[
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183-198.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ayllon, M. F., Gomez, I. A., & Balleste-Claver, J. (2016). Mathematical thinking and creativity through mathematical problem posing and solving. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4(1), 169-218.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balka, D. S. (1974). Creative ability in mathematics. The Arithmetic Teacher, 21(7), 633-636.10.5951/AT.21.7.0633
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barbosa, A., & Vale, I (2016). Visual patterns: A creatıve path to generalization. In G. Kaiser (Ed.), 13th International Congress on Mathematical Education. Hamburg: ICME-13.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonotto, C., & Santo, L. D. (2015). On the relationship between problem posing, problem solving, and creativity in the primary school. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing. From Research to Effective Practice (pp. 103-123). New York: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, S. I., & Walter, M. I. (2005). The Art of Problem Posing. Manwah, NJ: Erlbaum.10.4324/9781410611833
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, J. (1998). An investigation of U.S. and Chinese students’ mathematical problem posing and problem solving. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 10(1), 37-50.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, J. (2003). Singaporean students’ mathematical thinking in problem solving and problem posing: An exploratory study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 34(5), 719-737.10.1080/00207390310001595401
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, J., & Hwang, S. (2003). A perspective for examining the link between problem posing and problem solving. In N. A. Pateman, B. J. Dougherty, & J. T. Zilliox (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2003 Joint Meeting of PME and PMENA (Vol. 3) (pp. 103-110). Honolulu, HI: PME.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, J., Hwang, S., Jiang, C., & Silber, S. (2015). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Some answered and unanswered questions. In F. M. Singer, N. F. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing. From Research to Effective Practice (pp. 3-34). New York: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, J., Jiang, C., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Hu, D. (2016). How do textbooks incorporate mathematical problem posing? An international comparative study. In P. Felmer, E. Pehkonen, & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems (pp. 3-22). Cham: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cai, J., Moyer, J. C., Wang, N., Hwang, S., Nie, B., & Garber, T. (2013). Mathematical problem posing as a measure of curricular effect on students’ learning. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 57-69.10.1007/s10649-012-9429-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Carreira, S., & Amaral, N. (2018). Mathematical problem solving beyond school: A tool for highlighting creativity in children’s solutions. In N. Amado, S. Carreira, & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the Scope of Research on Mathematical Problem Solving. A Focus on Technology, Creativity and Affect (pp. 187-218). Switzerland: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chamberlin, S. A., & Moon, S. A. (2005). Model-eliciting activities as a tool to develop and identify creatively gifted mathematicians. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(1), 37-47.10.4219/jsge-2005-393
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chapman, O. (2012). Prospective elementary school teachers’ ways of making sense of mathematical problem posing. PNA: Revista de Investigación en Didáctica de la Matemática, 6(4), 135-146.10.30827/pna.v6i4.6137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Chen, L., Van Dooren, W., Chen, Q., & Verschaffel, L. (2007). The relationship between posing and solving arithmetic word problems among Chinese elementary school children. Research in Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1-31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Christou, C., Mousoulides, N., Pittalis, M., Pitta-Pantazi, D., & Sriraman, B. (2005). An empirical taxonomy of problem posing processes. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik/International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 37(3), 149-158.10.1007/s11858-005-0004-6
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral science. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Crespo, S., & Sinclair, N. (2008). What makes a problem mathematically interesting? Inviting prospective teachers to pose better problems. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 11(5), 395-415.10.1007/s10857-008-9081-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cropley, A. (2006). In praise of convergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal, 18(3), 391-404.10.1207/s15326934crj1803_13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children’s made-up mathematics problems: A new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17(3), 261-271.10.1007/BF00305073
]Search in Google Scholar
[
English, L. D. (1997). Promoting a problem-posing classroom. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(3), 172-179.10.5951/TCM.4.3.0172
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Freudenthal, H. (1991). Revisiting Mathematics Education. China Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.10.1037/h0063487
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harpen, V. X. Y., & Sriraman, B. (2013). Creativity and mathematical problem posing: An analysis of high school students’ mathematical problem posing in China and the USA. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(2), 201-221.10.1007/s10649-012-9419-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haylock, D. (1997). Recognising mathemmatical creativity in Schoolchildren. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 29(3), 68-74.10.1007/s11858-997-0002-y
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Işık, C., & Kar, T. (2011). Analysis of the problems related to verbal and visual representations posed by pre-service teachers. Pammukkale University Journal of Education, 30(30), 39-49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kar, T., Özdemir, E., Öçal, M. F., Güler, G., & İpek, A. S. (2019). Indicators of prospective mathematics teachers’ success in problem solving: the case of creativity in problem posing. In M. Graven, H. Venkat, A. Essien, & P. Vale (Eds.), Proceedings of the 43rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2) (pp. 456-463). Pretoria, South Africa: PU.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kilpatrick, J. (1987). Problem formulating: Where do good problems come from? In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), Cognitive Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 123-147). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Know, O. N., Park, J. S., & Park, J. H. (2006). Cultivating divergent thinking in mathematics through an open-ended approach. Asia Pacific Education Review, 7(1), 51-61.10.1007/BF03036784
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Knuth, E. J. (2000). Student understanding of the Cartesian connection: An exploratory study. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 500-507.10.2307/749655
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kontorovich, I., Koichu, B., Leikin, R., & Berman, A. (2011). Indicators of creativity in mathematical PP: How indicative are they? In M. Avotiņa, D. Bonka, H. Meissner, L. Ramāna, L. Sheffield, & E. Velikova (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference Creativity in Mathematics Education and the Education of Gifted Students (pp. 120-125). Latvia: Latvia University.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lannin, J., Barker, D., & Townsend, B. (2006). Algebraic generalization strategies: factors influencing student strategy selection. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 18(3), 3-28.10.1007/BF03217440
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lee, Y., Capraro, R. M., & Capraro M. M. (2018). Mathematics teachers’ subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in problem posing. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 13(2), 75-90.10.12973/iejme/2698
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leikin, R. (2009). Exploring mathematical creativity using multiple solution tasks. In R. Leikin, A. Berman, & B. Koichu (Eds.), Creativity in Mathematics and the Education of Gifted Students (pp. 129-145). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leikin, R. (2011). The education of mathematically gifted students: Some complexities and questions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 8(1), 167-188.10.54870/1551-3440.1211
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leung, S. S. (1997). On the role of creative thinking in problem posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 29(3), 81-85.10.1007/s11858-997-0004-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Leung, S. S., & Silver, E. A. (1997). The role of task format, mathematics knowledge, and creative thinking on the arithmetic problem posing of prospective elementary school teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 5-24.10.1007/BF03217299
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lowrie, T., & Whitland, J. (2000). Problem posing as a tool for learning, planning and assessment in the primary school. In T. Nakahara, & M. Koyama (Eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 247-254). Japan: Hiroshima.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mann, E. L. (2006). Creativity: The essence of mathematics. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 30(2), 236-260.10.4219/jeg-2006-264
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministry of National Education [MNE]. (2018). Matematik dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve ortaokul 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar). Retrieved from https://mufredat.meb.gov.tr
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moore-Russo, D., & Demler, E. L. (2018). Linking mathematical creativity to problem solving: Views from the Field. In N. Amado, S. Carreira, & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the Scope of Research on Mathematical Problem Solving. A Focus on Technology, Creativity and Affect (pp. 321-345). Switzerland: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics [NCTM]. (2000). Principles and Standard for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Novotná, J., Verbovanec, L., & Török, L. (2013). Creativity and motivation in higher education teacher training. Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 3(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1515/atd-2015-0023
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pehkonen, E. (1995). Introduction: Use of open-ended problems. International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 27(2), 55-57.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Polya, G. (1957). How to Solve It: A New Aspect of Mathematical Method. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2007). Abduction-induction (generalization) processes of elementary majors on figural patterns in algebra. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 26(2), 140-155.10.1016/j.jmathb.2007.05.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rivera, F., & Becker, J. R. (2008). Middle school children’s cognitive perceptions of constructive and deconstructive generalizations involving linear figural patterns. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 40(1), 65-82.10.1007/s11858-007-0062-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rosli, R., Capraro, M. M., Goldsby, D., Gonzalez, E. G., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Capraro, R. M., (2015). Middle grade preservice teachers’ mathematical problem solving and problem posing. In F. M. Singer, N. Ellerton, & J. Cai (Eds.), Mathematical Problem Posing: From Research to Effective Practice (pp. 333-354). New York: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shriki, A. (2010). Working like real mathematicians: developing prospective teachers’ awareness of mathematical creativity through generating new concepts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73(2), 159-179.10.1007/s10649-009-9212-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Shriki, A., & Lavy, I. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of mathematical creativity and its nurture. In T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proceedings of the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4) (pp. 91-98). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silber, S., & Cai, J. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ free and structured mathematical problem posing. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(2), 163-184.10.1080/0020739X.2016.1232843
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics. 14(1), 19-28.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silver, E. A. (1995). The nature and use of open problems in mathematics education: mathematical and pedagogical perspectives. Zentralblatt fur Didaktik der Mathematik/International Reviews on Mathematical Education, 27(2), 67-72.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silver, E. A. (1997). Fostering creativity through instruction rich in mathematical problem solving and problem posing. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 29(3), 75-80.10.1007/s11858-997-0003-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silver, E. A. (2013). Problem-posing research in mathematics education: Looking back, looking around, and looking ahead. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 83(1), 157-162.10.1007/s10649-013-9477-3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Silver, E. A., & Cai, J. (2005). Assessing students’ mathematical problem posing. Teaching Children Mathematics, 12(3), 129-135.10.5951/TCM.12.3.0129
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singer, F. M., Pelczer, I., & Voica, C. (2011). Problem posing and modification as a criterion of mathematical creativity. In M. Pytlak, T. Rowland, & E. Swoboda (Eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (pp. 1133-1142). Rzeszow, Poland: University of Rzeszo.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singer, F. M., & Voica, C. (2017). When mathematics meets real objects: How does creativity interact with expertise in problem solving and posing? In R. Leikin, & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Creativity and Giftedness: Interdisciplinary Perspectives (pp. 75-104). Switzerland: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sriraman, B. (2005). Are giftedness and creativity synonyms in mathematics? An analysis of constructs within the professional and school realms. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17, 20-36.10.4219/jsge-2005-389
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stickles, P. R. (2011). An analysis of secondary and middle school teachers’ mathematical problem posing. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 3(2), 1-34.10.1080/24727466.2011.11790301
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stoyanova, E., & Ellerton, N. F. (1996). A framework for research into students’ problem posing. In P. Clarkson (Ed.), Technology in Mathematics Education (pp. 518-525). Melbourne, Australia: Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. London: Sage Publications, Inc.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Contemporary Psychological Perspectives (pp. 43-75). New York: Cambridge University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Treffinger, D. J., Young, G. C., Selby, E. C., & Shepardson, C. (2002). Assessing Creativity: A Guide for Educators. Sarasota: Center for Creative Learning.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vale, I., Pimentel, T., & Barbosa, A. (2018). The power of seeing in problem solving and creativity: An issue under discussion. In N. Amado, S. Carreira, & K. Jones (Eds.), Broadening the Scope of Research on Mathematical Problem Solving. A Focus on Technology, Creativity and Affect (pp. 243-272). Switzerland: Springer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vale, I., Pimentel, T., Cabrita, I., & Barbosa, A. (2012). Pattern problem solving tasks as a mean to foster creativity in mathematics. In T. Y. Tso (Ed.), Proposal for the 36th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Volume 4, pp. 171-178). Taipei, Taiwan: PME.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Xu, B., Cai, J., Liu, Q., & Hwang, S. (2020). Teachers’ predictions of students’ mathematical thinking related to problem posing. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.04.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Yuan, X., & Sriraman, B. (2010). An exploratory study of relationships between students’ creativity and mathematical problem posing abilities. In B. Sriraman, & K. Lee (Eds.), The Elements of Creativity and Giftedness in Mathematics (pp. 5-28). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zaskis, R., & Liljedahl, P. (2002). Generalization of patterns: The tension between algebraic thinking and algebraic notation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(3), 379-402.10.1023/A:1020291317178
]Search in Google Scholar
