Iniciar sesión
Registrarse
Restablecer contraseña
Publicar y Distribuir
Soluciones de Publicación
Soluciones de Distribución
Temas
Arquitectura y diseño
Artes
Ciencias Sociales
Ciencias de la Información y Bibliotecas, Estudios del Libro
Ciencias de la vida
Ciencias de los materiales
Deporte y tiempo libre
Estudios clásicos y del Cercano Oriente antiguo
Estudios culturales
Estudios judíos
Farmacia
Filosofía
Física
Geociencias
Historia
Informática
Ingeniería
Interés general
Ley
Lingüística y semiótica
Literatura
Matemáticas
Medicina
Música
Negocios y Economía
Química
Química industrial
Teología y religión
Publicaciones
Revistas
Libros
Actas
Editoriales
Blog
Contacto
Buscar
EUR
USD
GBP
Español
English
Deutsch
Polski
Español
Français
Italiano
Carrito
Home
Revistas
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volumen 4 (2019): Edición 1 (January 2019)
Acceso abierto
Predicting the separation of time scales in a heteroclinic network
Maximilian Voit
Maximilian Voit
y
Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns
Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns
| 28 jun 2019
Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences
Volumen 4 (2019): Edición 1 (January 2019)
Acerca de este artículo
Artículo anterior
Artículo siguiente
Resumen
Artículo
Figuras y tablas
Referencias
Autores
Artículos en este número
Vista previa
PDF
Cite
Compartir
Article Category:
Papers dedicated to the memory of Valetnin Afraymovich (1945-2018)
Publicado en línea:
28 jun 2019
Páginas:
279 - 288
Recibido:
26 nov 2019
Aceptado:
03 may 2019
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.2478/AMNS.2019.1.00024
Palabras clave
winnerless competition
,
generalized Lotka-Volterra equations
,
heteroclinic dynamics
,
structural and temporal hierarchies
© 2019 Maximilian Voit, Hildegard Meyer-Ortmanns, published by Sciendo
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Fig. 1
Sketch of the topology of the hierarchical heteroclinic network. Black and grey dashed lines mark heteroclinic orbits with arrows indicating their directions. The red solid line gives an example for a trajectory in the vicinity of the network.
Fig. 2
(a) Schematic sketch of the vicinity of saddle σ1, including the cross-sections studied in section 3 together with the local maps ϕ312 and ϕ314 and the global map ψ12. (b) Sketch of phase space near the saddle σ1 showing contracting small (r3), expanding small (r2), and radial (r1) directions. The solid line gives an example of a trajectory in the vicinity of the heteroclinic network. Dashed lines mark the heteroclinic orbits. While the deviation x is highlighted in this projection, y0 cannot be visualized without the r4 direction.
Fig. 3
(a) Plot of the coordinates x = res(i) and yi = rel(i) of a real trajectory when passing Hiin,cs(i)∀i∈1,2,3$H_{i}^{\operatorname{in},cs\left( i \right)}\forall i\in 1,2,3$(red⊙).$\left. \odot \right).$The dynamics switches to the subsequent SHC when the line xFE${{x}^{\frac{F}{E}}}$is passed after the fifth iteration of the return map g. Blue × mark the analytical prediction starting from point “0” assuming A = 1 = B in eq. (19). When the actual coefficients A = 1.38,B = 2.42 (read off from the numerical data when the trajectory return to the section Hiin,cs(i)$H_{i}^{\operatorname{in},cs\left( i \right)}$for the first time) are initially inserted in eq. (19), which then is iteratively applied, the analytical predictions lie precisely on top of the numerically obtained values. The small red circles below the larger ones indicate a visit of the second and third saddle within the respective SHCs. (b) Same plot as in panel (a), now including also numerical values of switches between saddles at the next SHC (green ⚀), together with the transition leading there (green ◊$\left.\lozenge \right.$).