1 | Living human detection robot in earthquake conditions [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
2 | SAR system for detection of living humans by semi-autonomous mobile rescue robot [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
3 | Unmanned vehicle for detection of living humans during calamity [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ |
4 | Terminal analysis of the operation of a rescue robot constructed for assisting secondary disaster situations [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ |
5 | A low cost USAR robot for developing countries [ |
✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
6 | Design and implementation of a semi-autonomous mobile SAR robot [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
7 | Disaster response and surveillance bot [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
8 | Ground robot for detection of living humans in rescue operations [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ | ✓ | ✘ | ✓ |
Radar | Long range |
It is expensive |
[ |
LiDAR | Familiar in robotics |
High cost |
[ |
Magnetic | It is able to detect metal objects | Small range | [ |
ToF camera | Possible to provide in 3D measurements | Less accuracy |
[ |
Acoustic | Wide range |
Differs in acoustic characteristics based on different environments | [ |
Ultrasonic | Wide range |
Sound is absorbed by clothing and foliage | [ |
Optical | Wide range |
Costly |
[ |
IR and thermal | Possibility of detecting a target in the dark | In hot environments, detecting the target is difficult | [ |
RF | Easy to install |
Cables are required along the perimeter |
[ |
Motion | It is possible to classify the type of intrusion based on structures |
Limited range | [ |
Seismic | Exceptional stealth | Differs in each environment | [ |
1 | Living human detection robot in earthquake conditions | Low cost |
Due to the lack of internet connectivity under circumstances of landslides and avalanches, radar communication is preferred rather than IoT | [ |
2 | SAR system for detection of living humans by semi-autonomous mobile rescue robot | Low cost |
No location tracking and environment monitoring | [ |
3 | Unmanned vehicle for detection of living humans during calamity | Low cost |
No live streaming and environmental monitoring | [ |
4 | Terminal analysis of the operation of a rescue robot constructed for assisting secondary disaster situations | Optimum size and strength |
No location tracking | [ |
5 | A low-cost USAR robot for developing countries | With walkie-talkie on board, rescuers can communicate up to 1 km away | No location tracking | [ |
6 | Design and implementation of a semi-autonomous mobile SAR robot | Built with a CMOS camera for digital image production | Camera connection is lost and major issues on battery power | [ |
7 | Disaster response and surveillance bot | Low power consumption |
No location tracking | [ |
8 | Ground robot for detection of living humans in rescue operations | More accurate and efficient |
No environmental monitoring and obstacle detection | [ |
1 | Living human detection robot in earthquake conditions [ |
✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ |
2 | SAR system for detection of living humans by semi-autonomous mobile rescue robot [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
3 | Unmanned vehicle for detection of living humans during calamity [ |
✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ |
4 | Terminal analysis of the operation of a rescue robot constructed for assisting secondary disaster situations [ |
✘ | ✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
5 | A low cost USAR robot for developing countries [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
6 | Design and implementation of a semi-autonomous mobile SAR robot [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | |
7 | Disaster response and surveillance bot [ |
✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ |
8 | Ground robot for detection of living humans in rescue operations [ |
✘ | ✓ | ✘ | ✘ | ✘ | ✓ |