Acceso abierto

Copyright infringement in content generated by AI: an empirical analysis based on typical cases of China and the United States

 y   
26 mar 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Figure 1.

The DreamWriter case court judgement mind map
The DreamWriter case court judgement mind map

Figure 2.

American goods trade profile
American goods trade profile

Main component analysis results

Item Constituent
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
AI art works bring interest disputes T12 0.774
AI works are guided by people T13 0.765
AI works involve many interests T15 0.760
Whether artificial intelligence works in ingenuity T9 0.744
AI belongs to the object of the intellectual property system T16 0.684
AI has optimal results T11 0.552
AI has no emotional perception T14 0.547
Limited autonomy of AI T10 0.520
Natural persons of artificial intelligence enjoy and undertake T18 0.822
Generate new content T20 0.732
AI is not a tool man. T21 0.725
AI can change the content T22 0.684
The author of artificial intelligence creation is determined T17 0.546
The legal system is a major subvert T19 0.538
AI is efficient T25 0.764
AI works need to be certain T24 0.720
Efficient artificial intelligence T26 0.696
AI itself can’t speak itself T28 0.620
AI may produce plagiarism T27 0.558
AI is enough for its own study T23 0.549
AI creation makes copyright protection difficult T5 0.745
The necessary conditions for copyright protection T6 0.729
Copyright protection encourages artificial intelligence development T7 0.625
To realize the “increment” of social and public culture T8 0.612
Artificial intelligence works efficiency T33 0.745
Whether AI is infringing T34 0.586
Supervisory type T35 0.587
Continuous operation of artificial intelligence T32 0.542
Technical characteristics of AI T1 0.779
AI creations are generated literature, music, design drawings, etc T2 0.763
AI can generate poems and other works T3 0.754
AI can be designed independently T4 0.668
AI creation has commercial value T29 0.682
The part of the interests of the personality should be adjusted appropriately T30 0.637
Belonging to the same subject, convenient copyright use T31 0.603

Trade loss(million)

2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023
Movie 122 125 162 170 175 292 248 359 466 502 519
Recording 72 72 48 50 288 211 213 218 457 579 478
Commercial software 442 773 1146 1645 1785 1493 1567 2186 3003 3012 3428
Entertainment software 1392 NA 463 NA 576 522 608 625 NA NA NA
Book 134 133 133 42 42 54 56 56 56 NA NA
Total 2162 1103 1952 1907 2866 2572 2692 3444 3982 4093 4425

Confirmatory Factor Analysis Fitting Index and Standard

Fit excellence index Fitness criteria
RMSEA=0.064 Adaptation mode
GFI=0.85 Acceptance
AGFI=0.86 Acceptance
NFI=0.87 Acceptance
NNFI=0.89 Good match
CFI=0.93 Good match

Measures to strengthen IPR in the US

Target Pathway
Domestic measures Intellectual property in domestic protector To formulate domestic laws and authorize the administrative organs and court systems to implement
Prevention of intellectual property spread abroad Export restrictions on technology and capital goods
Restrictions on imports of U.S. intellectual property rights Stop import entry
Prevention and punishment violate American intellectual property rights Stop sales
Bilateral negotiations Prevent production of goods that violate American intellectual property rights Prohibit sales to other countries Reach intellectual property agreements with other countries
Multilateral negotiation To obtain multilateral consensus on intellectual property issues Seek the law of international law

Descriptive statistics

Demographic characteristics Classification Number Proportion
Gender Man 415 55.33%
Female 335 44.67%
Age 21-30 347 46.27%
31-40 198 26.40%
41-50 122 16.27%
51-60 70 9.33%
61-70 13 1.73%
Educational background Specialty 10 1.33%
Undergraduate 95 12.67%
Master 379 50.53%
Doctor 266 35.47%
Occupation Artificial intelligence developer/technical personnel 268 35.73%
Artificial intelligence product personnel 9 1.20%
The law of intellectual property law is the research of people 46 6.13%
Intellectual property service personnel 63 8.40%
Other people related to artificial intelligence/intellectual property 364 48.53%