Genomic evaluation of body weight traits in a F₂ mixture of commercial broiler and native chicken

1 ADEYINKA I.A., ONI O.O., NWAGU B.I., ADEYINKA F.D., 2006 - Genetic parameter estimates of body weights of naked neck broiler chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 5(6), 589-592. Search in Google Scholar

2 AGUILAR I., MISZTAL I., TSURUTA S., WIGGANS G.R., LAWLOR T.J., 2011- Multiple trait genomic evaluation of conception rate in Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science 94(5), 2621-2624. Search in Google Scholar

3 BERMANN M., LEGARRA A., HOLLIFIELD M.K., MASUDA Y., LOURENCO D., MISZTAL I., 2021- Validation of single‐step GBLUP genomic predictions from threshold models using the linear regression method: An application in chicken mortality. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 138(1), 4-13. Search in Google Scholar

4 BRADBURY P.J., ZHANG Z., KROON D. E., CASSTEVENS T.M., RAMDOSS Y., BUCKLER E.S., 2007 - TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23(19), 2633-2635. Search in Google Scholar

5 CHANG C.C., CHOW C.C., TELLIER L.C., VATTIKUTI S., PURCELL S.M., LEE J.J., 2015 -Second-generation PLINK: rising to the challenge of larger and richer datasets. Gigascience 4(1), s13742-015. Search in Google Scholar

6 CHEN C.Y., MISZTAL I., AGUILAR I., TSURUTA S., MEUWISSEN T.H.E., AGGREY S.E., MUIR W.M., 2011 - Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: an example using broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science 89(1), 23-28. Search in Google Scholar

7 CHRISTENSEN O.F., MADSEN P., NIELSEN B., OSTERSEN T, SU G., 2012 - Single-step methods for genomic evaluation in pigs. Animal 6(10), 1565-1571. Search in Google Scholar

8 CLARK S.A., HICKEY J.M., VANDERWERF J.H., 2011 - Different models of genetic variation and their effect on genomic evaluation. Genetics Selection Evolution 43(1), 1-9. Search in Google Scholar

9 DRUET T., MACLEOD I.M., HAYES B.J., 2014 - Toward genomic prediction from whole-genome sequence data: impact of sequencing design on genotype imputation and accuracy of predictions. Heredity 112(1), 39-47. Search in Google Scholar

10 GODDARD M.E, HAYES B.J., 2009 - Mapping genes for complex traits in domestic animals and their use in breeding programmes. Nature Reviews Genetics 10(6), 381-391. Search in Google Scholar

11 HABIER D., FERNANDO R.L., DEKKERS J.C., 2009 - Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics 182(1), 343-353. Search in Google Scholar

12 LEGARRA A., AGUILAR I., MISZTAL I., 2009 - A relationship matrix including full pedigree and genomic information. Journal of Dairy Science 92(9), 4656-4663. Search in Google Scholar

13 LI B., ZHANG N., WANG Y.G., GEORGE A.W., REVERTER A., LI Y., 2018 - Genomic prediction of breeding values using a subset of SNPs identified by three machine learning methods. Frontiers in Genetics 9, 237. Search in Google Scholar

14 LI X., WANG S., HUANG J., LI L., ZHANG Q, DING X., 2014 - Improving the accuracy of genomic prediction in Chinese Holstein cattle by using one-step blending. Genetics Selection Evolution 46(1), 1-5. Search in Google Scholar

15 LIU R., SUN Y., ZHAO G., WANG H., ZHENG M., LI P., WEN J., 2015 - Identification of loci and genes for growth related traits from a genome-wide association study in a slow× fast-growing broiler chicken cross. Genes and Genomics 37(10), 829-836. Search in Google Scholar

16 LOURENCO D.A.L., MISZTAL I., TSURUTA S., AGUILAR I., EZRA E., RON M., WELLER J.I., 2014 - Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses. Journal of Dairy Science 97(3), 1742-1752. Search in Google Scholar

17 LOURENCO D., LEGARRA A., TSURUTA S., MASUDA Y., AGUILAR I., MISZTAL I., 2020-Single-step genomic evaluations from theory to practice: using SNP chips and sequence data in BLUPF90. Genes 11(7), 790. Search in Google Scholar

18 LUO W., LUO C., WANG M., GUO L., CHEN X., LI Z., NIE Q., 2020 - Genome diversity of Chinese indigenous chicken and the selective signatures in Chinese gamecock chicken. Scientific Reports 10(1), 1-14. Search in Google Scholar

19 MACLEOD I.M., HAYES B.J., GODDARD M.E., 2014 - The effects of demography and long-term selection on the accuracy of genomic prediction with sequence data. Genetics 198(4), 1671-1684. Search in Google Scholar

20 MEBRATIE W., SHIRALI M., MADSEN P., SAPP R.L., HAWKEN R., JENSEN J., 2017 - The effect of selection and sex on genetic parameters of body weight at different ages in a commercial broiler chicken population. Livestock Science 204, 78-87. Search in Google Scholar

21 MEUWISSEN T.H., HAYES B.J., GODDARD M., 2001 - Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157(4), 1819-1829. Search in Google Scholar

22 MEUWISSEN T., GODDARD M., 2010 - Accurate prediction of genetic values for complex traits by whole-genome resequencing. Genetics 185(2), 623-631. Search in Google Scholar

23 MEUWISSEN T., HAYES B., GODDARD M., 2016 - Genomic selection: A paradigm shift in animal breeding. Animal Frontiers 6(1), 6-14. Search in Google Scholar

24 MIGNON-GRASTEAU S., 1999 - Genetic parameters of growth curve parameters in male and female chickens. British Poultry Science 40(1), 44-51. Search in Google Scholar

25 MISZTAL I., TSURUTA S., LOURENCO D., AGUILAR I., LEGARRA A., VITEZICA Z., 2014 -Manual for BLUPF90 Family of Programs. Athens: University of Georgia. Search in Google Scholar

26 MISZTAL I., TSURUTA S., STRABEL T., AUVRAY B., DRUET T., LEE D., 2002 - “BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90),” in Proceedings of the 7th world Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, 743-744. Search in Google Scholar

27 MRODE R., OJANGO J. M., OKEYO A.M., MWACHARO J. M., 2019 - Genomic selection and use of molecular tools in breeding programs for indigenous and crossbred cattle in developing countries: Current status and future prospects. Frontiers in Genetics 694. Search in Google Scholar

28 OGAWA S., MATSUDA H., TANIGUCHI Y., WATANABE T., NISHIMURA S., SUGIMOTO Y., IWAISAKI H., 2014 - Effects of single nucleotide polymorphism marker density on degree of genetic variance explained and genomic evaluation for carcass traits in Japanese Black beef cattle. BMC Genetics 15(1), 1-13. Search in Google Scholar

29 PURCELL S., NEALE B., TODD-BROWN K., THOMAS L., FERREIRA M.A., BENDER D., SHAM P.C., 2007 - PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. The American Journal of Human Genetics 81(3), 559-575. Search in Google Scholar

30 R CORE TEAM., 2013 - R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Search in Google Scholar

31 ROLF M.M., TAYLOR J.F., SCHNABEL R.D., MCKAY S.D., MCCLURE M.C., NORTHCUTT S.L., WEABER R.L., 2010- Impact of reduced marker set estimation of genomic relationship matrices on genomic selection for feed efficiency in Angus cattle. BMC Genetics 11(1), 1-10. Search in Google Scholar

32 SALEK ARDESTANI S., JAFARIKIA M., SARGOLZAEI M., SULLIVAN B., MIAR Y., 2021 -Genomic prediction of average daily gain, back-fat thickness, and loin muscle depth using different genomic tools in Canadian swine populations. Frontiers in Genetics 12, 735. Search in Google Scholar

33 SALVIAN M., MOREIRA G.C.M., REIS A.P., DAURIA B.D., PILONETTO F., GERVÁSIO I.C., MOURÃO G.B., 2020 - Estimation of breeding values using different densities of Snp to inform Kinship in broiler chickens. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-32429/v1 Search in Google Scholar

34 SILVA R.M.O., FRAGOMENI B.O., LOURENCO D.A.L., MAGALHÃES A.F.B., IRANO N., CARVALHEIRO R., ALBUQUERQUE L.G., 2016 - Accuracies of genomic prediction of feed efficiency traits using different prediction and validation methods in an experimental Nelore cattle population. Journal of Animal Science 94(9), 3613-3623. Search in Google Scholar

35 SIMEONE R., MISZTAL I., AGUILAR I., VITEZICA Z.G., 2012 - Evaluation of a multi‐line broiler chicken population using a single‐step genomic evaluation procedure. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 129(1), 3-10. Search in Google Scholar

36 SONG H., ZHANG J., JIANG Y., GAO H., TANG S., MI S., DING X., 2017 - Genomic prediction for growth and reproduction traits in pig using an admixed reference population. Journal of Animal Science 95(8), 3415-3424. Search in Google Scholar

37 SONG H., ZHANG J., ZHANG Q., DING X., 2019 - Using different single-step strategies to improve the efficiency of genomic prediction on body measurement traits in pig. Frontiers in Genetics 9, 730. Search in Google Scholar

38 SU G., BRØNDUM R.F., MA P., GULDBRANDTSEN B., AAMAND G.P., LUND M.S., 2012 -Comparison of genomic predictions using medium-density (~54,000) and high-density (~777,000) single nucleotide polymorphism marker panels in Nordic Holstein and Red Dairy Cattle populations. Journal of Dairy Science 95(8), 4657-4665. Search in Google Scholar

39 SUN Y., ZHAO G., LIU R., ZHENG M., HU Y., WU D., WEN J., 2013 - The identification of 14 new genes for meat quality traits in chicken using a genome-wide association study. BMC Genomics 14(1), 1-11. Search in Google Scholar

40 VANRADEN P.M., 2007 - Efficient estimation of breeding values from dense genomic data. Journal of Dairy Science 90, 374-375. Search in Google Scholar

41 VANRADEN P.M., TOOKER M.E., O’CONNELL J.R., COLE J.B., BICKHART D.M., 2017 -Selecting sequence variants to improve genomic predictions for dairy cattle. Genetics Selection Evolution 49(1), 1-12. Search in Google Scholar

42 VANRADEN P.M., VAN TASSELL C.P., WIGGANS G.R., SONSTEGARD T.S., SCHNABEL R.D., TAYLOR J.F., SCHENKEL F.S., 2009 - Invited review: Reliability of genomic predictions for North American Holstein bulls. Journal of Dairy Science 92(1), 16-24. Search in Google Scholar

43 WANG D., SUN Y., STANG P., BERLIN J. A., WILCOX M.A., LI Q., 2009 - December. Comparison of methods for correcting population stratification in a genome-wide association study of rheumatoid arthritis: principal-component analysis versus multidimensional scaling. BMC Proceedings 3(7), 1-6. Search in Google Scholar

44 WELLMANN R., PREUß S., THOLEN E., HEINKEL J., WIMMERS K., BENNEWITZ J., 2013 -Genomic selection using low density marker panels with application to a sire line in pigs. Genetics Selection Evolution 45(1), 1-11. Search in Google Scholar

45 WIMMER V., ALBRECHT T., AUINGER H.J., SCHÖN C.C., 2012 - synbreed: a framework for the analysis of genomic prediction data using R. Bioinformatics 28(15), 2086-2087. Search in Google Scholar

46 YAN G., QIAO R., ZHANG F., XIN W., XIAO S., HUANG T., HUANG L., 2017 - Imputation-based whole-genome sequence association study rediscovered the missing QTL for lumbar number in Sutai pigs. Scientific Reports 7(1), 1-10. Search in Google Scholar

47 ZHANG C., KEMP R. A., STOTHARD P., WANG Z., BODDICKER N., KRIVUSHIN K., PLASTOW G., 2018 - Genomic evaluation of feed efficiency component traits in Duroc pigs using 80K, 650K and whole-genome sequence variants. Genetics Selection Evolution 50(1), 1-13. Search in Google Scholar