Acceso abierto

Beyond surface correlations: Reference behavior mediates the disruptiveness-citation relationship

, , , ,  y   
28 may 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Purpose

This study examines why papers with high CD indices (measuring research disruptiveness) increasingly show reduced citation impact and investigates whether this represents genuine impact reduction or methodological artifacts.

Design/methodology/approach

We analyzed 29 million papers (1950-2016) using Poisson regression to examine relationships between the CD index and citation count, with controls for fields, team size, and reference count.

Findings

Papers with high CD indices showed reduced citation impact over time. However, when controlling for increasing reference counts in papers, this relationship reversed, revealing a positive association. Papers with more references exhibit lower CD indices owing to the index’s sensitivity to the reference count, while achieving higher citation counts. Alternative innovation metrics consistently show positive correlations with citation impact.

Research limitations

The approach may not adequately capture the reduced citation impact of highly disruptive papers with fewer references. The analysis is limited to journal articles and shows correlation rather than causality.

Practical implications

The apparent undervaluation of disruptive research stems from methodological artifacts in the CD index calculation driven by evolving reference patterns. Researchers should control for the reference count when using this metric.

Originality/value

This study reveals that bias against disruptive research is specific to the CD index’s calculation methodology, identifying reference behavior as the key factor affecting the relationship between disruption metrics and citation impact.

Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
4 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Informática, Tecnologías de la información, Gestión de proyectos, Bases de datos y minería de datos