[Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English Discourse Particles: Evidence from a Corpus. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/scl.10]Search in Google Scholar
[Andersen, Gisle. 2001. Pragmatic Markers and Sociolinguistic Variation: A Relevance-Theoretic Approach to the Language of Adolescents. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.84]Search in Google Scholar
[Arial, Mira. 1998. Discourse markers and form-function correlations. In Jucker, Andreas H. and Ziv, Yael. (eds), Discourse Markers: Descriptions and Theory. Pragmatics and Beyond Series, 57, 223–260. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.10.1075/pbns.57.12ari]Search in Google Scholar
[Beeching, Kate. 2016. Pragmatic Markers in British English – Meaning in Social Interaction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139507110]Search in Google Scholar
[Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.]Search in Google Scholar
[Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511486456]Search in Google Scholar
[Brown, Gillian–Yule, George. 1983. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511805226]Search in Google Scholar
[Carston, Roby. 1998. The semantics/pragmatics distinction: A view from relevance theory. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 10: 1–30.]Search in Google Scholar
[Crible, Ludivine. 2017. Towards an operational category of discourse markers: A definition and its model. In Chiara Fedriani and Andrea Sansó (eds), Pragmatic Markers, Discourse Markers and Modal Particles: New Perspectives, 99–124. John Benjamins: Amsterdam.10.1075/slcs.186.04cri]Search in Google Scholar
[Dér, Csilla Ilona. 2010. On the status of discourse markers. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 57(1): 3–28.10.1556/ALing.57.2010.1.1]Search in Google Scholar
[Fox Tree, Jean E.–Schrock, Josef C. 2002. Basic meanings of you know and I mean. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 727–47.10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00027-9]Search in Google Scholar
[Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31: 931–952.10.1016/S0378-2166(98)00101-5]Search in Google Scholar
[Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2013. The presence and absence of pragmatic markers in naturally-occurring and scripted discourse. In Katarína Labudova and Nóra Séllei (eds), Presences and Absences – Transdisciplinary Essays, 23–38. Tyneside: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2014. Cooptation over grammaticalization – The characteristics of discourse markers reconsidered. Argumentum 10: 289–300.]Search in Google Scholar
[Furkó, Bálint Péter. 2017. Manipulative uses of pragmatic markers in political discourse. Palgrave Communications 2017/54. https://www.nature.com/articles/palcomms201754. (Last accessed on: 6 September 2018).]Search in Google Scholar
[Furkó, Bálint Péter–Ágnes Abuczki. 2014. English Discourse Markers in Mediatised Political Interviews. Brno Studies in English 40(1): 45–64.10.5817/BSE2014-1-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Furkó, Bálint Péter–Ágnes Abuczki. 2015. A contrastive study of English and Hungarian discourse markers in mediatised interviews and natural conversations. Sprachentheorie und Germanistische Linguistik 25(2): 151–187.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hansen, Maj-Britt Mosegaard. 1997. Alors and donc in spoken French: A reanalysis. Journal of Pragmatics 28: 153–187.10.1016/S0378-2166(96)00086-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Heine, Bernd. 2013. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51(6): 1205–1247.10.1515/ling-2013-0048]Search in Google Scholar
[Infantidou-Trouki, E. 1992. Sentential adverbs and relevance. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 193–214.]Search in Google Scholar
[Levinson, Stephen C. 2004. Deixis and pragmatics. In Laurence Horn, Gregory Ward (eds), The Handbook of Pragmatics, 97–121. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1002/9780470756959.ch5]Search in Google Scholar
[Prentice, Sheryl. 2010. Using automated semantic tagging in Critical Discourse Analysis: A case study on Scottish independence from a Scottish nationalist perspective. Discourse and Society 21(4): 405–437.10.1177/0957926510366198]Search in Google Scholar
[Quirk, Randolph–Greenbaum, Sidney–Leech, Geoffrey–Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rayson, Paul–Archer, Dawn–Piao, Scott–McEnery, Tony. 2004. The UCREL Semantic Analysis System. Paper given at Beyond Named Entity Recognition Semantic Labeling for NLP Tasks in LREC ‘04, Lisbon.]Search in Google Scholar
[Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse Markers. Oxford: Blackwell.10.1017/CBO9780511611841]Search in Google Scholar
[Schourup, Lawrence. 1999. Discourse markers: Tutorial overview. Lingua 107: 227–265.10.1016/S0024-3841(96)90026-1]Search in Google Scholar
[Sidnell, Jack. 1998. Deixis. In Jef Verschueren et al. (ed.), Handbook of Pragmatics, 1998 Installment. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.]Search in Google Scholar
[Spooren, William–Degand, Liesbeth. 2010. Coding coherence relations: Reliability and validity. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 6(2): 241–266.10.1515/cllt.2010.009]Search in Google Scholar
[Stenström, Anna-Brita. 1990. Lexical items peculiar to spoken discourse. In Jan Svartvik (ed.) The London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research, 137–175. Lund: Lund University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Traugott, Elizabeth Gloss. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper given at the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Manchester, 13–18 August 1995.]Search in Google Scholar
[Waltereit, Richard. 2006. The rise of discourse markers in Italian: A specific type of language change. In Kerstin Fischer (ed.), Approaches to Discourse Particles, 61–76. Amsterdam: Elsevier.10.1163/9780080461588_005]Search in Google Scholar