Acceso abierto

Differences in health-promoting properties in civilisation diseases of Agaricus bisporus fruiting bodies harvested from three flushes

Anna Włodarczyk
Anna Włodarczyk
, 
Agata Krakowska
Agata Krakowska
, 
Jan Lazur
Jan Lazur
, 
Katarzyna Sułkowska-Ziaja
Katarzyna Sułkowska-Ziaja
 y 
Bożena Muszyńska
Bożena Muszyńska
   | 27 feb 2022
Folia Horticulturae's Cover Image
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Cite
Article Category: Original Article
Publicado en línea: 27 feb 2022
Páginas: 17 - 25
Recibido: 29 oct 2021
Aceptado: 13 ene 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2022-0002
Palabras clave
© 2022 Anna Włodarczyk et al., published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.

Figure 1

Concentration of (A) macroelements and (B) microelements in substrates [mg · 100 g−1 substrate] (one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey's test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. Fresh Substrate Control; ^p < 0.05, ^^p < 0.01, ^^^p < 0.001 vs. Substrate from Flush I Control; #p < 0.05 vs. Substrate from Flush II Control).
Concentration of (A) macroelements and (B) microelements in substrates [mg · 100 g−1 substrate] (one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey's test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001 vs. Fresh Substrate Control; ^p < 0.05, ^^p < 0.01, ^^^p < 0.001 vs. Substrate from Flush I Control; #p < 0.05 vs. Substrate from Flush II Control).

Figure 2

Concentration of (A) macroelements and (B) microelements in fruiting bodies of A. bisporus obtained from three cultivation flushes [mg · 100 g−1 dry weight] (one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey's test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. A. bisporus Flush I Control; ^p < 0.05, ^^p < 0.01 vs. A. bisporus Flush II Control).
Concentration of (A) macroelements and (B) microelements in fruiting bodies of A. bisporus obtained from three cultivation flushes [mg · 100 g−1 dry weight] (one-way ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey's test: *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 vs. A. bisporus Flush I Control; ^p < 0.05, ^^p < 0.01 vs. A. bisporus Flush II Control).

Figure 3

The value of the BCF coefficient for individual macro- and microelements calculated in relation to the fresh substrate (column chart) and to the substrates obtained after the set of projections (line charts). BCF, bioconcentration factor.
The value of the BCF coefficient for individual macro- and microelements calculated in relation to the fresh substrate (column chart) and to the substrates obtained after the set of projections (line charts). BCF, bioconcentration factor.

Content of organic compounds and total phenols and antioxidant activity (DPPH) of A. bisporus extracts from three flushes.

Compounds/flush I II III
Phenolic compounds (mg · 100 g−1 d.w.)
Gallic acid 18.20 ± 0.40 12.91 ± 0.20**** 15.0 ± 0.40**** ^^
p-Hydroxybenzoic acid 2.26 ± 0.002 1.37 ± 0.003**** 1.84 ± 0.002**** ^^^^
Rutoside 0.07 ± 0.003 0.12 ± 0.004**** 0.01 ± 0.001**** ^^^^
Quercetin 7.17 ± 0.02 5.11 ± 0.002**** 5.18 ± 0.05****
Total phenols 47.43 ± 1.52 43.81 ± 0.93** 45.51 ± 3.7*** ^^
Indole compounds (mg · 100 g−1 d.w.)
L-Tryptophan 221.71 ± 0.9 118.30 ± 0.2**** 170.82 ± 1.0**** ^^^^
5-HTP 213.99 ± 5.71 145.64 ± 5.45**** 199.56 ± 3.45* ^^^^
Serotonin 63.08 ± 1.00 36.42 ± 1.77**** 70.08 ± 4.19* ^^^^
Sterols (mg · 100 g−1 d.w.)
Ergosterol 64.32 ± 0.08 30.53 ± 0.89**** 3.56 ± 0.51**** ^^^^
Ergosterol peroxide 23.08 ± 0.34 17.71 ± 0.04*** 13.71 ± 0.41*** ^^^
Ergocalciferol – – –
Other compounds (mg · 100 g−1 d.w.)
Phenylalanine 386.2 ± 14.80 254.1 ± 9.41**** 300.2 ± 11.71*** ^^
Lovastatin 5.71 ± 0.35 1.69 ± 0.13**** 3.47 ± 0.32*** ^^^
Ergothioneine 10.88 ± 0.98 7.56 ± 0.83 14.74 ± 3.92^
DPPH (%) 89.41 ± 0.90 82.32 ± 3.20 76.71 ± 1.40
eISSN:
2083-5965
Idioma:
Inglés
Calendario de la edición:
2 veces al año
Temas de la revista:
Ciencias de la vida, Botánica, Zoología, Ecología, otros
RSS Feed de revista