Spending of medical devices in Slovakia

[1] Business Monitor. Slovakia Medical Devices Report. 2014, 157. Available at: http://store.businessmonitor.com/slovakia- medical-devices-report.html. Retrieved on August 14, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Clermont G. Non-clinical functional evaluation of medical devices: general recommendations and examples for soft tissue implants. Biocompatibility and Performance of Medical Devices, 2012, 345-361. 10.1533/9780857096456.3.345Search in Google Scholar

[3] Cruz AM. Evaluating record history of medical devices using association discovery and clustering techniques. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(13), 2013, 5292-5305. 10.1016/j.eswa.2013.03.034Search in Google Scholar

[4] Cookson R, Hutton J. Regulating the economic evaluation of pharmaceuticals and medical devices: a European perspective. Health Policy, 63(2), 2003, 167-178. 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00063-5Search in Google Scholar

[5] Cutler DM, McClellan M. “Is Technological Change Worth It?” Health Affairs 20(5), 2001, 11 – 29. 10.1377/hlthaff.20.5.1111558696Search in Google Scholar

[6] Danahoe G, King G. Estimates of Medical Device Spending in the United States. 2012, July, 16. Search in Google Scholar

[7] De Jong WH, Carraway JW, Geertsma RE. In vivo and in vitro testing for the biological safety evaluation of biomaterials and medical devices. Biocompatibility and Performance of Medical Devices, 2012, 120-158. 10.1533/9780857096456.2.120Search in Google Scholar

[8] Emergo Group. SLOVAKIA - Medical Device Industry and Demographic Data. Available at: http://www.emergogroup. com/resources/market-slovakia. Retrieved on August 13, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Eucomed. Medical devices and pharmaceuticals: Two different worlds in one health setting. Available at: http://www.eucomed.org/key-themes/medical-devices- directives/devices-pharmaceuticals. Retrieved on August 10, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[10] FDA. Is the product a medical device? 2014. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/MedicalDevices/DeviceRegulation andGuidance/Overview/ClassifyYourDevice/ucm 051512.htm. Retrieved on August 15, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[11] EMA. EMA/CAT and Medical Devices Notified Body (EMA/ CAT-NB) Collaboration Group. Mandate, objective, rules of proceduce. Available at: http://www.ema.europa.eu/ ema/index.jsp?curl=pages/contacts/CAT/people_listing_ 000086.jsp&mid=WC0b01ac058029021c. Retrieved on August 20, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

[12] InHealth. Assessing the Impact of Medical Technology Innovations on Human Capital; Phase I Final Report (Part A): State-of-the-Science Literature Reviews”, Prepared for the Institute for Medical Technology Innovation. Available at: http://www.inhealth.org/MediaCenter/Duke_Final_ Report_A___State_of_the_Science_Literature_Reviews. pdf . Retrieved on January 31, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Inmann A, Spensley J. Developing active implantable medical devices in a regulated environment. Implantable Sensor Systems for Medical Applications, 2013, 299-327. 10.1533/9780857096289.2.299Search in Google Scholar

[14] Kampfrath T, Cotton SW. The new collaborative path in medical device development: The medical device innovation consortium. Clinical Biochemistry, 46(15), 2013, 1320-1322. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.03.02123578741Search in Google Scholar

[15] Martin JL, Norris BJ, Murphy E, Crowe JA. Medical device development: The challenge for ergonomics. Applied Ergonomics, 39(3), 2008, 271-283. 10.1016/j.apergo.2007.10.00218061139Search in Google Scholar

[16] Kierkegaard S, Kierkegaard P. Danger to public health: Medical devices, toxicity, virus and fraud. Computer Law & Security Review, 29(1), 2013, 13-27. 10.1016/j.clsr.2012.11.006Search in Google Scholar

[17] Lin QL, Wang DJ, Lin WG, Liu HC. Human reliability assessment for medical devices based on failure mode and effects analysis and fuzzy linguistic theory. Safety Science, 62 (2), 2014, 248-256. 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.08.022Search in Google Scholar

[18] Ho C, Jensen D, Lacy F, Muni N, Reilly S, Mallis E. Use of standards in the review of medical devices. Journal of Electrocardiology, 38(4), Supplement, 2005, 171-174. 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2005.06.03016226095Search in Google Scholar

[19] Mičieta V. AmCham Connection. 10(4), 2012, 3. Search in Google Scholar

[20] Niederländer C, Wahlster P, Kriza C, Kolominsky-Rabas P. Registries of implantable medical devices in Europe. Health Policy, 113(1–2), 2013, 20-37. 10.1016/j.healthpol.2013.08.00824075007Search in Google Scholar

[21] Ouriel K, Fowl RJ, Davies MG, Forbes TL, Gambhir RPS, Morales JP, Ricci MA. Reporting standards for adverse events after medical device use in the peripheral vascular system. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 58(3), 2013, 776-786. 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.05923972246Search in Google Scholar

[22] Popp W, Rasslan O, Unahalekhaka A, Brenner P, Fischnaller E, Fathy M, Goldman C, Gillespie E. What is the use? An international look at reuse of single-use medical devices. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 213(4), 2010, 302-307. 10.1016/j.ijheh.2010.04.00320471316Search in Google Scholar

[23] Sastri VR. Plastics in Medical Devices Regulations for Medical Devices and Application to Plastics Suppliers: History and Overview. (Second Edition), 2014, 336. 10.1016/B978-1-4557-3201-2.00002-1Search in Google Scholar

[24] See Fuchs VR. “Economics, Values and Health Care Reform,” The American Economic Review, 86(1), 1996, 1 – 25. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Shuman EK, Chenoweth CE. Reuse of Medical Devices: Implications for Infection Control. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America, 26(1), 2012, 165-172. 10.1016/j.idc.2011.09.01022284382Search in Google Scholar

[26] Vidi VD, Matheny ME, Donnelly S, Resnic FS. An evaluation of a distributed medical device safety surveillance system: The DELTA network study. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 32(3), 2011, 309-317. 10.1016/j.cct.2011.02.001307004121356331Search in Google Scholar

[27] Emergo Group. SLOVAKIA - Medical Device Industry and Demographic Data. Available at: Search in Google Scholar

[28] Wallner PE, Sandler HM. US Food and Drug Administration medical device review and approval; Myths, misconceptions, realities, and potential policy changes. Practical Radiation Oncology, In Press, Corrected Proof. Search in Google Scholar