Acceso abierto

Investigation of the Effect of Needle Diameter and the Solution Flow Rate on Fiber Morphology in the Electrospinning Method


Cite

Fig. 1.

Electro Fiber Production Assembly
Electro Fiber Production Assembly

Normality test and test of homogeneity of variances

Diameter Flow rate Kolmogorov Simirnov statistic df Sig.
0.5 ml/hr 0.96 120 0.09
1 ml/hr 0.94 120 0.14
1.5 ml/hr 0.94 120 0.20
Test of homogeneity of variances
Diameter Levene statistic df Sig.
0.56 358 0.89

t-test results

Group N Mean Standard Deviation t df Sig.
20G 120 456.054 13.67 4.320 238 0.001
22G 120 435.287 15.44

Histogram graphs of nanofibers obtained with different diameter needles

Needle Histogram graphs
20G
22G

Experimental parameters

Distance between electrodes 20 cm
Voltage amount 20 kV
Needle diameter 22G
Metal collector material Copper
Metal collector thickness 10 mm
Metal collector shape Circle (10 cm diameter)
Flow rate 0.5-1-1.5 ml/hr

Histogram graps of nanofibers obtained at different flow rates

Flow rate Histogram graphs
0.5 ml/hr
1 ml/hr
1.5 ml/hr

SEM images and appearance on the paper surface

Flow rate 0.5 ml/hr 1 ml/hr 1.5 ml/hr
SEM
Appearance on the paper surface

Analysis of variance and Tukey test results

One-Way Anova Sum of squares df Mean squared F Sig.
Between groups 45950.16 2 22975.08 175.93 0.000
Within groups 46620.39 357 130.59
Total 92570.54 359
(I) Flow rate (J) Flow rate Average difference (I-J) Sig.
Tukey test 0.5 ml/hour 1 ml/hour -11.97 0.000
1.5 ml/hour -27.59 0.000
1 ml/hour 0.5 ml/hour 11.97 0.000
1.5 ml/hour -15.62 0.000
1.5 ml/hour 0.5 ml/hour 27.59 0.000
1 ml/hour 15.62 0.000