[
BROBERG, Morten, FENGER, Niels. The Procedure before the Court of Justice. Oxford: Oxford Scholarship, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198843580.003.0010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
DOUGAN, Michael. National remedies before the Court of Justice. Issues of harmonisation and differentiation. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2004, 424 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GASCÓN INCHAUSTI, Marta, HESS, Burkhard, CUNIBERTI, Gilles, OBERHAMMER, Paul. An evaluation study of national procedural laws and practices in terms of their impact on the free circulation of judgments and on the equivalence and effectiveness of the procedural protection of consumers under EU consumer law. (Report prepared by a Consortium of European universities led by the MPI Luxembourg for Procedural Law as commissioned by the European Commission) JUST/2014/RCON/PR/CIVI/0082. Strand 2 Procedural Protection of Consumers. Luxembourg: Max Planck Institute, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2838/38491
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOMBOS, Katalin, LEHÓCZKI, Balázs. A tisztességtelen szerződési feltételek eltávolítása a magyarországi devizaalapú hitelszerződésekből. Jogtudományi közlöny, 2019, vol. 74, no.11 pp. 434–444.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOMBOS, Katalin. Europeanisation effects in the court jurisprudence. International and Comparative Law Review, 2019, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 261–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2018-0059
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOMBOS, Katalin. Harmonisation of procedural law vs procedural autonomy of the member state (Harmonizácia procesného práva vs procesná autonómia členských štátov). Studia Iuridica Cassoviensia, 2018, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 24–32. Available at: http://sic.pravo.upjs.sk/files/3_gombos_-_harmonization_of_procedural_law.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOMBOS, Katalin. Impacts of European Law on the Rules of Remedy of the New Code of Hungarian Civil Procedural Law. Acta Universitatis Sapientiae Legal Studies, 2018, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 5–29. Available at: http://www.acta.sapientia.ro/acta-legal/C7-1/legal71-01.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
GOMBOS, Katalin. The Levels and Steps of the Judicial Protection Arising from the European Law. In BLUTMAN, László (ed.). Ünnepi kötet Dr. Bodnár László egyetemi tanár 70. születésnapjára. Szeged: Acta Universitatis Szegediensis. Acta Juridica et Politica. Tom. 77. Szegedi Tudományegyetem Állam – és Jogtudományi Kar, 2014. pp. 123–134. Available at: http://digit.bibl.u-szeged.hu/00000/00051/00442/juridpol_077.pdf
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HARSÁGI, Viktória, Gelencsér, Dániel. National Report – Hungary. In Hess, Burkhard; Law, Stephanie (eds.). Implementing EU Consumer Rights by National Procedural Law. Luxembourg Report on European Procedural Law. Volume II. München: C. H. Beck Verlag, 2019, pp. 1–34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
HULMÁK, Milan. Consumer Protection in the Order for Payment Procedure – the Czech and European Perspective. Journal of European Consumer and Market Law, 2020, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 120–124.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
IGLESIAS, Gil Carlos Rodríguez. Der EuGH und die Gerichte der Mitgliedstaaten – Komponenten der richterlichen Gewalt in der Europäischen Union. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift, 2000, vol. 53, no. 27, pp. 1889–1896.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LACCHI, Clelia. Preliminary References to the Court of Justice of the European Union and Effective Judicial Protection, Brussels: Larcier, 2020, 348 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LENAERTS, Koen, MASELIS, Ignace, GUTMAN, Kathleen (Nowak, Janek Tomasz ed.). EU Procedural Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014, 1056 p.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
ROSAS, Allan. The Preliminary Rulings Procedure (Chapter 13). In PATTERSON, Dennis, SÖDERSTEN, Anna (eds). A Companion to European Union Law and International Law. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell 2016. pp. 179–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119037712.fmatter
]Search in Google Scholar
