[
[1] Business Monitor. Slovakia Medical Devices Report. 2014,
157. Available at: http://store.businessmonitor.com/slovakia-
medical-devices-report.html. Retrieved on August
14, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Clermont G. Non-clinical functional evaluation of medical
devices: general recommendations and examples for
soft tissue implants. Biocompatibility and Performance
of Medical Devices, 2012, 345-361.
10.1533/9780857096456.3.345]Search in Google Scholar
[[3] Cruz AM. Evaluating record history of medical devices using
association discovery and clustering techniques. Expert
Systems with Applications, 40(13), 2013, 5292-5305.
10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.034]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Cookson R, Hutton J. Regulating the economic evaluation
of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: a European
perspective. Health Policy, 63(2), 2003, 167-178.
10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00063-5]Search in Google Scholar
[[5] Cutler DM, McClellan M. “Is Technological Change Worth
It?” Health Affairs 20(5), 2001, 11 – 29.
10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.1111558696]Search in Google Scholar
[[6] Danahoe G, King G. Estimates of Medical Device Spending
in the United States. 2012, July, 16.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[7] De Jong WH, Carraway JW, Geertsma RE. In vivo and in
vitro testing for the biological safety evaluation of biomaterials
and medical devices. Biocompatibility and Performance
of Medical Devices, 2012, 120-158.
10.1533/9780857096456.2.120]Search in Google Scholar
[[8] Emergo Group. SLOVAKIA - Medical Device Industry and
Demographic Data. Available at: http://www.emergogroup.
com/resources/market-slovakia. Retrieved on August
13, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Eucomed. Medical devices and pharmaceuticals: Two
different worlds in one health setting. Available at:
http://www.eucomed.org/key-themes/medical-devices-
directives/devices-pharmaceuticals. Retrieved on August
10, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[10] FDA. Is the product a medical device? 2014. Available at:
http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulation
andGuidance/Overview/ClassifyYourDevice/ucm
051512.htm. Retrieved on August 15, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] EMA. EMA/CAT and Medical Devices Notified Body (EMA/
CAT-NB) Collaboration Group. Mandate, objective, rules
of proceduce. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/
ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/contacts/CAT/people_listing_
000086.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058029021c. Retrieved
on August 20, 2014.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[12] InHealth. Assessing the Impact of Medical Technology Innovations
on Human Capital; Phase I Final Report (Part
A): State-of-the-Science Literature Reviews”, Prepared for
the Institute for Medical Technology Innovation. Available
at: http://www.inhealth.org/MediaCenter/Duke_Final_
Report_A___State_of_the_Science_Literature_Reviews.
pdf . Retrieved on January 31, 2006.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Inmann A, Spensley J. Developing active implantable
medical devices in a regulated environment. Implantable
Sensor Systems for Medical Applications, 2013, 299-327.
10.1533/9780857096289.2.299]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Kampfrath T, Cotton SW. The new collaborative path in medical
device development: The medical device innovation consortium.
Clinical Biochemistry, 46(15), 2013, 1320-1322.
10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.03.02123578741]Search in Google Scholar
[[15] Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA. Medical device
development: The challenge for ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics,
39(3), 2008, 271-283.
10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.00218061139]Search in Google Scholar
[[16] Kierkegaard S, Kierkegaard P. Danger to public health:
Medical devices, toxicity, virus and fraud. Computer Law
& Security Review, 29(1), 2013, 13-27.
10.1016/j.clsr.2012.11.006]Search in Google Scholar
[[17] Lin QL, Wang DJ, Lin WG, Liu HC. Human reliability assessment
for medical devices based on failure mode and effects
analysis and fuzzy linguistic theory. Safety Science,
62 (2), 2014, 248-256.
10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.022]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Ho C, Jensen D, Lacy F, Muni N, Reilly S, Mallis E. Use of
standards in the review of medical devices. Journal of
Electrocardiology, 38(4), Supplement, 2005, 171-174.
10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.06.03016226095]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Mičieta V. AmCham Connection. 10(4), 2012, 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[20] Niederländer C, Wahlster P, Kriza C, Kolominsky-Rabas
P. Registries of implantable medical devices in Europe.
Health Policy, 113(1–2), 2013, 20-37.
10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.00824075007]Search in Google Scholar
[[21] Ouriel K, Fowl RJ, Davies MG, Forbes TL, Gambhir RPS,
Morales JP, Ricci MA. Reporting standards for adverse
events after medical device use in the peripheral vascular
system. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 58(3), 2013, 776-786.
10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.05923972246]Search in Google Scholar
[[22] Popp W, Rasslan O, Unahalekhaka A, Brenner P, Fischnaller
E, Fathy M, Goldman C, Gillespie E. What is the use? An
international look at reuse of single-use medical devices.
International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental
Health, 213(4), 2010, 302-307.
10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.04.00320471316]Search in Google Scholar
[[23] Sastri VR. Plastics in Medical Devices Regulations for
Medical Devices and Application to Plastics Suppliers:
History and Overview. (Second Edition), 2014, 336.
10.1016/B978-1-4557-3201-2.00002-1]Search in Google Scholar
[[24] See Fuchs VR. “Economics, Values and Health Care Reform,”
The American Economic Review, 86(1), 1996, 1 – 25.
]Search in Google Scholar
[[25] Shuman EK, Chenoweth CE. Reuse of Medical Devices:
Implications for Infection Control. Infectious Disease
Clinics of North America, 26(1), 2012, 165-172.
10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.01022284382]Search in Google Scholar
[[26] Vidi VD, Matheny ME, Donnelly S, Resnic FS. An evaluation
of a distributed medical device safety surveillance
system: The DELTA network study. Contemporary Clinical
Trials, 32(3), 2011, 309-317.
10.1016/j.cct.2011.02.001307004121356331]Search in Google Scholar
[[27] Emergo Group. SLOVAKIA - Medical Device Industry and
Demographic Data. Available at:
]Search in Google Scholar
[[28] Wallner PE, Sandler HM. US Food and Drug Administration
medical device review and approval; Myths, misconceptions,
realities, and potential policy changes. Practical
Radiation Oncology, In Press, Corrected Proof.
]Search in Google Scholar