Acceso abierto

Multilayer regression analysis and psychological intervention effect assessment study of college students’ tennis intervention for depressed mood

  
19 mar 2025

Cite
Descargar portada

Multi-layer regression analysis affecting depression

Independent variable β SE Wald P OR(95%CI)
Individual level variable Natural log personal net income 0.44 0.42 1.17 0.44 1.26(0.39-4.39)
Education level (0~ 6) 0.37 0.62 0.75 0.35 1.38(0.73-4.16)
Health (health = 1) 0.38 0.68 0.55 0.59 1.19(0.75-5.35)
Gender (women = 1) 0.29 0.78 0.23 0.72 1.77(0.75-4.69)
Age 0.3 0.67 0.9 0.18 3.15(1.18-8.55)
Family level variable Social class (1~ 4) 0.03 0.61 0.56 0.78 1.79(0.54-3.21)
Natural log family net income 0.24 0.47 0.71 0.38 3.56(1.19-8.24)
Family size 0.65 0.52 1.21 0.51 1.12(0.55-3.95)
Community level variables Urbanization index 1.03 0.66 0.93 0.12 3.16(1.15-7.17)
Community education category 0.77 0.61 1.14 0.15 1.48(0.54-3.97)
Population density 0.5 0.51 1.71 0.19 3.13(1.19-8.17)
Transportation convenience 0.45 0.32 0.33 0.51 1.56(0.54-7.91)
Exercise interest No (too) interested 0.19 0.68 0.1 0.78 1.24(0.35-4.33)
It’s not clear 0.36 0.61 0.83 0.28 1.38(0.43-4.75)
Comparative interest 0.48 0.49 0.9 0.36 1.67(0.64-4.95)
Interest 0
Intensity of exercise Micromotion 0.54 0.45 1.23 0.27 0.62(0.25-1.46)
Small strength motion 0.37 0.45 0.84 0.34 0.67(0.35-1.54)
Medium intensity motion 0.34 0.57 0.38 0.53 0.72(0.21-2.15)
Large and large intensity movement 0
Exercise frequency Below 1 times per month 0.07 0.5 0.02 0.88 0.92(0.34-2.56)
2 to 3 times per month 0.4 0.43 0.78 0.35 0.65(0.26-1.62)
1 to 2 times a week 0.6 0.5 1.47 0.23 0.55(0.24-1.42)
3 to 5 times a week 0
Exercise time Below 20min 1.15 0.55 2.86 0.03* 3.15(1.14-6.63)
21~ 30min 0.72 0.49 1.87 0.19 1.98(0.74-5.35)
31~ 59min 0.61 0.47 1.71 0.23 1.82(0.74-4.66)
Above 60min 0
Exercise evaluation Very dissatisfied 1.45 0.51 7.59 0.01* 4.12(1.54-11.13)
Discontent 1.15 0.49 5.35 0.03* 3.12(1.18-8.16)
A little satisfied 0.38 0.51 0.56 0.43 1.48(0.54-3.95)
Satisfied 0.28 0.43 0.27 0.58 0.75(0.32-1.96)
Very satisfied 0

Variable descriptive statistics

Variable N Mean Standard deviation Min Max Median
Explained variable Poverty (national bureau of statistics standards) 80000 0.109 0.306 0 1 0
Poverty (bank 1.25m ppp) 80000 0.18 0.384 0 1 0
Poverty (world bank 2on ppp) 80000 0.285 0.454 0 1 0
Individual level variable Natural log personal net income 80000 8.247 1.631 0 14.698 8.305
Education level (0~ 6) 80000 1.826 1.422 0 6 2
Health (health = 1) 80000 0.046 0.22 0 1 0
Gender (women = 1) 80000 0.485 0.499 0 1 0
Age 80000 44.427 15.069 18 100 45
Family level variable Social class (1~ 4) 80000 2.972 1.177 1 4 3
Natural log family net income 80000 9.454 1.305 0 14.746 9.436
Family size 80000 3.974 1.591 1 14 5
Community level variables Urbanization index 80000 58.829 21.068 14.264 106.505 57.445
Community education category 80000 6.616 1.679 0.483 9.521 7.124
Population density 80000 5.968 1.481 0 10 6
Transportation convenience 80000 5.329 2.529 0 10 5
Neighborhood effect variable Poverty rate (national bureau of statistics standards) 80000 0.059 0.068 0 0.468 0.031
Poverty rate (bank 1.25m ppp) 80000 0.086 0.101 0 0.575 0.050
Poverty rate (bank 2am ppp) 80000 0.142 0.143 0 0.629 0.097
The average education degree in the community 80000 1.826 0.872 0.120 5.061 1.585
The average income of the natural log community 80000 8.642 1.211 0 11.651 8.605

The analysis of the effect of tennis and depression

Tennis score SDS standard
R value P value
Exercise effect -0.34 0.00
Health effect -0.22 0.02
Ability effect -0.17 0.01
Physical effect -0.07 0.31
Social effect -0.26 0.00
Total score -0.31 0.00

Score comparison

Factor Students who have not played tennis(N=70) Youth norm(N=700) College student(N=20000)
Somatization 1.36±0.52 1.32±0.56 1.43±0.54
Obsessive-compulsive disorder 1.87±0.62 1.68±0.62(P<0.01) 1.91±0.64
Interpersonal sensitivity 1.75±0.54 1.76±0.63 1.85±0.66
Depression 1.68±0.54 1.59±0.56(P<0.01) 1.77±0.59(P<0.05)
Anxiety 1.56±0.52 1.43±0.42(P<0.01) 1.53±0.59
Antagonism 1.58±0.72 1.53±0.59(P<0.05) 1.68±0.43(P<0.05)
Horror 1.37±0.32 1.32±0.49(P<0.05) 1.43±0.53
Paranoia 1.66±0.59 1.52±0.78(P<0.01) 1.76±0.69(P<0.01)
Insanity 1.54±0.46 1.37±0.55(P<0.01) 1.59±0.59

Students’ physical exercise effects were compared

Dimension score Overall (n= 200) Male (n= 80) Female (n= 120) T value P value
Exercise fun 3.61±0.75 3.78±0.63 3.54±0.73 2.64 0.02
Health effect 4.15±0.64 4.15±0.71 4.22±0.55 0.95 0.35
Ability effect 3.96±0.74 4.04±0.75 3.84±0.73 1.83 0.06
Physical effect 3.62±0.77 3.64±0.83 3.62±0.75 0.18 0.83
Social effect 3.82±0.75 3.96±0.83 3.67±0.73 2.72 0.02

The score of the game before and after the tennis exercise

Factor Before exercise After exercise T P
Somatization 1.43±0.44 1.36±0.52 -10.95 >0.05
Obsessive-compulsive disorder 1.64±0.52 1.62±0.65 1.52 >0.05
Interpersonal sensitivity 1.51±0.52 1.43±0.51 -7.65 >0.05
Depression 1.55±0.52 1.49±0.68 -1.28 >0.05
Anxiety 1.48±0.55 1.39±0.58 -3.2 <0.01**
Antagonism 1.42±0.46 1.41±0.65 -4.49 >0.05
Horror 1.28±0.37 1.28±0.42 3.44 >0.05
Paranoia 1.43±0.46 1.43±0.56 0.65 >0.05
Insanity 1.38±0.38 1.28±0.39 3.15 >0.05

Compare tennis data

Factor Students who have not played tennis(N=70) Youth norm(N=700) College student(N=20000)
Somatization 1.36±0.32 1.33±0.56 1.45±0.52
Obsessive-compulsive disorder 1.67±0.42 1.69±0.62 1.91±0.64(P<0.01)
Interpersonal sensitivity 1.75±0.52 1.76±0.65 1.85±0.65(P<0.05)
Depression 1.58±0.64 1.57±0.63 1.76±0.62(P<0.01)
Anxiety 1.45±0.42 1.42±0.45 1.54±0.58(P<0.01)
Antagonism 1.49±0.46 1.51±0.58 1.68±0.63(P<0.01)
Horror 1.36±0.33 1.33±0.48 1.42±0.52
Paranoia 1.58±0.43 1.52±0.62(P<0.05) 1.77±0.65(P<0.01)
Insanity 1.41±0.46 1.37±0.45 1.58±0.55(P<0.01)