Cultural adaption and validation of the German version of the diagnostic thinking inventory (DTI-G) / Ein Instrument zur Erhebung diagnostischer Kompetenz: Validierung und kulturelle Adaptation des Diagnostic Thinking Inventory (DTI-G)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Beaton, D.E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F. & Ferraz, M.B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3186-91.BeatonD.E.BombardierC.GuilleminF.FerrazM.B.2000Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measuresSpine (Phila Pa 1976)252431869110.1097/00007632-200012150-0001411124735Search in Google Scholar
Beullens, J., Struyf, E. & Van Damme, B. (2006). Diagnostic ability in relation to clinical seminars and extended-matching questions examinations. Medical Education, 40(12), 1173-9.BeullensJ.StruyfE.Van DammeB.2006Diagnostic ability in relation to clinical seminars and extended-matching questions examinationsMedical Education40121173910.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02627.x17118110Search in Google Scholar
Bordage, G., Grant, J. & Marsden, P. (1990). Quantitative Assessment of Diagnostic Ability. Medical Education, 24, 413-25.BordageG.GrantJ.MarsdenP.1990Quantitative Assessment of Diagnostic AbilityMedical Education244132510.1111/j.1365-2923.1990.tb02650.x2215294Search in Google Scholar
Bühner, M. (2011). Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion. 3rd ed. München: Pearson.BühnerM.2011Einführung in die Test- und Fragebogenkonstruktion3rd edMünchenPearsonSearch in Google Scholar
Custers, E.J.F.M., Regehr, G. & Norman, G.R. (1996). Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge: a review. Acad Med, 71, 55-61.CustersE.J.F.M.RegehrG.NormanG.R.1996Mental representations of medical diagnostic knowledge: a reviewAcad Med71556110.1097/00001888-199610000-000448940935Search in Google Scholar
de Vet, H. C., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Reliability. In Measurement in Medicine (pp. 96-148). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.de VetH. C.TerweeC. B.MokkinkL. B.KnolD. L.2011ReliabilityMeasurement in Medicine96148CambridgeCambridge University Press10.1017/CBO9780511996214.006Search in Google Scholar
Elstein, AS. (2009). Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspective. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract.,14 Suppl 1, 7-18. doi: 10.1007/s10459-009-9184-0ElsteinAS.2009Thinking about diagnostic thinking: a 30-year perspectiveAdv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract14171810.1007/s10459-009-9184-019669916Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Elstein, A. S., Shulman, L.S. & Sprafka, S.A. (1978). Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.ElsteinA. S.ShulmanL.S.SprafkaS.A.1978Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical ReasoningCambridge, MAHarvard University Press10.4159/harvard.9780674189089Search in Google Scholar
Gehlhar, K., Klimke-Jung, K., Stosch, C. & Fischer, M.R. (2014). Do different medical curricula influence self-assessed clinical thinking of students? GMS Z Med Ausbild, 31(2), 1 - 20. doi: 10.3205/zma000915GehlharK.Klimke-JungK.StoschC.FischerM.R.2014Do different medical curricula influence self-assessed clinical thinking of students?GMS Z Med Ausbild31212010.3205/zma000915402780824872858Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Goss, B., Reid, K., Dodds, A. & McColl, G. (2011). Comparison of medical students’ diagnostic reasoning skills in a traditional and a problem based learning curriculum. International Journal of Medical Education, 2, 87-93. doi: 10.5116/ijme.4e64.055aGossB.ReidK.DoddsA.McCollG.2011Comparison of medical students’ diagnostic reasoning skills in a traditional and a problem based learning curriculumInternational Journal of Medical Education2879310.5116/ijme.4e64.055aOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Groves, M. (2012). Understanding clinical reasoning: the next step in working out how it really works. Medical Education, 46(5), 444-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04244.xGrovesM.2012Understanding clinical reasoning: the next step in working out how it really worksMedical Education465444610.1111/j.1365-2923.2012.04244.x22515751Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Groves, M., O’Rourke, P. & Alexander, H. (2003). The clinical reasoning characteristics of diagnostic experts. Med Teach, 25(3), 308-13. doi: 10.1080/0142159031000100427GrovesM.O’RourkeP.AlexanderH.2003The clinical reasoning characteristics of diagnostic expertsMed Teach2533081310.1080/014215903100010042712881056Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118HuL. t.BentlerP. M.1999Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternativesStructural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal6115510.1080/10705519909540118Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hrynchak, P., Glover Takahashi, S. & Nayer, M. (2014). Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature review. Medical Education, 48(9), 870-83. doi: 10.1111/medu.12509.HrynchakP.Glover TakahashiS.NayerM.2014Key-feature questions for assessment of clinical reasoning: a literature reviewMedical Education4898708310.1111/medu.1250925113114Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jensen, G.M., Gwyer, J., Hack, L.M. & Shepard, K F. (2007). Understanding Expertise: Connecting Research and Theory to Physical Therapy. In: W.B. Saunders (Ed.), Expertise in Physical Therapy Practice (pp. 19-47). 2nd ed. St. Louis: Elsevier.JensenG.M.GwyerJ.HackL.M.ShepardK F.2007Understanding Expertise: Connecting Research and Theory to Physical TherapySaundersW.B.Expertise in Physical Therapy Practice19472nd edSt. Louis: Elsevier10.1016/B978-141600214-7.50009-4Search in Google Scholar
Jones, U. F. (1997). The reliability and validity of the Bordage, Grant & Marsden diagnostic thinking inventory for use with physiotherapists. Med Teach. 19(2), 133-40.JonesU. F.1997The reliability and validity of the Bordage, Grant & Marsden diagnostic thinking inventory for use with physiotherapistsMed Teach1921334010.3109/01421599709019366Search in Google Scholar
Lee, A., Joynt, G.M., Lee, A.K.H., Ho, A.M.H., Groves, M., Vlantis, A.C., et al. (2010). Using illness scripts to teach clinical reasoning skills to medical students. Family medicine, 42(4), 255-61.LeeA.JoyntG.M.LeeA.K.H.HoA.M.H.GrovesM.VlantisA.C.2010Using illness scripts to teach clinical reasoning skills to medical studentsFamily medicine42425561Search in Google Scholar
Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken. 11th ed. Weinheim, Basel: Beltz.MayringP.2010Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken11th edWeinheim, BaselBeltz10.1007/978-3-531-92052-8_42Search in Google Scholar
Rahayu, G.R. & McAleer, S. (2008). Clinical reasoning of Indonesian medical students as measured by diagnostic thinking inventory. South East Asian Journal of Medical Education, 2(1), 42-7.RahayuG.R.McAleerS.2008Clinical reasoning of Indonesian medical students as measured by diagnostic thinking inventorySouth East Asian Journal of Medical Education2142710.4038/seajme.v2i1.491Search in Google Scholar
Schermelleh-Engel. K., Moosbrugger, H. & Müller, H. (2003). Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measures. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 8(2), 23-74.Schermelleh-EngelK.MoosbruggerH.MüllerH.2003Evaluating the fit of structural equation models: Tests of significance and descriptive goodness-of-fit measuresMethods of Psychological Research Online822374Search in Google Scholar
Willis, G. B. (2005). Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design: Sage: Thousand Oaks.WillisG. B.2005Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire DesignSageThousand Oaks10.4135/9781412983655Search in Google Scholar
