[1. Adams, S. (2009), “Foreign Direct investment, domestic investment, and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 939-949.10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Amado, C. A. F., São José, J. M. S., Santos, S. P. (2016), “Measuring active ageing: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 255, No. 1, pp. 207-223.10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.048]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Arruñada, B. (2007), “Pitfalls to avoid when measuring institutions: Is Doing Business damaging business?”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 729-747.10.1016/j.jce.2007.08.003]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Basu, P., Guariglia, A. (2007), “Foreign Direct Investment, inequality, and growth”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 824-839.10.1016/j.jmacro.2006.02.004]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Becker, W., Saisana, M., Paruolo, P., Vandecasteele, I. (2017), “Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap”, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 80, pp. 12-22.10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Bird, S. M., Sir David, C., Farewell, V. T., Harvey, G., Tim, H., Peter C. S. (2005), “Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 168, No. 1, pp. 1-27.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.00333.x]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Booysen, F. (2002), “An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 115-151.10.1023/A:1016275505152]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G., Weder, B. (1997), Institutional Obstacles to Doing Business: Region-by-Region Results from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector, World Bank Publications.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Büthe, T., Milner, H. V. (2008), “The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 741-762.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00340.x]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Cavusgil, S. T. (1997), “Measuring the potential of emerging markets: An indexing approach”, Business Horizons, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 87-91.10.1016/S0007-6813(97)90030-6]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Celebi, M. E., Kingravi, H. A., Vela, P. A. (2013), “A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 200-210.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.021]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., Niknafs, A. (2014), “NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set”, Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 61, No. 6.10.18637/jss.v061.i06]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T. (2007), “An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 111-145.10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Liska, R., Tarantola, S. (2008), “Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 239-251.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602445]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., Merry, S. E. (2012), “Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance”, Law & Society Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 71-104.10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00473.x]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Decancq, K., Lugo, M. A. (2013), “Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview”, Econometric Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 7-34.10.1080/07474938.2012.690641]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Despotis, D. K. (2005), “A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 56, No. 8, pp. 969-980.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601927]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2002), “The Regulation of Entry”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 1-37.10.1162/003355302753399436]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Dobrota, M., Bulajic, M., Bornmann, L., Jeremic, V. (2016), “A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I-distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 200-211.10.1002/asi.23355]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Dobrota, M., Martic, M., Bulajic, M., Jeremic, V. (2015), “Two-phased composite I-distance indicator approach for evaluation of countries’ information development”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 406-420.10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.003]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Gohou, G., Soumaré, I. (2012), “Does Foreign Direct Investment Reduce Poverty in Africa and are There Regional Differences?”, World Development, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 75-95.10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.014]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Hartigan, J. A., Wong, M. A. (1979), “Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm”, Applied Statistics, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 100-108.10.2307/2346830]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Hoyland, B., Moene, K., Willumsen, K. (2008), Be Careful When Doing Business, Report to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Huang, M.-H. (2012), “Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 71-78.10.1093/reseval/rvr003]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Independent Evaluation Group (2008), Doing Business: An Independent Evaluation. Taking the Measure of the World Bank-IFC Doing Business Indicators, World Bank, Washington, DC.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Ivanovic, B. (1977), Teorija Klasifikacije, Institut za ekonomiku industrije, Beograd.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Jain, A. K. (2010), “Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 651-666.10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., Radojicic, Z. (2011), “A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities”, Scientometrics, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 587-596.10.1007/s11192-011-0361-6]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Jeremic, V., Jovanovic Milenkovic, M., Radojicic, Z., Martic, M. (2013), “Excellence with Leadership: the crown indicator of Scimago Institutions Rankings Iber report”, El Profesional de La Información, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 474-480.10.3145/epi.2013.sep.13]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Jovanovic, M., Jeremic, V., Savic, G., Bulajic, M., Martic, M. (2012), “How does the normalization of data affect the ARWU ranking?”, Scientometrics, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 319-327.10.1007/s11192-012-0674-0]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Kasim, A., Shkedy, Z., Kaiser, S., Hochreiter, S., Talloen, W. (2016), Applied Biclustering Methods for Big and High-Dimensional Data Using R, Chapman and Hall.10.1201/9781315373966]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Konings, J. (2001), “The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms Evidence from firm-level panel data in emerging economies”, The Economics of Transition, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 619-633.10.1111/1468-0351.00091]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Maricic, M., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., Dobrota, M. (2015), “Measuring the ict development: the fusion of biased and objective approach”, Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 326-334.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Maricic, M., Bulajic, M., Radojicic, Z., Jeremic, V. (2016), “Multivariate approach to imposing additional constraints on the Benefit-of-the-Doubt model: The case of QS World University Rankings by Subject”, Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-14.10.1515/crebss-2016-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Maricic, M., Zornic, N., Jeremic, V. (2016), “Ranking European Universities Based on Their Level of Collaboration with the Industry: The Univesity-Industry Research Connections Index”, in proceedings of the International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, IATED, pp. 6095-6105.10.21125/edulearn.2016.0306]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Maricic, M., Zornic, N., Pilcevic, I., Dacic-Pilcevic, A. (2017), “ARWU vs. Alternative ARWU Ranking: What are the Consequences for Lower Ranked Universities?”, Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-14.10.7595/management.fon.2017.0002]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Miyamoto, S. (2012), “An Overview of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Algorithms of Clustering for Semi-supervised Classification”, in Torra V., Narukawa Y., López B., V. M. (Eds.), Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1-10.10.1007/978-3-642-34620-0_1]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Munda, G. (2008), Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., Giovannini, E. (2005), Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, OECD Statistics Working Papers.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Neumayer, E., De Soysa, I. (2011), “Globalization and the Empowerment of Women: An Analysis of Spatial Dependence via Trade and Foreign Direct Investment”, World Development, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 1065-1075.10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.008]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A. (2013), “Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science?”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 176, No. 3, pp. 609-634.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.x]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Radojicic, M., Savic, G., Radovanovic, S., Jeremic, V. (2015), “A novel bootstrap dba-dea approach in evaluating efficiency of banks”, Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 375-384.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Russell, L. B., Bhanot, G., Kim, S.-Y., Sinha, A. (2017), “Using Cluster Analysis to Group Countries for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: An Application to Sub-Saharan Africa”, Medical Decision Making, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 139-149.10.1177/0272989X17724773]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Saisana, M., D’Hombres, B., Saltelli, A. (2011), “Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications”, Research Policy, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 165-177.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Savic, D., Jeremic, V., Petrovic, N. (2016), “Rebuilding the Pillars of Sustainable Society Index: A Multivariate Post Hoc I-Distance Approach”, Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems of Sustainable Development, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 125-134.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., Dikshit, A. K. (2007), “Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry”, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 565-588.10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.06.004]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Škrabuľáková, E. F., Ivanova, M., Michaeli, E. (2016), “Usage of clustering methods in mathematics, geoinformatics and related fields of university study”, in proceedings of 17th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), IEEE, pp. 723-728.10.1109/CarpathianCC.2016.7501190]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Soh, K. (2014), “Nominal versus attained weights in Universitas 21 Ranking”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 944-951.10.1080/03075079.2012.754866]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., Hastie, T. (2001), “Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 411-423.10.1111/1467-9868.00293]Search in Google Scholar
[50. World Bank (2017), Doing Business 2018: Reforming to Create Jobs, Washington, D.C, available at: http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/WBG/DoingBusiness/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB2018-Full-Report.pdf (06 November 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., Zhou, D. Q. (2010), “Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: A multiplicative optimization approach”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 169-181.10.1007/s11205-009-9472-3]Search in Google Scholar