This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
More RB, Haubold AD, Bokros JC. Pyrolytic carbon for long-term medical implants. In: Ratner BD, Hoffman AS, Schoen FJ, Lemons J, editors, Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine 3rd ed. Cambridge, USA: Elsevier Inc., Academic Press; 2013 p. 209–222.MoreRBHauboldADBokrosJCPyrolytic carbon for long-term medical implantsIn:RatnerBDHoffmanASSchoenFJLemonsJeditors,Biomaterials science: an introduction to materials in medicine3rd ed.Cambridge, USAElsevier Inc., Academic Press2013209222Search in Google Scholar
Stevens MM. Biomaterials for bone tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2008; 11:18–25.StevensMMBiomaterials for bone tissue engineeringMater Today2008111825Search in Google Scholar
Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2012; 40:363–408.AminiARLaurencinCTNukavarapuSPBone tissue engineering: recent advances and challengesCrit Rev Biomed Eng201240363408Search in Google Scholar
Schmitz JP, Hollinger JO. The critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunions. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; 205:299–308.SchmitzJPHollingerJOThe critical size defect as an experimental model for craniomandibulofacial nonunionsClin Orthop Relat Res1986205299308Search in Google Scholar
Li Y, Chen S-K, Li L, Qin L, Wang X-L, Lai Y-X. Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials. J Orthop Transl. 2015; 3:95–104.LiYChenS-KLiLQinLWangX-LLaiY-XBone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterialsJ Orthop Transl2015395104Search in Google Scholar
Bao CLM, Teo EY, Chong MSK, Liu Y, Choolani M, Chan JKY. Advances in bone tissue engineering. In: Andrades JA, editor. Regenerative medicine and tissue engineering. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech; 2013, p. 599–614.BaoCLMTeoEYChongMSKLiuYChoolaniMChanJKYAdvances in bone tissue engineeringIn:AndradesJAeditor.Regenerative medicine and tissue engineeringRijeka, CroatiaInTech2013599614Search in Google Scholar
Fernandez-Yague MA, Abbah SA, McNamara L, Zeugolis DI, Pandit A, Biggs MJ. Biomimetic approaches in bone tissue engineering: integrating biological and physicomechanical strategies. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2015; 84:1–29.Fernandez-YagueMAAbbahSAMcNamaraLZeugolisDIPanditABiggsMJBiomimetic approaches in bone tissue engineering: integrating biological and physicomechanical strategiesAdv Drug Deliv Rev201584129Search in Google Scholar
Hutmacher DW. Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials. 2000; 21:2529–43.HutmacherDWScaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilageBiomaterials200021252943Search in Google Scholar
O’Brien FJ. Biomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today. 2011; 14:88–95.O’BrienFJBiomaterials and scaffolds for tissue engineeringMater Today2011148895Search in Google Scholar
Jiménez-Holguín J, Sánchez-Salcedo S, Vallet-Regí M, Salinas AJ. Development and evaluation of copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glasses for bone defects therapy. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2020; 308:110454. doi: 10.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110454Jiménez-HolguínJSánchez-SalcedoSVallet-RegíMSalinasAJDevelopment and evaluation of copper-containing mesoporous bioactive glasses for bone defects therapyMicroporous Mesoporous Mater202030811045410.1016/j.micromeso.2020.110454Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schumacher M, Habibovic P, van Rijt S. Mesoporous bioactive glass composition effects on degradation and bioactivity. Bioact Mater. 2021; 6:1921–31.SchumacherMHabibovicPvan RijtSMesoporous bioactive glass composition effects on degradation and bioactivityBioact Mater20216192131Search in Google Scholar
Rahaman MN, Day DE, Bal BS, Fu Q, Jung SB, Bonewald LF. Bioactive glass in tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7:2355–73.RahamanMNDayDEBalBSFuQJungSBBonewaldLFBioactive glass in tissue engineeringActa Biomater20117235573Search in Google Scholar
Hoppe A, Güldal NS, Boccaccini AR. A review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramics. Biomaterials. 2011; 32:2757–74.HoppeAGüldalNSBoccacciniARA review of the biological response to ionic dissolution products from bioactive glasses and glass-ceramicsBiomaterials201132275774Search in Google Scholar
Lakhkar NJ, Lee I-H, Kim H-W, Salih V, Wall IB, Knowles JC. Bone formation controlled by biologically relevant inorganic ions: role and controlled delivery from phosphate-based glasses. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2013; 65:405–20.LakhkarNJLeeI-HKimH-WSalihVWallIBKnowlesJCBone formation controlled by biologically relevant inorganic ions: role and controlled delivery from phosphate-based glassesAdv Drug Deliv Rev20136540520Search in Google Scholar
Kargozar S, Montazerian M, Hamzehlou S, Kim HW, Baino F. Mesoporous bioactive glasses: promising platforms for antibacterial strategies. Acta Biomater. 2018; 81:1–19.KargozarSMontazerianMHamzehlouSKimHWBainoFMesoporous bioactive glasses: promising platforms for antibacterial strategiesActa Biomater201881119Search in Google Scholar
Fu Q, Saiz E, Tomsia AP. Bioinspired strong and highly porous glass scaffolds. Adv Funct Mater. 2011; 21:1058–63.FuQSaizETomsiaAPBioinspired strong and highly porous glass scaffoldsAdv Funct Mater201121105863Search in Google Scholar
Gerhardt L-C, Boccaccini AR. Bioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Materials. 2010; 3:3867–910.GerhardtL-CBoccacciniARBioactive glass and glass-ceramic scaffolds for bone tissue engineeringMaterials201033867910Search in Google Scholar
Anand A, Lalzawmliana V, Kumar V, Das P, Devi KB, Maji AK, et al. Preparation and in vivo biocompatibility studies of different mesoporous bioactive glasses. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2019; 89:89–98.AnandALalzawmlianaVKumarVDasPDeviKBMajiAKPreparation and in vivo biocompatibility studies of different mesoporous bioactive glassesJ Mech Behav Biomed Mater2019898998Search in Google Scholar
Kokubo T, Takadama H. How useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity? Biomaterials. 2006; 27:2907–15.KokuboTTakadamaHHow useful is SBF in predicting in vivo bone bioactivity?Biomaterials200627290715Search in Google Scholar
Zhu Y, Zhu M, He X, Zhang J, Tao C. Substitutions of strontium in mesoporous calcium silicate and their physicochemical and biological properties. Acta Biomater. 2013; 9:6723–31.ZhuYZhuMHeXZhangJTaoCSubstitutions of strontium in mesoporous calcium silicate and their physicochemical and biological propertiesActa Biomater20139672331Search in Google Scholar
Percie du Sert N, Hurst V, Ahluwalia A, Alam S, Avey MT, Baker M, et al. The ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS Biol. 2020; 18:e3000410. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000410Percie du SertNHurstVAhluwaliaAAlamSAveyMTBakerMThe ARRIVE guidelines 2.0: updated guidelines for reporting animal researchPLoS Biol202018e300041010.1371/journal.pbio.3000410Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Jung I, Lim H, Lee E, Lee J, Jung U, Choi S. Comparative analysis of carrier systems for delivering bone morphogenetic proteins. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2015; 45:136–44.JungILimHLeeELeeJJungUChoiSComparative analysis of carrier systems for delivering bone morphogenetic proteinsJ Periodontal Implant Sci20154513644Search in Google Scholar
Araujo AS, Fernandes AB, Maciel JV, Netto Jde N, Bolognese AM. New methodology for evaluating osteoclastic activity induced by orthodontic load. J Appl Oral Sci. 2015; 23:19–25.AraujoASFernandesABMacielJVNetto JdeNBologneseAMNew methodology for evaluating osteoclastic activity induced by orthodontic loadJ Appl Oral Sci2015231925Search in Google Scholar
Erdfelder E, Faul F, Buchner A. GPOWER: a general power analysis program. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 1996; 28:1–11.ErdfelderEFaulFBuchnerAGPOWER: a general power analysis programBehav Res Methods Instrum Comput199628111Search in Google Scholar
Li X, Wang X, He D, Shi J. Synthesis and characterization of mesoporous CaO–MO–SiO2–P2O5 (M= Mg, Zn, Cu) bioactive glasses/composites. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7:3638–44.LiXWangXHeDShiJSynthesis and characterization of mesoporous CaO–MO–SiO2–P2O5 (M= Mg, Zn, Cu) bioactive glasses/compositesActa Biomater20117363844Search in Google Scholar
Ma J, Wang CZ, Huang BX, Zhao XC, Chen CZ, Yu HJ. In vitro degradation and apatite formation of magnesium and zinc incorporated calcium silicate prepared by sol-gel method. Mater Technol. 2021; 36:420–9.MaJWangCZHuangBXZhaoXCChenCZYuHJIn vitro degradation and apatite formation of magnesium and zinc incorporated calcium silicate prepared by sol-gel methodMater Technol2021364209Search in Google Scholar
Tas AC. X-ray diffraction data for flux-grown calcium hydroxyapatite whiskers. Powder Diffr. 2001; 16:102–6.TasACX-ray diffraction data for flux-grown calcium hydroxyapatite whiskersPowder Diffr2001161026Search in Google Scholar
Salinas AJ, Shruti S, Malavasi G, Menabue L, Vallet-Regí M. Substitutions of cerium, gallium and zinc in ordered mesoporous bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater. 2011; 7:3452–8.SalinasAJShrutiSMalavasiGMenabueLVallet-RegíMSubstitutions of cerium, gallium and zinc in ordered mesoporous bioactive glassesActa Biomater2011734528Search in Google Scholar
Koohkan R, Hooshmand T, Tahriri M, Mohebbi-Kalhori D. Synthesis, characterization and in vitro bioactivity of mesoporous copper silicate bioactive glasses. Ceram Int. 2018; 44:2390–9.KoohkanRHooshmandTTahririMMohebbi-KalhoriDSynthesis, characterization and in vitro bioactivity of mesoporous copper silicate bioactive glassesCeram Int20184423909Search in Google Scholar
Babu MM, Prasad, PS, Rao PV, Govindan NP, Singh RK, Kim HW, Veeraiah N. Titanium incorporated Zinc-Phosphate bioactive glasses for bone tissue repair and regeneration: impact of Ti4+ on physico-mechanical and in vitro bioactivity. Ceram Int. 2019; 45:23715–27.BabuMMPrasadPSRaoPVGovindanNPSinghRKKimHWVeeraiahNTitanium incorporated Zinc-Phosphate bioactive glasses for bone tissue repair and regeneration: impact of Ti4+ on physico-mechanical and in vitro bioactivityCeram Int2019452371527Search in Google Scholar
Ramakrishna S, Mayer J, Wintermantel E, Leong KW. Biomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a review. Compos Sci Technol. 2001; 61:1189–224.RamakrishnaSMayerJWintermantelELeongKWBiomedical applications of polymer-composite materials: a reviewCompos Sci Technol2001611189224Search in Google Scholar
Lalzawmliana V, Anand A, Roy M, Kundu B, Nandi SK. Mesoporous bioactive glasses for bone healing and biomolecules delivery. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020; 106:110180. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110180LalzawmlianaVAnandARoyMKunduBNandiSKMesoporous bioactive glasses for bone healing and biomolecules deliveryMater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl202010611018010.1016/j.msec.2019.110180Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Giannoudis PV, Dinopoulos H, Tsiridis E. Bone substitutes: an update. Injury. 2005; 36 Suppl 3:S20–7.GiannoudisPVDinopoulosHTsiridisEBone substitutes: an updateInjury200536Suppl 3S207Search in Google Scholar
Gu Y, Huang W, Rahaman MN, Day DE. Bone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with fibrous scaffolds composed of a mixture of silicate and borate bioactive glasses. Acta Biomater. 2013; 9:9126–36.GuYHuangWRahamanMNDayDEBone regeneration in rat calvarial defects implanted with fibrous scaffolds composed of a mixture of silicate and borate bioactive glassesActa Biomater20139912636Search in Google Scholar
Rath SN, Brandl A, Hiller D, Hoppe A, Gbureck U, Horch RE, et al. Bioactive copper-doped glass scaffolds can stimulate endothelial cells in co-culture in combination with mesenchymal stem cells. PLoS One. 2014; 9:e113319. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0113319RathSNBrandlAHillerDHoppeAGbureckUHorchREBioactive copper-doped glass scaffolds can stimulate endothelial cells in co-culture in combination with mesenchymal stem cellsPLoS One20149e11331910.1371/journal.pone.0113319Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hu G. Copper stimulates proliferation of human endothelial cells under culture. J Cell Biochem. 1998; 69:326–35.HuGCopper stimulates proliferation of human endothelial cells under cultureJ Cell Biochem19986932635Search in Google Scholar
Sen CK, Khanna S, Venojarvi M, Trikha P, Ellison EC, Hunt TK, Roy S. Copper-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression and wound healing. Am J Physiol Hear Circ Physiol. 2002; 282:H1821–7.SenCKKhannaSVenojarviMTrikhaPEllisonECHuntTKRoySCopper-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression and wound healingAm J Physiol Hear Circ Physiol2002282H18217Search in Google Scholar
Cordioli G, Mazzocco C, Schepers E, Brugnolo E, Majzoub Z. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findings. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001; 12:270–8.CordioliGMazzoccoCSchepersEBrugnoloEMajzoubZMaxillary sinus floor augmentation using bioactive glass granules and autogenous bone with simultaneous implant placement. Clinical and histological findingsClin Oral Implants Res2001122708Search in Google Scholar
Matsuo K, Irie N. Osteoclast-osteoblast communication. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2008; 473:201–9.MatsuoKIrieNOsteoclast-osteoblast communicationArch Biochem Biophys20084732019Search in Google Scholar
Matsuoka K, Park KA, Ito M, Ikeda K, Takeshita S. Osteoclast-derived complement component 3a stimulates osteoblast differentiation. J Bone Miner Res. 2014; 29:1522–30.MatsuokaKParkKAItoMIkedaKTakeshitaSOsteoclast-derived complement component 3a stimulates osteoblast differentiationJ Bone Miner Res201429152230Search in Google Scholar