[
1. Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129:837-47.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005119415130224345399
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Malhi N, Hawkins NM, Andrage JG, Krahn AD, Deyell MW. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2018;29:1049-58.10.1111/jce.1349729630760
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, Arbelo E, Bax JJ, Blomström-Lundqvist C, et al. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2021;42:373-498.10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa61232860505
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Furnkranz A, Metzner A, Ouyang F, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:2235-45.10.1056/NEJMoa160201427042964
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Su WW, Reddy VY, Bhasin K, Champagne J, Sangrigoli RM, Braegelmann KM, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for persistent atrial fibrillation: Results from the multicenter STOP Persistent AF trial. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(11):1841-7.10.1016/j.hrthm.2020.06.02032590151
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Packer DL, Mark DB, Robb RA, Monahan KH, Bahnson TD, Poole JE, et al. CABANA Investigators. Effect of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drug therapy on mortality, stroke, bleeding, and cardiac arrest among patients with atrial fibrillation: the CABANA randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;21:1261-74.10.1001/jama.2019.0693645028430874766
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Turagam MK, Garg J, Whang W, Sartori S, Koruth JS, Miller MA, et al. Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in patients with heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:41-50.10.7326/M18-099230583296
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Kirchhof P, Camm AJ, Goette A, Brandes A, Eckardt L, Elvan A, et al. EAST-AFNET 4 Trial Investigators. Early rhythm-control therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:1305-16.10.1056/NEJMoa201942232865375
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Wazni OM, Dandamudi G, Sood N, Hoyt R, Tyler J, Durrani S, et al. STOP AF First Trial Investigators. Cryoballoon ablation as initial therapy for atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:316-24.10.1056/NEJMoa202955433197158
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Andrade JG, Wells GA, Deyell MW, Bennett M, Essebag V, Champagne J, et al. Cryoablation or drug therapy for initial treatment of atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:305-15.10.1056/NEJMoa202998033197159
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Di Biase L, Mohanty P, Mohanty S, Santangeli P, Trivedi C, Lakkireddy D, et al. Ablation Circulation versus amiodarone for treatment of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with congestive heart failure and an implanted device: results from the AATAC multicenter randomized trial. Circulation. 2016;133:1637-44.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.115.01940627029350
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Prabhu S, Taylor AJ, Costello BT, Kaye DM, McLellan AJA, Voskoboinik A, et al. Catheter ablation versus medical rate control in atrial fibrillation and systolic dysfunction: the CAMERA-MRI study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1949-61.10.1016/j.jacc.2017.08.04128855115
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Marrouche NF, Brachmann J, Andresen D, Siebels J, Boersma L, Jordaens L, et al. CASTLE-AF Investigators. Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation with heart failure. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:417-27.10.1056/NEJMoa170785529385358
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Kuniss M, Pavlovic N, Velagic V, Hermida JS, Healey S, Arena G, et al. Cryoballoon ablation vs. antiarrhythmic drugs: first-line therapy for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2021;23(7):1033-41.10.1093/europace/euab029828685133728429
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Steinberg C, Champagne J, Deyell MW, Dubuc M, Leong-Sit P, Calkins H, et al. CIRCA-DOSE Study Investigators. Prevalence and outcome of early recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmias in the cryoballoon vs irrigated radiofrequency catheter ablation (CIRCA-DOSE) study. Heart Rhythm. 2021;18(9):1463-70.10.1016/j.hrthm.2021.06.117234126269
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Hayashi T, Murakami M, Saito S, Iwasaki K. Characteristics of anatomical difficulty for cryoballoon ablation: insights from CT. Open Heart. 2022;9(1):e001724.10.1136/openhrt-2021-001724873944534992156
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Thai WE, Wai B, Truong QA. Preprocedural imaging for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012; 14:584-92.10.1007/s11886-012-0293-7343362622828754
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Angulo Hervias E, Guillén Subirán ME, Yagüe Romeo D, Castán Senar A, Seral Moral P, Núñez Motilva ME. Multidetector computed tomography in planning the treatment of atrial fibrillation. Radiologia (Engl Ed). 2020;62(2):148-59.10.1016/j.rxeng.2019.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Sandhu A, Zipse MM, Borne RT, Aleong RG, Tompkins C, Schuller J, et al. Esophageal position, measured luminal temperatures, and risk of atrioesophageal fistula with atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(4):458-63.10.1111/pace.1363930779183
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Kapur S, Barbhaiya C, Deneke T, Michaud GF. Esophageal injury and atrioesophageal fistula caused by ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circulation. 2017;136(13):1247-55.10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.02582728947480
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Lemola K, Sneider M, Desjardins B, Case I, Han J, Good E, at al. Computed tomographic analysis of the anatomy of the left atrium and the esophagus: implications for left atrial catheter ablation. Circulation. 2004;110(24):3655-60.10.1161/01.CIR.0000149714.31471.FD15569839
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Tsao HM, Wu MH, Higa S, Lee KT, Tai CT, Hsu NW, at al. Anatomic relationship of the esophagus and left atrium: implication for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Chest. 2005;128(4):2581-7.10.1378/chest.128.4.258116236927
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Starek Z, Lehar F, Jez J, Scurek M, Wolf J, Kulik T, Zbankova A. Esophageal positions relative to the left atrium; data from 293 patients before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Indian Heart J. 2018;70(1):37-44.10.1016/j.ihj.2017.06.013590282129455785
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Narui R, Tokuda M, Matsushima M, Isogai R, Tokutake K, Yokoyama K, et al. Incidence and factors associated with the occurrence of pulmonary vein narrowing after cryoballoon ablation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017;10(6):e004588.10.1161/CIRCEP.116.00458828630168
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Matsuda J, Miyazaki S, Nakamura H, Taniguchi H, Kajiyama T, Hachiya H, et al. Pulmonary vein stenosis after second-generation cryoballoon ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2017;28(3):298-303.10.1111/jce.1315528032927
]Search in Google Scholar
[
26. Tokutake K, Tokuda M, Yamashita S, Sato H, Ikewaki H, Okajima E, et al. Anatomical and procedural factors of severe pulmonary vein stenosis after cryoballoon pulmonary vein ablation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;5(11):1303-15.10.1016/j.jacep.2019.08.00331753437
]Search in Google Scholar
[
27. Beinart R, Abbara S, Blum A, Ferencik M, Heist K, Ruskin J, et al. Left atrial wall thickness variability measured by CT scans in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22(11):1232-6.10.1111/j.1540-8167.2011.02100.x21615817
]Search in Google Scholar
[
28. Hof I, Chilukuri K, Arbab-Zadeh A, Scherr D, Dalal D, Nazarian S, et al. Does left atrial volume and pulmonary venous anatomy predict the outcome of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2009;20:1005-10.10.1111/j.1540-8167.2009.01504.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
29. Dorenkamp M, Sohns C, Vollmann D, Lüthje L, Seegers J, Wachter R, et al. Detection of left atrial thrombus during routine diagnostics work-up prior to pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation: Role of transesophageal echocardiography and multi-detector computed tomography. Int J Cardiol. 2013;163:26-33.10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.06.12421764466
]Search in Google Scholar
[
30. Mosleh W, Sheikh A, Said Z, Ahmed MA, Gadde S, Shah T, et al. The use of cardiac-CT alone to exclude left atrial thrombus before atrial fibrillation ablation: Efficiency, safety and cost analysis. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;41(7):727-33.10.1111/pace.13353619287329667208
]Search in Google Scholar
[
31. Hong SJ, Kim JY, Kim JB, Sung JH, Wook Kim D, Uhm JS, et al. Multidetector computed tomography may be an adequate screening test to reduce periprocedural stroke in atrial fibrillation ablation: a multicenter propensity – matched analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(5): 763-70.10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.01.02624469219
]Search in Google Scholar
[
32. Bilchick KC, Mealor A, Gonzalez J, Norton P, Zhuo D, Mason P, et al. Effectiveness of integrating delayed computed tomography angiography imaging for left atrial appendage thrombus exclusion into the care of patients undergoing ablation of atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13(1):12-9.10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.09.002485834926341605
]Search in Google Scholar
[
33. Kottmaier M, Jilek C, Berglar S, Reents T, Bourier F, Semmler V, et al. Exclusion of left atrial thrombus by dual-source cardiac computed tomography prior to catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2019;108(2):150-6.10.1007/s00392-018-1333-030051177
]Search in Google Scholar
[
34. Zhai Z, Tang M, Zhang S, Fang P, Jia Y, Feng T, Wang J. Transoesophageal echocardiography prior to catheter ablation could be avoided in atrial fibrillation patients with a low risk of stroke and without filling defects in the late-phase MDCT scan: A retrospective analysis of 783 patients. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(5):1835-40.10.1007/s00330-017-5172-629218612
]Search in Google Scholar
[
35. Pathan F, Hecht H, Narula J, Marwick TH. Roles of transechophageal echocardiogaphy and cardiac computed tomography for evaluation of left atrial thrombus and associated pathology: A review and critical analysis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(4):616-27.10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.12.01929622180
]Search in Google Scholar
[
36. Khurram IM, Dewire J, Mager M, Maqbool F, Zimmerman SL, Zipunnikov V, et al. Relationship between left atrial appendage morphology and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10(12):1843-9.10.1016/j.hrthm.2013.09.06524076444
]Search in Google Scholar
[
37. Lee Y, Park HC, Lee Y, Kim SG. Comparison of morphologic features and flow velocity of the left atrial appendage among patients with atrial fibrillation alone, transient ischemic attack, and cardioembolic stroke. Am J Cardiol. 2017;119(10):1596-604.10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.02.01628364953
]Search in Google Scholar
[
38. Wu L, Liang E, Fan S, Zheng L, Du Z, Liu S, et al. Relation of left atrial appendage morphology determined by computed tomography to prior stroke or to increased risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123(8):1283-6.10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.01.02430709597
]Search in Google Scholar
[
39. Nedios S, Kornej J, Koutalas E, Bertagnolli L, Kosiuk J, Rolf S, et al. Left atrial appendage morphology and thromboembolic risk after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(12):2239-46.10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.08.01625128733
]Search in Google Scholar
[
40. Zheng GA, Lin CY, Weng L, Chen JD. Left atrial appendage volume is a valuable predictor of atrial fibrillation recurrence after radiofrequency catheter ablation. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2017;45(11):924-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
41. Du W, Dai M, Wang M, Gong Q, Ye TQ, Wang H, Luo CD. Large left atrial appendage predicts the ablation outcome in hypertensive patients with atrial fibrillation. J Electrocardiol. 2020;63:139-44.10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2020.07.01733212414
]Search in Google Scholar
[
42. Patel SN, French A, Mathias H, Lyen S, Hamilton MC, Manghat NE. Presence of left atrial diverticula, accessory appendages, and normal variant pulmonary venous anatomy diagnosed using MDCT and adverse outcomes following radiofrequency catheter ablation therapy in patients with drug-refractory atrial fibrillation: an exploratory study. Clin Radiol. 2013;68(8):762-9.10.1016/j.crad.2013.02.00523541094
]Search in Google Scholar
[
43. Demir GG, Güneş HM, Seker M, Savur Ü, Güler GB, Güler E, et al. Is the presence of left atrial diverticulum associated with recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation? Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis. 2019;11(4):25-31.10.5114/amsad.2019.83508645114130963133
]Search in Google Scholar
[
44. Peng LQ, Yu JQ, Yang ZG, Wu D, Xu JJ, Chu ZG, et al. Left atrial diverticula in patients referred for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation: assessment of prevalence and morphologic characteristics by dual-source computed tomography. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2012;5(2):345-50.10.1161/CIRCEP.111.96566522345391
]Search in Google Scholar
[
45. Wong CX, Ganesan AN, Selvanayagam JB. Epicardial fat and atrial fibrillation: current evidence, potential mechanisms, clinical implications, and future directions. Eur Heart J. 2017;38(17): 1294-302.10.1093/eurheartj/ehw045
]Search in Google Scholar
[
46. Wong CX, Abed HS, Molaee P, Nelson AJ, Brooks AG, Sharma G, et al. Pericardial fat is associated with atrial fibrillation severity and ablation outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(17):1745-51.10.1016/j.jacc.2010.11.04521511110
]Search in Google Scholar
[
47. Kim TH, Park J, Park JK, Uhm JS, Joung B, Lee MH, Pak HN. Pericardial fat volume is associated with clinical recurrence after catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation, but not paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an analysis of over 600-patients. Int J Cardiol. 2014;176(3):841-6.10.1016/j.ijcard.2014.08.00825176630
]Search in Google Scholar
[
48. Kosehan D, Akin K, Koktener A, Cakir B, Aktas A, Teksam M. Interatrial shunt: diagnosis of patent foramen ovale and atrial septal defect with 64-row coronary computed tomography angiography. Jpn J Radiol. 2011;29(8):576-82.10.1007/s11604-011-0602-x21928000
]Search in Google Scholar
[
49. Yasunaga D, Hamon M. MDCT of interatrial septum. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2015;96(9):891-9.10.1016/j.diii.2015.02.01125981979
]Search in Google Scholar
[
50. Xiong L, Zeng Y, Gan T, Yan F, Bai J, Shi Y, et al. Assessing patent foramen ovale on coronary computed tomographic angiography: a comparison with transesophageal echocardiography. Jpn J Radiol. 2022;40(7):689-95.10.1007/s11604-021-01244-z35080696
]Search in Google Scholar
[
51. Kiedrowicz R. Fire or ice in the treatment of atrial fibrillation? What do the results of the fire or ice trial tell us? WDR. 2016;41(4):37-40.10.5604/18967892.1223379
]Search in Google Scholar
[
52. Takamiya T, Nitta J, Inaba, Sato A, Inamura Y, Kato N, et al. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in hemodialysis patients. Heart Vessels. 2020;35(12): 1709-16.10.1007/s00380-020-01646-532524235
]Search in Google Scholar
[
53. Wang Y, Wang W, Yao J, Chen L, Yi S. Second-generation cryoballoon vs. contact-force sensing radiofrequency catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2021;60(1):9-19.10.1007/s10840-020-00893-w33040244
]Search in Google Scholar
[
54. Buiatti A, von Olshausen G, Barthel P, Schneider S, Luik A, Kaess B, et al. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: an updated meta-analysis of randomized and observational studies. Europace. 2017;19(3):378-84.10.1093/europace/euw26227702864
]Search in Google Scholar
[
55. Matta M, Anselmino M, Ferraris F, Scaglione M, Gaita F. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency contact force ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a propensity score analysis. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018;19(4):141-47.10.2459/JCM.000000000000063329432399
]Search in Google Scholar
[
56. Murray MI, Arnold A, Younis M, Varghese S, Zeiher AM. Cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(8):658-69.10.1007/s00392-018-1232-429564527
]Search in Google Scholar
[
57. Inaba O, Metzner A, Rottner L, Mathew S, Lemes C, Maurer T, et al. Radiofrequency or cryoballoon ablation for index pulmonary vein isolation: What is the impact on long-term clinical outcomes after repeat ablation? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(5):1068-74.10.1111/jce.1443232128924
]Search in Google Scholar
[
58. Glowniak A, Tarkowski A, Fic P, Wojewoda K, Wojcik J, Wysokinski A. Second-generation cryoballoon ablation for recurrent atrial fibrillation after an index procedure with radiofrequency versus cryo: different pulmonary vein reconnection patterns but similar long-term outcome – results of a multicenter analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2019;30:1005-12.10.1111/jce.1393830938917
]Search in Google Scholar
[
59. Ali AN, Riad O, Tawfik M, Opel A, Wong T. Newer generation cryoballoon vs. contact force-sensing radiofrequency ablation catheter in the ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2021;32(2):236-43.10.1007/s00399-021-00763-633999265
]Search in Google Scholar
[
60. Wieczorek M, Sassani K, Hoeltgen R. Comparison of pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after multielectrode phased radiofrequencyand cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2020;20(1):197.10.1186/s12872-020-01459-4718153132326885
]Search in Google Scholar
[
61. Gunawardene MA, Hoffmann BA, Schaeffer B, Chung DU, Moser J, Akbulak RO, et al. Influence of energy source on early atrial fibrillation recurrences: a comparison of cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency current energy ablation with the endpoint of unexcitability in pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2018;20(1):43-9.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
62. Buist TJ, Adiyaman A, Smit JJ, Ramdat Misier AR, Elvan A. Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107(6):498-506.10.1007/s00392-018-1211-929411114
]Search in Google Scholar
[
63. Chen CF, Zhong YG, Jin CL, Gao XF, Liu XH, Xu YZ. Comparing between second-generation cryoballoon vs open-irrigated radiofrequency ablation in elderly patients: Acute and long-term outcomes. Clin Cardiol. 2020;43(5):500-7.10.1002/clc.23335724430031943264
]Search in Google Scholar
[
64. Mörtsell D, Arbelo E, Dagres N, Brugada J, Laroche C, Trines SA, et al. ESC-EHRA Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Long-Term Registry investigators. Cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: a study of outcome and safety based on the ESC-EHRA atrial fibrillation ablation long-term registry and the Swedish catheter ablation registry. Europace. 2019;21(4):581-9.10.1093/europace/euy23930376055
]Search in Google Scholar
[
65. Sørensen SK, Johannessen A, Worck R, Hansen ML, Hansen J. Radiofrequency versus cryoballoon catheter ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: durability of pulmonary vein isolation and effect on atrial fibrillation burden: The RACE-AF randomized controlled trial. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2021;14(5):e009573.10.1161/CIRCEP.120.009573813646233835823
]Search in Google Scholar
[
66. Marom EM, Herndon JE, Kim YH, McAdams HP. Variations in pulmonary venous drainage to the left atrium: Implications for radiofrequency ablation. Radiology. 2004;230(3):824-9.10.1148/radiol.230303031514739316
]Search in Google Scholar
[
67. Wannasopha Y, Oilmungmool N, Euathrongchit J. Anatomical variations of pulmonary venous drainage in Thai people: multidetector CT study. Biomed Imaging Interv J. 2012;8(1):e4.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
68. Mulder BA, Al-Jazairi MIH, Arends BKO, Bax N, Dijkshoorn LA, Sheikh U, et al. Pulmonary vein anatomy addressed by computed tomography and relation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Clin Cardiol. 2019;42 (4):438-43.10.1002/clc.23163671231530756396
]Search in Google Scholar
[
69. Schmidt M, Dorwarth U, Straube F, Daccarett M, Rieber J, Wankerl M, et al. Cryoballoon in AF ablation: Impact of PV ovality on AF recurrence. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167(1):114-20.10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.01722206633
]Search in Google Scholar
[
70. Stachyra M, Szczasny M, Tarkowski A, Mianowana M, Wojewoda K, Wysokinska K, et al. Impact of pulmonary vein ovality index on cooling kinetics and acute success of atrial fibrillation ablation with the third-generation cryoballoon cathether. Adv Interv Cardiol. 2021;17(4):403-9.10.5114/aic.2021.110927880264335126556
]Search in Google Scholar
[
71. Sorgente A, Chierchia GB, Asmundis C, Sarkozy A, Namdar M, Capulzini L, et al. Pulmonary vein ostium shape and orientation as possible predictors of occlusion in patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation undergoing cryoballon ablation. Europace. 2011;13:205-12.10.1093/europace/euq38820974756
]Search in Google Scholar
[
72. Kajiyma T, Miyazaki S, Matsuda J, Watanabe T, Niida T, Takagi T, et al. Anatomic parameters predicting procedural difficulty and balloon temperature predicting successful applications in individual pulmonary veins during 28mm second-generation cryoballoon ablation. Jacc Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(6):580-8.10.1016/j.jacep.2017.01.00429759431
]Search in Google Scholar
[
73. Boussoussou M, Szilveszter B, Vattay B, Kolossváry M, Vecsey-Nagy M, Salló Z, et. al. The effect of left atrial wall thickness and pulmonary vein sizes on the acute procedural success of atrial fibrillation ablation. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022;38:1601-11.10.1007/s10554-022-02533-y35138472
]Search in Google Scholar
[
74. Istratoaie S, Roșu R, Cismaru G, Vesa ȘC, Puiu M, Zdrenghea D, et.al. The impact of pulmonary vein anatomy on the outcomes of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Medicina (Kaunas). 2019;55(11):727.10.3390/medicina55110727691542931690031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
75. Ronsoni RM, Silvestrini TL, Essebag V, Lopes RD, Lumertz Saffi MA, Luz Leiria TL. Association of the left common ostium with clinical outcome after pulmonary vein isolation in atrial fibrillation. Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J. 2021;21(2):95-100.10.1016/j.ipej.2020.11.020795277033271275
]Search in Google Scholar
[
76. Hanaki Y, Yoshida K, Baba M, Hasebe H, Takeyasu N, Nogami A, Ieda M. Interatrial distance predicts the necessity of additional carina ablation to isolate the right-sided pulmonary veins. Heart Rhythm. 2020;1(4):259-67.10.1016/j.hroo.2020.08.003818389034113879
]Search in Google Scholar
[
77. Baran J, Piotrowski R, Sikorska A, Kowalik I, Krynski T, Stec S, et al. Impact of pulmonary vein ostia anatomy on efficacy of cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. Heart Beat J. 2016;1:65-70.10.24255/hbj/68162
]Search in Google Scholar
[
78. Matsumoto Y, Muraoka Y, Funama Y, Mito S, Masuda T, Sato T, et al. Analysis of anatomical features of pulmonary veins on preprocedural cardiac CT images resulting in incomplete cryoballoon ablation for atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2019;13(2):118-27.10.1016/j.jcct.2018.11.00530466810
]Search in Google Scholar
[
79. Kocyigit D, Yalcin MU, Gurses KM, Selin A, Turk G, Canpolat U, et al. Pulmonary vein orientation is independently associated with outcomes following cryoballoon-based atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018;12(4):281-5.10.1016/j.jcct.2018.01.01129500095
]Search in Google Scholar