The development of student feedback literacy through peer feedback in the online learning environment

Bıkmaz Bilgen, Ö., & Doğan, N. (2017). The comparison of interrater reliability estimating techniques. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 8(1), 63–78. Bıkmaz BilgenÖ. DoğanN. 2017 The comparison of interrater reliability estimating techniques Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology 8 1 63 78 Search in Google Scholar

Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Los Angeles, CA, USA: Sage Publications. BoyatzisR. E. 1998 Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development Los Angeles, CA, USA Sage Publications Search in Google Scholar

Carless, D. (2022). From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 23(2), 143–153. doi:10.1177/1469787420945845 CarlessD. 2022 From teacher transmission of information to student feedback literacy: Activating the learner role in feedback processes Active Learning in Higher Education 23 2 143 153 10.1177/1469787420945845 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 CarlessD. BoudD. 2018 The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 8 1315 1325 10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cheng, M. W. T., & Chan, C. K. Y. (2019). An experimental test: Using rubrics for reflective writing to develop reflection. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 61, 176–182. doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.001 ChengM. W. T. ChanC. K. Y. 2019 An experimental test: Using rubrics for reflective writing to develop reflection Studies in Educational Evaluation 61 176 182 10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.04.001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Cheng, K. H., Liang, J. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2015). Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 78–84. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001 ChengK. H. LiangJ. C. TsaiC. C. 2015 Examining the role of feedback messages in undergraduate students’ writing performance during an online peer assessment activity The Internet and Higher Education 25 78 84 10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.02.001 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016). Supporting second language writing using multimodal feedback. Foreign Language Annals, 49(1), 58–74. doi:10.1111/flan.12183 ElolaI. OskozA. 2016 Supporting second language writing using multimodal feedback Foreign Language Annals 49 1 58 74 10.1111/flan.12183 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ene, E., & Upton, T. A. (2018). Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition. Journal of Second Language Writing, 41, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005 EneE. UptonT. A. 2018 Synchronous and asynchronous teacher electronic feedback and learner uptake in ESL composition Journal of Second Language Writing 41 1 13 10.1016/j.jslw.2018.05.005 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Er, E., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2020). A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: A theoretical framework. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(4), 586–600. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1786497 ErE. DimitriadisY. GaševićD. 2020 A collaborative learning approach to dialogic peer feedback: A theoretical framework Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 4 586 600 10.1080/02602938.2020.1786497 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Espasa, A., Guasch, T., Mayordomo, R. M., Martinez-Melo, M., & Carless, D. (2018). A dialogic feedback index measuring key aspects of feedback processes in online learning environments. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(3), 499–513. doi:10.1080/07294360.2018.1430125 EspasaA. GuaschT. MayordomoR. M. Martinez-MeloM. CarlessD. 2018 A dialogic feedback index measuring key aspects of feedback processes in online learning environments Higher Education Research & Development 37 3 499 513 10.1080/07294360.2018.1430125 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Field, A. (2005). Discovering statistics using SPSS (2nd ed.,). London, England: Sage Publications. FieldA. 2005 Discovering statistics using SPSS 2nd ed. London, England Sage Publications Search in Google Scholar

Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018). Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs. Computers & Education, 125, 86–100. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004 FiliusR. M. de KleijnR. A. UijlS. G. PrinsF. J. van RijenH. V. GrobbeeD. E. 2018 Strengthening dialogic peer feedback aiming for deep learning in SPOCs Computers & Education 125 86 100 10.1016/j.compedu.2018.06.004 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Filius, R. M., de Kleijn, R. A., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., van Rijen, H. V., & Grobbee, D. E. (2019). Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(5), 607–619. doi:10.1111/jcal.12363 FiliusR. M. de KleijnR. A. UijlS. G. PrinsF. J. van RijenH. V. GrobbeeD. E. 2019 Audio peer feedback to promote deep learning in online education Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 35 5 607 619 10.1111/jcal.12363 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Foo, S. Y. (2021). Analysing peer feedback in asynchronous online discussions: A case study. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 4553–4572. doi:10.1007/s10639-021-10477-4 FooS. Y. 2021 Analysing peer feedback in asynchronous online discussions: A case study Education and Information Technologies 26 4553 4572 10.1007/s10639-021-10477-4 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Foster, J. J. (2001). Data analysis using SPSS for Windows versions 8 to 10: A beginner's guide (2nd ed., pp. 222–223). London: Sage Publications. FosterJ. J. 2001 Data analysis using SPSS for Windows versions 8 to 10: A beginner's guide 2nd ed. 222 223 London Sage Publications 10.4135/9781849208796 Search in Google Scholar

Gikandi, J. W., & Morrow, D. (2016). Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 25(2), 153–170. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2015.1058853 GikandiJ. W. MorrowD. 2016 Designing and implementing peer formative feedback within online learning environments Technology, Pedagogy and Education 25 2 153 170 10.1080/1475939X.2015.1058853 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Göktaş, Y. (2016). Öğretim Teknolojilerinde Akademik Yazım - (Academic Writing in Instructional Technology). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/6268100/%C3%96%C4%9Fretim_Teknolojilerinde_Akademik_Yaz%C4%B1m_Academic_Writing_in_Instructional_Technology_ GöktaşY. 2016 Öğretim Teknolojilerinde Akademik Yazım - (Academic Writing in Instructional Technology) Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/6268100/%C3%96%C4%9Fretim_Teknolojilerinde_Akademik_Yaz%C4%B1m_Academic_Writing_in_Instructional_Technology_ Search in Google Scholar

Green, S. (2019). What students don’t make of feedback in higher education: An illustrative study. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 38, 83–94. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.010 GreenS. 2019 What students don’t make of feedback in higher education: An illustrative study Journal of English for Academic Purposes 38 83 94 10.1016/j.jeap.2019.01.010 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Greene, J. C. (2005). The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 28(2), 207–211. doi:10.1080/01406720500256293 GreeneJ. C. 2005 The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry International Journal of Research & Method in Education 28 2 207 211 10.1080/01406720500256293 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gürsakal, N. (2012). Betimsel İstatistik. Bursa: Dora Publication. GürsakalN. 2012 Betimsel İstatistik Bursa Dora Publication Search in Google Scholar

Han, Y., & Xu, Y. (2020). The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(5), 680–696. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545 HanY. XuY. 2020 The development of student feedback literacy: The influences of teacher feedback on peer feedback Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 5 680 696 10.1080/02602938.2019.1689545 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Hey-Cunningham, A. J., Ward, M. H., & Miller, E. J. (2020). Making the most of feedback for academic writing development in postgraduate research: Pilot of a combined programme for students and supervisors. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 58(2), 182–194. doi:10.1080/14703297.2020.1714472 Hey-CunninghamA. J. WardM. H. MillerE. J. 2020 Making the most of feedback for academic writing development in postgraduate research: Pilot of a combined programme for students and supervisors Innovations in Education and Teaching International 58 2 182 194 10.1080/14703297.2020.1714472 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Iglesias Pérez, M. C., Vidal-Puga, J., & Pino Juste, M. R. (2020). The role of self and peer assessment in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 47(3), 683–692. doi:10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526 Iglesias PérezM. C. Vidal-PugaJ. Pino JusteM. R. 2020 The role of self and peer assessment in higher education Studies in Higher Education 47 3 683 692 10.1080/03075079.2020.1783526 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26. doi:10.3102/0013189×033007014 JohnsonR. B. OnwuegbuzieA. J. 2004 Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come Educational Researcher 33 7 14 26 10.3102/0013189×033007014 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Karagöz, Y. (2010). Nonparametrik Tekniklerin Güç ve Etkinlikleri. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 9(33), 18–40. Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6147/82524 KaragözY. 2010 Nonparametrik Tekniklerin Güç ve Etkinlikleri Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 9 33 18 40 Retrieved from: https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/esosder/issue/6147/82524 Search in Google Scholar

Kennette, L., & Chapman, M. 2021. Providing positive student feedback in an online environment. Academia Letters, 203, 1–3. doi: 10.20935/al203 KennetteL. ChapmanM. 2021 Providing positive student feedback in an online environment Academia Letters 203 1 3 10.20935/al203 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Ketonen, L., Nieminen, P., & Hähkiöniem, M. (2020). The development of secondary students’ feedback literacy: Peer assessment as an intervention. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(6), 407–417. doi:10.1080/00220671.2020.1835794 KetonenL. NieminenP. HähkiöniemM. 2020 The development of secondary students’ feedback literacy: Peer assessment as an intervention The Journal of Educational Research 113 6 407 417 10.1080/00220671.2020.1835794 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310 LandisJ. R. KochG. 1977 The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 1 159 174 10.2307/2529310 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Malecka, B., Boud, D., & Carless, D. (2020). Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: Mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–15. doi:10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784 MaleckaB. BoudD. CarlessD. 2020 Eliciting, processing and enacting feedback: Mechanisms for embedding student feedback literacy within the curriculum Teaching in Higher Education 1 15 10.1080/13562517.2020.1754784 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: CA: Sage Publications. MilesM. B. HubermanA. M. 1994 Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: CA Sage Publications Search in Google Scholar

Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 MinH. T. 2006 The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality Journal of Second Language Writing 15 2 118 141 10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Molloy, E., Boud, D., & Henderson, M. (2020). Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 527–540. doi:10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955 MolloyE. BoudD. HendersonM. 2020 Developing a learning-centred framework for feedback literacy Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 45 4 527 540 10.1080/02602938.2019.1667955 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Özsoy, O. (2010). İktisatçılar ve İşletmeciler İçin İstatistik Excel Uygulamalı. Ankara, Turkey: Siyasal Publication. ÖzsoyO. 2010 İktisatçılar ve İşletmeciler İçin İstatistik Excel Uygulamalı Ankara, Turkey Siyasal Publication Search in Google Scholar

Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 21(2), 133–148. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872 PanaderoE. RomeroM. 2014 To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self-assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy Assessment Education: Principles, Policy and Practice 21 2 133 148 10.1080/0969594X.2013.877872 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Paterson, C., Paterson, N., Jackson, W., & Work, F. (2020). What are students’ needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 85, 104236. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104236 PatersonC. PatersonN. JacksonW. WorkF. 2020 What are students’ needs and preferences for academic feedback in higher education? A systematic review Nurse Education Today 85 104236. 10.1016/j.nedt.2019.104236 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Planas-Lladó, A., Feliu, L., Arbat, G., Pujol, J., Suñol, J. J., Castro, F., & Martí, C. (2021). An analysis of teamwork based on self and peer evaluation in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(2), 191–207. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1763254 Planas-LladóA. FeliuL. ArbatG. PujolJ. SuñolJ. J. CastroF. MartíC. 2021 An analysis of teamwork based on self and peer evaluation in higher education Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 2 191 207 10.1080/02602938.2020.1763254 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Price, M., Handley, K., & Millar, J. (2011). Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement. Studies in Higher Education, 36(8), 879–896. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.483513 PriceM. HandleyK. MillarJ. 2011 Feedback: Focusing attention on engagement Studies in Higher Education 36 8 879 896 10.1080/03075079.2010.483513 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Prins, F. J., de Kleijn, R., & van Tartwijk, J. (2017). Students’ use of a rubric for research theses. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(1), 128–150. doi:10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954 PrinsF. J. de KleijnR. van TartwijkJ. 2017 Students’ use of a rubric for research theses Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 42 1 128 150 10.1080/02602938.2015.1085954 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Razı, S. (2015). Development of a rubric to assess academic writing incorporating plagiarism detectors. Sage Open, 5(2), 1–13. doi:10.1177/2158244015590162 RazıS. 2015 Development of a rubric to assess academic writing incorporating plagiarism detectors Sage Open 5 2 1 13 10.1177/2158244015590162 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Sutton, P. (2012). Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 49(1), 31–40. doi:10.1080/14703297.2012.647781 SuttonP. 2012 Conceptualizing feedback literacy: Knowing, being, and acting Innovations in Education and Teaching International 49 1 31 40 10.1080/14703297.2012.647781 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Tian, L., & Zhou, Y. (2020). Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context. System, 91, 102247. doi:10.1016/j.system.2020.102247 TianL. ZhouY. 2020 Learner engagement with automated feedback, peer feedback and teacher feedback in an online EFL writing context System 91 102247. 10.1016/j.system.2020.102247 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

To, J. (2016). ‘This is not what I need’: Conflicting assessment feedback beliefs in a post-secondary institution in Hong Kong. Research in Post-Compulsory Education, 21(4), 447–467. doi:10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588 ToJ. 2016 ‘This is not what I need’: Conflicting assessment feedback beliefs in a post-secondary institution in Hong Kong Research in Post-Compulsory Education 21 4 447 467 10.1080/13596748.2016.1226588 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wei, W., Sun, Y., & Xu, X. (2020). Investigating the impact of increased student feedback literacy level on their expectations on university teachers’ feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(7), 1092–1103. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1846017 WeiW. SunY. XuX. 2020 Investigating the impact of increased student feedback literacy level on their expectations on university teachers’ feedback Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 7 1092 1103 10.1080/02602938.2020.1846017 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Winstone, N. E., Mathlin, G., & Nash, R. A. (2019). Building feedback literacy: Students’ perceptions of the developing engagement with feedback toolkit. Frontiers in Education, 4(39), 1–11. doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00039 WinstoneN. E. MathlinG. NashR. A. 2019 Building feedback literacy: Students’ perceptions of the developing engagement with feedback toolkit Frontiers in Education 4 39 1 11 10.3389/feduc.2019.00039 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Winstone, N., Nash, R., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Education Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37. doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 WinstoneN. NashR. ParkerM. RowntreeJ. 2017 Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes Education Psychologist 52 1 17 37 10.1080/00461520.2016.1207538 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wood, J. M. (2022). Supporting the uptake process with dialogic peer screencast feedback: A sociomaterial perspective. Teaching in Higher Education, 1–23. doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243 WoodJ. M. 2022 Supporting the uptake process with dialogic peer screencast feedback: A sociomaterial perspective Teaching in Higher Education 1 23 10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Xu, Y., & Carless, D. (2017). ‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’: Cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 42(7), 1082–1094. doi:10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759 XuY. CarlessD. 2017 ‘Only true friends could be cruelly honest’: Cognitive scaffolding and social-affective support in teacher feedback literacy Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 42 7 1082 1094 10.1080/02602938.2016.1226759 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Yang, M., & Carless, D. (2013). The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes. Teaching in Higher Education, 18(3), 285–297. doi:10.1080/13562517.2012.719154 YangM. CarlessD. 2013 The feedback triangle and the enhancement of dialogic feedback processes Teaching in Higher Education 18 3 285 297 10.1080/13562517.2012.719154 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Nitel veri analizi. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Turkey: Seçkin Publications. YıldırımA. ŞimşekH. 2013 Nitel veri analizi. Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri Ankara, Turkey Seçkin Publications Search in Google Scholar

Yu, S., & Liu, C. (2021). Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework. Assessing Writing, 48, 100525. doi:10.1016/j.asw.2021.100525 YuS. LiuC. 2021 Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-based framework Assessing Writing 48 100525. 10.1016/j.asw.2021.100525 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zhan, Y. (2019). Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(7), 973–986. doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105 ZhanY. 2019 Conventional or sustainable? Chinese university students’ thinking about feedback used in their English lessons Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 44 7 973 986 10.1080/02602938.2018.1557105 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zheng, L., Cui, P., Li, X., & Huang, R. (2018). Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(3), 500–514. doi:10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533 ZhengL. CuiP. LiX. HuangR. 2018 Synchronous discussion between assessors and assessees in web-based peer assessment: Impact on writing performance, feedback quality, meta-cognitive awareness and self-efficacy Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43 3 500 514 10.1080/02602938.2017.1370533 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Zong, Z., Schunn, C. D., & Wang, Y. (2020). Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 973–992. doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179 ZongZ. SchunnC. D. WangY. 2020 Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 46 6 973 992 10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179 Open DOISearch in Google Scholar