the last one. Bullentin of the Atomic Scientists, pp. 36–43. doi: 10.1080/00963402.2019.1555999. ZalaB. 2019 How the next nuclear arms race will be different from the last one Bullentin of the Atomic Scientists 36 43 10.1080/00963402.2019.1555999 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar