Developed countries |
Benefited largely from rabies globalization |
Applying different vaccination methods; such as door-to-door vaccination, oral vaccination, capture vaccination, and combination of these methods |
Taking preemptive measures due to lower costs |
Maintaining the preventive measures and vaccination in rabies free areas |
Canine vaccinations in combination with post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) |
Close cooperation between public health and animal health |
High rabies education |
Low-income countries |
Low illness awareness |
Free ranging dog populations |
Lack of international collaboration |
Limited accessible resources for dog owners |
Lack of effective communication between the veterinary and the human health sectors |
Rarely enforced canine vaccinations |
Approaching post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) only |
Old-fashioned preemptive control methods such as mass culling of community dogs |
Creating an ecological vacuum and attracting more dogs into the area due to outdated methods |
PEP is the only form in which a country tries to control rabies |
Much more severe economic burden of rabies; Direct medical costs from post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP), costs of controlling rabies among dogs, livestock losses, and surveillance costs |
Lack of official livestock vaccination in the Veterinary Services’ control programs |
Prevention of outbreaks is the primary goal in the fight against rabies due to lack of resources in some areas |
Out-of-date laws |
Poor veterinary and human health infrastructure |
Lack of vaccination programs for animals playing a role in rabies cycle |
Mismanagement of funds |
No close cooperation between public health and animal health |
Low rabies education |
High importance of rabies owing to the fact that animal husbandry is a main means of livelihood |
Implementing development impact bonds could be an effective way to deal with long term financial commitment in these countries |
Developing region-specific networks such as MERACON |