[1. Abramowicz, Michael. “Cryptocurrency-Based Law.” Arizona Law Review 58 (2016): 359-420.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bradley, Robert. “On the Origins of the Sherman Antitrust Act.” Cato Journal 9 (1990): 737–742.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Champagne, Phil. The book of Satoshi: The collected writings of Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto. USA: e53 Publishing, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Comm’n of The European Communities, “Guidance on the Commission’s Enforcement Priorities in Applying Article 82 Ec Treaty to Abusive Exclusionary Conduct by Dominant Undertakings,” Official Journal of the European Union (Dec. 3, 2008) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52009XC0224%2801%29.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Cong, Lin, and Zhiguo He. “Blockchain Disruption and Smart Contracts.” The Review of Financial Studies 32 (2018): 1754-1797.10.1093/rfs/hhz007]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Cuccuru, Pierluigi. “Beyond Bitcoin: An Early Overview on Smart Contracts.” International Journal of Law and Information Technology 25 (2017): 179-195.10.1093/ijlit/eax003]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Dannen, Chris. Introducing Ethereum and Solidity: Foundations of Cryptocurrency and Blockchain Programming for Beginners. New York: Apress, 2017.10.1007/978-1-4842-2535-6]Search in Google Scholar
[8. De Filippi, Primavera. Blockchain and the law: the Rule of Code. Boston: Harvard University Press. 2018.10.2307/j.ctv2867sp]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Desal, Kiran. Blockchain and competition law. London: Ernest & Young Law Alert, 2018 // https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-blockchain-and-competition-law/$FILE/ey-blockchain-and-competition-law.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Economides, Nicholas, and Ioannis Lianos. “Elusive Antitrust Standard on Bundling in Europe and in the United States in the Aftermath of the Microsoft Cases.” Antitrust law Journal 76 (2010): 483-494.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. European Central Bank. “Why does the ECB have a stake in market infrastructure?” (2016) // https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/annual/special-features/2016/html/index.en.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Freedman, Maurice. Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1962.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Guegan, Dominique. “Public Blockchain Versus Private Blockhain.” Documents de travail du Centre d’Economie de la Sorbonne 1 (2017): 17020 // https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01524440/document.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hong, Sunghyuck. “P2P networking based internet of things (IoT) sensor node authentication by Blockchain.” Peer-to-Peer Netw. 13 (2020): 579-589.10.1007/s12083-019-00739-x]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Hovenkamp, Herbert J. “The Rule of Reason.” Florida Law Review 70 (2018): 81-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Huberman, Gur, Jacob Leshno, and Ciamac Moallemi. “An Economic Analysis of the Bitcoin Payment System.” Columbia Business School Research Paper 2 (2017): 17-92.10.2139/ssrn.3032375]Search in Google Scholar
[17. IDC Trackers. “Worldwide Blockchain Spending Guide” // https://www.idc.com/tracker/showproductinfo.jsp?prod_id=1842.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Jenny, Frederic. “The Institutional Design of Competition Authorities: Debates and Trends,” In Competition law enforcement in the BRICS and in developing countries, pp. 1-57 (2016) // https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2894893.]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Kim, Seoung. “Ethereum Upgrades as Hard Forks Activate on Blockchain.” Coindesk, (2019).]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Lianos, Ioannis. “Blockchain Competition.” CLES Research Paper Series 4/2018 (2018) // https://scihub.tw/https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3257307.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Mauri, Ross. “Three Features of Blockchain that Help Prevent Fraud.” IBM (2017) // https://www.ibm.com/blogs/blockchain/2017/09/three-features-ofblockchain-thathelp-prevent-fraud.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. May, Timothy. “The Crypto Anarchist Manifesto.” Activism (1992) // https://www.activism.net/cypherpunk/crypto-anarchy.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Miseviciute, Jurgita. “Blockchain and virtual currency regulation in the EU.” Journal of Investment Compliance 19 (2018): 33-38.10.1108/JOIC-04-2018-0026]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Nakamoto, Satoshi. “Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.” Bitcoin (2008) // https://bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. O’Donoghue, Robert, and Jorge Padilla. The Law and Economics of Article 102 TFEU. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. OECD. Blockchain Technology and Competition Policy: Issues Paper by the Secretariat. OECD, 2018 // https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WD(2018)47/en/pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. OECD. “Roundtable on Changes in Institutional Design.” DAF/COMP/M(2015)1/ANN6/FINAL // https://one.oecd.org/document/DAF/COMP/WP2/M(2015)1/ANN6/FINAL/en/pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Østbye, Peder. “The Adequacy of Competition Policy for Cryptocurrency Markets.” Social Science Research Network (2017) // https://www.competitionpolicyinternational.com/the-adequacy-of-competition-policy-for-cryptocurrency-markets/.10.2139/ssrn.3025732]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Østbye, Peder. “The Case for a 21 Million Bitcoin Conspiracy.” Journal of Financial Transformation 48 (2018): 88-97.10.2139/ssrn.3136044]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Penz-Sharp, Alan. “Blockchain for Business: Ready or Not, Here it Comes.” CMSWire (2017) // https://www.cmswire.com/information-management/blockchain-for-business-ready-or-not-here-it-comes.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Posner, Eric, and Glen Weyl. Radical Markets: uprooting capitalism and democracy for a just society. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Posner, Richard. Antitrust Law. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Raval, Siraj. Decentralized Applications: Harnessing Bitcoin’s Blockchain Technology. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Roberts, Russ, and Jim Epstein. “Jim Epstein on Bitcoin, the Blockchain, and Freedom in Latin America.” Econ Talk (2017) // http://www.econtalk.org/jim-epstein-on-bitcoin-the-blockchain-and-freedom-in-latin-america/.]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Rochet, Jean-Charles, and Jean Tirole. “Platform Competition in Two-Sided Markets.” Journal of the European Economic Association 1 (2003): 990-1029.10.1162/154247603322493212]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Swan, Melanie. Blockchain: Blueprint for a new economy. Sebastopol: O’Reilly Media, 2015.]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Talamo, Maurizio, Franco Arcieri, Andrea Dimitri, and Christian H. Schunck, “A Blockchain based PKI Validation System based on Rare Events Management.” Future Internet 12 (2020): 40.10.3390/fi12020040]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Tapscott, Don, and Alex Tapscott. A Blockchain Revolution: how the technology behind Bitcoin is changing money, business and the world. New York: Penguin Ramdom House, 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. The World Bank. “Blockchain or distributed ledger technology.” The World Bank Group (2018) // http://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/pt/260121548673898731/pdf/134063-WP-121278-2nd-edition-IFC-EMCompass-Blockchain-Report-PUBLIC.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Thomas, Ryan “Blockchains and Antitrust: new technology, same old risks.” JonesDay One Firm Wolrdwide Whitepaper (2018) // https://www.jonesday.com/blockchains-and-antitrust-new-technology-same-old-risks-08-02-2018/.]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Tsu, Sun. The Art of War. London: Macmillan, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Vigna, Paul, and Michael Casey. The Truth Machine: the Blockchain and the Future of Everything. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Walch, Angela. “The Path of the Blockchain Lexicon (and the Law).” Review of Banking & Financial Law 36 (2017): 713-718.]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Werbach, Kevin. The Blockchain and the New Architecture of Trust. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2018.10.7551/mitpress/11449.001.0001]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Werbach, Kevin. “Trust, but Verify: Why the Blockchain Needs the Law.” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 33 (2018): 487-495.]Search in Google Scholar
[46. World Economic Forum. “Deep Shift: Technology Tipping Points and Societal Impact” (2015) // https://www.weforum.org/reports/deep-shift-technology-tipping-points-and-societal-impact.]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Zamfir, Vlad. “Introducing Casper ‘The Friendly Ghost’.” Ethereum Blog (2015) // https://blog.ethereum.org/2015/08/01/introducing-casper-friendly-ghost.]Search in Google Scholar
[1. Blue Cross & Blue Shield United of Wis. v. Marshfield Clinic. (1995) 65, F.3d 1406, 1413.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. British Airways v. Comm’n. (2003) T-219/99, E.C.R. II-5925.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Brooke Group Ltd. v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. (1993) 509, U.S. 209, 220.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Cascade Health Sols. v PeaceHealth. (2007) 502, F.3d 895, 905]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Clearstream Banking AG v. Comm’n. (2009). T-301/04, E.C.R. 317.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Consolidated Version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. Official Journal (2012) // https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A12012E%2FTXT [hereinafter TFEU]).]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Deutsche Telekom AG v. Comm’n. (2010) C280/08 P, E.C.R. I-9555.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Eisai Inc. v Sanofi-Aventis U.S. (2014) 08-4168, WL 1343254, at *12.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. European Night Servs. Ltd. (ENS) v. Commission. (1998) T-374/94, T375/94, T-384/94, and T-388/94, E.C.R. II-3141;]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Google Shopping. (2017) 39740, E.C.R. 145.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Hynix Semiconductor Inc v. Infineon. (2010) COMP/38.636, O.J. C 30.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Hoffmann-La Roche and Co. AG v. Comm’n. (1979) 85/76, E.C.R. 461]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Illinois Tool Works Inc. v. Independent Ink, Inc. (2006) 547, U.S. 28.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Intel Corp. v. Comm’n. (2017) C-413/14 P, E.C.R. 632]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Irish Sugar v. Comm’n. (1999) T-228/97, E.C.R. II-2975]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Jefferson Parish Hosp. District No. 2 v. Hyde. (1984) 466, U.S. 2, 1]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Konkurrensverket v. TeliaSonera Sverige AB. (2011) C-52/09, E.C.R. I-527.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. LePage’s Inc. v. 3M. (2003) 324, F.3d 141, 157]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Microsoft Corp. v. Sun Microsystems, Inc, Comm’n Decision. (2004) 3/37.792.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Oscar Bronner v. Mediaprint Zeitungs und Zeitschriftenverlag. (1998) C-7/97, E.C.R. I-7796.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Pac. Bell Tel. Co. v. LinkLine Commc’ns, Inc. (2009) 555, U.S. 438.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Post Danmark A/S v. Konkurrencerådet. (2012) C209/10, E.C.R. 172.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Telefónica and Telefónica de España v. Comm’n. (2013) C-295/12, E.C.R. 619.]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Tomra Sys. ASA & Others v. Comm’n. (2010) T-155/06, 2010 E.C.R. II-4361]Search in Google Scholar
[25. United States v. Microsoft Corp. (2001) 253, F.3d 34.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Verizon Comm. Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP. (2004) 540, U.S. 398]Search in Google Scholar