Acceso abierto

Does the sunblock alleviate abiotic stress in mango trees grown in the tropical semiarid?

Anderson R. L. Silva

Anderson R. L. Silva

Post-graduation Program in Agronomy, Federal University of ParaíbaBrazil
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Silva, Anderson R. L.
, 
Ítalo H. L. Cavalcante

Ítalo H. L. Cavalcante

Agronomy Engineering, Federal University of São Francisco ValleyBrazil
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Cavalcante, Ítalo H. L.
, 
Marcelle A. Silva

Marcelle A. Silva

Agronomy Engineering, Federal University of São Francisco ValleyBrazil
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Silva, Marcelle A.
, 
Vespasiano B. Paiva Neto

Vespasiano B. Paiva Neto

Agronomy Engineering, Federal University of São Francisco ValleyBrazil
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Paiva Neto, Vespasiano B.
, 
Renata A. Amariz

Renata A. Amariz

Agronomy Engineering, Federal University of São Francisco ValleyBrazil
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Amariz, Renata A.
 y 
Letícia Y. A. Amorim

Letícia Y. A. Amorim

Agronomy Engineering, Federal University of São Francisco ValleyBrazil
Perfil de Orcid
Buscar este autor en
Sciendo|Google Scholar
Amorim, Letícia Y. A.
  
08 dic 2022
Does the sunblock alleviate abiotic stress in mango trees grown in the tropical semiarid?'s Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Descargar portada
Categoría del artículo: Original Article
Publicado en línea: 08 dic 2022
Páginas: 211 - 221
Recibido: 23 jun 2022
Aceptado: 10 oct 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2022-0016
Palabras clave
© 2022 Anderson R. L. Silva et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Maximum, minimum and average air temperature, air humidity and rainfall recorded during the execution of the experiment.
Maximum, minimum and average air temperature, air humidity and rainfall recorded during the execution of the experiment.

Figure 2

Net photosynthesis – A (A) and leaf transpiration – E (B) of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).
Net photosynthesis – A (A) and leaf transpiration – E (B) of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).

Figure 3

Total soluble carbohydrate concentrations (TSC) in “Palmer” mango leaves as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).
Total soluble carbohydrate concentrations (TSC) in “Palmer” mango leaves as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).

Figure 4

Leaf concentrations of starch (A) and α-amylase activity (B) of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. FM = fresh mass; (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).
Leaf concentrations of starch (A) and α-amylase activity (B) of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. FM = fresh mass; (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).

Figure 5

Leaf activity of catalase – CAT (A) and ascorbate peroxidase – APX (B) enzymes of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).
Leaf activity of catalase – CAT (A) and ascorbate peroxidase – APX (B) enzymes of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies and days after treatments. Points with the same lowercase letters do not differ on each evaluation date by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).

Figure 6

Details of treatment distribution on leaves of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).
Details of treatment distribution on leaves of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).

Figure 7

Fruit yield of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies. Grey bars with the same lowercase letters do not differ by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).
Fruit yield of “Palmer” mango trees as a function of sunblock strategies. Grey bars with the same lowercase letters do not differ by Tukey's test at 0.01 probability level. Vertical lines indicate error bars. (T1) control (no sunblock); (T2) calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T3) sunblock (5 mL · L−1); (T4) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + calcium carbonate (50 g · L−1); (T5) sunblock (5 mL · L−1) + sunblock silicon concentrated (20 mL · L−1) and (T6) sunblock (20 mL · L−1).

Chemical and physical characteristics of the soil (0–30 cm soil depth) in the experimental site before the execution of the experiment_

Soil characteristic Value
Organic matter (%) 2.61
pH (in KCl) 5.38
Ca2+ (cmolc· dm−3) 3.6
Mg2+ (cmolc· dm−3) 1.14
Al3+ (cmolc· dm−3) 0.06
K+ (cmolc· dm−3) 0.78
Na+ (cmolc· dm−3) 0.18
P (mg · dm−3) 14.84

Leaf nutrient concentrations of the “Palmer” mango orchard before the experiment_

N P K Ca Mg Mn Fe Zn B
________________________________________ g · kg−1 ________________________________________ ________________________________________ mg· kg−1 ________________________________________
8.82 2.48 11.58 28.78 2.76 426.17 55.01 26.98 108.72
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ciencias de la vida, Botánica, Zoología, Ecología, Ciencias de la vida, otros
RSS Feed de revista