Shedding Light on the Doing Business Index: a Machine Learning Approach

1. Adams, S. (2009), “Foreign Direct investment, domestic investment, and economic growth in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Journal of Policy Modeling, Vol. 31, No. 6, pp. 939-949.10.1016/j.jpolmod.2009.03.003Search in Google Scholar

2. Amado, C. A. F., São José, J. M. S., Santos, S. P. (2016), “Measuring active ageing: A Data Envelopment Analysis approach”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 255, No. 1, pp. 207-223.10.1016/j.ejor.2016.04.048Search in Google Scholar

3. Arruñada, B. (2007), “Pitfalls to avoid when measuring institutions: Is Doing Business damaging business?”, Journal of Comparative Economics, Vol. 35, No. 4, pp. 729-747.10.1016/j.jce.2007.08.003Search in Google Scholar

4. Basu, P., Guariglia, A. (2007), “Foreign Direct Investment, inequality, and growth”, Journal of Macroeconomics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 824-839.10.1016/j.jmacro.2006.02.004Search in Google Scholar

5. Becker, W., Saisana, M., Paruolo, P., Vandecasteele, I. (2017), “Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap”, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 80, pp. 12-22.10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.03.056Search in Google Scholar

6. Bird, S. M., Sir David, C., Farewell, V. T., Harvey, G., Tim, H., Peter C. S. (2005), “Performance indicators: good, bad, and ugly”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 168, No. 1, pp. 1-27.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2004.00333.xSearch in Google Scholar

7. Booysen, F. (2002), “An overview and evaluation of composite indices of development”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 115-151.10.1023/A:1016275505152Search in Google Scholar

8. Brunetti, A., Kisunko, G., Weder, B. (1997), Institutional Obstacles to Doing Business: Region-by-Region Results from a Worldwide Survey of the Private Sector, World Bank Publications.Search in Google Scholar

9. Büthe, T., Milner, H. V. (2008), “The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI through International Trade Agreements?”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 52, No. 4, pp. 741-762.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00340.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Cavusgil, S. T. (1997), “Measuring the potential of emerging markets: An indexing approach”, Business Horizons, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 87-91.10.1016/S0007-6813(97)90030-6Search in Google Scholar

11. Celebi, M. E., Kingravi, H. A., Vela, P. A. (2013), “A comparative study of efficient initialization methods for the k-means clustering algorithm”, Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 200-210.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.07.021Search in Google Scholar

12. Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., Niknafs, A. (2014), “NbClust: An R Package for Determining the Relevant Number of Clusters in a Data Set”, Journal of Statistical Software, Vol. 61, No. 6.10.18637/jss.v061.i06Search in Google Scholar

13. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T. (2007), “An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 82, No. 1, pp. 111-145.10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7Search in Google Scholar

14. Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Liska, R., Tarantola, S. (2008), “Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: the case of the Technology Achievement Index”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 59, No. 2, pp. 239-251.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602445Search in Google Scholar

15. Davis, K. E., Kingsbury, B., Merry, S. E. (2012), “Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance”, Law & Society Review, Vol. 46, No. 1, pp. 71-104.10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00473.xSearch in Google Scholar

16. Decancq, K., Lugo, M. A. (2013), “Weights in Multidimensional Indices of Wellbeing: An Overview”, Econometric Reviews, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 7-34.10.1080/07474938.2012.690641Search in Google Scholar

17. Despotis, D. K. (2005), “A reassessment of the human development index via data envelopment analysis”, Journal of the Operational Research Society, Vol. 56, No. 8, pp. 969-980.10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601927Search in Google Scholar

18. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A. (2002), “The Regulation of Entry”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 117, No. 1, pp. 1-37.10.1162/003355302753399436Search in Google Scholar

19. Dobrota, M., Bulajic, M., Bornmann, L., Jeremic, V. (2016), “A new approach to the QS university ranking using the composite I-distance indicator: Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses”, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 200-211.10.1002/asi.23355Search in Google Scholar

20. Dobrota, M., Martic, M., Bulajic, M., Jeremic, V. (2015), “Two-phased composite I-distance indicator approach for evaluation of countries’ information development”, Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 39, No. 5, pp. 406-420.10.1016/j.telpol.2015.03.003Search in Google Scholar

21. Gohou, G., Soumaré, I. (2012), “Does Foreign Direct Investment Reduce Poverty in Africa and are There Regional Differences?”, World Development, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 75-95.10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.05.014Search in Google Scholar

22. Hartigan, J. A., Wong, M. A. (1979), “Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm”, Applied Statistics, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 100-108.10.2307/2346830Search in Google Scholar

23. Hoyland, B., Moene, K., Willumsen, K. (2008), Be Careful When Doing Business, Report to the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs.Search in Google Scholar

24. Huang, M.-H. (2012), “Opening the black box of QS World University Rankings”, Research Evaluation, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 71-78.10.1093/reseval/rvr003Search in Google Scholar

25. Independent Evaluation Group (2008), Doing Business: An Independent Evaluation. Taking the Measure of the World Bank-IFC Doing Business Indicators, World Bank, Washington, DC.Search in Google Scholar

26. Ivanovic, B. (1977), Teorija Klasifikacije, Institut za ekonomiku industrije, Beograd.Search in Google Scholar

27. Jain, A. K. (2010), “Data clustering: 50 years beyond K-means”, Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 31, No. 8, pp. 651-666.10.1016/j.patrec.2009.09.011Search in Google Scholar

28. Jeremic, V., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., Radojicic, Z. (2011), “A fresh approach to evaluating the academic ranking of world universities”, Scientometrics, Vol. 87, No. 3, pp. 587-596.10.1007/s11192-011-0361-6Search in Google Scholar

29. Jeremic, V., Jovanovic Milenkovic, M., Radojicic, Z., Martic, M. (2013), “Excellence with Leadership: the crown indicator of Scimago Institutions Rankings Iber report”, El Profesional de La Información, Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 474-480.10.3145/epi.2013.sep.13Search in Google Scholar

30. Jovanovic, M., Jeremic, V., Savic, G., Bulajic, M., Martic, M. (2012), “How does the normalization of data affect the ARWU ranking?”, Scientometrics, Vol. 93, No. 2, pp. 319-327.10.1007/s11192-012-0674-0Search in Google Scholar

31. Kasim, A., Shkedy, Z., Kaiser, S., Hochreiter, S., Talloen, W. (2016), Applied Biclustering Methods for Big and High-Dimensional Data Using R, Chapman and Hall.10.1201/9781315373966Search in Google Scholar

32. Konings, J. (2001), “The effects of foreign direct investment on domestic firms Evidence from firm-level panel data in emerging economies”, The Economics of Transition, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 619-633.10.1111/1468-0351.00091Search in Google Scholar

33. Maricic, M., Bulajic, M., Martic, M., Dobrota, M. (2015), “Measuring the ict development: the fusion of biased and objective approach”, Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 326-334.Search in Google Scholar

34. Maricic, M., Bulajic, M., Radojicic, Z., Jeremic, V. (2016), “Multivariate approach to imposing additional constraints on the Benefit-of-the-Doubt model: The case of QS World University Rankings by Subject”, Croatian Review of Economic, Business and Social Statistics, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 1-14.10.1515/crebss-2016-0005Search in Google Scholar

35. Maricic, M., Zornic, N., Jeremic, V. (2016), “Ranking European Universities Based on Their Level of Collaboration with the Industry: The Univesity-Industry Research Connections Index”, in proceedings of the International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, IATED, pp. 6095-6105.10.21125/edulearn.2016.0306Search in Google Scholar

36. Maricic, M., Zornic, N., Pilcevic, I., Dacic-Pilcevic, A. (2017), “ARWU vs. Alternative ARWU Ranking: What are the Consequences for Lower Ranked Universities?”, Management: Journal of Sustainable Business and Management Solutions in Emerging Economies, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp. 1-14.10.7595/management.fon.2017.0002Search in Google Scholar

37. Miyamoto, S. (2012), “An Overview of Hierarchical and Non-hierarchical Algorithms of Clustering for Semi-supervised Classification”, in Torra V., Narukawa Y., López B., V. M. (Eds.), Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, pp. 1-10.10.1007/978-3-642-34620-0_1Search in Google Scholar

38. Munda, G. (2008), Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation for a Sustainable Economy, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg.10.1007/978-3-540-73703-2Search in Google Scholar

39. Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., Hoffman, A., Giovannini, E. (2005), Handbook on Constructing Composite Indicators, OECD Statistics Working Papers.Search in Google Scholar

40. Neumayer, E., De Soysa, I. (2011), “Globalization and the Empowerment of Women: An Analysis of Spatial Dependence via Trade and Foreign Direct Investment”, World Development, Vol. 39, No. 7, pp. 1065-1075.10.1016/j.worlddev.2010.12.008Search in Google Scholar

41. Paruolo, P., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A. (2013), “Ratings and rankings: voodoo or science?”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), Vol. 176, No. 3, pp. 609-634.10.1111/j.1467-985X.2012.01059.xSearch in Google Scholar

42. Radojicic, M., Savic, G., Radovanovic, S., Jeremic, V. (2015), “A novel bootstrap dba-dea approach in evaluating efficiency of banks”, Naval Academy Scientific Bulletin, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 375-384.Search in Google Scholar

43. Russell, L. B., Bhanot, G., Kim, S.-Y., Sinha, A. (2017), “Using Cluster Analysis to Group Countries for Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: An Application to Sub-Saharan Africa”, Medical Decision Making, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 139-149.10.1177/0272989X17724773Search in Google Scholar

44. Saisana, M., D’Hombres, B., Saltelli, A. (2011), “Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications”, Research Policy, Vol. 40, No. 1, pp. 165-177.10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003Search in Google Scholar

45. Savic, D., Jeremic, V., Petrovic, N. (2016), “Rebuilding the Pillars of Sustainable Society Index: A Multivariate Post Hoc I-Distance Approach”, Problemy Ekorozwoju - Problems of Sustainable Development, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 125-134.Search in Google Scholar

46. Singh, R. K., Murty, H. R., Gupta, S. K., Dikshit, A. K. (2007), “Development of composite sustainability performance index for steel industry”, Ecological Indicators, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 565-588.10.1016/j.ecolind.2006.06.004Search in Google Scholar

47. Škrabuľáková, E. F., Ivanova, M., Michaeli, E. (2016), “Usage of clustering methods in mathematics, geoinformatics and related fields of university study”, in proceedings of 17th International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC), IEEE, pp. 723-728.10.1109/CarpathianCC.2016.7501190Search in Google Scholar

48. Soh, K. (2014), “Nominal versus attained weights in Universitas 21 Ranking”, Studies in Higher Education, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 944-951.10.1080/03075079.2012.754866Search in Google Scholar

49. Tibshirani, R., Walther, G., Hastie, T. (2001), “Estimating the number of clusters in a data set via the gap statistic”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 63, No. 2, pp. 411-423.10.1111/1467-9868.00293Search in Google Scholar

50. World Bank (2017), Doing Business 2018: Reforming to Create Jobs, Washington, D.C, available at: http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/WBG/DoingBusiness/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB2018-Full-Report.pdf (06 November 2018).Search in Google Scholar

51. Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., Zhou, D. Q. (2010), “Weighting and aggregation in composite indicator construction: A multiplicative optimization approach”, Social Indicators Research, Vol. 96, No. 1, pp. 169-181.10.1007/s11205-009-9472-3Search in Google Scholar